Assessment of fold recognition predictions in CASP6

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue SUPPL. 7, 2005, Pages 46-66

  Wang, Guoli ^a   Jin, Yumi ^a   Dunbrack Jr , Roland L ^a  

^a FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; CASP6; Fold recognition; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; CASP6 SYSTEM; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; FOLD RECOGNITION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ALIGNMENT PROGRAM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 30344449457     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20721     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Dunbrack Jr. RL. Protein structure prediction in biology and medicine. In: Lengauer T, editor. Bioinformatics and drug design. New York: Wiley; 2001.
2. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000;9:1753-1773.
3. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack Jr. RL, A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003;12:2001-2014.
4. Wallner B, Elofsson A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 2005;14: 1315-1327.
5. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:ii-v.
6. Levitt M. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:92-104.
7. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. Measures of threading specificity and accuracy. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:74-82.
8. Orengo CA, Taylor WR. SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison. Methods Enzymol 1996;266:617-635.
9. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
10. Ohkawa H, Ostell J, Bryant S. MMDB: an ASN.1 specification for macromolecular structure. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1995;3:259-267.
11. Murzin AG. Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:88-103.
12. Feng Z, Sippl MJ. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Fold Des 1996;1:123-132.
13. Lackner P, Koppensteiner WA, Domingues FS, Sippl MJ. Automated large scale evaluation of protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:7-14.
14. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Sadreyev RI, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin NV. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:395-409.
15. Sauder JM, Arthur JW, Dunbrack Jr. RL, Large-scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments. Proteins 2000;40:6-22.
16. Wang G, Dunbrack Jr. RL, Scoring profile-to-profile sequence alignments. Protein Sci 2004;13:1612-1626.
17. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 2002;11:2606-2621.
18. Sierk ML, Pearson WR. Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison. Protein Sci 2004;13:773-785.
19. Kolodny R, Koehl P, Levitt M. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. J Mol Biol 2005;346:1173-1188.
20. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998;11:739-747.
21. Gerstein M, Levitt M. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the scop classification of proteins. Protein Sci 1998;7:445-456.
22. Subbiah S, Laurents DV, Levitt M. Structural similarity of DNA-binding domains of bacteriophage repressors and the globin core. Curr Biol 1993;3:141-148.
23. Orengo CA, Pearl FM, Thornton JM. The CATH domain structure database. Methods Biochem Anal 2003;44:249-271.
24. Edgar RC, Sjolander K. A comparison of scoring functions for protein sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1301-1308.
25. Zemla A. LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
26. Dror O, Benyamini H, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. MASS: multiple structural alignment by secondary structures. Bioinformatics 2003;19Suppl 1:i95-i104.
27. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002;315:1257-1275.
28. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
29. Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, Russell RB. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 2003;332:989-998.