Molecular chaperones: Guardians of the proteome in normal and disease states

F1000Research

Volumn 4, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Tsai, Francis T F ^a   Jeng, Wilson ^a   Lee, Sukyeong ^a   Sung, Nuri ^a   Lee, Jungsoon ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970966295     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7214.1     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. Brandvold KR Morimoto RI: The Chemical Biology of Molecular Chaperones--Implications for Modulation of Proteostasis. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(18):2931-47. 26003923 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.05.010
2. Hipp MS Park SH Hartl FU: Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(9):506-14. 24946960 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.05.003
3. Baxa U Cassese T Kajava AV: Structure, function, and amyloidogenesis of fungal prions: filament polymorphism and prion variants. Adv Protein Chem. 2006;73:125-80. 17190613 10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73005-4
4. Toyama BH Weissman JS: Amyloid structure: conformational diversity and consequences. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:557-85. 21456964 10.1146/annurev-biochem-090908-120656 3817101
5. Eisenberg D Jucker M: The amyloid state of proteins in human diseases. Cell. 2012;148(6):1188-203. 22424229 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.022 3353745
6. Varadi M Kosol S Lebrun P: pE-DB: a database of structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered and of unfolded proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D326-35. 24174539 10.1093/nar/gkt960 3964940
7. Oldfield CJ Dunker AK: Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:553-84. 24606139 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164947
8. Arai M Sugase K Dyson HJ: Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(31):9614-9. 26195786 10.1073/pnas.1512799112 4534220
9. Wickner RB Shewmaker FP Bateman DA: Yeast prions: structure, biology, and prion-handling systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79(1):1-17. 25631286 10.1128/MMBR.00041-14 4402965
10. Masison DC Reidy M: Yeast prions are useful for studying protein chaperones and protein quality control. Prion. 2015;9(3):174-83. 26110609 10.1080/19336896.2015.1027856
11. Chernoff YO Lindquist SL Ono B: Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [psi+]. Science. 1995;268(5212):880-4. 7754373 10.1126/science.7754373
12. Moriyama H Edskes HK Wickner RB: [URE3] prion propagation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: requirement for chaperone Hsp104 and curing by overexpressed chaperone Ydj1p. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(23):8916-22. 11073991 86546
13. Shorter J Lindquist S: Hsp104, Hsp70 and Hsp40 interplay regulates formation, growth and elimination of Sup35 prions. EMBO J. 2008;27(20):2712-24. 18833196 10.1038/emboj.2008.194 2572177
14. Higurashi T Hines JK Sahi C: Specificity of the J-protein Sis1 in the propagation of 3 yeast prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(43):16596-601. 18955697 10.1073/pnas.0808934105 2575465
15. Tipton KA Verges KJ Weissman JS: In vivo monitoring of the prion replication cycle reveals a critical role for Sis1 in delivering substrates to Hsp104. Mol Cell. 2008;32(4):584-91. 19026788 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.003 2875781
16. Telling GC Scott M Mastrianni J: Prion propagation in mice expressing human and chimeric PrP transgenes implicates the interaction of cellular PrP with another protein. Cell. 1995;83(1):79-90. 7553876 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90236-8
17. Quinlan RA Ellis RJ: Chaperones: needed for both the good times and the bad times. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1617): 20130091. 23530265 10.1098/rstb.2013.0091 3638401
18. Sanchez Y Lindquist SL: HSP104 required for induced thermotolerance. Science. 1990;248(4959):1112-5. 2188365 10.1126/science.2188365
19. Parsell DA Kowal AS Singer MA: Protein disaggregation mediated by heat-shock protein Hsp104. Nature. 1994;372(6505):475-8. 7984243 10.1038/372475a0
20. Glover JR Lindquist S: Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell. 1998;94(1):73-82. 9674429 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81223-4
