Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 84, Issue S1, 2016, Pages 247-259

  Cao, Renzhi ^a   Bhattacharya, Debswapna ^a   Adhikari, Badri ^a   Li, Jilong ^a   Cheng, Jianlin ^a,b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; integration; model quality assessment; protein structure prediction; template based modeling

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; BENCHMARKING; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84946236899     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24924     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Eisenhaber F, Persson B, Argos P. Protein structure prediction: recognition of primary, secondary, and tertiary structural features from amino acid sequence. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1995;30:1–94.
2. Rost B. Protein structure prediction in 1D, 2D, and 3D. Encyclopaedia Comput Chem 1998;3:2242–2255.
3. Anfinsen CB, Haber E, Sela M, White F, Jr. The kinetics of formation of native ribonuclease during oxidation of the reduced polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1961;47:1309
4. Floudas C. Computational methods in protein structure prediction. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;97:207–213.
5. Shah M, Passovets S, Kim D, Ellrott K, Wang L, Vokler I, LoCascio P, Xu D, Xu Y. A computational pipeline for protein structure prediction and analysis at genome scale. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1985
6. Fox BG, Goulding C, Malkowski MG, Stewart L, Deacon A. Structural genomics: from genes to structures with valuable materials and many questions in between. Nat Methods 2008;5:129–132.
7. Lemer CMR, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 1995; 23:337–355.
8. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:ii–iv.
9. Zhang Y. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008;18:342–348.
10. Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164–170.
11. Jones DT, Taylort W, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86–89.
12. Simons K, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209–225.
13. Zhang Y. Interplay of I-TASSER and QUARK for template-based and ab initio protein structure prediction in CASP10. Proteins 2014;82:175–187.
14. Zhang Y. ITASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:40
15. Källberg M, Wang H, Wang S, Peng J, Wang Z, Lu H, Xu J. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat Protoc 2012;7:1511–1522.
16. Zhang J, Wang Q, Barz B, He Z, Kosztin I, Shang Y, Xu D. MUFOLD: a new solution for protein 3D structure prediction. Proteins 2010;78:1137–1152.
17. Xu D, Zhang Y. Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins 2012;80:1715–1735.
18. Li SC, Bu D, Xu J, Li M. Fragment-HMM: a new approach to protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2008;17:1925–1934.
19. Cao R, Wang Z, Cheng J. Designing and evaluating the MULTICOM protein local and global model quality prediction methods in the CASP10 experiment. BMC Struct Biol 2014;14:13
20. Cao R, Wang Z, Wang Y, Cheng J. SMOQ: a tool for predicting the absolute residue-specific quality of a single protein model with support vector machines. BMC Bioinformatics 2014;15:120
21. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702–710.
22. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci 2003;12:1073–1086.
23. Ray A, Lindahl E, Wallner B. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:224
24. Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schomburg D. QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins 2008;71:261–277.
25. Benkert P, Künzli M, Schwede T. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation. Nucleic Acids Res 2009:gkp322.
26. Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie J. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:396–404.
27. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. APOLLO: a quality assessment service for single and multiple protein models. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1715–1716.
28. McGuffin LJ. The ModFOLD server for the quality assessment of protein structural models. Bioinformatics 2008;24:586–587.
29. McGuffin LJ. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server. Proteins 2009;77:185–190.
30. McGuffin LJ, Roche DB. Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments. Bioinformatics 2010;26:182–188.
31. Dobson CM, Šali A, Karplus M. Protein folding: a perspective from theory and experiment. Angew Chem Int Ed 1998;37:868–893.
32. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998;95:11158–11162.
33. Zhang J, Zhang Y. A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction. PLoS One 2010;5:e15386
34. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002;11:2714–2726.
35. Shen My Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 2006;15:2507–2524.
36. Zhang J, He Z, Wang Q, Barz B, Kosztin I, Shang Y, Xu D. Prediction of protein tertiary structures using MUFOLD. Functional genomics. Springer; 2012. pp 3–13.
37. Wu Y, Lu M, Chen M, Li J, Ma J. OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Cα positions. Protein Sci 2007;16:1449–1463.
38. Wang Z, Tegge AN, Cheng J. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2009;75:638–647.
39. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information. Protein Sci 2006;15:900–913.
40. Larsson P, Skwark M, Wallner B, Elofsson A. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 2009;77:167–172.
41. Cao R, Bhattacharya D, Adhikari B, Li J, Cheng J. Large-scale model quality asessment for improving protein tertiary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2015;31:i116–i123.
42. Zhang J, Xu D. Fast algorithm for population-based protein structural model analysis. Proteomics 2013;13:221–229.
43. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J. MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics 2010;26:882–888.
44. Lu M, Dousis AD, Ma J. OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. Journal of Molecular Biology 2008;376:288–301.
45. Rykunov D, Fiser A. Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparse statistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials. Proteins 2007;67:559–568.
46. Randall A, Baldi P. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs. BMC Struct Biol 2008;8:52
47. Yang Y, Zhou Y. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins 2008;72:793–803.
48. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195–202.
49. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 2000;16:404–405.
50. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Cryst 1976;32:922–923.
51. Wang G, Dunbrack RL. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589–1591.
52. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J, Rost B, Tramontano A. Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins 2009;77:18–28.
53. Huang YJ, Mao B, Aramini JM, Montelione GT. Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10. Proteins 2014;82:43–56.
54. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K. CASP Prediction Center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL. Proteins 2014;82:7–13.
55. Mariani V, Biasini M, Barbato A, Schwede T. lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests. Bioinformatics 2013;29:2722–2728.
56. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009;77:778–795.