Exploring Student response to contemporary Picturebooks

Exploring Student Response to Contemporary Picturebooks

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-243

  Pantaleo, Sylvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961189413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (255)

1. Agosto, D. (1999). One and inseparable: Interdependent storytelling in picture storybooks. Children’s Literature in Education,30 (4), 267-80.
2. Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.
3. Allington, R. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Addison-Wesley.
4. Allington, R. (2002). What I’ve learned about effective reading instruction from a decade of studying exemplary elementary classroom teachers. Phi Delta Kappan,83 (10), 740-7.
5. Almasi, J. (1995). The nature of fourth-graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly,30 (3), 314-51.
6. Almasi, J., O’Flahavan, J., & Arya, P. (2001). A comparative analysis of student and teacher development in more or less proficient discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly,36 (2), 96-120.
7. Almasi, J., Garas, K., Cho, H., Ma, W., Shanahan, L., & Augustino, A. (2004, December). The impact of peer discussion on social, cognitive, and affective growth in literacy. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
8. Anfara, V., Brown, K., & Mangione, T. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31 (7), 28-38.
9. Anstey, M. (2002). ‘It’s not all black and white’: Postmodern picture books and new literacies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45 (6), 444-57.
10. Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2003). Children reading pictures: Interpreting visual texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
11. Bader, B. (1976). American picturebooks from Noah’s ark to The beast within. New York: Macmillan.
12. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum (1st ed.). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
14. Barnes, D. (1992). From communication to curriculum (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
15. Barone, D. (1990). The written responses of young children: Beyond comprehension to story understanding. The New Advocate, 3 (1), 49-56.
16. Barrentine, S. J. (1996). Engaging with reading through interactive read- alouds. The Reading Teacher, 50 (1), 36-43.
17. Barthes, R. (1970, trans. 1974). S/Z: An essay. New York: Hill & Wang.
18. Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. London: Jonathan Cape.
19. Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. London: Fontana.
20. Barton, D. (2007). An introduction to the ecology of unwritten language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-15). London: Routledge.
22. Battle, J. (1995). Collaborative story talk in a bilingual kindergarten. In N. Roser & M. Martinez (Eds.), Book talk and beyond: Children and teachers respond to literature (pp. 157-67). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. Baumann, J., & Bergeron, B. (1993). Story mapping instruction using children’s literature: Effects on first-graders’ comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 407-37.
24. Beach, R. (1993). A teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Beach, R., Appleman, D., & Dorsey, S. (1990). Adolescents’ use of intertextual links to understand literature. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds.), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 224-45). Norwood, NJ: Albex Publishing Corporation.
26. Berk, L., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
27. Blair, H., & Sanford, K. (2004). Morphing literacy: Boys reshaping their school-based literacy practices. Language Arts, 81 (6), 452-60.
28. Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertex- tuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28 (4), 305-32.
29. British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2002a). BC performance standards: Reading revised edition. Victoria, BC: Author.
30. British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2002b). BC performance standards: Writing revised edition. Victoria, BC: Author.
31. Britton, J. (1968). Response to literature. In J. R. Squire (Ed.), Response to literature: The Dartmouth seminar papers (pp. 3-10). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
32. Cairney, T. (1990). Intertextuality: Infectious echoes from the past. The Reading Teacher,43 (7), 478-84.
33. Cairney, T. (1992). Fostering and building students’ intertextual histories. Language Arts, 69 (7), 502-7.
34. Caroff, S., & Moje, E. (1992-1993). A conversation with David Wiesner: 1992 Caldecott Medal winner. The Reading Teacher, 46 (4), 284-9.
35. Cassady, J. (1998). Wordless picture books: No-risk tools for inclusive middle- age classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41 (6), 428-33.
36. Coles, M., & Hall, C. (2001). Breaking the line: New literacies, postmodernism and the teaching of printed texts. Reading: Literacy and Language, 35(3), 111-14.
37. Colledge, M. (2005). Baby Bear or Mrs. Bear? Young English Bengali-speaking children’s responses to narrative picture books at school. Literacy, 39, 24-30.
38. Columbia/Tri Star Studios. (2000). Timecode. Hollywood: Columbia/Tri Star Studios.
39. Commeyras, M., & Sumner, G. (1996). Literature discussions based on student-posed questions. The Reading Teacher, 50 (3), 262-5.
