Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A tale of two projects

Project Management Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 21-38

  Brady, Tim ^a   Davies, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

complexity; infrastructure; management; systems integration; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904410456     PISSN: 87569728     EISSN: 19389507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21434     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ashby, W. R., (1956). Introduction to cybernetics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Baccarini, D., (1996). The concept of project complexity: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14 (4), 201-204.
3. Bosch-Rekveldt, M,., Jongkind, Y,., Mooi, H,., Bakker, H,., &, Verbraeck, A,. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 728-739.
4. Boulding, K. E., (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 3 (2), 197-208.
5. Brady, T., &, Davies, A., (2010). From hero to hubris: Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow's Terminal 5. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 151-157.
6. Brady, T., Davies, A., &, Nightingale, P., (2012). Dealing with uncertainty in complex projects: Revisiting Klein and Meckling. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5 (4), 718-736.
7. Davies, A., Gann, D., &, Douglas, T., (2009). Innovation in megaprojects: Systems integration at Heathrow Terminal 5. California Management Review, 51 (2), 101-125.
8. Davies, A., &, Mackenzie, I., (2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games (forthcoming), International Journal of Project Management.
9. Dvir, D., &, Shenhar, A., (2011). What great projects have in common. Sloan Management Review, 52 (3), 19-21.
10. Edmonson, A. C., (2012). Teamwork on the fly. Harvard Business Review, April, 72-80.
11. Eisenhardt, K. M., &, Tabrizi, B. N., (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84-110.
12. Engwall, M., (2012). PERT, Polaris, and the realities of project execution. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5 (4), 595-616.
13. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., &, Rothengatter, W., (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Geraldi, J. G., (2008). The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model. International Journal of Project Management, 26 (4), 348-356.
15. Geraldi, J. G., Maylor, H., &, Williams, T., (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31 (9), 966-990.
16. Gersick, C. J. G., (1994). Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 1, 9-45.
17. Grabher, G., (2002). Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36, 245-262.
18. HM Treasury,. (2012). A new approach to public private partnerships. Retrieved from http://www.hm.treasury.gov.uk
19. Hertogh, M,., &, Westerveld, E,. (2010). Playing with complexity: Management and organisation of large infrastructure projects. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University (PhD thesis).
20. Henderson, R. M., &, Clark, K. B., (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 9-30.
21. Hirschman, A. O., (1967). Development projects observed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
22. Hobday, M., (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26 (6), 689-710.
23. Klein, B., &, Meckling, W., (1958). Application of operations research to development decisions. Operations Research, 6, 352-363.
24. Lawrence, P. R., &, Lorsch, J. W., (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
25. Lenfle, S., &, Loch, C. H., (2010). Lost roots: How project management came to emphasise control over flexibility and novelty. California Management Review, 53 (1), 32-55.
26. Loch, C. H., De Meyer, A., &, Pich, M. T., (2006). Managing the unknown: A new approach to managing high uncertainty and risk in projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
27. Mackenzie, I., &, Davies, A., (2011). Lessons learnt from the London 2012 Games construction programme. London Olympics Learning Legacy, ODA 2011/269.
28. Meier, S. R., (2008). Best project management and systems engineering practices in pre-acquisition practices in the federal intelligence and defense agencies. Project Management Journal, 39 (1), 59-71.
29. Miller, R., &, Lessard, D.R., (2001). The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30. Morris, P. W. G., &, Hough, G. H., (1987). The anatomy of major projects. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
31. Perrow, C., (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Prencipe, A., Davies, A., &, Hobday, M., (2003). The business of systems integration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Sapolsky, H. M., (1972). The Polaris System development: Bureaucratic and programmatic success in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
34. Sayles, L., &, Chandler, M. K., (1971). Managing large systems. New York, NY: The Free Press.
35. Scott, W. R., Levitt, R. E., &, Orr, R. J., (2011). Global projects: Institutional and political challenges. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Shenhar, A. J., (1993). From low- to hi-tech project management. R&D Management, 23 (3), 199-214.
37. Shenhar, A. J., (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains, Management Science, 47 (3), 394-414.
38. Shenhar, A. J., &, Dvir, D., (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy, 25 (4), 607-632.
39. Shenhar, A. J., &, Dvir, D., (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
40. Simon, H. A., (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6), 467-482.
41. Söderlund, J., (2012). Project management, interdependencies and time: Insights from managing large systems by Sayles and Chandler. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5 (4), 617-633.
42. Thompson, J. D., (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43. Van de Ven, A., (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide to organizational and social research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Von Bertalanffy, L., (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
45. Weick, K., 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (1), 1-19.
46. Wheelwright, S., &, Clark, K. B., (1992). Revolutionizing product development. New York, NY: Free Press.
47. Williams, T. M., (1999). The need for new paradigms of complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (5), 269-273.
48. Williams, T. M., (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52 (4), 497-508.