Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 630-642

  Saibil, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN 60; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 100; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90;

CELL FUNCTION; HUMAN; LONGEVITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP90 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84886412961     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm3658     Document Type: Review

References (124)

1. Gidalevitz, T., Prahlad, V. & Morimoto, R. I. The stress of protein misfolding: from single cells to multicellular organisms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a009704 (2011).
2. Taylor, R. C. & Dillin, A. Aging as an event of proteostasis collapse. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a004440 (2011).
3. Korennykh, A. & Walter, P. Structural basis of the unfolded protein response. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 251-277 (2012).
4. Hartl, F. U., Bracher, A. & Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475, 324-332 (2011).
5. Bukau, B., Weissman, J. & Horwich, A. Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell 125, 443-451 (2006).
6. Mayer, M. P. Gymnastics of molecular chaperones. Mol. Cell 39, 321-331 (2010).
7. Kampinga, H. H. & Craig, E. A. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nature Rev. Mol Cell. Biol. 11, 579-592 (2010).
8. Zuiderweg, E. R. et al. Allostery in the Hsp70 chaperone proteins. Top. Curr. Chem. 328, 99-153 (2013).
9. Young, J. C. Mechanisms of the Hsp70 chaperone system. Biochem. Cell Biol. 88, 291-300 (2010).
10. Sharma, S. K., De los Rios, P., Christen, P., Lustig, A. & Goloubinoff, P. The kinetic parameters and energy cost of the Hsp70 chaperone as a polypeptide unfoldase. Nature Chem. Biol. 6, 914-920 (2010).
11. Rothnie, A., Clarke, A. R., Kuzmic, P., Cameron, A. & Smith, C. J. A sequential mechanism for clathrin cage disassembly by 70-kDa heat-shock cognate protein (Hsc70) and auxilin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6927-6932 (2011).
12. Shorter, J. The mammalian disaggregase machinery: Hsp110 synergizes with Hsp70 and Hsp40 to catalyze protein disaggregation and reactivation in a cell-free system. PLoS ONE 6, e26319 (2011).
13. Rampelt, H. et al. Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. EMBO J. 31, 4221-4235 (2012).
14. Song, Y. et al. Molecular chaperone Hsp110 rescues a vesicle transport defect produced by an ALS-associated mutant SOD1 protein in squid axoplasm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5428-5433 (2013).
15. Mattoo, R. U. H., Sharma, S. K., Priya, S., Finka, A. & Goloubinoff, P. Hsp110 is a bona fide chaperone using ATP to unfold stable misfolded polypeptides and reciprocally collaborate with Hsp70 to solubilize protein aggregates. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 21399-21411 (2013).
16. Flaherty, K. M., Deluca-Flaherty, C. & McKay, D. B. 3-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70 k heat-shock cognate protein. Nature 346, 623-628 (1990).
17. Bork, P., Sander, C. & Valencia, A. An ATPase domain common to prokaryotic cell-cycle proteins, sugar kinases, actin, and Hsp70 heat-shock proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7290-7294 (1992).
18. Zhu, X. T. et al. Structural analysis of substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 272, 1606-1614 (1996).
19. Liu, Q. & Hendrickson, W. A. Insights into Hsp70 chaperone activity from a crystal structure of the yeast Hsp110 Sse1. Cell 131, 106-120 (2007).
20. Kityk, R., Kopp, J., Sinning, I. & Mayer, M. P. Structure and dynamics of the ATP-bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. Mol. Cell. 48, 863-874 (2012).
21. Zhuravleva, A., Clerico, E. M. & Gierasch, L. M. An interdomain energetic tug-of-war creates the allosterically active state in Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Cell 151, 1296-1307 (2012).
22. Qi, R. et al. Allosteric opening of the polypeptide-binding site when an Hsp70 binds ATP. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 900-907 (2013).
