Are complexity and uncertainty distinct concepts in project management? A taxonomical examination from literature

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 688-700

  Padalkar, Milind ^a   Gopinath, Saji ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT KOZHIKODE   (India)

Author keywords

Complexity; Project management; Research methods; Taxonomy; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; TAXONOMIES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMPLEXITY; COMPLEXITY THEORY; DECISION THEORETIC APPROACH; NOVEL METHODOLOGY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; RESEARCH INTERESTS; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COMPLEXITY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH METHOD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84963945143     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Acebes F., Pajares J., Galán J.M., López-Paredes A. A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014, 32(3):423-434.
2. Ahern T., Leavy B., Byrne P.J. Complex project management as complex problem solving: a distributed knowledge management perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014, 32(8):1371-1381.
3. Al-Mashari M., Al-Mudimigh A., Zairi M. Enterprise resource planning: a taxonomy of critical factors. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 146(2):352-364.
4. Aloini D., Dulmin R., Mininno V. Risk management in ERP project introduction: review of the literature. Inf. Manag. 2007, 44(6):547-567.
5. Ancona D.G., Goodman P.S., Lawrence B.S., Tushman M.L. Time: a new research lens. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2001, 26(4):645-663.
6. Anderson P. Perspective: complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 1999, 10(3):216-232.
7. Atkinson R., Crawford L., Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24(8):687-698.
8. Austin S., Newton A., Steele J., Waskett P. Modelling and managing project complexity. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2002, 20(3):191-198.
9. Baccarini D. The concept of project complexity-a review. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 1996, 14(4):201-204.
10. Belout A., Gauvreau C. Factors influencing project success: the impact of human resource management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2004, 22(1):1-11.
11. Benbya H., McKelvey B. Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Inf. Technol. People 2006, 19(1):12-34.
12. Biedenbach T., Müller R. Paradigms in project management research: examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2011, 4(1):82-104.
13. Bosch-Rekveldt M., Jongkind Y., Mooi H., Bakker H., Verbraeck A. Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29(6):728-739.
14. Bowman R.A. Efficient estimation of arc criticalities in stochastic activity networks. Manag. Sci. 1995, 41(1):58-67.
15. Bradley E.H., Curry L.A., Devers K.J. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv. Res. 2007, 42(4):1758-1772.
16. Brady T., Davies A. From hero to hubris-reconsidering the project management of Heathrow's Terminal 5. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2010, 28(2):151-157.
17. Brady T., Davies A. Managing structural and dynamic complexity: a tale of two projects. Proj. Manag. J. 2014, 45(4):21-38.
18. Brady T., Davies A., Nightingale P. Dealing with uncertainty in complex projects: revisiting Klein and Meckling. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2012, 5(4):718-736.
19. Browning T.R. Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014, 32(2):229-241.
20. Browning T.R., Eppinger S.D. Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2002, 49(4):428-442.
21. Burnes B. Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: back to the future?. J. Chang. Manag. 2004, 4(4):309-325.
22. Burt J.M. Planning and dynamic control of projects under uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 1977, 24(3):249-258.
23. Chanas S., Zieliński P. Critical path analysis in the network with fuzzy activity times. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2001, 122(2):195-204.
24. Chapman C. Key points of contention in framing assumptions for risk and uncertainty management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24(4):303-313.
25. Chapman C., Ward S. Estimation and evaluation of uncertainty: a minimalist first pass approach. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2000, 18(6):369-383.
26. Chen S.P. Analysis of critical paths in a project network with fuzzy activity times. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 183(1):442-459.
27. Cho J.G., Yum B.J. An uncertainty importance measure of activities in PERT networks. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1997, 35(10):2737-2758.
28. Cho S.H., Eppinger S.D. A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2005, 52(3):316-328.
29. Christopher M., Peck H., Towill D. A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2006, 17(2):277-287.
30. Cicmil S., Williams T., Thomas J., Hodgson D. Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24(8):675-686.
31. Cilliers P. What can we learn from a theory of complexity?. Emergence 2000, 2(1):23-33.
32. Collyer S., Warren C.M. Project management approaches for dynamic environments. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2009, 27(4):355-364.
