Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 781-790

  Giezen, Mendel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision making; Managing context political, economic, social and technical; Managing design, planning and appraisal; Project success and strategy; Risk, uncertainty and complexity

Indexed keywords

COST OVERRUNS; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT; MANAGING CONTEXT - POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TECHNICAL; MANAGING DESIGN, PLANNING AND APPRAISAL; MEGA PROJECTS; NETHERLANDS; PROJECT SUCCESS; ROTTERDAM; STUDY METHODS;

INNOVATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

RESEARCH;

COMPLEXITY; DECISION MAKING; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; METRO SYSTEM; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NETHERLANDS; ROTTERDAM; SOUTH HOLLAND;

EID: 84865397107     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Altshuler A., Luberoff D. Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment 2003, The Brookings Institutions, Washington DC.
2. Antoniadis D.N., Edum-Fotwe F.T., Thorpe A. Socio-organo complexity and project performance. International Journal of Project Management 2011, 29(7):808-816.
3. Bertolini L. Evolutionary urban transportation planning: an exploration. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(8):1998-2019.
4. Boschma R.A., Lambooy J.G. Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1999, 9(4):411-429.
5. Bosch-Rekveldt M., Jongkind Y., Mooi H., Bakker H., Verbraeck A. Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management 2011, 29(6):728-739.
6. Bruzelius N., Flyvbjerg B., Rothengatter W. Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects. Transport Policy 2002, 9(2):143-154.
7. Byrne D. Complexity, configurations and cases. Theory, Culture & Society 2005, 22(5):95-111.
8. De Bruijn H., Leijten M. Megaprojects and Contested Information. Transportation Planning and Technology 2007, 30(1):49-69.
9. Deutsch K.W. The Nerves of Government. Models of Political Communication and Control 1966, Free Press, New York. 2nd ed.
10. Dryzek J.S. Complexity and Rationality in Public Life. Political Studies 1987, 35(3):424-442.
11. Faludi A. Rationality, Critical Rationalism, and Planning Doctrine 1996, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick.
12. Flyvbjerg B. From Nobel prize to project management: getting risks right. Project Management Journal 2006, 37(3):5-15.
13. Flyvbjerg B. Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: problems, causes, cures. Environment and Planning B 2007, 34(4):578-597.
14. Flyvbjerg B. Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. European Planning Studies 2008, 16(1):3-21.
15. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M.S., Buhl S. Underestimating costs in public works projects: error or lie. Journal of the American Planning Association 2002, 68(3):279-295.
16. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M.K.S., Buhl S.L. How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects. Transport Reviews 2003, 23(1):71-88.
17. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M.K.S., Buhl S. What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects. Transport Reviews 2004, 24(1):3-18.
18. Gerring J. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Innes J.E., Booher D.E. Planning with Complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy 2010, Routledge, London.
20. Koppenjan J., Veeneman W.W., Van der Voort H., Ten Heuvelhof E., Leijten M. Competing management approaches in large engineering projects: The Dutch RandstadRail project. International Journal of Project Management 2010, 29(6):740-750.
21. Kvale S., Brinkmann S. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing 2009, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
22. Leijten M., Koppenjan J.F.M., Ten Heuvelhof E., Veeneman W.W., Van der Voort H. Dealing with Competing Project Management Values under Uncertainty: the Case of RandstadRail. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2010, 10(1):63-76.
23. Marchau V.A.W.J., Walker W.E., Van Wee G.P. Dynamic adaptive transport policies for handling deep uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2010, 77(6):940-950.
24. Miller R., Lessard D. The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Risks, Institutions and Governance 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An evolutionary theory of economic change 2006, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Olsson P., Gunderson L.H., Carpenter S.R., Ryan P., Lebel L., Folke C., Holling C.S. Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1):18.
27. Osland O., Strand A. The Politics and Institutions of Project Approval- a Critical-Constructive Comment on the Theory of Strategic Misrepresentation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2010, 10(1):77-88.
28. Perminova O., Gustafsson M., Wikström K. Defining uncertainty in projects - a new perspective. International Journal of Project Management 2008, 26(1):73-79. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005.
29. Priemus H. Development and design of large infrastructure projects: disregarded alternatives and issues of spatial planning. Environment and Planning B 2007, 34:626-644.
30. Priemus H., Flyvbjerg B., Van Wee B. Decision-Making on Mega-projects; Cost-Benefit analysis, Planning and Innovation 2008, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
31. Shane J., Molenaar K., Anderson S. Construction Project Cost Escalation Factors. Journal of Management in Engineering 2009, 25(4):221-229.
32. Shenhar A.J., Dvir D., Ofer L., Maltz A.C. Project Success: a Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Planning 2001, 34:699-725.
33. Sommer S.C., Loch C.H. Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty. Management Science 2004, 50(10):1334-1347.
34. Swyngedouw E., Moulaert F., Rodriguez A. Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy. Antipode 2002, 34(3):542-577.
35. Terano T. Beyond the KISS Principle for Agent-Based Social Simulation. Journal of Socio-Informatics 2008, 1(1):1-190.
36. Trapenberg Frick K. The cost of the technological sublime: daring ingenuity and the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Decision-making on mega projects: cost-benefit analysis, planning and innovation 2008, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. H. Priemus, B. Flyvbjerg, B. van Wee (Eds.).
37. Van der Heijden K. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation 1996, John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex.
38. Van Marrewijk A., Clegg S., Pitsis T., Veenswijk M. Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management 2008, 26(6):591-600.
39. Vidal L.A., Marle F., Bocquet J.C. Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management 2011, 29(6):718-727.
40. Ward S., Chapman C. Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management 2003, 21(2):97-105.
41. Weick K.E., Sutcliffe K. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science 2006, 17(4):514-524.