23. Jiang, J. et al. Structural basis of J cochaperone binding and regulation of Hsp70. Mol. Cell 28, 422-433 (2007).
24. Ahmad, A. et al. Heat shock protein 70 kDa chaperone/DnaJ cochaperone complex employs an unusual dynamic interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18966-18971 (2011).
25. Li, J. Z., Qian, X. G. & Sha, B. The crystal structure of the yeast Hsp40 Ydj1 complexed with its peptide substrate. Structure 11, 1475-1483 (2003).
26. Rodriguez, F. et al. Molecular basis for regulation of the heat shock transcription factor ?32 by the DnaK and DnaJ chaperones. Mol. Cell 32, 347-358 (2008).
27. Petrova, K., Oyadomari, S., Hendershot, L. M. & Ron, D. Regulated association of misfolded endoplasmic reticulum lumenal proteins with p58/ DNAJc3. EMBO J. 27, 2862-2872 (2008).
28. Harrison, C. J., Hayer-Hartl, M., Di Liberto, M., Hartl, F. & Kuriyan, J. Crystal structure of the nucleotide exchange factor GrpE bound to the ATPase domain of the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 276, 431-435 (1997).
29. Schuermann, J. P. et al. Structure of the Hsp110:Hsc70 nucleotide exchange machine. Mol. Cell 31, 232-243 (2008).
30. Polier, S., Dragovic, Z., Hartl, F. U. & Bracher, A. structural basis for the cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp110 chaperones in protein folding. Cell 133, 1068-1079 (2008).
31. Pratt, W. B. & Toft, D. O. Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones. Endrocrine Rev. 18, 306-360 (1997).
32. Li, J., Soroka, J. & Buchner, J. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery: conformational dynamics and regulation by co-chaperones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 624-635 (2012).
33. Didenko, T., Duarte, A. M. S., Karagoz, G. E. & Rudiger, S. G. D. Hsp90 structure and function studied by NMR spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 636-647 (2012).
34. Johnson, J. L. Evolution and function of diverse Hsp90 homologs and cochaperone proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 607-613 (2012).
35. Taipale, M., Jarosz, D. F. & Lindquist, S. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 515-528 (2010).
36. Jarosz, D. F. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation, Science 330, 1820-1824 (2010).
37. Ali, M. M. et al. Crystal structure of an Hsp90- nucleotide-p23/Sba1 closed chaperone complex. Nature 440, 1013-1017 (2006).
38. Krukenberg, K. A. et al. Conformational dynamics of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Q. Rev. Biophys. 44, 229-255 (2011).
39. Prodromou, C. et al. The ATPase cycle of Hsp90 drives a molecular 'clamp' via transient dimerization of the N-terminal domains. EMBO J. 19, 4383-4392 (2000).
40. Dutta, R. & Inouye, M. GHKL, an emergent ATPase/ kinase superfamily. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 24-28 (2000).
41. Mickler, M., Hessling, M., Ratzke, C., Buchner, J. & Hugel, T. The large conformational changes of Hsp90 are only weakly coupled to ATP hydrolysis. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 281-286 (2009).
42. Siligardi, G. et al. Regulation of Hsp90 by the co-chaperone Cdc37p/p50cdc37. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 20151-20159 (2002).
43. Prodromou, C. et al. Regulation of Hsp90 ATPase activity by tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-domain co-chaperones. EMBO J. 18, 754-762 (1999).
44. Chen, S. & Smith, D. F. Hop as an adaptor in the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and Hsp90 chaperone machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 35194-35200 (1998).
45. Retzlaff, M. et al. Asymmetric activation of the Hsp90 dimer by its cochaperone Aha1. Mol. Cell 37, 344-354 (2010).
46. Theodoraki, M. A. & Caplan, A. J. Quality control and fate determination of Hsp90 client proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 683-688 (2012).
47. Southworth, D. R. & Agard, D. A. Client-loading conformation of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone revealed in the cryo-EM structure of the human Hsp90:Hop complex. Mol. Cell 42, 771-781 (2011).