21. Hartl FU Bracher A Hayer-Hartl M: Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. 2011;475(7356):324-32. 21776078 10.1038/nature10317
22. Saibil H: Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(10):630-42. 24026055 10.1038/nrm3658 4340576
23. Haslbeck M Vierling E: A first line of stress defense: small heat shock proteins and their function in protein homeostasis. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(7):1537-48. 25681016 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.002 4360138
24. Wang L Wang X Wang CC: Protein disulfide-isomerase, a folding catalyst and a redox-regulated chaperone. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;83:305-13. 25697778 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.02.007
25. Preissler S Deuerling E: Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(7):274-83. 22503700 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.03.002
26. Bardwell JC Jakob U: Conditional disorder in chaperone action. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(12):517-25. 23018052 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.08.006 3508372
27. Hemmingsen SM Woolford C van der Vies SM: Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature. 1988;333(6171):330-4. 2897629 10.1038/333330a0
28. Hayer-Hartl M Bracher A Hartl FU: The GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Machine: A Nano-Cage for Protein Folding. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015; pii: S0968-0004(15)00140-1. 26422689 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.07.009
29. Braig K Otwinowski Z Hegde R: The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature. 1994;371(6498):578-86. 7935790 10.1038/371578a0
30. Fukami TA Yohda M Taguchi H: Crystal structure of chaperonin-60 from Paracoccus denitrificans. J Mol Biol. 2001;312(3):501-9. 11563912 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4961
31. Wang J Boisvert DC: Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP) 14 at 2.0 Å resolution. J Mol Biol. 2003;327(4):843-55. 12654267 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00184-0
32. Hunt JF Weaver AJ Landry SJ: The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 1996;379(6560):37-45. 8538739 10.1038/379037a0
33. Xu Z Horwich AL Sigler PB: The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP) 7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 1997;388(6644):741-50. 9285585 10.1038/41944
34. Chen DH Madan D Weaver J: Visualizing GroEL/ES in the act of encapsulating a folding protein. Cell. 2013;153(6):1354-65. 23746846 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.052 3695626
35. Sigler PB Xu Z Rye HS: Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:581-608. 9759498 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.581
36. Horwich AL Fenton WA: Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding. Q Rev Biophys. 2009;42(2):83-116. 19638247 10.1017/S0033583509004764
37. Lopez T Dalton K Frydman J: The Mechanism and Function of Group II Chaperonins. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(18):2919-30. 25936650 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.04.013
38. Booth CR Meyer AS Cong Y: Mechanism of lid closure in the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15(7):746-53. 18536725 10.1038/nsmb.1436 2546500
39. Houry WA Frishman D Eckerskorn C: Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 1999;402(6758):147-54. 10647006 10.1038/45977
40. Lund PA: Multiple chaperonins in bacteria--why so many? FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(4):785-800. 19416363 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00178.x
41. Qamra R Mande SC: Crystal structure of the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein, chaperonin 60.2, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(23):8105-13. 15547284 10.1128/JB.186.23.8105-8113.2004 529067
42. Sielaff B Lee KS Tsai FT: Structural and functional conservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL paralogs suggests that GroEL1 Is a chaperonin. J Mol Biol. 2011;405(3):831-9. 21094166 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.021 3017675
43. Ojha A Anand M Bhatt A: GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell. 2005;123(5):861-73. 16325580 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.012 F1000 Recommendation