40. Copenhaver, J. (2001). Running out of time: Rushed read-alouds in a primary classroom. Language Arts, 79 (2), 148-58.
41. Coulthard, K. (2003). ‘The words to say it’: Young bilingual learners responding to visual texts. In E. Arizpe & M. Styles (Eds.), Children reading pictures: Interpreting visual texts (pp. 164-90). London: Routledge.
42. Crawford, P., & Hade, D. (2000). Inside the picture, outside the frame: Semiotics and the reading of wordless picture books. Journal of Research in Childhood Education,15 (1), 66-80.
43. Cuddon, J. A. (1999). The Penguin dictionary of literary terms and literary theory(4th ed.). New York: Penguin.
44. Culler, J. (1980). Literary competence. In J. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (pp. 101-17). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45. Dawes, L. (2001). Talking about language. In P. Goodwin (Ed.), The articulate classroom: Talking and learning in the primary classroom (pp. 125-32). London: David Fulton.
46. Day, K. S. (1996). The challenge of style in reading picturebooks. Children’s Literature in Education, 27 (3), 153-66.
47. Dentith, S. (2000). Parody. New York: Routledge.
48. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.
49. Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: First Press.
50. Disney Enterprises, Inc./Pixar Animation Studios. (2001). Monsters, Inc. Burbank: Disney Enterprises, Inc./Pixar Animation Studios.
51. Doonan, J. (1993). Looking at pictures in picture books. Stroud, Glos.: Thimble Press.
52. Doonan, J. (1999). Drawing out ideas: A second decade of the work of Anthony Browne. The Lion and the Unicorn, 23 (1), 30-56.
53. Douglas Yellowlees, J. (2001). The end of books - or the books without end? Reading interactive narratives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54. Dresang, E. (1999). Radical change: Books for youth in a digital age. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company.
55. Dresang, E. (2005). Radical change. In K. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie, L. (Eds.), Theories of information behavior: A researcher’s guide (pp. 298-302). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
56. Duke, N., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 205-42). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
57. Dyson, A.H. (2001). Introduction… and a warning. The Elementary School Journal,101 (4), 379-83.
58. Eeds, M., & Wells, M. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature response groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23 (1), 4-29.
59. Eisner, E. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26 (6), 4-10.
60. Ellis, D., & Preston, F. (1984). Enhancing beginning reading using wordless picture books in a cross-age tutoring program. The Reading Teacher, 37 (8), 692-8.
61. Evans, K. (1996). Creating spaces for equity? The role of positioning in peer- led literature discussions. Language Arts, 73 (3), 194-202.
62. Evans, K. (2002). Fifth-grade students’ perceptions of how they experience literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly,37 (1), 46-69.
63. Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse. Linguistics and Education, 4, 269-293.
64. Fish, S. (1980). Interpreting the Variorum. In J. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader- response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (pp. 164-84). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65. Fish, S. (1994). Is there a text in the class? In D. Richter (Ed.), Falling into theory: Conflicting views on reading literature (pp. 226-37). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
66. Fisher, K., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of information behavior: A researcher’s guide. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
67. Flately, J., & Rutland, A. (1986). Using wordless picture books to teach linguistically/culturally different students. The Reading Teacher, 40 (3), 276-81.
68. Galda, L., Ash, G., & Cullinan, B. (2000). Children’s literature. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 361-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Galda, L., & Cullinan, B. (2002). Literature and the child (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
70. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
71. Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (3), 200-9.
72. Genette, G. (1982). Palimpsestes. Paris: Seuil.
73. Giarelli, J. (2001). The education of Eros and collateral learning in teacher education. In S. Rice (Ed.), Philosophy of education society yearbook 2001, (pp. 285-7). Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society Publications.
74. Gitelman, H. (1990). Using wordless picture books with disabled readers. The Reading Teacher, 43 (7), 525.
75. Glaser, B., & Straus, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
76. Golden, J. (1990). The narrative symbol in childhood literature: Explorations in the construction of text. Berlin: Mouton.
77. Goldstone, B. (1998). Ordering the chaos: Teaching metafictive characteristics of children’s books. Journal of Children’s Literature,24 (2), 48-55.
78. Goldstone, B. (2001-2002). Whaz up with our books? Changing picture book codes and teaching implications. The Reading Teacher, 55 (4), 362-70.
