Postsynaptic Neurotransmitter Receptor Reserve Pools for Synaptic Potentiation

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 170-182

  Kneussel, Matthias ^a   Hausrat, Torben Johann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endocytic recycling; Lateral diffusion; LTP; Reserve pool; Synaptic plasticity; Trafficking

Indexed keywords

NEUROTRANSMITTER RECEPTOR;

INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; ANIMAL; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPSE; SYNAPTIC POTENTIAL;

ANIMALS; RECEPTORS, NEUROTRANSMITTER; SYNAPSES; SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS;

EID: 84975736403     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Kandel E.R. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 2001, 294:1030-1038.
2. Malenka R.C., Nicoll R.A. Learning and memory. Never fear, LTP is hear. Nature 1997, 390:552-553.
3. Kandel E.R., et al. The molecular and systems biology of memory. Cell 2014, 157:163-186.
4. Moser E.I., et al. Impaired spatial learning after saturation of long-term potentiation. Science 1998, 281:2038-2042.
5. Nicoll R.A., Malenka R.C. Contrasting properties of two forms of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1995, 377:115-118.
6. Bliss T.V., Collingridge G.L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1993, 361:31-39.
7. Nabavi S., et al. Engineering a memory with LTD and LTP. Nature 2014, 511:348-352.
8. Huang Y.Y., et al. The influence of prior synaptic activity on the induction of long-term potentiation. Science 1992, 255:730-733.
9. Bliss T.V., Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. 1973, 232:331-356.
10. Linden D.J. The return of the spike: postsynaptic action potentials and the induction of LTP and LTD. Neuron 1999, 22:661-666.
11. Huganir R.L., Nicoll R.A. AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years. Neuron 2013, 80:704-717.
12. Granger A.J., et al. LTP requires a reserve pool of glutamate receptors independent of subunit type. Nature 2013, 493:495-500.
13. Lee H.K., et al. Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit is required for synaptic plasticity and retention of spatial memory. Cell 2003, 112:631-643.
14. Mainen Z.F., et al. Use-dependent AMPA receptor block in mice lacking GluR2 suggests postsynaptic site for LTP expression. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:579-586.
15. A receptor dynamics for the expression of inhibitory LTP. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3921.
16. A receptors. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:14326-14337.
17. Malinow R., Malenka R.C. AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 25:103-126.
18. Park M., et al. Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science 2004, 305:1972-1975.
19. Wang Z., et al. Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell 2008, 135:535-548.
20. Lledo P.M., et al. Postsynaptic membrane fusion and long-term potentiation. Science 1998, 279:399-403.
21. Petrini E.M., et al. Endocytic trafficking and recycling maintain a pool of mobile surface AMPA receptors required for synaptic potentiation. Neuron 2009, 63:92-105.
22. Choquet D., Triller A. The dynamic synapse. Neuron 2013, 80:691-703.
23. Borgdorff A.J., Choquet D. Regulation of AMPA receptor lateral movements. Nature 2002, 417:649-653.
24. Dahan M., et al. Diffusion dynamics of glycine receptors revealed by single-quantum dot tracking. Science 2003, 302:442-445.
25. A receptors at inhibitory synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:889-897.
26. Kneussel M., et al. SnapShot: receptor dynamics at plastic synapses. Cell 2014, 157:1738.
27. Patterson M.A., et al. AMPA receptors are exocytosed in stimulated spines and adjacent dendrites in a Ras-ERK-dependent manner during long-term potentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:15951-15956.
28. Makino H., Malinow R. AMPA receptor incorporation into synapses during LTP: the role of lateral movement and exocytosis. Neuron 2009, 64:381-390.
29. A receptor α5 subunit anchoring at the actin cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 2006, 25:987-999.
30. A receptor density and is essential for reversal learning and short-term memory. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:6872.
31. Grant B.D., Donaldson J.G. Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:597-608.
32. Archibald K., et al. Surface expression and metabolic half-life of AMPA receptors in cultured rat cerebellar granule cells. Neuropharmacology 1998, 37:1345-1353.
33. Zheng N., et al. Synaptic activity regulates AMPA receptor trafficking through different recycling pathways. Elife 2015, Published online May 13, 2015. 10.7554/eLife.06878.
34. Bredt D.S., Nicoll R.A. AMPA receptor trafficking at excitatory synapses. Neuron 2003, 40:361-379.
35. Malenka R.C., Bear M.F. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 2004, 44:5-21.
36. Ehlers M.D. Reinsertion or degradation of AMPA receptors determined by activity-dependent endocytic sorting. Neuron 2000, 28:511-525.
37. Esteves da Silva M., et al. Positioning of AMPA receptor-containing endosomes regulates synapse architecture. Cell Rep. 2015, 13:933-943.
38. Chater T.E., Goda Y. The role of AMPA receptors in postsynaptic mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 8:401.
39. Lee S.H., et al. Subunit rules governing the sorting of internalized AMPA receptors in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 2004, 43:221-236.