44. Islam MS Richards JP Ojha AK: Targeting drug tolerance in mycobacteria: a perspective from mycobacterial biofilms. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10(9):1055-66. 23106280 10.1586/eri.12.88 3562728
45. Powers ET Balch WE: Diversity in the origins of proteostasis networks--a driver for protein function in evolution. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(4):237-48. 23463216 10.1038/nrm3542 3718298
46. Freeman BC Myers MP Schumacher R: Identification of a regulatory motif in Hsp70 that affects ATPase activity, substrate binding and interaction with HDJ-1. EMBO J. 1995;14(10):2281-92. 7774586 398335
47. Rüdiger S Germeroth L Schneider-Mergener J: Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 1997;16(7):1501-7. 9130695 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1501 1169754
48. Jiang J Prasad K Lafer EM: Structural basis of interdomain communication in the Hsc70 chaperone. Mol Cell. 2005;20(4):513-24. 16307916 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.028 4443753 F1000 Recommendation
49. Liu Q Hendrickson WA: Insights into Hsp70 chaperone activity from a crystal structure of the yeast Hsp110 Sse1. Cell. 2007;131(1):106-20. 17923091 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.039 2041797 F1000 Recommendation
50. Chang YW Sun YJ Wang C: Crystal structures of the 70-kDa heat shock proteins in domain disjoining conformation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(22):15502-11. 18400763 10.1074/jbc.M708992200 3258884
51. Bertelsen EB Chang L Gestwicki JE: Solution conformation of wild-type E. coli Hsp70 (DnaK) chaperone complexed with ADP and substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(21):8471-6. 19439666 10.1073/pnas.0903503106 2689011 F1000 Recommendation
52. Zhuravleva A Clerico EM Gierasch LM: An interdomain energetic tug-of-war creates the allosterically active state in Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Cell. 2012;151(6):1296-307. 23217711 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.002 3521165 F1000 Recommendation
53. Kityk R Kopp J Sinning I: Structure and dynamics of the ATP-bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. Mol Cell. 2012;48(6):863-74. 23123194 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.023 F1000 Recommendation
54. Qi R Sarbeng EB Liu Q: Allosteric opening of the polypeptide-binding site when an Hsp70 binds ATP. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(7):900-7. 23708608 10.1038/nsmb.2583 3772632
55. Mayer MP: Hsp70 chaperone dynamics and molecular mechanism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38(10):507-14. 24012426 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.08.001
56. Seyffer F Kummer E Oguchi Y: Hsp70 proteins bind Hsp100 regulatory M domains to activate AAA+ disaggregase at aggregate surfaces. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(12):1347-55. 23160352 10.1038/nsmb.2442
57. Lee J Kim JH Biter AB: Heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 is an activator of the Hsp104 motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(21):8513-8. 23650362 10.1073/pnas.1217988110 3666692
58. Shorter J: The mammalian disaggregase machinery: Hsp110 synergizes with Hsp70 and Hsp40 to catalyze protein disaggregation and reactivation in a cell-free system. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26319. 22022600 10.1371/journal.pone.0026319 3194798
59. Rampelt H Kirstein-Miles J Nillegoda NB: Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. EMBO J. 2012;31(21):4221-35. 22990239 10.1038/emboj.2012.264 3492728
60. Song Y Nagy M Ni W: Molecular chaperone Hsp110 rescues a vesicle transport defect produced by an ALS-associated mutant SOD1 protein in squid axoplasm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(14):5428-33. 23509252 10.1073/pnas.1303279110 3619309
61. Nillegoda NB Kirstein J Szlachcic A: Crucial HSP70 co-chaperone complex unlocks metazoan protein disaggregation. Nature. 2015;524(7564):247-51. 26245380 10.1038/nature14884
62. Andréasson C Fiaux J Rampelt H: Hsp110 is a nucleotide-activated exchange factor for Hsp70. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(14):8877-84. 18218635 10.1074/jbc.M710063200
63. Polier S Dragovic Z Hartl FU: Structural basis for the cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp110 chaperones in protein folding. Cell. 2008;133(6):1068-79. 18555782 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.022 F1000 Recommendation
