Building a KATalogue of acetyllysine targeting and function

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 109-118

  Downey, Michael ^a   Baetz, Kristin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acetylation; Acetylome; High content screening; KAT; KDAC; Synthetic lethality

Indexed keywords

ACETYLATION; GENETIC MODEL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MODEL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; BIOTINYLATION; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LETHAL MUTATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

AMIDASE; LYSINE; LYSINE ACETYLTRANSFERASE;

ACETYLATION; AMIDOHYDROLASES; BIOTINYLATION; GENOMICS; LYSINE; LYSINE ACETYLTRANSFERASES; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYNTHETIC LETHAL MUTATIONS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84964804605     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv045     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Brownell JE, Zhou J, Ranalli T, et al. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 1996;84:843-51.
2. Arrowsmith CH, Bountra C, Fish PV, et al. Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012;11:384-400.
3. Beltrao P, Albanese V, Kenner LR, et al. Systematic functional prioritization of protein posttranslational modifications. Cell 2012;150:413-25.
4. Henriksen P, Wagner SA, Weinert BT, et al. Proteome-wide analysis of lysine acetylation suggests its broad regulatory scope in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012;11:1510-22.
5. Weinert BT, Wagner SA, Horn H, et al. Proteome-wide mapping of the Drosophila acetylome demonstrates a high degree of conservation of lysine acetylation. Sci Signal 2011;4:ra48.
6. Downey M, Johnson JR, Davey NE, et al. Acetylome profiling reveals overlap in the regulation of diverse processes by sirtuins, gcn5, and esa1. Mol Cell Proteomics 2015;14:162-76.
7. Weinert BT, Iesmantavicius V, Moustafa T, et al. Acetylation dynamics and stoichiometry in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Syst Biol 2014;10:716.
8. Chan ET, Cherry JM. Considerations for creating and annotating the budding yeast Genome Map at SGD: a progress report. Database (Oxford) 2012;2012:bar057.
9. Galdieri L, Zhang T, Rogerson D, et al. Protein acetylation and acetyl coenzyme a metabolism in budding yeast. Eukaryot Cell 2014;13:1472-83.
10. VanDemark AP, Kasten MM, Ferris E, et al. Autoregulation of the rsc4 tandem bromodomain by gcn5 acetylation. Mol Cell 2007;27:817-28.
11. Choi JK, Grimes DE, Rowe KM, et al. Acetylation of Rsc4p by Gcn5p is essential in the absence of histone H3 acetylation. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:6967-72.
12. Charles GM, Chen C, Shih SC, et al. Site-specific acetylation mark on an essential chromatin-remodeling complex promotes resistance to replication stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:10620-5.
13. Kim JH, Saraf A, Florens L, et al. Gcn5 regulates the dissociation of SWI/SNF from chromatin by acetylation of Swi2/ Snf2. Genes Dev 2010;24:2766-71.
14. Cai L, McCormick MA, Kennedy BK, et al. Integration of multiple nutrient cues and regulation of lifespan by ribosomal transcription factor Ifh1. Cell Rep 2013;4:1063-71.
15. Downey M, Knight B, Vashisht AA, et al. Gcn5 and sirtuins regulate acetylation of the ribosomal protein transcription factor Ifh1. Curr Biol 2013;23:1638-48.
16. Lin YY, Lu JY, Zhang J, et al. Protein acetylation microarray reveals that NuA4 controls key metabolic target regulating gluconeogenesis. Cell 2009;136:1073-84.
17. Lu JY, Lin YY, Sheu JC, et al. Acetylation of yeast AMPK controls intrinsic aging independently of caloric restriction. Cell 2011;146:969-79.
18. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Kim W, et al. A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008;321:566-9.
19. Rowland BD, Roig MB, Nishino T, et al. Building sister chromatid cohesion: smc3 acetylation counteracts an antiestablishment activity. Mol Cell 2009;33:763-74.
20. Beckouet F, Hu B, Roig MB, et al. An Smc3 acetylation cycle is essential for establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell 2010;39:689-99.
21. Sutani T, Kawaguchi T, Kanno R, et al. Budding yeast Wpl1(Rad61)-Pds5 complex counteracts sister chromatid cohesion- establishing reaction. Curr Biol 2009;19:492-7.
22. Borges V, Lehane C, Lopez-Serra L, et al. Hos1 deacetylates Smc3 to close the cohesin acetylation cycle. Mol Cell 2010;39:677-88.
23. Xiong B, Lu S, Gerton JL. Hos1 is a lysine deacetylase for the Smc3 subunit of cohesin. Curr Biol 2010;20:1660-5.
24. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Unal E, Koshland D. Distinct targets of the Eco1 acetyltransferase modulate cohesion in S phase and in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2009;34:311-21.
25. Ghosh S, Gardner JM, Smoyer CJ, et al. Acetylation of the SUN protein Mps3 by Eco1 regulates its function in nuclear organization. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:2546-59.
26. Tao R, Xue H, Zhang J, et al. Deacetylase Rpd3 facilitates checkpoint adaptation by preventing Rad53 overactivation. Mol Cell Biol 2013;33:4212-24.
27. Mallory MJ, Law MJ, Sterner DE, et al. Gcn5p-dependent acetylation induces degradation of the meiotic transcriptional repressor Ume6p. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:1609-17.