40. Hoogenraad C.C., et al. Neuron specific Rab4 effector GRASP-1 coordinates membrane specialization and maturation of recycling endosomes. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000283.
41. van der Sluijs P., Hoogenraad C.C. New insights in endosomal dynamics and AMPA receptor trafficking. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:499-505.
42. Hanley J.G. Molecular mechanisms for regulation of AMPAR trafficking by PICK1. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34:931-935.
43. Shepherd J.D., Bear M.F. New views of Arc, a master regulator of synaptic plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:279-284.
44. Kato A.S., et al. TARPs differentially decorate AMPA receptors to specify neuropharmacology. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33:241-248.
45. Hussain N.K., et al. Sorting nexin 27 regulates basal and activity-dependent trafficking of AMPARs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:11840-11845.
46. Lussier M.P., et al. Dynamic regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors by posttranslational modifications. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290:28596-28603.
47. Lu W., Ziff E.B. PICK1 interacts with ABP/GRIP to regulate AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron 2005, 47:407-421.
48. Thomas G.M., et al. Palmitoylation by DHHC5/8 targets GRIP1 to dendritic endosomes to regulate AMPA-R trafficking. Neuron 2012, 73:482-496.
49. Hanley L.J., Henley J.M. Differential roles of GRIP1a and GRIP1b in AMPA receptor trafficking. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 485:167-172.
50. Correia S.S., et al. Motor protein-dependent transport of AMPA receptors into spines during long-term potentiation. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:457-466.
51. Kapitein L.C., Hoogenraad C.C. Building the neuronal microtubule cytoskeleton. Neuron 2015, 87:492-506.
52. McVicker D.P., et al. Signaling to the microtubule cytoskeleton: an unconventional role for CaMKII. Dev. Neurobiol. 2015, 75:423-434.
53. Kneussel M., Wagner W. Myosin motors at neuronal synapses: drivers of membrane transport and actin dynamics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14:233-247.
54. Hales C.M., et al. Rab11 family interacting protein 2 associates with myosin Vb and regulates plasma membrane recycling. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:50415-50421.
55. Kusters R., et al. Shape-induced asymmetric diffusion in dendritic spines allows efficient synaptic AMPA receptor trapping. Biophys. J. 2013, 105:2743-2750.
56. A receptor trafficking-mediated plasticity of inhibitory synapses. Neuron 2011, 70:385-409.
57. A receptors by an association with the adaptin AP2 complex modulates inhibitory synaptic currents in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:7972-7977.
58. A receptors. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2001, 18:13-25.
59. Li R.W., et al. GRIP1 in GABAergic synapses. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 488:11-27.
60. A receptor transport in neurons. Neuron 2011, 70:66-81.
61. Kittler J.T., et al. Huntingtin-associated protein 1 regulates inhibitory synaptic transmission by modulating γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor membrane trafficking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:12736-12741.
62. ARs to synapses is mediated by HAP1-KIF5 and disrupted by mutant huntingtin. Neuron 2010, 65:53-65.
63. Yan Q., et al. CART: an Hrs/actinin-4/BERP/myosin V protein complex required for efficient receptor recycling. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:2470-2482.
64. A receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:11883-11888.
65. Tran D.D., et al. CAML is required for efficient EGF receptor recycling. Dev. Cell 2003, 5:245-256.
66. A receptors. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2008, 38:277-289.
67. Kielland A., et al. Activity patterns govern synapse-specific AMPA receptor trafficking between deliverable and synaptic pools. Neuron 2009, 62:84-101.
68. Groc L., et al. Differential activity-dependent regulation of the lateral mobilities of AMPA and NMDA receptors. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:695-696.
69. Zamanillo D., et al. Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. Science 1999, 284:1805-1811.
70. Rouach N., et al. TARP γ-8 controls hippocampal AMPA receptor number, distribution and synaptic plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1525-1533.
71. Park M., et al. Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes. Neuron 2006, 52:817-830.
72. Racz B., et al. Lateral organization of endocytic machinery in dendritic spines. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:917-918.
73. Yudowski G.A., et al. Real-time imaging of discrete exocytic events mediating surface delivery of AMPA receptors. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11112-11121.
74. Lu J., et al. Postsynaptic positioning of endocytic zones and AMPA receptor cycling by physical coupling of dynamin-3 to Homer. Neuron 2007, 55:874-889.
75. Simons K., Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 1997, 387:569-572.
76. Renner M., et al. Control of the postsynaptic membrane viscosity. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:2926-2937.