33. Cook T.M., Jennings R.H. Estimating a project's completion time distribution using intelligent simulation methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1979, 30(12):1103-1108.
34. Cooke-Davies T., Cicmil S., Crawford L., Richardson K. Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Proj. Manag. J. 2007, 38(2):50-61.
35. Creswell J.W., Miller D.L. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000, 39(3):124-130.
36. Danilovic M., Browning T.R. Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2007, 25(3):300-314.
37. De Meyer A., Loch C.H., Pich M.T. From variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2002, 43(2):60-67.
38. De Reyck B., Herroelen W. On the use of the complexity index as a measure of complexity in activity networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1996, 91(2):347-366.
39. Eden C., Williams T., Ackermann F., Howick S. The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51(3):291-300.
40. Elmaghraby S.E., Fathi Y., Taner M.R. On the sensitivity of project variability to activity mean duration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 1999, 62(3):219-232.
41. Ford D.N., Lander D.M., Voyer J.J. A real options approach to valuing strategic flexibility in uncertain construction projects. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2002, 20(4):343-351.
42. Geraldi J., Adlbrecht G. On faith, fact, and interaction in projects. Proj. Manag. J. 2007, 38(1):32-43.
43. Geraldi J.G. The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: a conceptual model. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2008, 26(4):348-356.
44. Geraldi J., Maylor H., Williams T. Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): a systematic review of the complexities of projects. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2011, 31(9):966-990.
45. Gidado K.I. Project complexity: the focal point of construction production planning. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1996, 14(3):213-225.
46. Giezen M. Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30(7):781-790.
47. Gosling J., Naim M., Towill D. Identifying and categorizing the sources of uncertainty in construction supply chains. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2012, 139(1):102-110.
48. Gray C.F., Larson E.W., Desai G.V. Project Management: The Managerial Process, 4/e 2010, New Delhi, Tata McGraw-Hill.
49. Grubbs F.E. Letter to the Editor-Attempts to Validate Certain PERT Statistics or "Picking on PERT". Oper. Res. 1962, 10(6):912-915.
50. Gunasekaran A., Yusuf Y.Y. Agile manufacturing: a taxonomy of strategic and technological imperatives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40(6):1357-1385.
51. Gutierrez G., Paul A. Analysis of the effects of uncertainty, risk-pooling, and subcontracting mechanisms on project performance. Oper. Res. 2000, 48(6):927-938.
52. Harland C.M., Lamming R.C., Zheng J., Johnsen T.E. A taxonomy of supply networks. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2001, 37(3):21-27.
53. Hartmann S., Briskorn D. A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 207(1):1-14.
54. Herroelen W., Leus R. Robust and reactive project scheduling: a review and classification of procedures. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42(8):1599-1620.
55. Herroelen W., Leus R. Project scheduling under uncertainty: survey and research potentials. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2005, 165(2):289-306.
56. Herroelen W., De Reyck B., Demeulemeester E. Resource-constrained project scheduling: a survey of recent developments. Comput. Oper. Res. 1998, 25(4):279-302.
57. Hobday M. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Res. Policy 1998, 26(6):689-710.
58. Howell D., Windahl C., Seidel R. A project contingency framework based on uncertainty and its consequences. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2010, 28(3):256-264.
59. Howick S., Eden C. The impact of disruption and delay when compressing large projects: going for incentives?. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2001, 26-34.
60. Huemann M., Keegan A., Turner J.R. Human resource management in the project-oriented company: a review. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2007, 25(3):315-323.
61. Ika L.A. Project success as a topic in project management journals. Proj. Manag. J. 2009, 40(4):6-19.
62. Jaafari A. Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2001, 19(2):89-101.
63. Jacobsson M., Söderholm A. Breaking out of the straitjacket of project research: in search of contribution. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2011, 4(3):378-388.
64. Jensen C., Johansson S., Löfström M. Project relationships-a model for analyzing interactional uncertainty. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24(1):4-12.