28. Law MJ, Mallory MJ, Dunbrack RL, Jr., et al. Acetylation of the transcriptional repressor Ume6p allows efficient promoter release and timely induction of the meiotic transient transcription program in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2014;34:631-42.
29. Lin YY, Qi Y, Lu JY, et al. A comprehensive synthetic genetic interaction network governing yeast histone acetylation and deacetylation. Genes Dev 2008;22:2062-74.
30. Kaluarachchi Duffy S, Friesen H, Baryshnikova A, et al. Exploring the yeast acetylome using functional genomics. Cell 2012;149:936-48.
31. Mitchell L, Lau A, Lambert JP, et al. Regulation of septin dynamics by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Lysine Acetyltransferase NuA4. PLoS One 2011;6:e25336.
32. Yi C, Ma M, Ran L, et al. Function and molecular mechanism of acetylation in autophagy regulation. Science 2012;336:474-7.
33. Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M, Dixon S, et al. Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol 2010;470:145-79.
34. Kuzmin E, Sharifpoor S, Baryshnikova A, et al. Synthetic genetic array analysis for global mapping of genetic networks in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1205:143-68.
35. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 2001;294:2364-8.
36. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004;303:808- 13.
37. Pan X, Ye P, Yuan DS, et al. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2006;124:1069-81.
38. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010;327:425-31.
39. Fillingham J, Recht J, Silva AC, et al. Chaperone control of the activity and specificity of the histone H3 acetyltransferase Rtt109. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:4342-53.
40. Liu B, Larsson L, Caballero A, et al. The polarisome is required for segregation and retrograde transport of protein aggregates. Cell 2010;140:257-67.
41. Mitchell L, Lambert JP, Gerdes M, et al. Functional dissection of the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase reveals its role as a genetic hub and that Eaf1 is essential for complex integrity. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:2244-56.
42. Chatr-Aryamontri A, Breitkreutz BJ, Oughtred R, et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D470-8.
43. Koh JL, Ding H, Costanzo M, et al. DRYGIN: a database of quantitative genetic interaction networks in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:D502-7.
44. Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 2007;446:806-10.
45. Rossetto D, Cramet M, Wang AY, et al. Eaf5/7/3 form a functionally independent NuA4 submodule linked to RNA polymerase II-coupled nucleosome recycling. EMBO J 2014;33:1397-415.
46. Bhat W, Ahmad S, Cote J. TINTIN, at the interface of chromatin, transcription elongation, and mRNA processing. RNA Biol 2015;12:486-9.
47. Cheng X, Cote J. A new companion of elongating RNA Polymerase II: TINTIN, an independent sub-module of NuA4/ TIP60 for nucleosome transactions. Transcription 2014;5:e995571.
48. Mnaimneh S, Davierwala AP, Haynes J, et al. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell 2004;118:31-44.
49. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell 2006;21:319-30.
50. Huang D, Kaluarachchi S, van Dyk D, et al. Dual regulation by pairs of cyclin-dependent protein kinases and histone deacetylases controls G1 transcription in budding yeast. PLoS Biol 2009;7:e1000188.
51. Sharifpoor S, van Dyk D, Costanzo M, et al. Functional wiring of the yeast kinome revealed by global analysis of genetic network motifs. Genome Res 2012;22:791-801.
52. Sopko R, Huang D, Smith JC, et al. Activation of the Cdc42p GTPase by cyclin-dependent protein kinases in budding yeast. EMBO J 2007;26:4487-500.
53. Sopko R, Papp B, Oliver SG, et al. Phenotypic activation to discover biological pathways and kinase substrates. Cell Cycle 2006;5:1397-402.
54. Liu C, van Dyk D, Li Y, et al. A genome-wide synthetic dosage lethality screen reveals multiple pathways that require the functioning of ubiquitin-binding proteins Rad23 and Dsk2. BMC Biol 2009;7:75.
55. Douglas AC, Smith AM, Sharifpoor S, et al. Functional analysis with a barcoder yeast gene overexpression system. G3 (Bethesda) 2012;2:1279-89.
56. Magtanong L, Ho CH, Barker SL, et al. Dosage suppression genetic interaction networks enhance functional wiring diagrams of the cell. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:505-11.
57. Measday V, Baetz K, Guzzo J, et al. Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for chromosome segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:13956-61.
58. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R, et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 2001;293:2101-5.
59. Huh WK, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 2003;425:686-91.
60. Chong YT, Cox MJ, Andrews B. Proteome-wide screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using the yeast GFP collection. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012;736:169-78.
61. Breker M, Gymrek M, Schuldiner M. A novel single-cell screening platform reveals proteome plasticity during yeast stress responses. J Cell Biol 2013;200:839-50.
62. Chong YT, Koh JL, Friesen H, et al. Yeast proteome dynamics from single cell imaging and automated analysis. Cell 2015;161:1413-24.
63. Tkach JM, Yimit A, Lee AY, et al. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2012;14:966-76.
