An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: Methodological issues

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 423-436

  Smyth, Hedley J ^a   Morris, Peter W G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bodies of knowledge; Causality; Critical realism; Empiricism; Methodology; Paradigm; Positivism; Theory

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

CRITICAL REALISM; EPISTEMOLOGICAL EVALUATION;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

EID: 34047153781     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (172)

1. This article is a development of the original EURAM paper: Smyth HJ, Morris, PWG and Cooke-Davies T. Understanding the management of projects: philosophical and methodological issues. Oslo: EURAM, May 17-20, 2006.
2. Griseri P. Management knowledge: a critical view (2002), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
3. Morris P.W.G. The validity of knowledge in project management and the challenge of learning and competency development. In: Morris P.W.G., and Pinto J.K. (Eds). The Wiley guide to managing projects (2004), John Wiley & Sons, New York
4. Maylor H. Beyond the Gantt chart: project management moving on. Eur Manage J 19 (2001) 92-100
5. cf. Meredith JR. Developing project management theory for managerial application: the view of a research journal's editor. In: PMI Research Conference, Seattle, July 14-17, 2002. p. 47-53.
6. The narrow sense, project management is the traditional approach, reflected in. PMI. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (2004), Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA which focuses upon execution
7. The management of projects, the broad sense, refers to everything needed to define, develop and realise projects successfully - see. Morris P.W.G. The management of projects (1994), Thomas Telford, London
8. In: Morris P.W.G., and Pinto J.K. (Eds). The Wiley guide to managing projects (2004), John Wiley & Sons, New York
9. Project management may be taken either as synonymous with the management of projects, as is the case in the Association for Project Management's BOK - see. APM. Project management body of knowledge (2006), Association for Project Management, High Wycombe
10. For example Griseri, see [2].
11. Engwall M. The project concept(s): on the unit of analysis in the study of project management. In: Lundin RA, Midler C, editors. Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Pryke S.D., and Smyth H.J. The management of complex projects: a relationship approach (2006), Blackwell, Oxford
13. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions (1996), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
14. Morris PWG, Crawford L, Hodgson D, Shepherd M, Thomas J. Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession - the case of project management. International Journal of Project Management, forthcoming.
15. Morris PWG. Managing the front-end: how project managers shape business strategy and manage project definition. Edinburgh: Project Management Institute EMEA Symposium. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute; 2005.
16. Winter M., Smith C., Morris P.W.G., and Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network. Int J Project Manage 24 (2006) 638-649
17. Hobday M. The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?. Res Policy 29 (2000) 871-893
18. Davies A., and Hobday M. The business of projects (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Winch G.M. Managing construction projects (2002), Blackwell, Oxford
20. Meredith, see [2].
21. Lawrence P.R., and Lorsch J.W. Organization and the environment (1967), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
22. Galbraith J. Strategies of organizational design (1973), Addison-Wesley, Reading
23. Mintzberg H. The structuring of organizations (1979), Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs
24. DeFillippi R.J., and Arthur M. Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of filmmaking. Calif Manage Rev 40 (1998) 125-139
25. Sydow J., Lindkvist L., and DeFillippi R.J. Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge. Organization Stud 25 (2004) 1475-1489
26. cf. Cherns A.B., and Bryant D.T. Studying the client's role in project management. Construct Manage Econ 1 (1983) 177-184
27. For example. Morris P.W.G., and Hough G.H. The anatomy of major projects (1987), Wiley & Sons, Chichester
28. Miller R., and Lessard D.R. The strategic management of large engineering projects: shaping institutions, risks, and governance (2000), MIT Press, Boston
29. Flyberg B., Bruzelius N., and Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
30. For detailed citation see Winter, see [7].
31. Davies, Hobday, see [8].
32. Morris P.W.G., and Jamieson A. Translating corporate strategy into project strategy (2004), Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA
33. Engwall, see [4].
34. Winch, see [9].
35. Williamson O.E. The economic institutions of capitalism (1985), Free Press, New York
36. Hodgson D., and Cicmil S. Making the management of projects critical (2006), Palgrave, London
37. Hodgson, Cicmil, see [6].
38. Hodgson D., and Cicmil S. New possibilities for project management theory: a critical engagement. Project Manage J 37 3 (2006) 111-122