79. Graham, J. (1990). Pictures on the page. Sheffield, UK: The National Association for the Teaching of English.
80. Guralnik, D. (Ed.). (1976). Webster’s new world dictionary of the American language (2nded.). New York: William Collins and World Publishing.
81. Guzzetti, B., Young, J., Gritsavage, M., Fyfe, L., & Hardenbrook, M. (2002). Reading, writing, and talking gender in literacy learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
82. Halliday, M. (1969). Relevant models of language. Educational Review, 21 (3), 26-37.
83. Hardy, B. (1975). Tellers and listeners: The narrative imagination. Dover, NH: Longwood.
84. Hickman, J. (1981). Anew perspective on response to literature: Research in an elementary setting. Research in the Teaching of English,15 (4), 343-54.
85. Hickman, J. (1983). Everything considered: Response to literature in an elementary school setting. Journal of Research and Development in Education,16 (3), 8-13.
86. Hickman, J. (1984). Research currents: Researching children’s response to literature. Language Arts, 61 (3), 278-84.
87. Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. New York: Routledge.
88. Hunt, P. (1991). Criticisms, theory and children’s literature. Oxford: Blackwell.
89. Hutcheon, L. (1985). A theory of parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. London: Methuen.
90. Hynds, S. (1992). Challenging questions in the teaching of literature. In J.A. Langer (Ed.), Literature instruction: A focus on student response (pp. 78-100). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
91. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
92. Iser, W. (1980). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In J. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism(pp. 50-69). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
93. Jewell, T., & Pratt, D. (1999). Literature discussions in the primary grades: Children’s thoughtful discourse about books and what teachers can do to make it happen. The Reading Teacher, 52 (8), 842-50.
94. Johnson, S. (2005). Everything bad is good for you: How today’s popular culture is actually making us smarter. New York: Riverhead Books.
95. Johnston, P. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
96. Kauffman, G., Short, K., Crawford, K., Kahn, L., & Kaser, S. (1996). Examining the roles of teachers and students in literature circles across classroom contexts. In D. Leu, C. Kinzer, & K. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st century: Forty-fifth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (Vol. 45, pp. 373-84). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
97. Keep, C., McLaughlin, T., & Parmar, R. (2002, May 15). Intertextuality. Retrieved from http://www.iath.virginia.edu/elab/hfl0278.html.
98. Kiefer, B. (1993). Children’s responses to picture books: A developmental perspective. In K. Holland, R. Hungerford, & S. Ernst (Eds.), Journeying: Children responding to literature (pp. 267-83). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
99. Kiefer, B. (1995). The potential of picturebooks: From visual literacy to aesthetic understanding. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
100. Klein, M. (1977). Talk in the language arts classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
101. Kress, G. (2003a). Interpretation or design: From the world told to the world shown. In M. Styles & E. Bearne (Eds.), Art, narrative and childhood (pp. 137-153). Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
102. Kress, G. (2003b). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
103. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
104. Labbo, L. (1996). Beyond storytime: A sociopsychological perspective on young children’s opportunities for literacy development during story extension time. Journal of Literacy Research, 28 (3), 405-28.
105. Lancia, P. (1997). Literary borrowing: The effects of literature on children’s writing. The Reading Teacher, 50 (6), 470-5.
106. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
107. Leal, D. (1993). The power of literary peer-group discussions: How children collaboratively negotiate meaning. The Reading Teacher, 47 (2), 114-21.
108. Lewis, D. (1990). The constructedness of texts: Picture books and the metafic- tive. Signal,62, 131-46.
109. Lewis, D. (2001). Reading contemporary picture books: Picturing text. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
110. Lodge, D. (1992). The art of fiction. London: Penguin Books.
111. Lukens, R. (1999). A critical handbook of children’s literature (6th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
112. Macaulay, D. (1991). Caldecott acceptance speech. Horn Book, 67 (4), 410-21.
113. Mackey, M. (1990). Metafiction for beginners: Allan Ahlberg’s Ten in a bed. Children’s Literature in Education,21 (3), 179-87.
114. Mackey, M. (2003). At play on the borders of the diegetic: Story boundaries and narrative interpretation. Journal of Literacy Research,35 (1), 591-632.
115. Maloch, B. (2002). Scaffolding student talk: One teacher’s role in literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly,37 (1), 94-112.