64. Schuermann JP Jiang J Cuellar J: Structure of the Hsp110:Hsc70 nucleotide exchange machine. Mol Cell. 2008;31(2):232-43. 18550409 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.006 2892728 F1000 Recommendation
65. Mattoo RU Sharma SK Priya S: Hsp110 is a bona fide chaperone using ATP to unfold stable misfolded polypeptides and reciprocally collaborate with Hsp70 to solubilize protein aggregates. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(29):21399-411. 23737532 10.1074/jbc.M113.479253 3774407
66. Raviol H Sadlish H Rodriguez F: Chaperone network in the yeast cytosol: Hsp110 is revealed as an Hsp70 nucleotide exchange factor. EMBO J. 2006;25(11):2510-8. 16688211 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601139 1478168
67. Abrams JL Verghese J Gibney PA: Hierarchical functional specificity of cytosolic heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) nucleotide exchange factors in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(19):13155-67. 24671421 10.1074/jbc.M113.530014 4036327
68. Pearl LH Prodromou C: Structure and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:271-94. 16756493 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142738
69. Krukenberg KA Street TO Lavery LA: Conformational dynamics of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Q Rev Biophys. 2011;44(2):229-55. 21414251 10.1017/S0033583510000314
70. Mayer MP Le Breton L: Hsp90: breaking the symmetry. Mol Cell. 2015;58(1):8-20. 25839432 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.022
71. Pratt WB Toft DO: Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003;228(2):111-33. 12563018
72. Li J Buchner J: Structure, function and regulation of the Hsp90 machinery. Biomed J. 2013;36(3):106-17. 23806880 10.4103/2319-4170.113230
73. Taipale M Krykbaeva I Koeva M: Quantitative analysis of HSP90-client interactions reveals principles of substrate recognition. Cell. 2012;150(5):987-1001. 22939624 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.047 3894786 F1000 Recommendation
74. Neckers L Workman P: Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: are we there yet? Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(1):64-76. 22215907 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1000 3252205
75. Johnson JL: Evolution and function of diverse Hsp90 homologs and cochaperone proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):607-13. 22008467 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.09.020
76. Anderson JF Siller E Barral JM: The sacsin repeating region (SRR): a novel Hsp90-related supra-domain associated with neurodegeneration. J Mol Biol. 2010;400(4):665-74. 20488193 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.023
77. Anderson JF Siller E Barral JM: The neurodegenerative-disease-related protein sacsin is a molecular chaperone. J Mol Biol. 2011;411(4):870-80. 21726565 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.06.016
78. Tsutsumi S Mollapour M Graf C: Hsp90 charged-linker truncation reverses the functional consequences of weakened hydrophobic contacts in the N domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(11):1141-7. 19838189 10.1038/nsmb.1682
79. Tsutsumi S Mollapour M Prodromou C: Charged linker sequence modulates eukaryotic heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) chaperone activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(8):2937-42. 22315411 10.1073/pnas.1114414109 3287002 F1000 Recommendation
80. Jahn M Rehn A Pelz B: The charged linker of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 modulates domain contacts and biological function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(50):17881-6. 25468961 10.1073/pnas.1414073111 4273377
81. Ali MM Roe SM Vaughan CK: Crystal structure of an Hsp90-nucleotide-p23/Sba1 closed chaperone complex. Nature. 2006;440(7087):1013-7. 16625188 10.1038/nature04716 F1000 Recommendation
82. Shiau AK Harris SF Southworth DR: Structural Analysis of E. coli hsp90 reveals dramatic nucleotide-dependent conformational rearrangements. Cell. 2006;127(2):329-40. 17055434 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.027 F1000 Recommendation
83. Dollins DE Warren JJ Immormino RM: Structures of GRP94-nucleotide complexes reveal mechanistic differences between the hsp90 chaperones. Mol Cell. 2007;28(1):41-56. 17936703 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024 2094010
