Read-across approaches - Misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead

Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 387-396

  Patlewicz, Grace ^a   Ball, Nicholas ^b   Becker, Richard A ^c   Booth, Ewan D ^d   Cronin, Mark T D ^e   Kroese, Dinant ^f   Steup, David ^g   Van Ravenzwaay, Ben ^h   Hartung, Thomas ^i,j  

^a DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^b DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY   (United States)

^c American Chemistry Council   (United States)

^d JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^e LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f TNO   (Netherlands)

^g SHELL OIL COMPANY   (United States)

^h BASF SE   (Germany)

ⁱ JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

(Q)SARs; Adverse outcome pathways (AOP); Analogue approach; Category approach; Scientific confidence framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910681772     PISSN: 0301732X     EISSN: 07176201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14573/altex.1410071     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J. et al. (2010). Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29, 730-741. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/etc. 34
2. Aptula, A. O. and Roberts, D. W. (2006). Mechanistic applicability domains for non animal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. Chem Res Toxicol 19, 1097-1105. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1021/tx06
3. Ball, N., Bartels, M. J., Budinsky, R. A. et al. (2014). The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene Glycol Methyl Ether Acetate, an exemplary case study. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 68, 212-221. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2013. 12. 007
4. Balcke, G. U., Kolle, S. N., Kamp, H. et al. (2011). Linking energy metabolism to dysfunctions in mitochondrial respiration-a metabolomics in vitro approach. Toxicol Lett 203, 200-209. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. toxlet. 2011. 03. 013
5. Basketter, D. A., Clewell, H., Kimber, I. et al. (2012). A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. ALTEX 29, 3-89. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/altex. 2012. 1. 003
6. Beker van Woudenberg, A., Wolterbeek, A., Te Brake, L. et al. (2013). A category approach to predicting the developmental (neuro) toxicity of organotin compounds: the value of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryotoxicity test (ZET). Reprod Toxicol 41, 35-44. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. reprotox. 2013. 06. 067
7. Blackburn, K., Bjerke, D., Daston, G. et al. (2011). Case studies to test: a framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60, 120-135. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2011. 03. 002
8. Blackburn, K. and Stuard, S. B. (2014). A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 68, 353-362. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2014. 01. 004
9. Bouhifd, M., Hartung, T., Hogberg, H. T. (2013). Review: toxicometabolomics. J Appl Toxicol 33, 1365-83. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/jat. 2874
10. Cox, L. A., Douglas, D., Marty, S. et al. (2014). Applying a scientific confidence framework to a HTS-derived prediction model for endocrine endpoints: lessons learned from a case study. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 69, 443-450. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2014. 05. 010
11. Dancik, Y., Miller, M. A., Jaworska, J. and Kasting, G. B. (2013). Design and performance of a spreadsheet-based model for estimating bioavailability of chemicals from dermal exposure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65, 221-236. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. addr. 2012. 01. 006
12. ECETOC (2010). Technical Report 109 High information content technologies in support of read-across in chemical risk assessment. http://www. ecetoc. org/technical-reports
13. E CET OC (2012). Technical Report 116 Category approaches, read-across, (Q)SAR. http://www. ecetoc. org/technical-reports
14. E C-European Commission (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EE C) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EE C and Commission Directives 91/155/EE C, 93/67/EE C, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off J Eur Union L396, 1-849. http://eur-lex. europa. eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006R1907&
15. from=EN ECHA (2008). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R. 6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. http://echa. europa. eu/documents/10162/13632/information-requirements-r6-en. pdf
16. E CHA (2014). The Use of Alternatives to Testing on Animals for the REACH Regulation: Second report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation. http://echa. europa. eu/documents/10162/13639/alternatives-test-animals-2014-en. pdf
17. Ferrario, D., Brustio, R. and Hartung, T. (2014). Glossary of reference terms for alternative test methods and their validation. ALTEX 31, 319-335. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/ altex. 1403
18. Hanway, R. H. and Evans, P. F. (2000). Read-across of toxicological data in the notification of new chemicals. Toxicol Lett 116, Suppl 1, 61.
19. Hartung, T., Bremer, S., Casati, S. et al. (2004). A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. Altern Lab Anim 32, 467-72.
20. Hartung, T. (2007). Food for thought on cell culture. ALTEX 24, 143-147. http://www. altex. ch/All-issues/Issue. 50. html?iid=87&aid=1
21. Hartung, T. (2009). Food for thought on evidence-based toxicology. ALTEX 26, 75-82. http://www. altex. ch/All-issues/ Issue. 50. html?iid=105&aid=1
22. Hartung, T. (2010). Food for thought on alternative methods for chemical safety testing. ALTEX 27, 3-14. http://www. altex. ch/All-issues/Issue. 50. html?iid=112&aid=1
23. Hartung, T., Luechtefeld, T., Maertens, A. and Kleensang, A. (2013a). Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments. ALTEX 30, 3-18. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/altex. 2013. 1. 003
24. Hartung, T., Stephens, M. and Hoffmann, S. (2013b). Mechanistic validation. ALTEX 30, 119-130. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/altex. 2013. 2. 119
25. Hoffmann, S. and Hartung, T. (2006). Towards an evidence-based toxicology. Human Exp Toxicol 25, 497-513. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1191/0960327106het648oa
26. Klimisch, H.-J., Andreae, M. and Tillmann, U. (1997). Systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 25, 1-5. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1006/rtph. 1996. 1076