39. Cicmil S., and Marshall D. Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Build Res Inf 33 (2005) 523-535
40. Fincham R. Narratives of success and failure in systems development. Br J Manage 13 (2002) 1-14
41. Artto K.A., and Wikstom K. What is project business?. Int J Project Manage 5 (2005) 343-353
42. Pryke, Smyth, see [4].
43. Burrell G., and Morgan G. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis (1979), Heinnemann, London
44. cf. Deetz S. Describing differences in approaches to organization science: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Sci 7 (1996) 191-207
45. For example. Turner J.R. The handbook of project-based management. 2nd ed. (1999), McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead
46. Turner JR, Mûller R, On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. 21, 2003, p. 1-8.
47. Koskela L. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction, Report 408. Espoo: VTT; 2000.
48. Handy C.B. Understanding organizations (1997), Penguin, London
49. Morris, see [3]; Morris and Pinto, see [3]; Miller and Lessard, see [13]; cf. Davies and Hobday, see [8].
50. Bredillet C. Beyond the positivist mirror: towards a project management 'gnosis'. Finland: IRNOP IV, Turku; 2004.
51. Bredillet C., Thiry M., and Deguire M. Enacting strategy through projects: an archetypal approach (2005), EURAM, Munich
52. Thiry M, Deguire M. Recent developments in project-based organizations, Xi'an: IRNOP VII; 2006.
53. De Wit B., and Meyer R. Strategy: process context, content - an international perspective (2004), Thomson Learning, London
54. Mintzberg, see [11].
55. cf. Bresnan M., Goussevskaia A., and Swan J. Managing projects as complex social settings. Build Res Inf 33 (2005) 487-493
56. PMI. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (2004), Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA
57. Morris P.W.G. Updating the project management bodies of knowledge. Project Manage J 32 (2001) 21-30
58. Williams T. Assessing and building on the underlying theory of project management in the light of badly overrun projects. In: PMI Research Conference, London, 2004.
59. Williams T.M. Assessing and building on project management theory in the light of badly over-run projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 52 4 (2005) 497-508
60. cf. Maruyama M. Academic concept inbreeding, failure of interbreeding, and its remedy by outbreeding. Human Syst Manage 17 (1998) 89-91
61. Morris et al., see [6].
62. Caupin G., Knopfel H., Morris P.W.G., Motzel E., and Pannenbacker O. ICB IPMA competence baseline (1998), Zurich International Project Management Association
63. APM. In: Dixon M. (Ed). Project management body of knowledge (2000), Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire
64. APM, 2006, see [3].
65. Respectively; Caupin et al., see [32]; APM, 2000, see [32]; ENAA, P2M: project and program management for enterprise innovation. www.enaa,or,op.jp: Engineering Advancement Association of Japan; 2001.
66. Crawford L. Global body of project management knowledge and standards. In: Morris P.W.G., and Pinto J.K. (Eds). The Wiley guide to managing projects (2004), John Wiley & Sons, New York
67. In: Morris P.W.G., and Pinto J.K. (Eds). The Wiley guide to managing projects (2004), John Wiley & Sons, New York
68. Morris et al., see [5].
69. Morris, see [2], p. 1142.
70. Weber, 1949, see [36], p. 1141.
71. Morris, see [2].
72. cf. Balogun J., Huff A.S., and Johnson P. Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing. J Manage Stud 40 (2003) 198-224
73. Johnson G., Melin L., and Whittington R. Mirco strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view. J Manage Stud 40 (2003) 3-22
74. Sayer R.A. Method in social science: a realist approach. 2nd ed. (1992), Routledge, London
75. Maruyama, see [31].
76. Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad Manage Learning Educ 4 (2005) 75-91
77. Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. 2002 ed. (1968), Routledge, London
78. cf. Argyris C., and Schön D.A. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective (1978), Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading
79. Schön D.A. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action (2003), Ashgate, Aldershot
80. Krige J. What's so great about facts?. In: Irvine J., Miles I., and Evans J. (Eds). Demystifying social statistics (1979), Pluto, London
81. Sayer, see [40].
82. Williamson O.E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J Law Econ 36 (1993) 453-486
83. Gruneberg S.L., and Ive G.J. The economics of the modern construction firm (2000), Macmillan, Basingstoke
84. See [2,13], cf. Engwall, see [4].
85. Glaser B.G., and Strauss A.L. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (1967), Aldine, New York
86. Smyth et al., see [1].
87. Sayer R.A. Realism and social science (2000), Sage, London
88. Harré R. The philosophies of science (1972), Oxford University Press, Oxford
89. Harré R. Social being (1979), Blackwell, Oxford
90. Harré R., and Secord P.F. The explanation of social behaviour (1972), Blackwell, Oxford
91. Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science (1975), Leeds Books, Leeds
92. Bhaskar R. The possibility of naturalism (1979), Harvester Press, Hassocks
93. Outhwaite W. New philosophies of social science: realism, hermeneutics and critical theory (1987), Macmillan, New York
94. Sayer, see [39,48].
95. Keegan A., and Turner R.J. The organic management of innovation projects. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestao 7 (2001) 57-70 Thiry et al., see [28]
96. Bhaskar, 1978, see [50].
97. Sayer, see [39,48].
98. Packendorff J. Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research. Scand J Manage 11 4 (1995) 319-334
99. Söderlund J. On the development of project management research: schools of thought and critique. Int Project Manage J 8 1 (2002) 20-31
100. Söderlund, see [53].
101. Harré, 1979, see [49].
102. Sayer, see [39,48].
103. The papers below are all located in the International Journal of Project Management, hence for brevity this has been omitted: Alderman N, Ivory C, McLoughlin I, Vaughan R. Sense-making as a process within complex service-led projects. 2005;23(5):380-5.
