Genome-editing technologies and their potential application in horticultural crop breeding

Horticulture Research

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Xiong, Jin Song ^a   Ding, Jing ^a   Li, Yi ^a,b  

^a NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963708836     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20527276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2015.19     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Xu Y. Molecular plant breeding. CABI, 2010.
2. Dirks R, Van Dun K, De Snoo CB, Van Den Berg M, Lelivelt CL, Voermans W et al. Reverse breeding: A novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis. Plant Biotechnol J 2009; 7: 837-845.
3. Liu Y, Yang H, Sakanishi A. Ultrasound: mechanical gene transfer into plant cells by sonoporation. Biotechnol Adv 2006; 24: 1-16.
4. van Nocker S, Gardiner SE. Breeding better cultivars, faster: Applications of new technologies for the rapid deployment of superior horticultural tree crops. Hor Res 2014; 1 14022.
5. Longhi S, Giongo L, Buti M, Surbanovski N, Viola R, Velasco R et al. Molecular genetics and genomics of the Rosoideae: state of the art and future perspectives. Hor Res 2014; 1.
6. Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Flintham JE, et al. 'Green revolution' genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 1999; 400: 256-2825.
7. Ban Y, Honda C, Hatsuyama Y, Igarashi M, Bessho H, Moriguchi T. Isolation and functional analysis of a MYB transcription factor gene that is a key regulator for the development of red coloration in apple skin. Plant Cell Physiol 2007; 48: 958-970.
8. Alleweldt G, Possingham JV. Progress in grapevine breeding. Theor Appl Genet 1988; 75: 669-673.
9. Parry MA, Madgwick PJ, Bayon C, Tearall K, Hernandez-Lopez A, Baudo M et al. Mutation discovery for crop improvement. J Exp Bot 2009; 60: 2817-2825.
10. Shu QY. Turning plant mutation breeding into a new era: molecular mutation breeding. In Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Rome: FAO, 2009: 425-427.
11. Hansen G, Wright MS. Recent advances in the transformation of plants. Trends Plant Sci 1999; 4: 226-231.
12. James C, Krattiger AF. Global review of the field testing and commercialization of transgenic plants: 1986 to 1995. ISAAA Briefs 1996; (1).
13. Bruening G, Lyons J. The case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. Calif Agr 2000; 54: 6-7.
14. Clark D, Klee H, Dandekar A. Despite benefits, commercialization of transgenic horticultural crops lags. Calif Agr 2004; 58: 89-98.
15. Azad MA, Amin L, Sidik NM. Gene technology for papaya ringspot virus disease management. The Scientific World J 2014; 2014: 768038.
16. Luo KM, Duan H, Zhao DG, Zheng XL, Deng W, Chen YQ et al. 'GM-gene-deletor': fused loxP-FRT recognition sequences dramatically improve the efficiency of FLP or CRE recombinase on transgene excision from pollen and seed of tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnol J 2007; 5: 263-274.
17. Ding J, Duan H, Deng ZN, Zhao DG, Yi GJ, Li Y. Molecular strategies for addressing gene flow problems and their potential applications in abiotic stress tolerant transgenic plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2014; 33: 190-204.
18. Carroll D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annu Rev Biochem 2014; 83: 409-439.
19. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF, 3rd. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2013; 31: 397-405.
20. Wyman C, Kanaar R. DNA double-strand break repair: All's well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40: 363-383.
21. Pabo CO, Peisach E, Grant RA. Design and selection of novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70: 313-340.
22. Cathomen T, Joung JK. Zinc-finger nucleases: The next generation emerges. Mol Ther 2008; 16: 1200-1207.
23. Pavletich NP, Pabo CO. Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A. Science 1991; 252: 809-817.
24. Kim YG, Cha J, Chandrasegaran S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 1156-1160.
25. Perez EE, Wang J, Miller JC, Jouvenot Y, Kim KA, Liu O et al. Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD41 T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 808-816.
26. Doyon Y, McCammon JM, Miller JC, Faraji F, Ngo C, Katibah GE et al. Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafish using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 702-708.
27. Meng X, NoyesMB, Zhu LJ, Lawson ND, Wolfe SA. Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafish using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 695-701.
28. Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Toki S. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 12034-12039.
29. Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ, Fu F, Maeder ML, Joung JK et al. Highfrequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2009; 459: 442-445.
30. Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, Worden SE, et al. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2009; 459: 437-441.
31. Hsu PD, Zhang F. Dissecting neural function using targeted genome engineering technologies. ACS Chem Neurosci 2012; 3: 603-610.