84. Lavery LA Partridge JR Ramelot TA: Structural asymmetry in the closed state of mitochondrial Hsp90 (TRAP1) supports a two-step ATP hydrolysis mechanism. Mol Cell. 2014;53(2):330-43. 24462206 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.023 3947485 F1000 Recommendation
85. Richter K Muschler P Hainzl O: Coordinated ATP hydrolysis by the Hsp90 dimer. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(36):33689-96. 11441008 10.1074/jbc.M103832200
86. Mishra P Bolon DN: Designed Hsp90 heterodimers reveal an asymmetric ATPase-driven mechanism in vivo. Mol Cell. 2014;53(2):344-50. 24462207 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.024 3923517
87. Southworth DR Agard DA: Species-dependent ensembles of conserved conformational states define the Hsp90 chaperone ATPase cycle. Mol Cell. 2008;32(5):631-40. 19061638 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.024 2633443
88. Krukenberg KA Förster F Rice LM: Multiple conformations of E. coli Hsp90 in solution: insights into the conformational dynamics of Hsp90. Structure. 2008;16(5):755-65. 18462680 10.1016/j.str.2008.01.021 2600884 F1000 Recommendation
89. Partridge JR Lavery LA Elnatan D: A novel N-terminal extension in mitochondrial TRAP1 serves as a thermal regulator of chaperone activity. eLife. 2014;3:e03487. 25531069 10.7554/eLife.03487 4381864
90. Hwang BJ Woo KM Goldberg AL: Protease Ti, a new ATP-dependent protease in Escherichia coli, contains protein-activated ATPase and proteolytic functions in distinct subunits. J Biol Chem. 1988;263(18):8727-34. 2967816
91. Katayama Y Gottesman S Pumphrey J: The two-component, ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli. Purification, cloning, and mutational analysis of the ATP-binding component. J Biol Chem. 1988;263(29):15226-36. 3049606
92. Beyer A: Sequence analysis of the AAA protein family. Protein Sci. 1997;6(10):2043-58. 9336829 10.1002/pro.5560061001 2143574
93. Neuwald AF Aravind L Spouge JL: AAA +: A class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 1999;9(1):27-43. 9927482
94. Sauer RT Baker TA: AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:587-612. 21469952 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060408-172623
95. Alexopoulos JA Guarné A Ortega J: ClpP: a structurally dynamic protease regulated by AAA+ proteins. J Struct Biol. 2012;179(2):202-10. 22595189 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.05.003
96. Malinovska L Palm S Gibson K: Dictyostelium discoideum has a highly Q/N-rich proteome and shows an unusual resilience to protein aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(20):E2620-9. 25941378 10.1073/pnas.1504459112 4443358 F1000 Recommendation
97. Lee S Sowa ME Watanabe YH: The structure of ClpB: a molecular chaperone that rescues proteins from an aggregated state. Cell. 2003;115(2):229-40. 14567920 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00807-9
98. Lee S Choi J Tsai FT: Visualizing the ATPase cycle in a protein disaggregating machine: structural basis for substrate binding by ClpB. Mol Cell. 2007;25(2):261-71. 17244533 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.002 1855157
99. Lee S Sielaff B Lee J: CryoEM structure of Hsp104 and its mechanistic implication for protein disaggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(18):8135-40. 20404203 10.1073/pnas.1003572107 2889573
100. Carroni M Kummer E Oguchi Y: Head-to-tail interactions of the coiled-coil domains regulate ClpB activity and cooperation with Hsp70 in protein disaggregation. eLife. 2014;3:e02481. 24843029 10.7554/eLife.02481 4023160
101. Hattendorf DA Lindquist SL: Cooperative kinetics of both Hsp104 ATPase domains and interdomain communication revealed by AAA sensor-1 mutants. EMBO J. 2002;21(1-2):12-21. 11782421 10.1093/emboj/21.1.12 125804
102. Hattendorf DA Lindquist SL: Analysis of the AAA sensor-2 motif in the C-terminal ATPase domain of Hsp104 with a site-specific fluorescent probe of nucleotide binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(5):2732-7. 11867765 10.1073/pnas.261693199 122416
103. Mogk A Schlieker C Strub C: Roles of individual domains and conserved motifs of the AAA+ chaperone ClpB in oligomerization, ATP hydrolysis, and chaperone activity. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(20):17615-24. 12624113 10.1074/jbc.M209686200