104. Al-Reshaid K, Kartam N. Design-build pre-qualification and tendering approach for public projects. 2005;23(4):309-20.
105. Artto, Wikstom, op. cit. [22]; Barber RB, Understanding internally generated risks in projects. 2005;(8):584-90.
106. Beach R, Webster M, Campbell KM. An evaluation of partnership development in the construction industry. 2005;(8):611-21.
107. Bing L, Akintoye A, Edwards PJ, Hardcastle C. The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. 2005;(1):25-35.
108. Brady T, Davies A, Gann DM. Creating value by delivering integrated solutions. 2005;(5):360-65.
109. Bryde DJ, Robinson L. Client versus contractor perspectives on project success criteria. 2005;(8):622-9.
110. Chan EHW, Yu ATW. Contract strategy for design management in the design and build system. 2005;(8):630-9.
111. Cheah CYJ, Ting SK. Appraisal of value engineering in construction in Southeast Asia. 2005;(2):151-8.
112. Chen HL, Chen WT. Clarifying the behavioral patterns of contractor supply chain payment conditions. 2005;(6):463-73.
113. Cioffi DF. A tool for managing projects: an analytic parameterization of the S-curve. 2005;(3):215-22.
114. Cova B, Salle R. Six key points to merge project marketing into project management. 2005;(5):354-9.
115. Crawford L. Senior management perceptions of project management competence. International Journal of Project Management 1 (2005) 7-16
116. Danilovic M, Sandkull B. The use of dependence structure matrix and domain mapping matrix in managing uncertainty in multiple project situations. 2005;(3):193-203.
117. Deakins E, Dillon S. A helical model for managing innovative product and service initiatives in volatile commercial environments. 2005;(1):65-74.
118. Diallo A, Thuillier D. The success of international development projects, trust and communication: an African perspective. 2005;(3):237-52.
119. Dietrich P, Lehtonen P. Successful management of strategic intentions through multiple projects - Reflections from empirical study. 2005;(5):386-91.
120. Dillibahu R, Krishnaiah K. Cost estimation of a software product using COCOMO II.2000 model - a case study. 2005;(4):297-307.
121. Dvir D. Transferring projects to their final users: The effect of planning and preparations for commissioning on project success. 2005;(4):257-2.
122. Dzeng R-J, Wen K-S. Evaluating project teaming strategies for construction of Taipei 101 using resource-based theory. 2005;(6):483-91.
123. Eden C, Williams T, Ackermann F. Analysing project cost overruns: comparing the "measured mile" analysis and system dynamics modeling. 2005;(2):135-9.
124. Elhag TMS, Boussabaine AH, Ballal TMA. Critical determinants of construction tendering costs: Quantity surveyors' standpoint. 2005;(7):538-45.
125. Eskerod P, Blichfeldt BS. Managing team entrees and withdrawals during the project life cycle. 2005;(7):495-503.
126. Eskerod P, Jepsen AL. Staffing renewal projects by voluntary enrolment. 2005;(6):445-53.
127. Fung IWH, Tam CM, Tung KCF, Man ASK. Safety cultural divergences among management, supervisory and worker groups in Hong Kong construction industry. 2005;(7):504-12.
128. Garcia ACB, Kunz J, Fischer M. Voting on the agenda: the key to social efficient meetings. 2005;(1):17-24.
129. Gemunden HG, Salomo S, Krieger A. The influence of project autonomy on project success. 2005;(5):366-73.
130. Gutierrez O, Friedman DH. Managing project expectations in human services information systems implementations: The case of homeless management information systems. 2005;(7):513-23.
131. Hellstrom M, Wikstrom K. Project business concepts based on modularity - improved manoeuvrability through unstable structures. 2005;(5):392-7.
132. Iyer KC, Jha KN. Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects. 2005;(4):283-95.
133. Kujala J, Ahola T. The value of customer satisfaction surveys for project-based organizations: symbolic, technical, or none. 2005;(5):404-9.
134. Kutsch E, Hall M. Intervening conditions on the management of project risk: Dealing with uncertainty in information technology projects. 2005;(8):591-9.
