Site-specific acetylation mark on an essential chromatin-remodeling complex promotes resistance to replication stress

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 26, 2011, Pages 10620-10625

  Charles, Georgette M ^a   Chen, Changbin ^a   Shih, Susan C ^a   Collins, Sean R ^b   Beltrao, Pedro ^b   Zhang, Xin ^b   Sharma, Tanu ^a   Tan, Song ^c   Burlingame, Alma L ^b   Krogan, Nevan J ^a   Madhani, Hiten D ^a   Narlikar, Geeta J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; HYDROXYUREA;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA HISTONE INTERACTION; HISTONE ACETYLATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS;

ACETYLATION; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; LIGANDS; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79960594763     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1019735108     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Winter S, Fischle W (2010) Epigenetic markers and their cross-talk. Essays Biochem 48: 45-61.
2. Clapier CR, Cairns BR (2009) The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 78:273-304.
3. Agalioti T, Chen G, Thanos D (2002) Deciphering the transcriptional histone acetylation code for a human gene. Cell 111:381-392. (Pubitemid 35341391)
4. Agalioti T, et al. (2000) Ordered recruitment of chromatin modifying and general transcription factors to the IFN-beta promoter. Cell 103:667-678.
5. Carey M, Li B, Workman JL (2006) RSC exploits histone acetylation to abrogate the nucleosomal block to RNA polymerase II elongation. Mol Cell 24:481-487. (Pubitemid 44647905)
6. Hassan AH, Awad S, Prochasson P (2006) The Swi2/Snf2 bromodomain is required for the displacement of SAGA and the octamer transfer of SAGA-acetylated nucleosomes. J Biol Chem 281:18126-18134. (Pubitemid 44043078)
7. Hassan AH, et al. (2002) Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 111:369-379. (Pubitemid 35345152)
8. VanDemark AP, et al. (2007) Autoregulation of the rsc4 tandem bromodomain by gcn5 acetylation. Mol Cell 27:817-828. (Pubitemid 47333230)
9. Sengupta SM, et al. (2001) The interactions of yeast SWI/SNF and RSC with the nucleosome before and after chromatin remodeling. J Biol Chem 276:12636-12644.
10. Ferreira R, et al. (2007) Site-specific acetylation of ISWI by GCN5. BMC Mol Biol 8: 73-84.
11. Sims RJ, 3rd, Reinberg D (2008) Is there a code embedded in proteins that is based on post-translational modifications? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:815-820.
12. Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR (2002) Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation. Genes Dev 16:2120-2134.
13. Choi JK, Grimes DE, Rowe KM, Howe LJ (2008) Acetylation of Rsc4p by Gcn5p is essential in the absence of histone H3 acetylation. Mol Cell Biol 28:6967-6972.
14. Balasubramanian R, Pray-Grant MG, Selleck W, Grant PA, Tan S (2002) Role of the Ada2 and Ada3 transcriptional coactivators in histone acetylation. J Biol Chem 277:7989-7995. (Pubitemid 34968250)
15. Ferreira H, Flaus A, Owen-Hughes T (2007) Histone modifications influence the action of Snf2 family remodelling enzymes by different mechanisms. J Mol Biol 374:563-579. (Pubitemid 350018763)
16. Hassan AH, et al. (2007) Selective recognition of acetylated histones by bromodomains in transcriptional co-activators. Biochem J 402:125-133.
17. Somers J, Owen-Hughes T (2009) Mutations to the histone H3 alpha N region selectively alter the outcome of ATP-dependent nucleosome-remodelling reactions. Nucleic Acids Res 37:2504-2513.
18. Schuldiner M, et al. (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123:507-519. (Pubitemid 41546679)
19. Beltrao P, Cagney G, Krogan NJ (2010) Quantitative genetic interactions reveal biological modularity. Cell 141:739-745.
20. Collins SR, et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446:806-810. (Pubitemid 46582025)
21. Bandyopadhyay S, Kelley R, Krogan NJ, Ideker T (2008) Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLOS Comput Biol 4:e1000065.
22. Ulitsky I, Shlomi T, Kupiec M, Shamir R (2008) From E-MAPs to module maps: Dissecting quantitative genetic interactions using physical interactions. Mol Syst Biol 4:209-221.
23. Mizuguchi G, et al. (2004) ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303:343-348. (Pubitemid 38095768)
24. Wu WH, et al. (2005) Swc2 is a widely conserved H2AZ-binding module essential for ATP-dependent histone exchange. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:1064-1071.
