Functional innovation from changes in protein domains and their combinations

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2016, Pages 44-52

  Lees, Jonathan G ^a   Dawson, Natalie L ^a   Sillitoe, Ian ^a   Orengo, Christine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOSTERISM; ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CANCER GENETICS; CATALYSIS; DIMERIZATION; DNA BINDING; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; NEOPLASM;

PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PROTEIN DOMAINS; PROTEINS;

EID: 84973290083     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.05.016     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Sillitoe I., Lewis T.E., Cuff A., Das S., Ashford P., Dawson N.L., Furnham N., Laskowski R.A., Lee D., Lees J.G., et al. CATH: comprehensive structural and functional annotations for genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43:D376-D381.
2. Finn R.D., Coggill P., Eberhardt R.Y., Eddy S.R., Mistry J., Mitchell A.L., Potter S.C., Punta M., Qureshi M., Sangrador-Vegas A., et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 44:D279-D285.
3. Murzin A.G., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T., Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995, 247:536-540.
4. Andreeva A., Howorth D., Chothia C., Kulesha E., Murzin A.G. SCOP2 prototype: a new approach to protein structure mining. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42.
5. Edwards H., Deane C.M. Structural bridges through fold space. PLoS Comput Biol 2015, 11:e1004466.
6. Eddy S.R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7.
7. Lam S.D., Dawson N.L., Das S., Sillitoe I., Ashford P., Lee D., Lehtinen S., Orengo C.A., Lees J.G. Gene3D: expanding the utility of domain assignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 44:D404-D409.
8. Oates M.E., Stahlhacke J., Vavoulis D.V., Smithers B., Rackham O.J.L., Sardar A.J., Zaucha J., Thurlby N., Fang H., Gough J. The SUPERFAMILY 1.75 database in 2014: a doubling of data. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43:D227-D233.
9. Das S., Lee D., Sillitoe I., Dawson N.L., Lees J.G., Orengo C.A. Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 31:3460-3467.
10. Das S., Dawson N.L., Orengo C.A. Diversity in protein domain superfamilies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2015, 35:40-49.
11. Radivojac P., Clark W.T., Oron T.R., Schnoes A.M., Wittkop T., Sokolov A., Graim K., Funk C., Verspoor K., Ben-Hur A., et al. A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat Methods 2013, 10:221-227.
12. Jiang Y., Oron T.R., Clark W.T., Bankapur A.R., D'Andrea D., Lepore R., Funk C.S., Kahanda I., Verspoor K.M., Ben-Hur A., et al. An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy 2016, arxiv, http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00891.
13. Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014, 16:18-29.
14. Bellay J., Han S., Michaut M., Kim T., Costanzo M., Andrews B.J., Boone C., Bader G.D., Myers C.L., Kim P.M. Bringing order to protein disorder through comparative genomics and genetic interactions. Genome Biol 2011, 12:R14.
15. Tompa P., Fersht A. Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins 2009, CRC, Chapman and Hall.
16. Todd A.E., Orengo C.a., Thornton J.M. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 2001, 307:1113-1143.
17. Bashton M., Chothia C. The generation of new protein functions by the combination of domains. Structure 2007, 15:85-99.
18. Bornberg-Bauer E., Albà M.M. Dynamics and adaptive benefits of modular protein evolution. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013, 23:459-466.
19. Scaiewicz A., Levitt M. The language of the protein universe. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2015, 35:50-56.
20. Vogel C., Berzuini C., Bashton M., Gough J., Teichmann S.A. Supra-domains: evolutionary units larger than single protein domains. J Mol Biol 2004, 336:809-823.
21. Jacob F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 1977, 196:1161-1166.
22. Wagner G.P., Pavlicev M., Cheverud J.M. The road to modularity. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:921-931.
23. Abdullayev I., Kirkham M., Björklund Å.K., Simon A., Sandberg R. A reference transcriptome and inferred proteome for the salamander Notophthalmus viridescens. Exp Cell Res 2013, 319:1187-1197.
24. Hamada M., Shoguchi E., Shinzato C., Kawashima T., Miller D.J., Satoh N. The complex NOD-like receptor repertoire of the coral acropora digitifera includes novel domain combinations. Mol Biol Evol 2013, 30:167-176.
25. Hsu C.-H., Chiang A.W.T., Hwang M.-J., Liao B.-Y. Proteins with highly evolvable domain architectures are nonessential but highly retained. Mol Biol Evol 2016, 10.1093/molbev/msw006.
26. Cohen-Gihon I., Fong J.H., Sharan R., Nussinov R., Przytycka T.M., Panchenko A.R. Evolution of domain promiscuity in eukaryotic genomes - a perspective from the inferred ancestral domain architectures. Mol Biosyst 2011, 7:784-792.
27. Introduction to Marine Genomics 2010, Springer Science & Business Media.
28. Sardar A.J., Oates M.E., Fang H., Forrest A.R.R., Kawaji H., Gough J., Rackham O.J.L. The evolution of human cells in terms of protein innovation. Mol Biol Evol 2014, 31:1364-1374.