48. Vaughan, C. K. et al. Structure of an Hsp90-Cdc37- Cdk4 complex. Mol. Cell 23, 697-707 (2006).
49. Fang, L. Ricketson, D. Getubig, L. & Darimont, B. Unliganded and hormone-bound glucocorticoid receptors interact with distinct hydrophobic sites in the Hsp90 C-terminal domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18487-18492 (2006).
50. Genest, O. et al. Uncovering a region of heat shock protein 90 important for client binding in E. coli and chaperone function in yeast. Mol. Cell 49, 464-473 (2013).
51. Trepel, J., Mollapour, M., Giaccone, G. & Neckers, L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 10, 537-549 (2010).
52. Hemmingsen, S. M. et al. Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature 333, 330-334 (1988).
53. Goloubinoff, P., Gatenby, A. A. & Lorimer, G. H. GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oligomers in Escherichia coli. Nature 337, 44-47 (1989).
54. Ostermann, J., Horwich, A. L., Neupert, W. & Hartl, F. U. Protein folding in mitochondria requires complex formation with hsp60 and ATP hydrolysis. Nature 341, 125-130 (1989).
55. Horwich, A. L. & Fenton, W. A. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding. Q. Rev. Biophys. 42, 83-116 (2009).
56. Saibil, H. R., Fenton, W. A., Clare, D. K. & Horwich, A. L. Structure and allostery of the chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 1476-1487 (2013).
57. Braig, K. et al. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371, 578-586 (1994).
58. Xu, Z., Horwich, A. L. & Sigler, P. B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388, 741-750 (1997).
59. Farr, G. W. et al. Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell 100, 561-573 (2000).
60. Elad, N. et al. Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Mol. Cell 26, 415-426 (2007).
61. Lin, Z., Madan, D. & Rye, H. S. GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 303-311 (2008).
62. Motojima, F., Chaudhry, C., Fenton, W. A., Farr, G. W. & Horwich, A. L. Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15005-15012 (2004).
63. Chaudhuri, T. K., Farr, G. W., Fenton, W. A., Rospert, S. & Horwich, A. L. GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated. Cell 107, 235-246 (2001).
64. Clare, D. K., Bakkes, P. J., van Heerikhuizen, H., van der Vies, S. M. & Saibil, H. R. Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber. Nature 457, 107-110 (2009).
65. Clare, D. K. et al. ATP-triggered molecular mechanics of the chaperonin GroEL. Cell 149, 113-123 (2012).
66. Yifrach, O. & Horovitz, A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34, 5303-5308 (1995).
67. Miyazaki, T. et al. GroEL-substrate-GroES ternary complexes are an important transient intermediate of the chaperonin cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50621-50628 (2002).
68. Nojima, T., Murayama, S., Yoshida, M. & Motojima, F. Determination of the number of active GroES subunits in the fused heptamer GroES required for interactions with GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 18385-18392 (2008).
69. Buckle, A. M., Zahn, R. & Fersht, A. R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3571-3575 (1997).
70. Chen, L. & Sigler, P. B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell 99, 757-768 (1999).
71. Clare, D., Bakkes, P. J., van Heerikhuizen, H., van der Vies, S. M. & Saibil, H. R. An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex. J. Mol. Biol. 358, 905-911 (2006).
72. Chen, D.-H. et al. Visualizing GroEL/ES in the act of encapsulating a folding protein. Cell 153, 1354-1365 (2013).
73. Ranson, N. A. et al. Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 147-152 (2006).
74. Fei, X., Yang, D., LaRonde-LeBlanc, N. & Lorimer, G. H. Crystal structure of a GroEL-ADP complex in the relaxed allosteric state at 2.7 Å resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2958-E2966 (2013).
