Domain architecture conservation in orthologs

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Forslund, Kristoffer ^a,b   Pekkari, Isabella ^a,b   Sonnhammer, Erik L L ^a,b,c  

^a SCIENCE FOR LIFE LABORATORY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Swedish eScience Research Center   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN ARCHITECTURES; EVOLUTIONARY DISTANCE; FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; LARGE-SCALE STUDIES; ORTHOLOGOUS PROTEINS; SELECTIVE PRESSURE; SEQUENCE DIVERGENCES;

CONSERVATION; PROTEINS;

ARCHITECTURE;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 79961109822     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-326     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Fitch WM. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst Zool 1970, 19:99-113. 10.2307/2412448, 5449325.
2. Remm M, Storm CEV, Sonnhammer ELL. Automatic Clustering of Orthologs and In-paralogs from Pairwise Species Comparisons. JMB 2001, 314:1041-1052.
3. Sonnhammer ELL, Koonin EV. Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet 2002, 18:619-620. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02793-2, 12446146.
4. Koonin EV. Orthologs, Paralogs and Evolutionary Genomics. Annu Rev Genet 2005, 39:309-338. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725, 16285863.
5. Gabaldón T, Dessimoz C, Huxley-Jones J, Vilella AJ, Sonnhammer EL, Lewis S. Joining forces in the quest for orthologs. Genome Biol 2009, 10(9):403. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-9-403, 2768974, 19785718.
6. Dolinski K, Botstein D. Orthology and Functional Conservation in Eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 2007, 41:465-507. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090439, 17678444.
7. Studer RA, Robinson-Rechavi M. How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ?. Trends in Genetics 2009, 25(5):210-216. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.004, 19368988.
8. Sonnhammer ELL, Eddy SR, Birney E, Bateman A, Durbin R. Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res 1998, 26:320-322. 10.1093/nar/26.1.320, 147209, 9399864.
9. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer ELL, Eddy SR, Bateman A. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, (38 Database):D211-D222.
10. Björklund T, Ekman D, Light S, Frey-Skött J, Elofsson A. Domain Rearrangements in Protein Evolution. J Mol Biol 2005, 353:911-923. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.067, 16198373.
11. Vogel C, Teichmann SA, Pereira-Leal J. The Relationship Between Domain Duplication and Recombination. JMB 2005, 346(1):355-365.
12. Björklund T, Ekman D, Elofsson A. Expansion of Protein Domain Repeats. PloS Comput Biol 2006, 2(8):114.
13. Buljan M, Bateman A. The evolution of protein domain families. Biochem Soc Transactions 2009, 37:751-755.
14. Hegyi H, Gerstein M. Annotation Transfer for Genomics: Measuring Functional Divergence in Multi-Domain Proteins. Genome Res 2001, 11:1632-1640. 10.1101/gr. 183801, 311165, 11591640.
15. Hayete B, Bienkowska JR. GOTrees: Predicting GO Associations from Protein Domain Composition Using Decision Trees. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2005, 140-151.
16. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Buillard V, Cerutti L, Copley R, Courcelle E, Das U, Daugherty L, Dibley M, Finn R, Fleischmann W, Gough J, Haft D, Hulo N, Hunter S, Kahn D, Kanapin A, Kejariwal A, Labarga A, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Letunic I, Madera M, Maslen J, McAnulla C, McDowall J, Mistry J, Mitchell A, Nikolskaya AN, Orchard S, Orengo C, Petryszak R, Selengut JD, Sigrist CJ, Thomas PD, Valentin F, Wilson D, Wu CH, Yeats C. New developments in the InterPro database. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, (35 Database):D224-228.
17. Forslund K, Sonnhammer ELL. Predicting protein function from domain content. Bioinformatics 2009, 24(15):1681-1687.
18. Lin K, Zhu L, Zhang DY. An initial strategy for comparing proteins at the domain architecture level. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(17):2081-2086. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl366, 16837531.
19. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28(1):33-36. 10.1093/nar/28.1.33, 102395, 10592175.
20. Song N, Sedgewick RD, Durand D. Domain Architecture Comparison for Multidomain Homology Identification. Journal of Computational Biology 2007, 14(4):496-516. 10.1089/cmb.2007.A009, 17572026.
21. Ostlund G, Schmitt T, Forslund K, Köstler T, Messina DN, Roopra S, Frings O, Sonnhammer ELL. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, (38 Database):D196-203.
22. Berglund AC, Sjolund E, Ostlund G, Sonnhammer ELL. InParanoid 6: eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D263-266. 2238924, 18055500.
23. Janssen P, Enright AJ, Audit B, Cases I, Goldovsky L, Harte N, Kunin V, Ouzounis CA. COmplete GENome Tracking (COGENT): a flexible data environment for computational genomics. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(11):1451-1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg161, 12874064.
24. Eddy SR. A probabilistic model of local sequence alignment that simplifies statistical significance estimation. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(5):e1000069. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000069, 2396288, 18516236.
25. Forslund K, Henricson A, Hollich V, Sonnhammer EL. Domain tree-based analysis of protein architecture evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2008, 25(2):254-264. 10.1093/molbev/msm254, 18025066.
26. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48:443-453. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4, 5420325.
27. Lassmann T, Sonnhammer EL. Kalign--an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:298. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-298, 1325270, 16343337.
28. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. Mammalian protein metabolism 1969, 21-123. New York: Academic Press, Munro HN.
29. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric Permutation Tests For Functional Neuroimaging: A Primer with Examples. Human Brain Mapping 2001, 15(1):1-25.
30. Weisstein EW. Bonferroni Correction. From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource 1999, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BonferroniCorrection.html
31. Weisstein EW. Chi-Squared Test. From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource 1999, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Chi-SquaredTest.html
32. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication. 1970, New York: Springer.
33. Lynch M, Force A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 2000, 154(1):459-473. 1460895, 10629003.
34. Dehal P, Boore JL. Two Rounds of Whole Genome Duplication in the Ancestral Vertebrate. PLoS Biol 2005, 3(10):e314. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314, 1197285, 16128622.
35. Ekman D, Björklund T, Frey-Skött J, Elofsson A. Multi-domain Proteins in the Three Kingdoms of Life: Orphan Domains and Other Unassigned Regions. J Mol Biol 2005, 348:231-243. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.007, 15808866.
36. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403-410.
37. Alexeyenko A, Lindberg J, Perez-Bercoff A, Sonnhammer ELL. Overview and comparison of ortholog databases. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 2006, 3:137-143.
38. Peterson ME, Chen F, Saven JG, Roos DS, Babbitt PC, Sali A. Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs. Protein Sci 2009, 18(6):1306-1315. 10.1002/pro.143, 2774440, 19472362.
39. Kondrashov FA, Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol 2002, 3(2).