29. Echave J., Spielman S.J., Wilke C.O. Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites. Nat Rev Genet 2016, 17:109-121.
30. Goldman A.D., Beatty J.T., Landweber L.F. The TIM barrel architecture facilitated the early evolution of protein-mediated metabolism. J Mol Evol 2016, 82:1-10.
31. Furnham N., Dawson N.L., Rahman S.A., Thornton J.M., Orengo C.A. Large-scale analysis exploring evolution of catalytic machineries and mechanisms in enzyme superfamilies. J Mol Biol 2015, 428:253-267.
32. Brown S.D., Babbitt P.C. New insights about enzyme evolution from large-scale studies of sequence and structure relationships. J Biol Chem 2014, 10.1074/jbc.R114.569350.
33. Dessailly B.H., Dawson N.L., Mizuguchi K., Orengo C.A. Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies. Biochim Biophys Acta - Proteins Proteomics 2013, 1834:874-889.
34. Dellus-Gur E., Toth-Petroczy A., Elias M., Tawfik D.S. What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. J Mol Biol 2013, 425:2609-2621.
35. Toth-Petroczy A., Tawfik D.S. The robustness and innovability of protein folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2014, 26:131-138.
36. Studer R.A., Christin P.-A., Williams M.A., Orengo C. Stability-activity tradeoffs constrain the adaptive evolution of RubisCO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:2223-2228.
37. Philip A.F., Kumauchi M., Hoff W.D. Robustness and evolvability in the functional anatomy of a PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:17986-17991.
38. Jack B.R., Meyer A.G., Echave J., Wilke C.O. Functional sites induce long-range evolutionary constraints in enzymes. PLOS Biol 2016, 14:e1002452.
39. Anderson D.P., Whitney D.S., Hanson-Smith V., Woznica A., Campodonico-Burnett W., Volkman B.F., King N., Prehoda K.E., Thornton J.W. Evolution of an ancient protein function involved in organized multicellularity in animals. Elife 2016, 5:1-21.
40. Zhang D., Iyer L.M., Burroughs A.M., Aravind L. Resilience of biochemical activity in protein domains in the face of structural divergence. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2014, 26:92-103.
41. Zmasek C.M., Godzik A. Strong functional patterns in the evolution of eukaryotic genomes revealed by the reconstruction of ancestral protein domain repertoires. Genome Biol 2011, 12:R4.
42. Wolf Y.I., Koonin E.V. Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution. BioEssays 2013, 35:829-837.
43. Forslund K., Pekkari I., Sonnhammer E.L. Domain architecture conservation in orthologs. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:326.
44. Marsh J.A., Teichmann S.A. How do proteins gain new domains?. Genome Biol 2010, 11:126.
45. Buljan M., Frankish A., Bateman A. Quantifying the mechanisms of domain gain in animal proteins. Genome Biol 2010, 11:R74.
46. Triant D.A., Pearson W.R. Most partial domains in proteins are alignment and annotation artifacts. Genome Biol 2015, 16:99.
47. Bornberg-Bauer E., Schmitz J., Heberlein M. Emergence of de novo proteins from "dark genomic matter" by "grow slow and moult". Biochem Soc Trans 2015, 43:867-873.
48. Bitard-Feildel T., Heberlein M., Bornberg-Bauer E., Callebaut I. Detection of orphan domains in Drosophila using "hydrophobic cluster analysis". Biochimie 2015, 119:244-253.
49. Weiner J., Beaussart F., Bornberg-Bauer E. Domain deletions and substitutions in the modular protein evolution. FEBS J 2006, 273:2037-2047.
50. Buljan M., Bateman A. The evolution of protein domain families. Biochem Soc Trans 2009, 37:751-755.
51. Leonard G., Richards T.A. Genome-scale comparative analysis of gene fusions, gene fissions, and the fungal tree of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:21402-21407.
52. Prakash A., Bateman A. Domain atrophy creates rare cases of functional partial protein domains. Genome Biol 2015, 16:1-15.
53. Bryan P.N., Orban J. Proteins that switch folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010, 20:482-488.
54. Light S., Elofsson A., Gough J., Dunker A.K. The impact of splicing on protein domain architecture. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013, 23:451-458.
55. Yang X., Coulombe-Huntington J., Kang S., Sheynkman G.M., Hao T., Richardson A., Sun S., Yang F., Shen Y.A., Murray R.R., et al. Widespread expansion of protein interaction capabilities by alternative splicing. Cell 2016, 164:805-817.
56. Abascal F., Tress M.L., Valencia A. The evolutionary fate of alternatively spliced homologous exons after gene duplication. Genome Biol 2015, 7:1392-1403.
57. Abascal F., Ezkurdia I., Rodriguez-Rivas J., Rodriguez J.M., del Pozo A., Vázquez J., Valencia A., Tress M.L. Alternatively spliced homologous exons have ancient origins and are highly expressed at the protein level. PLoS Comput Biol 2015, 11.