75. Ditzel, L. et al. Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT. Cell 93, 125-138 (1998).
76. Kalisman, N., Adams, C. M. & Levitt, M. Subunit order of eukaryotic TRiC/CCT chaperonin by cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and combinatorial homology modeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2884-2889 (2012).
77. Leitner, A. et al. The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Structure 20, 814-825 (2012).
78. Clare, D. K. et al. Multiple states of a nucleotide-bound group 2 chaperonin. Structure 16, 528-534 (2008).
79. Zhang, J. et al. Mechanism of folding chamber closure in a group II chaperonin. Nature 463, 379-383 (2010).
80. Huo, Y. et al. Crystal structure of group II chaperonin in the open state. Structure 18, 1270-1279 (2010).
81. Cong, Y. et al. Symmetry-free cryo-EM structures of the chaperonin TRiC along its ATPase-driven conformational cycle. EMBO J. 31, 720-730 (2011).
82. Horovitz, A. & Willison, K. R. Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. Curr. Opin. 15, 646-651 (2005).
83. Bigotti, M. G. & Clarke, A. R. Cooperativity in the thermosome. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 13-26 (2005).
84. Neuwald, A. F., Aravind, L., Spouge, J. L. & Koonin, E. V. AAA+: a class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 9, 27-43 (1999).
85. Hanson, P. I. & Whiteheart, S. W. AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 519-529 (2005).
86. Wang, J. et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 9, 177-184 (2001).
87. Effantin, G., Ishikawa, T., De Donatis, G. M., Maurizi, M. R. & Steven, A. C. Local and global mobility in the ClpA AAA+ chaperone detected by cryo-electron microscopy: functional connotations. Structure 18, 553-562 (2010).
88. Lander, G. C. et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482, 186-191 (2012).
89. da Fonseca, P. C., He, J. & Morris, E. P. Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 46, 54-66 (2012).
90. Cranz-Mileva, S. et al. The flexible attachment of the N-domains to the ClpA ring body allows their use on demand. J. Mol. Biol. 378, 412-424 (2008).
91. Zhang, T. et al. Flexible connection of the N-terminal domain in ClpB modulates substrate binding and the aggregate reactivation efficiency. Proteins 80, 2758-2768 (2012).
92. Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 587-612 (2011).
93. Weber-Ban, E. U., Reid, B. G., Miranker, A. D. & Horwich, A. L. Global unfolding of a substrate protein by the Hsp100 chaperone ClpA. Nature 401, 90-93 (1999).
94. Hinnerwisch, J., Fenton, W. A., Furtak, K. J., Farr, G. W. & Horwich, A. L. Loops in the central channel of ClpA chaperone mediate protein binding, unfolding, and translocation. Cell 121, 1029-1041 (2005).
95. Glynn, S. E., Martin, A., Nager, A. R., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139, 744-756 (2009).
96. Maillard, R. A. et al. ClpX(P) generates mechanical force to unfold and translocate its protein substrates. Cell 145, 459-469 (2011).
97. DeLaBarre, B. & Brunger, A. T. Nucleotide dependent motion and mechanism of action of p97/VCP. J. Mol. Biol. 347, 437-452 (2005).
98. Niwa, H. et al. The role of the N-domain in the ATPase activity of the mammalian AAA ATPasep97/VCP. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 8561-8570 (2012).
99. Barthelme, D. & Sauer, R. T. Identification of the Cdc48·20S proteasome as an ancient AAA+ proteolytic machine. Science 337, 843-846 (2012).
100. Glover, J. R. & Lindquist, S. Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 94, 73-82 (1998).
101. Goloubinoff, P., Mogk, A., Zvi, A. P., Tomoyasu, T. & Bukau, B. Sequential mechanism of solubilization and refolding of stable protein aggregates by a bichaperone network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13732-13737 (1999).
102. Miot, M. et al. Species-specific collaboration of heat shock proteins (Hsp) 70 and 100 in thermotolerance and protein disaggregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6915-6920 (2011).