65. Jugdev K., Müller R. A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Proj. Manag. J. 2005, 36(4):19-31.
66. Kloppenborg T.J., Opfer W.A. The current state of project management research: trends, interpretations, and predictions. Proj. Manag. J. 2002, 33(2):5-18.
67. Kolisch R. Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: theory and computation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1996, 90(2):320-333.
68. Kolisch R., Padman R. An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling. Omega 2001, 29(3):249-272.
69. Lenfle S. The strategy of parallel approaches in projects with unforeseeable uncertainty: the Manhattan case in retrospect. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29(4):359-373.
70. Levy D.L. Applications and limitations of complexity theory in organization theory and strategy. Public Adm. Public Policy 2000, 79:67-88.
71. Littau P., Jujagiri N.J., Adlbrecht G. 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984-2009). Proj. Manag. J. 2010, 41(4):17-29.
72. Lombard M., Snyder-Duch J., Bracken C.C. Content analysis in mass communication. Hum. Commun. Res. 2002, 28(4):587-604.
73. Lu Y., Luo L., Wang H., Le Y., Shi Q. Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33(3):610-622.
74. MacCrimmon K.R., Ryavec C.A. An analytical study of the PERT assumptions. Oper. Res. 1964, 12(1):16-37.
75. Manson S.M. Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 2001, 32(3):405-414.
76. Martinsuo M., Korhonen T., Laine T. Identifying, framing and managing uncertainties in project portfolios. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014, 32(5):732-746.
77. Maylor H.R., Turner N.W., Murray-Webster R. How hard can it be? Actively managing complexity in technology projects. Res. Technol. Manag. 2013, 56(4):45-51.
78. Maylor H., Vidgen R., Carver S. Managerial complexity in project-based operations: a grounded model and its implications for practice. Proj. Manag. J. 2008, 39(S1):S15-S26.
79. McLain D. Quantifying project characteristics related to uncertainty. Proj. Manag. J. 2009, 40(4):60-73.
80. Meijer K., Frasincar F., Hogenboom F. A semantic approach for extracting domain taxonomies from text. Decis. Support. Syst. 2014, 62:78-93.
81. Miles M., Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1994, Sage.
82. Miller J.G., Roth A.V. A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Manag. Sci. 1994, 40(3):285-304.
83. Morgan G. Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 1980, 25(4):605-622.
84. Morris P.W. Research and the future of project management. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2010, 3(1):139-146.
85. Mulholland B., Christian J. Risk assessment in construction schedules. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 1999, 125(1):8-15.
86. Müller R., Jugdev K. Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott-the elucidation of project success. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2012, 5(4):757-775.
87. Mummolo G. Measuring uncertainty and criticality in network planning by PERT-path technique. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 1997, 15(6):377-387.
88. Padalkar M., Gopinath S. Delays in projects: a game-theoretic study. Trends and Research in the Decision Sciences: Best Papers from the 2014 Annual Conference 2015, 191-212. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ. M. Warkentin (Ed.).
89. Perminova O., Gustafsson M., Wikström K. Defining uncertainty in projects-a new perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2008, 26(1):73-79.
90. Petit Y. Project portfolios in dynamic environments: organizing for uncertainty. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30(5):539-553.
91. Petit Y., Hobbs B. Project portfolios in dynamic environments: sources of uncertainty and sensing mechanisms. Proj. Manag. J. 2010, 41(4):46-58.
92. Pich M.T., Loch C.H., Meyer A.D. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48(8):1008-1023.
93. Pollack J. The changing paradigms of project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2007, 25(3):266-274.
94. Pollack J., Adler D. Emergent trends and passing fads in project management research: a scientometric analysis of changes in the field. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33(1):236-248.
95. Qureshi S.M., Kang C. Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33(1):165-176.
96. Ramasesh R.V., Browning T.R. A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management. J. Oper. Manag. 2014, 32(4):190-204.
97. Ramnath S., Rock S., Shane P. The financial analyst forecasting literature: a taxonomy with suggestions for further research. Int. J. Forecast. 2008, 24(1):34-75.