64. Vizeacoumar FJ, van Dyk N, F SV, et al. Integrating highthroughput genetic interaction mapping and high-content screening to explore yeast spindle morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 2010;188:69-81.
65. Buchan JR, Kolaitis RM, Taylor JP, et al. Eukaryotic stress granules are cleared by autophagy and Cdc48/VCP function. Cell 2013;153:1461-74.
66. Liu IC, Chiu SW, Lee HY, et al. The histone deacetylase Hos2 forms an Hsp42-dependent cytoplasmic granule in quiescent yeast cells. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:1231-42.
67. Koh JL, Chong YT, Friesen H, et al. CYCLoPs: A comprehensive database constructed from automated analysis of protein abundance and subcellular localization patterns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 2015;5:1223-32.
68. Breker M, Gymrek M, Moldavski O, et al. LoQAtE-Localization and Quantitation ATlas of the yeast proteomE. A new tool for multiparametric dissection of single-protein behavior in response to biological perturbations in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D726-30.
69. Mitchell L, Huard S, Cotrut M, et al. mChIP-KAT-MS, a method to map protein interactions and acetylation sites for lysine acetyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:E1641-50.
70. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000;403:623-7.
71. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006;440:637-43.
72. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002;415:180-3.
73. Lee KK, Sardiu ME, Swanson SK, et al. Combinatorial depletion analysis to assemble the network architecture of the SAGA and ADA chromatin remodeling complexes. Mol Syst Biol 2011;7:503.
74. Durand A, Bonnet J, Fournier M, et al. Mapping the deubiquitination module within the SAGA complex. Structure 2014;22:1553-9.
75. Setiaputra D, Ross JD, Lu S, et al. Conformational flexibility and subunit arrangement of the modular yeast Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase complex. J Biol Chem 2015;290:10057-70.
76. Han Y, Luo J, Ranish J, et al. Architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SAGA transcription coactivator complex. EMBO J 2014;33:2534-46.
77. Wang Q, Zhang Y, Yang C, et al. Acetylation of metabolic enzymes coordinates carbon source utilization and metabolic flux. Science 2010;327:1004-7.
78. Kim SC, Sprung R, Chen Y, et al. Substrate and functional diversity of lysine acetylation revealed by a proteomics survey. Mol Cell 2006;23:607-18.
79. Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 2009;325:834-40.
80. Madsen CT, Sylvestersen KB, Young C, et al. Biotin starvation causes mitochondrial protein hyperacetylation and partial rescue by the SIRT3-like deacetylase Hst4p. Nat Commun 2015;6:7726.
81. Basu A, Rose KL, Zhang J, et al. Proteome-wide prediction of acetylation substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:13785-90.
82. Li Y, Wang M, Wang H, et al. Accurate in silico identification of species-specific acetylation sites by integrating protein sequence- derived and functional features. Sci Rep 2014;4:5765.
83. Bryson BD, Del Rosario AM, Gootenberg JS, et al. Engineered bromodomains to explore the acetylproteome. Proteomics 2015;15:1470-5.
84. Roux KJ, Kim DI, Burke B. BioID: a screen for protein-protein interactions. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 2013;74:Unit 19.23.
85. Bheda P, Swatkoski S, Fiedler KL, et al. Biotinylation of lysine method identifies acetylated histone H3 lysine 79 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a substrate for Sir2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:E916-25.
86. Joshi AA, Struhl K. Eaf3 chromodomain interaction with methylated H3-K36 links histone deacetylation to Pol II elongation. Mol Cell 2005;20:971-8.
87. Lindstrom KC, Vary JC, Jr., Parthun MR, et al. Isw1 functions in parallel with the NuA4 and Swr1 complexes in stress-induced gene repression. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26:6117-29.
88. Sadeh A, Movshovich N, Volokh M, et al. Fine-tuning of the Msn2/4-mediated yeast stress responses as revealed by systematic deletion of Msn2/4 partners. Mol Biol Cell 2011;22:3127-38.
89. Chen Y, Sprung R, Tang Y, et al. Lysine propionylation and butyrylation are novel post-translational modifications in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007;6:812-19.
90. Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhang Z, et al. Identification and verification of lysine propionylation and butyrylation in yeast core histones using PTMap software. J Proteome Res 2009;8:900-6.
91. Weinert BT, Scholz C, Wagner SA, et al. Lysine succinylation is a frequently occurring modification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and extensively overlaps with acetylation. Cell Rep 2013;4:842-51.
92. Sabari BR, Tang Z, Huang H, et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation. Mol Cell 2015;58:203-15.
93. Smith BC, Denu JM. Sir2 deacetylases exhibit nucleophilic participation of acetyl-lysine in NADp cleavage. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129:5802-3.
94. Smith BC, Denu JM. Acetyl-lysine analog peptides as mechanistic probes of protein deacetylases. J Biol Chem 2007;282:37256-65.
95. Tang Y, Holbert MA, Wurtele H, et al. Fungal Rtt109 histone acetyltransferase is an unexpected structural homolog of metazoan p300/CBP. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008;15:738-45.