104. Yamasaki T Nakazaki Y Yoshida M: Roles of conserved arginines in ATP-binding domains of AAA+ chaperone ClpB from Thermus thermophilus. FEBS J. 2011;278(13):2395-403. 21554542 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08167.x
105. Biter AB Lee J Sung N: Functional analysis of conserved cis- and trans-elements in the Hsp104 protein disaggregating machine. J Struct Biol. 2012;179(2):172-80. 22634726 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.05.007 3411918
106. Zeymer C Fischer S Reinstein J: trans-Acting arginine residues in the AAA+ chaperone ClpB allosterically regulate the activity through inter- and intradomain communication. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(47):32965-76. 25253689 10.1074/jbc.M114.608828 4239642
107. Parsell DA Kowal AS Lindquist S: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104 protein. Purification and characterization of ATP-induced structural changes. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(6):4480-7. 8308017
108. Watanabe YH Motohashi K Yoshida M: Roles of the two ATP binding sites of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(8):5804-9. 11741950 10.1074/jbc.M109349200
109. Motohashi K Watanabe Y Yohda M: Heat-inactivated proteins are rescued by the DnaK.J-GrpE set and ClpB chaperones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(13):7184-9. 10377389 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7184 22047
110. Goloubinoff P Mogk A Zvi AP: Sequential mechanism of solubilization and refolding of stable protein aggregates by a bichaperone network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(24):13732-7. 10570141 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13732 24133
111. Zolkiewski M: ClpB cooperates with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE in suppressing protein aggregation. A novel multi-chaperone system from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(40):28083-6. 10497158 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28083
112. Sweeny EA Jackrel ME Go MS: The Hsp104 N-terminal domain enables disaggregase plasticity and potentiation. Mol Cell. 2015;57(5):836-49. 25620563 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.021 4623595
113. Haslberger T Weibezahn J Zahn R: M domains couple the ClpB threading motor with the DnaK chaperone activity. Mol Cell. 2007;25(2):247-60. 17244532 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.008
114. Sielaff B Tsai FT: The M-domain controls Hsp104 protein remodeling activity in an Hsp70/Hsp40-dependent manner. J Mol Biol. 2010;402(1):30-7. 20654624 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.030 2938849
115. Miot M Reidy M Doyle SM: Species-specific collaboration of heat shock proteins (Hsp) 70 and 100 in thermotolerance and protein disaggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(17):6915-20. 21474779 10.1073/pnas.1102828108 3084080
116. Mogk A Kummer E Bukau B: Cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp100 chaperone machines in protein disaggregation. Front Mol Biosci. 2015;2:22. 26042222 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00022 4436881
117. Doyle SM Genest O Wickner S: Protein rescue from aggregates by powerful molecular chaperone machines. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(10):617-29. 24061228 10.1038/nrm3660
118. Winkler J Tyedmers J Bukau B: Chaperone networks in protein disaggregation and prion propagation. J Struct Biol. 2012;179(2):152-60. 22580344 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.05.002
119. Biter AB Lee S Sung N: Structural basis for intersubunit signaling in a protein disaggregating machine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(31):12515-20. 22802670 10.1073/pnas.1207040109 3411974
120. Weibezahn J Tessarz P Schlieker C: Thermotolerance requires refolding of aggregated proteins by substrate translocation through the central pore of ClpB. Cell. 2004;119(5):653-65. 15550247 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.027 F1000 Recommendation
121. Lum R Tkach JM Vierling E: Evidence for an unfolding/threading mechanism for protein disaggregation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(28):29139-46. 15128736 10.1074/jbc.M403777200