98. Rodrigues A.G., Williams T.M. System dynamics in project management: assessing the impacts of client behaviour on project performance. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1998, 2-15.
99. Rozenes S., Vitner G., Spraggett S. Project control: literature review 2006, Project Management Institute.
100. Sanderson J. Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: a critical discussion of alternative explanations. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30(4):432-443.
101. Saunders F.C., Gale A.W., Sherry A.H. Conceptualising uncertainty in safety-critical projects: a practitioner perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33(2):467-478.
102. Saynisch M. Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: an approach to evolutionary, self-organizational principles and the complexity theory-results of the research program. Proj. Manag. J. 2010, 41(2):21-37.
103. Saynisch M. Mastering complexity and changes in projects, economy, and society via Project Management Second Order (PM-2). Proj. Manag. J. 2010, 41(5):4-20.
104. Schonberger R.J. Why projects are "always" late: a rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network. Interfaces 1981, 11(5):66-70.
105. Senescu R.R., Aranda-Mena G., Haymaker J.R. Relationships between project complexity and communication. J. Manag. Eng. 2012, 29(2):183-197.
106. Shenhar A.J. One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Manag. Sci. 2001, 47(3):394-414.
107. Shenhar A.J., Dvir D. Toward a typological theory of project management. Res. Policy 1996, 25(4):607-632.
108. Smyth H.J., Morris P.W. An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: methodological issues. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2007, 25(4):423-436.
109. Söderlund J. Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2004, 22(3):183-191.
110. Sommer S.C., Loch C.H. Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 2004, 50(10):1334-1347.
111. Sommer S.C., Loch C.H. Incentive contracts in projects with unforeseeable uncertainty. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2009, 18(2):185-196.
112. Sun M., Meng X. Taxonomy for change causes and effects in construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2009, 27(6):560-572.
113. Svejvig P., Andersen P. Rethinking project management: a structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33(2):278-290.
114. Tatikonda M.V., Rosenthal S.R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2000, 47(1):74-87.
115. Tesch D., Kloppenborg T.J., Stemmer J.K. Project management learning: what the literature has to say. Proj. Manag. J. 2003, 34(4):33-39.
116. Thamhain H. Managing risks in complex projects. Proj. Manag. J. 2013, 44(2):20-35.
117. Thomas J., Mengel T. Preparing project managers to deal with complexity-Advanced project management education. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2008, 26(3):304-315.
118. Turner J.R., Müller R. On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2003, 21(1):1-8.
119. Turner J.R., Müller R. The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: a literature review. Proj. Manag. J. 2005, 36(1):49-61.
120. Van de Vonder S., Demeulemeester E., Herroelen W., Leus R. The use of buffers in project management: the trade-off between stability and makespan. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2005, 97(2):227-240.
121. Vidal L.A., Marle F. Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes 2008, 37(8):1094-1110.
122. Vidal L.A., Marle F., Bocquet J.C. Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29(6):718-727.
123. Ward S., Chapman C. Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2003, 21(2):97-105.
124. Ward S., Chapman C. Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2008, 26(6):563-577.
125. Whitty S.J., Maylor H. And then came complex project management (revised). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2009, 27(3):304-310.
126. Williams T., Eden C., Ackerman F., Tait A. Vicious circles of parallelism. Int. J. of Proj. Manag. 1995, 13(3):151-155.
127. Williams T. Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2005, 52(4):497-508.
128. Williams T., Samset K. Issues in front-end decision making on projects. Proj. Manag. J. 2010, 41(2):38-49.
129. Williams T.M. Criticality in stochastic networks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1992, 353-357.
130. Williams T.M. The need for new paradigms for complex projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 1999, 17(5):269-273.
131. Winter M., Smith C., Morris P., Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24(8):638-649.
132. Xia W., Lee G. Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Commun. ACM 2004, 47(5):68-74.
133. Xia W., Lee G. Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2005, 22(1):45-83.
134. Yukl G., Gordon A., Taber T. A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: integrating a half century of behavior research. J. Leadersh. Org. Stud. 2002, 9(1):15-32.