116. Maloch, B. (2004). One teacher’s journey: Transitioning into literature discussion groups. Language Arts, 81 (4), 312-22.
117. Many, J., & Wiseman, D. (1992). The effect of teaching approach on third- grade students’ responses to literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24 (3), 265-87.
118. McCabe, A. (1997). Cultural background and storytelling: A review and implications for schooling. The Elementary School Journal, 97 (5), 453-73.
119. McCallum, R. (1996). Metafictions and experimental work. In P. Hunt (Ed.), International companion encyclopedia of children’s literature (pp. 397-409). New York: Routledge.
120. McClay, J. (2000). ‘Wait a second…’: Negotiating complex narratives in Black and white. Children’s Literature in Education, 31 (2), 91-106.
121. McGee, L. (1992). An exploration of meaning construction in first graders’ grand conversations. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory and practice: Views from many perspectives: Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 177-86). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
122. McGillis, R. (1996). The nimble reader: Literary theory and children’s literature. New York: Twayne.
123. McRobbie, C., & Tobin, K. (1997). A social constructivist perspective on learning environments. International Journal of Science Education,19 (2), 193-208.
124. Marantz, K. (1977). The picture book as art object: A call for balanced reviewing. Wilson Library Bulletin, 52 (2), 148-51.
125. Marshall, J.D. (1987). The effects of writing on students’ understanding of literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English,21 (1), 30-62.
126. Marshall, J. (2000). Research on response to literature. In M. Kamil, P. Mosen- thal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 381-402). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
127. Martinez, M., & Roser, N. (2003). Children’s responses to literature. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. Squire, & J. Jensen (Eds.) Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 799-813). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
128. Meek, M. (1988). How texts teach what readers learn. Stroud, Glos.: Thimble Press.
129. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
130. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
131. Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
132. Morrow, L.M. (1987). The effect of small group story reading on children’s questions and comments. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: Thirty-seventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 77-86). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
133. Morrow, L.M. (1988). Young children’s responses to one-to-one story readings in school settings. Reading Research Quarterly,23 (1), 89-107.
134. Morrow, L.M., & Gambrell, L. (2000). Literature-based reading instruction. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 563-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
135. Morrow, L.M., & Smith, J.K. (1990). The effects of group size on interactive storybook reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (2), 214-31.
136. The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60-92.
137. Nikolajeva, M. (1998). Exit children’s literature? The Lion and the Unicorn,22(2), 221-36.
138. Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C. (2000). The dynamics of picturebook communication. Children’s Literature in Education,31 (4), 225-39.
139. Nikolajeva, M., & Scott, C. (2001). How picturebooks work. New York: Garland Publishing.
140. Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
141. Nodelman, P. (1996). The pleasures of children’s literature (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
142. Nodelman, P., & Reimer, M. (2003). The pleasures of children’s literature (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
143. Oyler, C., & Barry, A. (1996). Intertextual connections in read-alouds of information books. Language Arts, 73 (5), 324-9.
144. Pantaleo, S. (1995). The influence of teacher practice on student response to literature. Journal of Children’s Literature,21 (1), 38-47.
145. Pantaleo, S. (2002). Grade 1 students meet David Wiesner’s three pigs. Journal of Children’s Literature, 28 (2), 72-84.
146. Pantaleo, S. (2003a). ‘Godzilla lives in New York’: Grade 1 students and the peritextual features of picture books. Journal of Children’s Literature, 29 (2), 66-77.
147. Pantaleo, S. (2003b). The art of playful parody: Exploring David Wiesner’s Tuesday. The Dragon Lode, 22 (1), 42-50.
148. Pantaleo, S. (2004a). Young children and radical change characteristics in picture books. The Reading Teacher, 58 (2), 178-87.
149. Pantaleo, S. (2004b). Young children interpret the metafictive in Anthony Browne’s Voices in the park. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,4 (2), 211-33.
150. Pantaleo, S. (2004c). Exploring Grade 1 students’ textual connections. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18 (3), 211-25.
151. Pantaleo, S. (2004d). The long, long way: Young children explore the fabula and syuzhet of Shortcut. Children’s Literature in Education: An International Quarterly,35 (1), 1-20.
152. Pantaleo, S. (2005a). ‘Reading’ young children’s visual texts. Early Childhood Research & Practice [On-line serial] 7 (1). Available http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v7n1/pantaleo.html.