135. Labuschagne C, Brent AC. Sustainable Project Life Cycle Management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector. 2005;(2):159-68.
136. Linderoth HCJ, Pellegrino G. Frames and inscriptions: tracing a way to understand IT-dependent change projects. 2005;(5):415-20.
137. Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K. Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). 2005;(7):564-72.
138. Maheswari JU, Varghese K. Project Scheduling using Dependency Structure Matrix. 2005;(3):223-30.
139. Manning S. Managing project networks as dynamic organizational forms: Learning from the TV movie industry. 2005;(5):410-4.
140. Mavrotas G, Caloghirou Y, Koune J. A model on cash flow forecasting and early warning for multi-project programmes: application to the Operational Programme for the Information Society in Greece. 2005;(2):121-33.
141. Milosevic D, Patanakul P. Standardized project management may increase development projects success. 2005;(3):181-92.
142. Muller R, Turner JR. The impact of principal-agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. 2005;(5):398-403.
143. Olander S, Landin A. Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. 2005;(4):321-8.
144. Parker SK, Skitmore M. Project management turnover: causes and effects on project performance. 2005;(3):205-14
145. Partington D, Pellegrinelli S, Young M. Attributes and levels of programme management competence: an interpretive study. 2005;(2):87-95.
146. Reyck B de, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lockett, M, Calderini SR, Moura M, Sloper A. The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. 2005;(7):524-37.
147. Ruuska I, Vartiainen M. Characteristics of knowledge sharing communities in project organizations. 2005;(5):374-9.
148. Shi JJ, Li H, Zhang H. Two resource dispatching rules for modeling human decisions in simulation. 2005;(2):97-107.
149. Shore B, Cross BJ. Exploring the role of national culture in the management of largescale international science projects. 2005;(1):55-64.
150. Sing D, Tiong RLK. Development of life cycle costing framework for highway bridges in Myanmar. 2005;(1):37-44.
151. Taylor H. Congruence between risk management theory and practice in Hong Kong vendor-driven IT projects. 2005;(6):437-44.
152. Teo EAI, Ling FYY, Chong AFW. Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. 2005;(4):329-41.
153. Trietsch D. The effect of systemic errors on optimal project buffers. 2005;(4):267-74.
154. Uher TE, Brand MC. Analysis of adjudication determinations made under security of payment legislation in New South Wales. 2005;(6):474-82
155. van Donk DP, Riezebos J. Exploring the knowledge inventory in project-based organisations: a case study. 2005;(1):75-83.
156. Wadeson N. Projects as search processes. 2005;(6):421-7.
157. Wang W-C. Impact of soft logic on the probabilistic duration of construction projects. 2005;(8):600-10.
158. Wang W-C, Liu JJ. Factor-based path analysis to support subcontractor management. 2005;(2):109-20.
159. Wang E, Chou H-W, Jiang J. The impacts of charismatic leadership style on team cohesiveness and overall performance during ERP implementation. 2005;(3):173-80.
160. Whitty SJ. A memetic paradigm of project management. 2005;(8):575-83.
161. Wierschem D, Johnston C. The role of project management in university computing resource departments. 2005;(8):640-9.
162. Willoughby KA. Process improvement in project expediting: there must be a better way. 2005;(3):231-6.
163. Winch GM, Kelsey J. What do construction project planners do? 2005;(2):141-9.
164. Wu C, Hsieh T, Cheng W. Statistical analysis of causes for design change in highway construction on Taiwan. 2005;(7):554-63.
165. Xu T, Bower DA, Smith NJ. Types of collaboration between foreign contractors and their Chinese partners. 2005;(1):45-53.
166. Yang I-T, Chang C-Y. Stochastic resource-constrained scheduling for repetitive construction projects with uncertain supply of resources and funding. 2005;(7):546-53.
167. Yang I-T. Simulation-based estimation for correlated cost elements. 2005;(4):275-82.
168. Yu AGY, Flett PD, Bowers AJ. Developing a value-centred proposal for assessing project success. 2005;(6):428-36.
169. Zwikael O, Shimizu, K, Globerson S. Cultural differences in project management capabilities: A field study. 2005;(6):454-62.
170. Crawford, see [56], p. 11.
171. Dillibahu, Krishnaiah, see [56], stated they used a 'case study' approach, which in practice meant a small sample.
172. For example Diallo and Thuillier consider one international project in Africa, Eskerod and Blichfeldt try to generalize from a single case concerning changing project team membership [62], and Sing and Tiong try to generalise on life cycle costing from a single case of a bridge for Myanmar, which in this instance they admit as being "somewhat crude and imprecise" (p. 43), see [56].