103. Lee, S. et al. The structure of ClpB: a molecular chaperone that rescues proteins from an aggregated state. Cell 115, 229-240 (2003).
104. Weibezahn, J. et al. Thermotolerance requires refolding of aggregated proteins by substrate translocation through the central pore of ClpB. Cell 119, 653-665 (2004).
105. Seyffer, F. et al. Hsp70 proteins bind Hsp100 regulatory M domains to activate AAA+ disaggregase at aggregate surfaces. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1347-1355 (2012).
106. Rosenzweig, R., Moradi, S., Zarrine-Afsar, A., Glover, J. R. & Kay, L. E. Unraveling the mechanism of protein disaggregation through a ClpB-DnaK interaction. Science 339, 1080-1083 (2013).
107. Wendler, P. et al. Atypical AAA+ subunit packing creates an expanded cavity for disaggregation by the protein-remodeling factor Hsp104. Cell 131, 1366-1377 (2007).
108. Lee, S., Sielaff, B., Lee, J. & Tsai, F. T. CryoEM structure of Hsp104 and its mechanistic implication for protein disaggregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8135-8140 (2010).
109. Wang, F. et al. Structure and mechanism of the hexameric MecA-ClpC molecular machine. Nature 471, 331-335 (2011).
110. Oguchi, Y. et al. A tightly regulated molecular toggle controls AAA+ disaggregase. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1338-1346 (2012).
111. Kaushal, S. & Khorana, H. G. Structure and function in rhodopsin. 7. Point mutations associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Biochemistry 33, 6121-6128 (1994).
112. Mendes, H. F., Van der Spuy, J., Chapple, J. P. & Cheetham, M. E. Mechanisms of cell death in rhodopsin retinitis pigmentosa: implications for therapy. Trends Mol. Med. 11, 177-185 (2005).
113. Chiti, F. & Dobson, C. M. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 333-366 (2006).
114. Buxbaum, J. N. & Linke, R. P. A molecular history of the amyloidoses. J. Mol. Biol. 421, 142-159 (2012).
115. Eisenberg, D. & Jucker, M. The amyloid state of proteins in human diseases. Cell 148, 1188-1203 (2012).
116. Auluck, P. K., Chan, H. Y. E., Trojanowski, J. Q., Lee, V. M. Y. & Bonini, N. M. Chaperone suppression of α-synuclein toxicity in a Drosophila model for Parkinson's disease. Science 295, 865-868 (2002).
117. Kitamura, A. et al. Cytosolic chaperonin prevents polyglutamine toxicity with altering the aggregation state. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 1163-1170 (2006).
118. Tam, S., Geller, R., Spiess, C. & Frydman, J. The chaperonin TRiC controls polyglutamine aggregation and toxicity through subunit-specific interactions. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 1155-1162 (2006).
119. Behrends, C. et al. Chaperonin TRiC promotes the assembly of polyQ expansion proteins into nontoxic oligomers. Mol. Cell 23, 887 -897 (2006).
120. Balch, W. E., Morimoto, R. I., Dillin, A. & Kelly, J. W. Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science 319, 916-919 (2008).
121. Powers, E. T., Morimoto, R. I., Dillin, A., Kelly, J. W. & Balch, W. E. Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 959-991 (2009).
122. Shiau, A. K., Harris, S. F., Southworth, D. R. & Agard, D. A. Structural analysis of E. coli hsp90 reveals dramatic nucleotide-dependent conformational rearrangements, Cell 127, 329-340 (2006).
123. Dollins, D. E., Warren, J. J., Immormino, R. M. & Gewirth, D. T. Structures of GRP94-nucleotide complexes reveal mechanistic differences between the hsp90 chaperones. Mol. Cell 28, 41-56 (2007).
124. Sousa, M. C. et al. Crystal and solution structures of an HslUV protease-chaperone complex. Cell 103, 633-643 (2000).