27. Kroese, E. D., Bosgra, S., Buist, H. E. et al. (2014). Evaluation of an alternative in vitro test battery for detecting reproductive toxicity in a grouping context. Reprod Toxicol, in Press.
28. L eist, M., Hasiwa, N., Rovida, C. et al. (2014). Consensus report on the future of animal-free systemic toxicity testing. ALTEX 31, 341-156. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/altex. 1406
29. OECD (2002). Manual for investigation of HPV Chemicals. Section 3. 2. Guidance on the development and use of chemical categories. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
30. OECD (2007). Guidance on grouping of chemicals. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 80. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
31. OECD (2011). OECD Series on Testing and Assessment Number 138. Report of the Workshop on Using Mechanistic Information in Forming Chemical Categories.
32. ENV/JM/MONO(2011) 8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris, France.
33. OECD (2012). The Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation Initiated by Covalent Binding to Proteins Part 1: Scientific Evidence. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 168 ENV/JM/MONO(2012)10/PART
34. OECD (2014a). Guidance on grouping of chemicals. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 194. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
35. OECD (2014b). How to use the Toolbox AOP workflow for Skin Sensitization. http://bit. ly/1tlBOtf
36. Patlewicz, G. and Worth, A. (2008). Review of data sources, QSARs and integrated testing strategies for skin sensitisation. EUR 23225 EN. European Commission, JRC, IHCP, Ispra, Italy.
37. Patlewicz, G., Ball, N., Booth, E. D. et al. (2013a). Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 67, 1-12. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2013. 06. 002
38. Patlewicz, G., Roberts, D. W., Aptula, A. et al. (2013b). Workshop: Use of 'read-across' for chemical safety assessment under REACH. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 65, 226-228. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2012. 12. 004
39. Patlewicz, G., Simon, T., Goyak, K. et al. (2013c). Use and validation of HT/HC assays to support 21st century toxicity evaluations. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 65, 259-268. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2012. 12. 008
40. Patlewicz, G., Kuseva, C., Mehmed, A. et al. (2014a). TIMES-SS-recent refinements as a result of an industrial skin sensitisation consortium. SAR QSAR Environ Res 25, 367-391. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/1062936X. 2014. 9005
41. Patlewicz, G., Kuseva, C., Kesova, A. et al. (2014b). Towards AOP application-implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 69, 529-545. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2014. 06. 001
42. Ramirez, T., Daneshian, M., Kamp, H. et al. (2013). Metabolomics in toxicology and preclinical research. ALTEX 30, 209-225. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/altex. 2013. 2. 209
43. Reif, D., Martin, M. T., Tan, S. et al. (2010). Endocrine profiling and prioritization of environmental chemicals using ToxCast data. Environ Health Perspect 118, 2-8. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1289/ehp. 1002
44. Roberts, D. W., Aptula, A. O., Patlewicz, G. and Pease, C. (2008). Chemical reactivity indices and mechanism-based read across for non-animal based assessment of skin sensitization potential. J Appl Toxicol 28, 443-454. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/jat. 1293
45. Rovida, C. and Hartung, T. (2009). Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements. ALTEX 26, 187-208. http://www. altex. ch/All-issues/Issue. 50. html?iid=107&aid=4
46. Rovida, C., Longo, F. and Rabbit, R. R. (2011). How are reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity addressed in REACH dossiers? ALTEX 28, 273-294. http://dx. doi. org/10. 14573/altex. 2011. 4. 273
47. Schneider, K., Schwarz, M., Burkholder, I. et al. (2009). "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. Toxicol Lett 189, 138-144. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. toxlet. 2009. 05. 013
48. Tanimoto, T. T. (1957). IBM Internal Report 17th Nov.
49. Ten Berge, W. (2009). A simple dermal absorption model: derivation and application. Chemosphere 75, 1440-1445. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. chemosphere. 2009. 02. 043
50. Tollefsen, K. E., Scholz, S., Cronin, M. T. et al. (2014). Applying adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) to support integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA). Reg Toxicol Pharmacol, in press. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2014. 09. 009
51. US EPA (2004). Status and future directions of the High Production Volume Challenge programme. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC
52. US EPA (2010). TSCA New Chemicals Program (NCP). USEPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC. http://www. epa. gov/oppt/newchems/pubs/chemcat. htm
53. van Leeuwen, C. J., Patlewicz, G. Y. and Worth, A. P. (2007). Intelligent Testing Strategies. In C. J. Leeuwen and T. Vermeire (eds. ), Risk Assessment of Chemicals: An Introduction (467-509). Springer.
54. van Ravenzwaay, B., Coelho-Palermo Cunha, G., Leibold, E. et al. (2007). The use of metabolomics for the discovery of new biomarkers of effects. Toxicol Lett 172, 21-28. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. toxlet. 2007. 05. 021
55. van Ravenzwaay, B., Coelho-Palermo Cunha, G., Strauss, V. et al. (2010). The individual and combined metabolite profiles (metabolomics) of dibutylphthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate following a 28-day dietary exposure in rats. Toxicol Lett 198, 159-170. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. toxlet. 2010. 06. 009
56. van Ravenzwaay, B., Herold, M., Kamp, H. et al. (2012). Metabolomics: a tool for early detection of toxicological effects and an opportunity for biology based grouping of chemicals-from QSAR to QBAR. Mutat Res 746, 144-150. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. mrgentox. 2012. 01. 006
57. Willett, P., Barnard, J. M. and Downs, G. M. (1998). Chemical similarity searching. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38, 983-996. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1021/ci98
58. Wu, S., Blackburn, K., Amburgey, J., Jaworska, J. and Federle, T. (2010). A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 56, 67-81. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. yrtph. 2009. 09. 006