32. Joung JK, Sander JD. TALENs: Awidely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nature reviews Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14: 49-55.
33. Boch J, Bonas U. Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-Type III effectors: discovery and function. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2010; 48: 419-436.
34. Bogdanove AJ, Schornack S, Lahaye T. TAL effectors: finding plant genes for disease and defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010; 13: 394-401.
35. Bonas U, Stall RE, Staskawicz B. Genetic and structural characterization of the avirulence gene avrBs3 from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Mol Gen Genet 1989; 218: 127-136.
36. Moscou MJ, Bogdanove AJ. A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors. Science 2009; 326: 1501.
37. Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, Landgraf A, Hahn S, Kay S et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-Type III effectors. Science 2009; 326: 1509-1512.
38. Mak AN, Bradley P, Cernadas RA, Bogdanove AJ, Stoddard BL. The crystal structure of TAL effector PthXo1 bound to its DNA target. Science 2012; 335: 716-719.
39. Deng D, Yan C, Pan X, Mahfouz M, Wang J, Zhu JK et al. Structural basis for sequence-specific recognition of DNA by TAL effectors. Science 2012; 335: 720-723.
40. Sander JD, Cade L, Khayter C, Reyon D, Peterson RT, Joung JK et al. Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 697-698.
41. Huang P, Xiao A, Zhou M, Zhu Z, Lin S, Zhang B. Heritable gene targeting in zebrafish using customized TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 699-700.
42. Tesson L, Usal C, Menoret S, Leung E, Niles BJ, Remy S et al. Knockout rats generated by embryo microinjection of TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 695-696.
43. Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, Wang J, Xia DF et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 143-148.
44. Hockemeyer D, Wang H, Kiani S, Lai CS, Gao Q, Cassady JP et al. Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 731-734.
45. Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol 2012; 30: 390-392.
46. Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32: 947-951.
47. Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, Schmidt C, Zhang F, Hummel A et al. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 2010; 186: 757-761.
48. Cermak T, Doyle EL, Christian M, Wang L, Zhang Y, Schmidt C et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res 2011: gkr218.
49. Li L, Piatek MJ, Atef A, Piatek A, Wibowo A, Fang X et al. Rapid and highly efficient construction of TALE-based transcriptional regulators and nucleases for genome modification. Plant Mol Biol 2012; 78: 407-416.
50. Sawai S, Ohyama K, Yasumoto S, Seki H, Sakuma T, Yamamoto T et al. Sterol side chain reductase 2 is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of cholesterol, the common precursor of toxic steroidal glycoalkaloids in potato. Plant cell 2014; 26: 3763-3774.
51. Lor VS, Starker CG, Voytas DF, Weiss D, Olszewski NE. Targeted mutagenesis of the tomato PROCERA gene using transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Plant Physiol 2014; 166: 1288-1291.
52. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012; 337: 816-821.
53. Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol 1987; 169: 5429-5433.
54. Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature 2012; 482: 331-338.
55. Pourcel C, Salvignol G, Vergnaud G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology 2005; 151: 653-663.
56. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology 2005; 151: 2551-2561.
57. Mojica FJ, Diez-Villasenor C, Garcia-Martinez J, Soria E. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol 2005; 60: 174-182.
58. Deveau H, Garneau JE, Moineau S. CRISPR/Cas system and its role in phagebacteria interactions. Annu Rev Microbiol 2010; 64: 475-493.
59. Walsh RM, Hochedlinger K. A variant CRISPR-Cas9 system adds versatility to genome engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 15514-15515.
60. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013; 339: 823-826.
61. Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK et al. High-frequency offtarget mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 822-826.
62. Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases.Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 827-832.
63. Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger JP, Ma E, Doudna JA, Liu DR. High-Throughput profiling of off-Target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 839-843.
64. Hou Z, Zhang Y, Propson NE, Howden SE, Chu L-F, Sontheimer EJ et al. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 15644-15649.
65. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim Y, Kweon J, Kim HS, Bae S et al. Analysis of off-Target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res 2014; 24: 132-141.
66. Fu YF, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32: 279-284.
67. Chang N, Sun C, Gao L, Zhu D, Xu X, Zhu X et al. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos. Cell Res 2013; 23: 465-472.
68. Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 227-229.
69. Shen B, Zhang J, Wu H, Wang J, Ma K, Li Z et al. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting. Cell Res 2013; 23: 720-723.
70. Tsai SQ, Wyvekens N, Khayter C, Foden JA, Thapar V, Reyon D et al. Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided Fok I nucleases for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32: 569-576.