77. Brachet A., et al. LTP-triggered cholesterol redistribution activates Cdc42 and drives AMPA receptor synaptic delivery. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 208:791-806.
78. Frischknecht R., et al. Brain extracellular matrix affects AMPA receptor lateral mobility and short-term synaptic plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:897-904.
79. Hennekinne L., et al. Differential control of thrombospondin over synaptic glycine and AMPA receptors in spinal cord neurons. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:11432-11439.
80. Szepesi Z., et al. Synaptically released matrix metalloproteinase activity in control of structural plasticity and the cell surface distribution of GluA1-AMPA receptors. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e98274.
81. O'Brien R.J., et al. Synaptic clustering of AMPA receptors by the extracellular immediate-early gene product Narp. Neuron 1999, 23:309-323.
82. Hardingham G.E., et al. Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:405-414.
83. Hardingham G.E., Bading H. Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:682-696.
84. A receptors: form, pharmacology, and function. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:12757-12763.
85. A receptors regulate the intrinsic excitability of mouse hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:2244-2254.
86. A receptor. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:5572-5580.
87. Opazo P., et al. CaMKII triggers the diffusional trapping of surface AMPARs through phosphorylation of stargazin. Neuron 2010, 67:239-252.
88. Bats C., et al. Channel properties reveal differential expression of TARPed and TARPless AMPARs in stargazer neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:853-861.
89. Zhang H., et al. Regulation of AMPA receptor surface trafficking and synaptic plasticity by a cognitive enhancer and antidepressant molecule. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18:471-484.
90. Tao-Cheng J.H., et al. Depolarization of hippocampal neurons induces formation of nonsynaptic NMDA receptor islands resembling nascent postsynaptic densities(1,2,3). eNeuro 2015, Published online December 8, 2015. 10.1523/ENEURO. 0066-15.2015.
91. Ju Y.H., et al. Distinct properties of murine alpha 5 γ-aminobutyric acid type a receptors revealed by biochemical fractionation and mass spectroscopy. J. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 87:1737-1747.
92. Granger E., et al. The role of the cytoskeleton and molecular motors in endosomal dynamics. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 31:20-29.
93. van Bergeijk P., et al. Right time, right place: probing the functions of organelle positioning. Trends Cell Biol. 2015, Published online November 2, 2015. 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.001.
94. Deisseroth K. Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18:1213-1225.
95. Bourzac K. Cell imaging: beyond the limits. Nature 2015, 526:S50-S54.
96. Collingridge G.L., et al. Receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:952-962.
97. Fonseca R., et al. Competing for memory: hippocampal LTP under regimes of reduced protein synthesis. Neuron 2004, 44:1011-1020.
98. Hardt O., et al. GluA2-dependent AMPA receptor endocytosis and the decay of early and late long-term potentiation: possible mechanisms for forgetting of short- and long-term memories. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2014, 369:20130141.
99. Sutton M.A., Schuman E.M. Dendritic protein synthesis, synaptic plasticity, and memory. Cell 2006, 127:49-58.
100. Singer S.J., Nicolson G.L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 1972, 175:720-731.
101. Serge A., et al. Receptor activation and homer differentially control the lateral mobility of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the neuronal membrane. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:3910-3920.
102. Nair D., et al. Super-resolution imaging reveals that AMPA receptors inside synapses are dynamically organized in nanodomains regulated by PSD95. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:13204-13224.
103. MacGillavry H.D., et al. Nanoscale scaffolding domains within the postsynaptic density concentrate synaptic AMPA receptors. Neuron 2013, 78:615-622.
104. Fukata Y., et al. Local palmitoylation cycles define activity-regulated postsynaptic subdomains. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 202:145-161.
105. Constals A., et al. Glutamate-induced AMPA receptor desensitization increases their mobility and modulates short-term plasticity through unbinding from stargazin. Neuron 2015, 85:787-803.
106. Tardin C., et al. Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4656-4665.
107. Ehlers M.D., et al. Diffusional trapping of GluR1 AMPA receptors by input-specific synaptic activity. Neuron 2007, 54:447-460.
108. Heine M., et al. Surface mobility of postsynaptic AMPARs tunes synaptic transmission. Science 2008, 320:201-205.
109. AR diffusion dynamics. Neuron 2009, 62:670-682.
110. Bannai H., et al. Imaging the lateral diffusion of membrane molecules with quantum dots. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1:2628-2634.
111. Gonzalez-Gonzalez I.M., et al. Measuring membrane protein dynamics in neurons using fluorescence recovery after photobleach. Methods Enzymol. 2012, 504:127-146.
112. Liu Z., et al. Imaging live-cell dynamics and structure at the single-molecule level. Mol. Cell 2015, 58:644-659.