The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

Nature

Volumn 388, Issue 6644, 1997, Pages 741-750

  Xu, Zhaohui ^a   Horwich, Arthur L ^b   Sigler, Paul B ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; CHLOROPLAST; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GENE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY;

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROEL PROTEIN; GROES PROTEIN; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 0030870719     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/41944     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ellis, R. J. (ed.) The Chaperonins (Academic, San Diego, 1996).
2. Hartl, F. U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381, 571-579 (1996).
3. Fenton, W. A. & Horwich, A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6, 743-760 (1997).
4. Anfinsen, C. B. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181, 223-230 (1973).
5. Goloubinoff, P., Christeller, J. T., Gatebgy, A. A. & Lorimer, G. H. Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonin proteins and MgATP. Nature 342, 884-889 (1989).
6. Buchner, J. et al. GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry 30, 1586-1591 (1991).
7. Martin, J. et al. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate. Nature 352, 36-42 (1991).
8. Cheng, M. Y. et al. Mitochondrial heat-shock protein hsp60 is essential for assembly of proteins imported into yeast mitochondria. Nature 337, 620-625 (1989).
9. Fayet, O., Ziegelhoffer, T. & Georgopoulos, C. The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171, 1379-1385 (1989).
10. Horwich, A. L., Low, K. B., Fenton, W. A., Hirshfield, I. N. & Furtak, K. Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL. Cell 74, 909-917 (1993).
11. Braig, K. et al. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371, 578-586 (1994).
12. Fenton, W. A., Kashi, Y., Furtak, K. & Horwich, A. L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371, 614-619 (1994).
13. Hlodan, R., Tempst, P. & Hartl, F. U. Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Nature Struct. Biol. 2, 587-595 (1995).
14. Lin, S., Schwarz, F. P. & Eisenstein, E. The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1011-1014 (1995).
15. Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E. & Fersht, A. R. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry 34, 14581-14587 (1995).
16. Weissman, J. S., Kashi, Y., Fenton, W. A. & Horwich, A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell 78, 693-702 (1994).
17. Ranson, N. A., Dunsten N, J., Burston, S. G. & Clarke, A. R. Chaperonins can catalyze the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. J. Mol. Biol. 250, 581-586 (1995).
18. Zahn, R., Perrett, S., Stenberg, G. & Fersht, A. T. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science 271, 642-645 (1996).
19. Walter, S., Lorimer, G. H. & Schmid, F. X. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9425-9430 (1996).
20. Weissman, J. S. et al. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83, 577-587 (1995).
21. Mayhew, M. et al. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 379, 420-426 (1996).
22. Weissman, J. S., Rye, H. S., Fenton, W. A., Beechem, J. M. & Horwich, A. L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84, 481-490 (1996).
23. Roseman, A. M., Chen, S., White, H., Braig, K. & Sabil, H. R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell 87, 241-251 (1996).
24. Yifrach, O. & Horovitz, A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255, 356-361 (1996).
25. Gray, T. E. & Fersht, A. R. Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES, FEBS Lett 292, 254-258 (1991); erratum, FEBS Lett. 310, 99 (1992).
26. Gray, T. E. & Fersht, A. R. Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES, FEBS Lett 292, 254-258 (1991); erratum, FEBS Lett. 310, 99 (1992).
27. Bochkareva, E. S., Lissin, N. M., Flynn, G. C., Rothman, J. E. & Girshovich, A. S. Positive cooperativity in the functioning of molecular chaperone GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6796-6800 (1992).
28. Yifrach, O. & Horovitz, A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemisty 34, 5303-5308 (1995).
29. Boisvert, D. C., Wang, J., Otwinowski, Z., Horwich, A. L. & Sigler, P. B. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP-γS. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 170-177 (1996).
30. Jackson, G. S. et al. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry 32, 2554-2563 (1993).
31. Todd, M. J., Viitanen, P. V. & Lorimer, G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding, Science 265, 659-666 (1994).
32. Todd, M. J., Lorimer, G. H. & Thirumalai, D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4030-4035 (1996).
33. Ranson, N. A., Burston, S. G. & Clarke, A. R. Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 656-664 (1997).
34. Taguchi, H. & Yoshida, M. Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin. FEBS Lett. 359, 195-198 (1995).
35. Smith, K. E. & Fisher, M. T. Interactions between the GroE chaperonins and rhodanese. Multiple intermediates and release and rebinding. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21517-21523 (1995).
36. Burston, S. G., Weissman, J. S., Farr, G. W., Fenton, W. A. & Horwich, A. L. Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex. Nature 383, 96-99 (1996).
37. Saibil, H. R., Dong, Z., Wood, S. & auf der Mauer, A. Binding of chaperonins. Nature 353, 25-26 (1991).
38. Langer, T., Pfeifer, G., Martin, J., Baumeister, W. & Hartl, F. U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 11, 4757-4765 (1992).
39. Ishii, N., Taguchi, H., Sumi, M. & Yoshida, M. Structure of holo-chaperonin studied with electron microscopy. FEBS Lett. 299, 169-174 (1992).
40. Chen, S. et al. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 371, 261-264 (1994).
41. Hunt, J. F., Weaver, A. J., Landry, S. J., Gierasch, L. & Deisenhofer, J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 379, 37-45 (1996).
42. Buckle, A. M., Zahn, R. & Fersht, A. R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3571-3575 (1997).
43. Rye, H. S. et al. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388, 792-798 (1997).
44. Landry, S. J., Zeilstra-Ryalls, J., Fayet, O., Georgopoulos, C. & Gierasch, L. M. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature 364, 255-258 (1993).
45. Landry, S. J., Taher, A., Georgopoulos, C. & Van Der Vies, S. M. Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11622-11627 (1996).
46. Zeilstra-Ryalls, J., Fayet, O. & Georgopoulos, C. Two classes of extragenic suppressor mutations identify functionally distinct regions of the GroEL chaperone of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 176, 6558-6565 (1994).
47. Murai, N., Makino, Y. & Yoshida, M. GroEL locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain cross-link can bind ATP and polypeptide but cannot process further reaction steps. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28229-28234 (1996).
48. Chandrasekhar, G. N., Tilly, K., Woolford, C., Hendrix, R. & Georgopoulos, C. Purification and properties of the GroES morphogenetic protein of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12414-12419 (1986).
49. Thiyagarajan, P., Henderson, S. J. & Joachimiak, A. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. Structure 4, 79-88 (1996).
50. Lambright, D. G., Noel, J. P., Hamm, H. E. & Sigler, P. B. Structural determinants for activation of the α-subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein. Nature 369, 621-628 (1994).
51. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
52. Brunger, A. T. X-PLOR Version 3.1 Manual 1 (Yale University, New Haven, 1993).
53. Braig, K., Adams, P. D. & Brunger, A. T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature Struct. Biol. 2, 1083-1094 (1995).
54. Jones, T. A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A47, 110-119 (1991).
55. Jones, T. A. in Molecular replacement (ed. Dodson, E.) 91-105 (SERC Daresbury Laboratory, 1992).
56. Rice, L. M. & Brunger, A. T. Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling | enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 19, 277-290 (1994).
57. Adams, P. D., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J. & Brunger, A. T. Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5018-5023 (1997).
58. Carson, M. Ribbon models of macromolecules. J. Mol. Graphics 5, 103-106 (1987).
59. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A. & Honig, B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 11, 281-296 (1991).