Analysis of publically available skin sensitization data from REACH registrations 2008-2014

Altex

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 135-148

  Luechtefeld, Thomas ^a   Maertens, Alexandra ^a   Russo, Daniel P ^b   Rovida, Costanza ^d   Zhu, Hao ^b,c   Hartung, Thomas ^a,d  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Animal testing alternatives; Chemical safety; Computational toxicology; In silico

Indexed keywords

BIOAVAILABILITY; HEALTH HAZARD; K NEAREST NEIGHBOR; LANDSCAPE; MODEL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PREDICTION; RECOGNITION; REGISTRATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; BIOLOGY; DANGEROUS GOODS; FACTUAL DATABASE; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; SKIN ALLERGY; TOXICITY;

DANGEROUS GOODS;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; MICE;

EID: 84962821185     PISSN: 1868596X     EISSN: 18688551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14573/altex.1510055     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adler, S., Basketter, D., Creton, S. et al. (2011). Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: Current status and future prospects-2010. Arch Toxicol 85, 367-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0693-2.
2. Altaf-Ul-Amine, M., Nishikata, K., Korna, T. and Miyasato, T. (2003). Prediction of protein functions based on k-cores of protein-protein interaction networks and amino acid sequences. Genome Informatics 14, 498-499. http://doi.org/10.11234/gi1990.14.498.
3. Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Statistician 46, 175-185.
4. Alvarez-Hamelin, J. I., Dall'Asta, L., Barrat, A. and Vespignani, A. (2005). k-core decomposition: A tool for the visualization of large scale networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18, arXiv cs/0504107.
5. Barratt, M. D. and Langowski, J. J. (1999). Validation and subsequent development of the DEREK skin sensitization rulebase by analysis of the BGVV list of contact allergens. J Chem Informat Computer Sci 39, 294-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci980204n.
6. Basketter, D. A., Clewell, H., Kimber, I. et al. (2012). A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. ALTEX 29, 3-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.2012.1.003.
7. Bastian, M., Heymann, S. and Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) 8, 361-362. https://gephi.org/users/publications/.
8. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. and Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Statist Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 10, P10008. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
9. Bolton, E. E., Wang, Y., Thiessen, P. A. and Bryant, S. H. (2008). PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities (217-241). Vol. 4. Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-1400(08)00012-1.
10. Bos, J. D. and Meinardi, M. M. H. M. (2000). The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol 9, 165-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009003165.x.
11. Bowler, M. (2002). HtmlUnit. http://sourceforge.net/p/htmlunit/mailman/message/5463073/.
12. Chodorow, K. (2013). MongoDB: The Definitive Guide (pp. 432). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
13. Dimitrov, S. D., Low, L. K., Patlewicz, G. Y. et al. (2005). Skin sensitization: Modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates. Int J Toxicol 24, 189- 204. http://doi.org/10.1080/10915810591000631.
14. ECVAM (2013). EURL ECVAM strategy for replacement of animal testing for skin sensitisation hazard identification and classification. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC79446.
15. Enoch, S. J., Madden, J. C. and Cronin, M. T. (2007). Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19, 555-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10629360802348985.
16. Godbillon, S. (2015). Reactive Mongo. Git Hub Repository. https://github.com/ReactiveMongo.
17. Hartung, T. and Hoffmann, S. (2009). Food for thought ... on in silico methods in toxicology. ALTEX 26, 155-166. http://www.altex.ch/resources/altex-2009-3-155-166-FFT-Hartung.pdf.
18. Hartung, T. and Rovida, C. (2009). Chemical regulators have overreached. Nature 460, 1080-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4601080a.
19. Hartung, T. (2010). Food for thought ... on alternative methods for chemical safety testing. ALTEX 27, 3-14. http://www.altex.ch/resources/altex-2010-1-3-14-FFT-Hartung.pdf.
20. Hartung, T., Luechtefeld, T., Maertens, A. and Kleensang, A. (2013). Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments. ALTEX 30, 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.2013.1.003.
21. Hirota, M., Kouzuki, H., Ashikaga, T. et al. (2013). Artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays for prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 27, 1233-1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013.02.013.
22. Hoffmann, S., Cole, T. and Hartung, T. (2005). Skin irritation: Prevalence, variability, and regulatory classification of existing in vivo data from industrial chemicals. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 41, 159-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.11.003.
23. Hoffmann, S. (2015). LLNA variability: An essential ingredient for a comprehensive assessment of non-animal skin sensitization test methods and strategies. ALTEX 32, 379- 383. http://www.altex.ch/resources/altex-2015-4-379-383-SCHoffmann.pdf.
24. Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S. and Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. Plos One 9, e98679. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679.
25. Jaworska, J. and Nikolova-Jeliazkova, N. (2007). How can structural similarity analysis help in category formation? SAR QSAR Environ Res 18, 195-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10629360701306050.
26. Jaworska, J., Harol, A., Kern, P. S. and Gerberick, G. F. (2011). Integrating non-animal test information into an adaptive testing strategy - skin sensitization proof of concept case. ALTEX 28, 211-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.2011.3.211.
27. Jaworska, J., Dancik, Y., Kern, P. et al. (2013). Bayesian integrated testing strategy to assess skin sensitization potency: From theory to practice. J Appl Toxicol 33, 1353-1364. http://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2869.
28. Karlberg, A. T., Borje, A., Duus, J. J. et al. (2013). Activation of non-sensitizing or low-sensitizing fragrance substances into potent sensitizers - prehaptens and prohaptens. Contact Dermatitis 69, 323-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.12127.