58. Vogel C., Pleiss J. The modular structure of ThDP-dependent enzymes. Proteins 2014, 82:2523-2537.
59. Huang H., Pandya C., Liu C., Al-Obaidi N.F., Wang M., Zheng L., Toews Keating S., Aono M., Love J.D., Evans B., et al. Panoramic view of a superfamily of phosphatases through substrate profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:E1974-E1983.
60. Pabis A., Kamerlin S.C.L. Promiscuity and electrostatic flexibility in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2016, 37:14-21.
61. Wagner A. The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2012, 279:1249-1258.
62. Lai A., Sato P.M., Peisajovich S.G. Evolution of synthetic signaling scaffolds by recombination of modular protein domains. ACS Synth Biol 2015, 4:714-722.
63. Sato P.M., Yoganathan K., Jung J.H., Peisajovich S.G. The robustness of a signaling complex to mutations that alter interaction specificities facilitates network evolution. PLoS Biol 2012, 2012:e1002012.
64. Rakshambikai R., Manoharan M., Gnanavel M., Srinivasan N. Typical and atypical domain combinations in human protein kinases: functions, disease causing mutations and conservation in other primates. RSC Adv 2015, 5:25132-25148.
65. Su Z., Denu J.M. Reading the combinatorial histone language. ACS Chem Biol 2015, 10.1021/acschembio.5b00864.
66. Mitchell A., Chang H.Y., Daugherty L., Fraser M., Hunter S., Lopez R., McAnulla C., McMenamin C., Nuka G., Pesseat S., et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43:D213-D221.
67. Ekman D., Björklund Å.K., Elofsson A. Quantification of the elevated rate of domain rearrangements in metazoa. J Mol Biol 2007, 372:1337-1348.
68. Nam H.-J., Kim I., Bowie J.U., Kim S. Metazoans evolved by taking domains from soluble proteins to expand intercellular communication network. Sci Rep 2015, 5:9576.
69. Louis A., Roest Crollius H.R., Robinson-Rechavi M. How much does the amphioxus genome represent the ancestor of chordates?. Brief Funct Genomics 2012, 11:89-95.
70. Huang S., Chen Z., Yan X., Yu T., Huang G., Yan Q., Pontarotti P.A., Zhao H., Li J., Yang P., et al. Decelerated genome evolution in modern vertebrates revealed by analysis of multiple lancelet genomes. Nat Commun 2014, 5:5896.
71. Linkeviciute V., Rackham O.J.L., Gough J., Oates M.E., Fang H. Function-selective domain architecture plasticity potentials in eukaryotic genome evolution. Biochimie 2015, 119:269-277.
72. Cromar G., Wong K.-C., Loughran N., On T., Song H., Xiong X., Zhang Z., Parkinson J. New tricks for "old" domains: how novel architectures and promiscuous hubs contributed to the organization and evolution of the ECM. Genome Biol Evol 2014, 6:2897-2917.
73. Selivanova G., Wiman K.G. Reactivation of mutant p53: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Oncogene 2007, 26:2243-2254.
74. Yang F., Petsalaki E., Rolland T., Hill D.E., Vidal M., Roth F.P. Protein domain-level landscape of cancer-type-specific somatic mutations. PLoS Comput Biol 2015, 11.
75. Shi J., Wang E., Milazzo J.P., Wang Z., Kinney J.B., Vakoc C.R. Discovery of cancer drug targets by CRISPR-Cas9 screening of protein domains. Nat Biotechnol 2015, 33:1-10.
76. Mittal V.K., McDonald J.F. Integrated sequence and expression analysis of ovarian cancer structural variants underscores the importance of gene fusion regulation. BMC Med Genomics 2015, 8:40.
77. Singh D., Chan J.M., Zoppoli P., Niola F., Sullivan R., Castano A., Liu E.M., Reichel J., Porrati P., Pellegatta S., et al. Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma. Science 2012, 337:1231-1235.
78. Stransky N., Cerami E., Schalm S., Kim J.L., Lengauer C. The landscape of kinase fusions in cancer. Nat Commun 2014, 5:4846.
79. Ortiz de Mendíbil I., Vizmanos J.L., Novo F.J. Signatures of selection in fusion transcripts resulting from chromosomal translocations in human cancer. PLoS ONE 2009, 4.
80. Shugay M., De Mendíbil I.O., Vizmanos J.L., Novo F.J. Oncofuse: a computational framework for the prediction of the oncogenic potential of gene fusions. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:2539-2546.
81. Frenkel-Morgenstern M., Valencia A. Novel domain combinations in proteins encoded by chimeric transcripts. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:i67-i74.
82. Jin J., Xie X., Chen C., Park J.G., Stark C., James D.A., Olhovsky M., Linding R., Mao Y., Pawson T. Eukaryotic protein domains as functional units of cellular evolution. Sci Signal 2009, 2:ra76.
83. Wang B., Barahona M., Buck M., Schumacher J. Rewiring cell signalling through chimaeric regulatory protein engineering. Biochem Soc Trans 2013, 41:1195-1200.
84. Lim W.A. Designing customized cell signalling circuits. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:393-403.