25. Shen X, Mizuguchi G, Hamiche A, Wu C (2000) A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406:541-544. (Pubitemid 30625741)
26. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM (2004) Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119:777-788. (Pubitemid 40017685)
27. van Attikum H, Gasser SM (2005) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle 4:1011-1014.
28. Morrison AJ, Shen X (2009) Chromatin remodelling beyond transcription: The INO80 and SWR1 complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:373-384.
29. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Gasser SM (2007) Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 26:4113-4125. (Pubitemid 47462094)
30. Morrison AJ, et al. (2004) INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119:767-775. (Pubitemid 40017684)
31. Morrison AJ, et al. (2007) Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130:499-511. (Pubitemid 47198299)
32. Kasten M, et al. (2004) Tandem bromodomains in the chromatin remodeler RSC recognize acetylated histone H3 Lys14. EMBO J 23:1348-1359. (Pubitemid 38525006)
33. Soutourina J, et al. (2006) Rsc4 connects the chromatin remodeler RSC to RNA polymerases. Mol Cell Biol 26:4920-4933. (Pubitemid 43955809)
34. Fry RC, Begley TJ, Samson LD (2005) Genome-wide responses to DNA-damaging agents. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:357-377. (Pubitemid 41507436)
35. Harrison JC, Haber JE (2006) Surviving the breakup: The DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40:209-235. (Pubitemid 44956785)
36. Liang B, Qiu J, Ratnakumar K, Laurent BC (2007) RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 17:1432-1437. (Pubitemid 47259384)
37. Chen SH, Albuquerque CP, Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H (2010) A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 285:12803-12812.
38. Faucher D, Wellinger RJ (2010) Methylated H3K4, a transcription- associated histone modification, is involved in the DNA damage response pathway. PLoS Genet 6(8):1-16.
39. Kent NA, Chambers AL, Downs JA (2007) Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J Biol Chem 282:27693-27701.
40. Shim EY, et al. (2007) RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 27:1602-1613.
41. Wong LY, Recht J, Laurent BC (2006) Chromatin remodeling and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J Mol Histol 37:261-269. (Pubitemid 44795629)
42. Falbo KB, et al. (2009) Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1167-1172.
43. Shimada K, et al. (2008) Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr Biol 18:566-575.
44. Vincent JA, Kwong TJ, Tsukiyama T (2008) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling shapes the DNA replication landscape. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:477-484. (Pubitemid 351653590)
45. Shen X, Ranallo R, Choi E, Wu C (2003) Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 12:147-155. (Pubitemid 36945043)
46. Glozak MA, Seto E (2009) Acetylation/deacetylation modulates the stability of DNA replication licensing factor Cdt1. J Biol Chem 284:11446-11453.
47. Paolinelli R, Mendoza-Maldonado R, Cereseto A, Giacca M (2009) Acetylation by GCN5 regulates CDC6 phosphorylation in the S phase of the cell cycle. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:412-420.
48. Burgess RJ, Zhou H, Han J, Zhang Z (2010) A role for Gcn5 in replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell 37:469-480.
49. Escargueil AE, Soares DG, Salvador M, Larsen AK, Henriques JA (2008) What histone code for DNA repair? Mutat Res 658:259-270.
50. Burgess RJ, Zhang Z (2010) Roles for Gcn5 in promoting nucleosome assembly and maintaining genome integrity. Cell Cycle 9:2979-2985.
51. Ozdemir A, Masumoto H, Fitzjohn P, Verreault A, Logie C (2006) Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation: A new twist in the chromosome cycle. Cell Cycle 5:2602-2608. (Pubitemid 44785804)
52. Sif S, Stukenberg PT, Kirschner MW, Kingston RE (1998) Mitotic inactivation of a human SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev 12:2842-2851. (Pubitemid 28440143)
53. Hollstein M, Hainaut P (2010) Massively regulated genes: The example of TP53. J Pathol 220:164-173.
54. Wang L, Tang Y, Cole PA, Marmorstein R (2008) Structure and chemistry of the p300/ CBP and Rtt109 histone acetyltransferases: Implications for histone acetyltransferase evolution and function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18:741-747.