29. Kleinstreuer, N. C., Yang, J., Berg, E. L. et al. (2014). Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms. Nat Biotechnol 32, 583- 591. http://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2914.
30. Klimisch, H.-J., Andreae, M. and Tillmann, U. (1997). A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1996.1076.
31. Kolle, S.N., Basketter, D.A., Casati, S. et al. (2013). Performance standards and alternative assays: Practical insights from skin sensitization. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 65, 278- 285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.12.006.
32. Leist, M., Hasiwa, N., Rovida, C. et al. (2014). Consensus report on the future of animal-free systemic toxicity testing. ALTEX 31, 341-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1406091.
33. Linkov, I., Massey, O., Keisler, J. et al. (2015). From "weight of evidence" to quantitative data integration using multicriteria decision analysis and Bayesian methods. ALTEX 32, 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1412231.
34. Luechtefeld, T., Maertens, A., McKim, J. et al. (2015). Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose response modeling using feature elimination instead of QSAR. J Appl Toxicol 35, 1361-1371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.3172.
35. Luechtefeld, T., Maertens, A., Russo, D. P. et al. (2016). Global analysis of publicly available safety data for 9, 801 substances registered under REACH from 2008-2014. ALTEX 33, 95- 109. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1510052.
36. Lushniak, B. D. (2004). Occupational contact dermatitis. Dermatol Ther 17, 272-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04032.x.
37. Martin, Y. C., Kofron, J. L. and Traphagen, L. M. (2002). Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? J Med Chem 45, 4350-4358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm020155c.
38. McDonald, J. C., Beck, M. H., Chen, Y. and Cherry, N. M. (2006). Incidence by occupation and industry of work-related skin diseases in the United Kingdom, 1996-2001. Occup Med 56, 398-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql039.
39. Natsch, A., Ryan, C. A., Foertsch, L. et al. (2013). A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation. J Appl Toxicol 33, 1337-1352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.2868.
40. Netzeva, T. I., Worth, A., Aldenberg, T. et al. (2005). Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52. Altern Lab Anim 33, 155-173.
41. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 70, 56131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131.
42. Nikolova, N. and Jaworska, J. (2003). Approaches to measure chemical similarity - A review. QSAR & Combinatorial Sci 22, 1006-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200330831.
43. Odersky, M., Altherr, P., Cremet, V. et al. (2004). An overview of the Scala programming language. 2nd edition. Technical Report LAMP-Report-2006-001, Lausanne, Switzerland. http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/files/ScalaOverview.pdf.
44. Patlewicz, G., Dimitrov, S. D., Low, L. K. et al. (2007). TIMES-SS - A promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 48, 225-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.03.003.
45. Patlewicz, G., Ball, N., Becker, R. A. et al. (2014). Food for thought: Read-across approaches - misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead. ALTEX 31, 387-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1410071.
46. Pirone, J. R., Smith, M., Kleinstreuer, N. C. et al. (2014). Open source software implementation of an integrated testing strategy for skin sensitization potency based on a Bayesian network. ALTEX 31, 336-340. http://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1310151.
47. Reisinger, K., Hoffmann, S., Alepée, N. et al. (2015). Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment. Toxicol In Vitro 29, 259-270. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.10.018.
48. Roberts, D. W., Mekenyan, O. G., Dimitrov, S. D. and Dimitrova, G. D. (2013). What determines skin sensitization potency-myths, maybes and realities. Part 1. The 500 molecular weight cut-off. Contact Dermatitis 68, 32-41. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02160.x.
49. Rovida, C. and Hartung, T. (2009). Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - A report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t4). ALTEX 26, 187- 208. http://www.altex.ch/resources/altex-2009-3-187-208-Rovida.pdf.
50. Rovida, C., Alépée, N., Api, A. M. et al. (2015). Integrated testing strategies (ITS) for safety assessment. ALTEX 32, 171- 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1506201.
51. Schultz, T. W., Yarbrough, J. W., Hunter, R. S. and Aptula, A. O. (2007). Verification of the structural alerts for Michael acceptors. Chem Res Toxicol 20, 1359-1363. http://doi.org/10.1021/tx700212u.
52. Schultz, T. W., Rogers, K. and Aptula, A. O. (2009). Read-across to rank skin sensitization potential: Subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain. Contact Dermatitis 60, 21-31. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01473.x.
53. Steinbeck, C., Han, Y., Kuhn, S. et al. (2003). The chemistry development kit (CDK): An open-source Java library for chemo- And bioinformatics. J Chem Inform Comp Sci 43, 493-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci025584y.
54. Teubner, W., Mehling, A., Schuster, P. X. et al. (2013). Computer models versus reality: How well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 67, 468-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.09.007.
55. Thyssen, J. P., Linneberg, A., Menné, T. and Johansen, J. D. (2007). The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population - prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 57, 287-299. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x.
56. Urbisch, D., Mehling, A., Guth, K. et al. (2015). Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 71, 337-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008.
57. Warshaw, E. M., Wang, M. Z., Mathias, C. G. et al. (2012). Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers/cosmetologists: Retrospective analysis of north american contact dermatitis group data, 1994 to 2010. Dermatitis 23, 258-268. http://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0b013e318273a3b8.
58. Wuchty, S. and Almaas, E. (2005). Peeling the yeast protein network. Proteomics 5, 444-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200400962.
59. Zhu, H., Bouhifd, M., Kleinstreuer, N. et al. (2016). Supporting read-across using biological data. ALTEX 33, 167-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.1601252.