메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 303-313

Key points of contention in framing assumptions for risk and uncertainty management

Author keywords

Guides; Probability impact matrices and indices or scores; Project risk management; Risk indices or risk scores; Uncertainty management

Indexed keywords

MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33645999641     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.006     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (48)

References (29)
  • 3
    • 33645974358 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Institution of Civil Engineers and the Faculty and Institute of Actuaries. RAMP Risk Analysis and Management for Projects, 2nd ed. London: Thomas Telford; 2005.
  • 5
    • 5444222841 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why risk efficiency is a key aspect of best practice projects
    • Chapman C.B., and Ward S.C. Why risk efficiency is a key aspect of best practice projects. Int J Project Manage 22 (2004) 619-632
    • (2004) Int J Project Manage , vol.22 , pp. 619-632
    • Chapman, C.B.1    Ward, S.C.2
  • 7
    • 5444238037 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maturity models in practice
    • Hopkinson M. Maturity models in practice. Risk Manage Bull 5 4 (2002)
    • (2002) Risk Manage Bull , vol.5 , Issue.4
    • Hopkinson, M.1
  • 8
    • 33645970791 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chapman CB. Key points of contention in generic process descriptions for project risk and uncertainty management. Int J Project Manage (submitted for publication).
  • 10
    • 0003467711 scopus 로고
    • The foundations of decisions under uncertainty: an elementary exposition
    • Pratt J.W., Raiffa H., and Schlaifer R. The foundations of decisions under uncertainty: an elementary exposition. J Am Stat Assoc 59 (1964) 353-375
    • (1964) J Am Stat Assoc , vol.59 , pp. 353-375
    • Pratt, J.W.1    Raiffa, H.2    Schlaifer, R.3
  • 12
    • 0033721056 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Estimation and evaluation of uncertainty: a minimalist first pass approach
    • Chapman C.B., and Ward S.C. Estimation and evaluation of uncertainty: a minimalist first pass approach. Int J Project Manage 18 (2000) 369-383
    • (2000) Int J Project Manage , vol.18 , pp. 369-383
    • Chapman, C.B.1    Ward, S.C.2
  • 16
    • 32644488723 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimising the effects of dysfunctional corporate culture in estimation and evaluation processes: a constructively simple approach
    • Chapman C.B., Ward S.C., and Harwood I. Minimising the effects of dysfunctional corporate culture in estimation and evaluation processes: a constructively simple approach. Int J Project Manage 24 (2006) 106-115
    • (2006) Int J Project Manage , vol.24 , pp. 106-115
    • Chapman, C.B.1    Ward, S.C.2    Harwood, I.3
  • 17
    • 33646004957 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dreck MH. [accessed 29.06.05].
  • 19
    • 33645980412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Flyvberg B. In association with COWI. The British Department for Transport, Procedures for dealing with optimism bias in transport planning, Guidance Document. Report 58924, Issue 1, Department for Transport, London, 2004.
  • 22
    • 0037292985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management
    • Ward S.C., and Chapman C.B. Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. Int J Project Manage 21 (2003) 95-105
    • (2003) Int J Project Manage , vol.21 , pp. 95-105
    • Ward, S.C.1    Chapman, C.B.2
  • 26
    • 33646013956 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004. Risk Management. Homebush NSW 2140: Standards Australia and Wellington 6001: Standards New Zealand, 2004.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.