122. Clarke AK Eriksson MJ: The truncated form of the bacterial heat shock protein ClpB/HSP100 contributes to development of thermotolerance in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(24):7092-6. 11092876 10.1128/JB.182.24.7092-7096.2000 94841
123. Beinker P Schlee S Groemping Y: The N terminus of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus is not essential for the chaperone activity. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(49):47160-6. 12351638 10.1074/jbc.M207853200
124. Hung GC Masison DC: N-terminal domain of yeast Hsp104 chaperone is dispensable for thermotolerance and prion propagation but necessary for curing prions by Hsp104 overexpression. Genetics. 2006;173(2):611-20. 16582428 10.1534/genetics.106.056820 1526498
125. Lum R Niggemann M Glover JR: Peptide and protein binding in the axial channel of Hsp104. Insights into the mechanism of protein unfolding. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(44):30139-50. 18755692 10.1074/jbc.M804849200 2662077
126. Barnett ME Zolkiewska A Zolkiewski M: Structure and activity of ClpB from Escherichia coli. Role of the amino-and -carboxyl-terminal domains. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(48):37565-71. 10982797 10.1074/jbc.M005211200 1819559
127. Barnett ME Nagy M Kedzierska S: The amino-terminal domain of ClpB supports binding to strongly aggregated proteins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(41):34940-5. 16076845 10.1074/jbc.M505653200
128. Park SK Kim KI Woo KM: Site-directed mutagenesis of the dual translational initiation sites of the clpB gene of Escherichia coli and characterization of its gene products. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(27):20170-4. 8376377
129. Li J Sha B: Crystal structure of the E. coli Hsp100 ClpB N-terminal domain. Structure. 2003;11(3):323-8. 12623019 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00030-3
130. Tanaka N Tani Y Hattori H: Interaction of the N-terminal domain of Escherichia coli heat-shock protein ClpB and protein aggregates during chaperone activity. Protein Sci. 2004;13(12):3214-21. 15537752 10.1110/ps.04780704 2287305
131. Chow IT Barnett ME Zolkiewski M: The N-terminal domain of Escherichia coli ClpB enhances chaperone function. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(20):4242-8. 16051221 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.06.055
132. Winkler J Tyedmers J Bukau B: Hsp70 targets Hsp100 chaperones to substrates for protein disaggregation and prion fragmentation. J Cell Biol. 2012;198(3):387-404. 22869599 10.1083/jcb.201201074 3413357
133. Erjavec N Larsson L Grantham J: Accelerated aging and failure to segregate damaged proteins in Sir2 mutants can be suppressed by overproducing the protein aggregation-remodeling factor Hsp104p. Genes Dev. 2007;21(19):2410-21. 17908928 10.1101/gad.439307 1993872
134. Tessarz P Schwarz M Mogk A: The yeast AAA + chaperone Hsp104 is part of a network that links the actin cytoskeleton with the inheritance of damaged proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(13):3738-45. 19398583 10.1128/MCB.00201-09 2698747
135. Wang F Brown EC Mak G: A chaperone cascade sorts proteins for posttranslational membrane insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell. 2010;40(1):159-71. 20850366 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.038 3652556 F1000 Recommendation
136. Johnson CR Weems AD Brewer JM: Cytosolic chaperones mediate quality control of higher-order septin assembly in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(7):1323-44. 25673805 10.1091/mbc.E14-11-1531 4454179
137. Csermely P: Chaperone overload is a possible contributor to 'civilization diseases'. Trends Genet. 2001;17(12):701-4. 11718923 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02495-7
138. Gidalevitz T Ben-Zvi A Ho KH: Progressive disruption of cellular protein folding in models of polyglutamine diseases. Science. 2006;311(5766):1471-4. 16469881 10.1126/science.1124514 F1000 Recommendation
139. Balch WE Morimoto RI Dillin A: Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science. 2008;319(5865):916-9. 18276881 10.1126/science.1141448 F1000 Recommendation
140. Lindquist SL Kelly JW: Chemical and biological approaches for adapting proteostasis to ameliorate protein misfolding and aggregation diseases: progress and prognosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(12): pii: a004507. 21900404 10.1101/cshperspect.a004507 3225948