71. Guilinger JP, Thompson DB, Liu DR. Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to Fok I nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32: 577-582.
72. Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 688-691.
73. Feng Z, Mao Y, Xu N, Zhang B, Wei P, Yang DL et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 4632-4637.
74. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 686-688.
75. Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res 2013; 23: 1233-1236.
76. Xie K, Yang Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Mol Plant 2013; 6: 1975-1983.
77. Jia HG, Wang N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PloS one 2014; 9: e93806.
78. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F et al. One-step generation ofmice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 2013; 153: 910-918.
79. Nagamangala Kanchiswamy C, Sargent DJ, Velasco R, Maffei ME, Malnoy M. Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops. Trends Biotechnol 2015; 33: 62-64.
80. Janick J. Horticultural plant breeding: past accomplishments, future directions. Proc. IS on Hort. in Asian-Pacific Region 2004; 694: 61-65.
81. Seeram NP, Adams LS, Hardy ML, Heber D. Total cranberry extract versus its phytochemical constituents: Antiproliferative and synergistic effects against human tumor cell lines. J AgrFood Chem 2004; 52: 2512-2517.
82. Joseph JA, Shukitt-Hale B, Denisova NA, Bielinski D, Martin A, McEwen JJ et al. Reversals of age-related declines in neuronal signal transduction, cognitive, and motor behavioral deficits with blueberry, spinach, or strawberry dietary supplementation. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 8114-8121.
83. Renaud S, de Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet 1992; 339: 1523-1526.
84. Hou DX, Fujii M, Terahara N, Yoshimoto M. Molecular mechanisms behind the chemopreventive effects of anthocyanidins. Journal Biomed Biotechnol 2004; 5: 321-325.
85. Allan AC, Hellens RP, Laing WA. MYB transcription factors that colour our fruit. Trends Plant Sci 2008; 13: 99-102.
86. Albert NW, Davies KM, Lewis DH, Zhang H, Montefiori M, Brendolise C et al. A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in eudicots. Plant cell 2014; 26: 962-980.
87. Hollender CA, Dardick C. Molecular basis of angiosperm tree architecture. New Phytol 2015; 206: 541-556.
88. Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pagè s V, Dun EA, Pillot J-P et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 2008; 455: 189-194.
89. Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N et al. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 2008; 455: 195-200.
90. Reid MS, Wu M-J. Ethylene and flower senescence. Plant Growth Regul 1992; 11: 37-43.
91. Savin KW, Baudinette SC, Graham MW, Michael MZ, Nugent GD, Lu C-Y et al. Antisense ACC oxidase RNA delays carnation petal senescence. HortScience 1995; 30: 970-972.
92. Shibuya K, Barry KG, Ciardi JA, Loucas HM, Underwood BA, Nourizadeh S et al. The central role of PhEIN2 in ethylene responses throughout plant development in petunia. Plant Physiol 2004; 136: 2900-2912.
93. Goldberg NP. Powdery mildew. Compendium of pepper diseases APS Press: St Paul 2003: 19-20.
94. Buschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R, Simons G, Wolter M, Frijters A et al. The barley Mlo gene: A novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 1997; 88: 695-705.
95. Devoto A, Hartmann HA, Piffanelli P, Elliott C, Simmons C, Taramino G et al. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the plant-specific seven-Transmembrane MLO family. J Mol Evol 2003; 56: 77-88.
96. Pavan S, Schiavulli A, Appiano M, Marcotrigiano AR, Cillo F, Visser RGF et al. Pea powdery mildew er1 resistance is associated to loss-of-function mutations at a MLO homologous locus. Theor Appl Genet 2011; 123: 1425-1431.
97. Jiwan D, Roalson EH, Main D, Dhingra A. Antisense expression of peach mildew resistance locus O (PpMlo1) gene confers cross-species resistance to powdery mildew in Fragaria 3 ananassa. Transgenic Res 2013; 22: 1119-1131.
98. Bolger ME, Weisshaar B, Scholz U, Stein N, Usadel B, Mayer KFX. Plant genome sequencing-Applications for crop improvement. Curr Opin Biotech 2014; 26: 31-37.
99. Zhang S, Chen W, Xin L, Gao Z, Hou Y, Yu X et al. Genomic variants of genes associated with three horticultural traits in apple revealed by genome re-sequencing. Horticulture Res 2014; 1: 14045.
100. Moore FE, Reyon D, Sander JD, Martinez SA, Blackburn JS, Khayter C et al. Improved somatic mutagenesis in zebrafish using transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). PLoS One 2012; 7: e37877.