IDDT: A local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 2722-2728

  Mariani, Valerio ^a,b   Biasini, Marco ^a,b   Barbato, Alessandro ^a,b   Schwede, Torsten ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STEREOISOMERISM; VALIDATION STUDY; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 84885990516     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allen, F.H. (2002) The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. Acta Crystallogr. B, 58, 380-388. (Pubitemid 135702674)
2. Battey, J.N. et al. (2007) Automated server predictions in CASP7. Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 68-82. (Pubitemid 350210114)
3. Biasini, M. et al. (2010) OpenStructure: a flexible software framework for computational structural biology. Bioinformatics, 26, 2626-2628.
4. Bordogna, A. et al. (2011) Predicting the accuracy of protein-ligand docking on homology models. J. Comput. Chem., 32, 81-98.
5. Chen, V.B. et al. (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 12-21.
6. Clarke, N.D. et al. (2007) Domain definition and target classification for CASP7. Proteins, 69(Suppl. 8), 10-18. (Pubitemid 350210109)
7. Cuff, A.L. et al. (2011) Extending CATH: increasing coverage of the protein structure universe and linking structure with function. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D420-D426.
8. Engh, R.A. and Huber, R. (1991) Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. A, 47, 392-400.
9. Engh, R.A. and Huber, R. (2006) Structure quality and target parameters. In: International Tables for Crystallography. Vol. F, ch. 18.3, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 382-392.
10. Flory, P.J. (1969) Statistical mechanics of chain molecules. Interscience Publishers, New York.
11. Guex, N. et al. (2009) Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: a historical perspective. Electrophoresis, 30 (Suppl. 1), S162-S173.
12. Huang, Y.J. et al. (2012) RPF: a quality assessment tool for protein NMR structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, W542-W546.
13. Hubbard, T.J. (1999) RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions. Proteins, 37 (Suppl. 3), 15-21. (Pubitemid 29463511)
14. Huggins, M.L. (1958) Physical chemistry of high polymers. Wiley, New York.
15. Jones, A.T. and Kleywegt, G.J. (1999) CASP3 comparative modeling evaluation. Proteins, Suppl. 3), 30-46. (Pubitemid 29463513)
16. Keedy, D.A. et al. (2009) The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models. Proteins, 77 (Suppl. 9), 29-49.
17. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2011) CASP9 target classification. Proteins, 79 (Suppl. 10), 21-36.
18. Kopp, J. et al. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 38-56. (Pubitemid 350210112)
19. Krivov, G.G. et al. (2009) Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins, 77, 778-795.
20. Kryshtafovych, A. et al. (2013) CASP Prediction Center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL. Proteins, 81.
21. MacCallum, J.L. et al. (2011) Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9. Proteins, 79 (Suppl. 10), 74-90.
22. Mao, B. et al. (2011) Improved technologies now routinely provide protein NMR structures useful for molecular replacement. Structure, 19, 757-766.
23. Mariani, V. et al. (2011) Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins, 79 (Suppl. 10), 37-58.
24. Martin, A.C. et al. (1997) Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins, 29 (Suppl. 1), 14-28. (Pubitemid 28090477)
25. Mosimann, S. et al. (1995) A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins. Proteins, 23, 301-317.
26. Moult, J. (2005) A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 15, 285-289. (Pubitemid 40826447)
27. Moult, J. et al. (2011) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) -round IX. Proteins, 79 (Suppl. 10), 1-5.
28. Olechnovic, K. et al. (2013) CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models. Proteins, 81, 149-162.
29. Perez, A. et al. (2012) FlexE: using elastic network models to compare models of protein structure. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 3985-3991.
30. Read, R.J. et al. (2011) A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the protein data bank. Structure, 19, 1395-1412.
31. Rodrigues, J.P. et al. (2012) Clustering biomolecular complexes by residue contacts similarity. Proteins, 80, 1810-1817.
32. Schwede, T. et al. (2009) Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research. Structure, 17, 151-159.
33. Shi, S. et al. (2009) Analysis of CASP8 targets, predictions and assessment methods. Database, 2009, bap003.
34. Siew, N. et al. (2000) MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics, 16, 776-785.
35. Sippl, M.J. (2008) On distance and similarity in fold space. Bioinformatics, 24, 872-873. (Pubitemid 351386931)
36. Vendruscolo, M. et al. (1999) Statistical properties of contact maps. American Physical Society, College Park, MD.
37. Zemla, A. (2003) LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3370-3374. (Pubitemid 37442162)
38. Zemla, A. et al. (2001) Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins, 45 (Suppl. 5), 13-21. (Pubitemid 34113164)
39. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins, 57, 702-710. (Pubitemid 39626992)