153. Pantaleo, S. (2005b). Young children engage with the metafictive in picture books. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28 (1), 19-37.
154. Pantaleo, S. (2006a). Readers and writers as intertexts: Exploring the inter- textualities in student writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29, 163-81.
155. Pantaleo, S. (2006b). Postmodernism, metafiction and Who’s afraid of the big bad book? The Journal of Children’s Literature Studies, 3 (1), 26-39.
156. Pantaleo, S. (2007a). ‘How could that be?’: Reading Banyai’s Zoom and ReZoom. Language Arts, 84 (3), 222-3.
157. Pantaleo, S. (2007b). Writing texts with radical change characteristics. Literacy,41 (1), 16-25.
158. Pantaleo, S. (2007c). Scieszka’s subversive little red hen: Aka ‘One annoying chicken.’ Journal of Children’s Literature,33 (1), 22-32.
159. Pantaleo, S. (2007d). ‘Everything comes from seeing things’: Narrative and illustrative play in Black and white. Children’s Literature in Education: An International Quarterly, 38 (1), 45-58.
160. Pantaleo, S. (2007e). Exploring the metafictive in elementary students’ writing. Changing English, 14 (1), 61-76.
161. Pantaleo, S. (2007f). Interthinking: Young children using language as a tool to think collectively during interactive read-alouds. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34 (6), 439-47.
162. Pantaleo, S. (2007g). Scieszka’s The stinky cheese man: A tossed salad of parodic re-versions. Children’s Literature in Education: An International Quarterly, 38 (4), 277-95.
163. Pantaleo, S., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2006). Collateral learning, changing texts and the curriculum. English in Australia, 41 (2), 51-60.
164. Peterson, S. (2006). Influence of gender on writing development. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research(pp. 311-23). New York: Guilford Press.
165. Pickett, B. (1962). Monster mash. Hollywood: Homewood Studios.
166. Purves, A. (1973). Literature education in ten countries: An empirical study. New York: Halsted.
167. Purves, A. (1974). People prose. In R. Fox (Ed.), Images in language, media and mind (pp. 3-27). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
168. Purves, A.C., & Rippere, V. (1968). Elements of writing about a literary work: A study of response to literature. Research Report No. 9. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
169. Purves, A., Rogers, T., & Soter, A. (1990). How porcupines make love II: Teaching a response-centered curriculum. New York: Longman.
170. Rose, M. (1993). Parody: Ancient, modern and post-modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Rosen, H. (1986). The importance of story. Language Arts, 63 (3), 226-37.
172. Rosenblatt, L. (1976). Literature as exploration (4th ed.). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
173. Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
174. Rosenblatt, L. (1981). The readers’ contribution in the literary experience. The English Quarterly, 14 (1), 3-12.
175. Rosenblatt, L. (1985). Viewpoints: Transaction versus interaction - a terminological rescue operation. Research in the Teaching of English,19 (1), 96-107.
176. Rosenblatt, L. (1986). The aesthetic transaction. Journal of Aesthetic Education,20 (4), 122-7.
177. Rosenblatt, L. (1988). The literary transaction. In P. Demers (Ed.), The creating word (pp. 66-85). Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
178. Rosenblatt, L. (1991). Literary theory. In J. Flood, J. Jensen, D. Lapp & J. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English Language Arts (pp. 57-62). New York: Macmillan.
179. Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th, ed., pp. 1057-92). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
180. Roser, N., & Martinez, M. (1985). Roles adults play in preschoolers’ response to literature. Language Arts, 62 (5), 485-90.
181. Roukes, N. (1997). Humor in art: A celebration of visual wit. Worcester, MA: Davis Publications.
182. Ryan, M., & Anstey, M. (2003). Identity and text: Developing self-conscious readers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26 (1), 9-22.
183. Schwandt, T. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 221-59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
184. Schwarcz, J. (1982). Ways of the illustrator: Visual communication in children’s literature. Chicago: American Library Association.
185. Schwarcz, J., & Schwarcz, C. (1991). The picture book comes of age. Chicago: American Library Association.
186. Short, K., Kauffman, G., Kaser, S., Kahn, L., & Crawford, K. (1999). Teacher watching: Examining teacher talk in literature circles. Language Arts, 76 (5), 377-85.
187. Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education,20 (4), 455-75.
188. Silvey, A. (2001). Pigs in space. School Library Journal, 47 (1), 48-50.
189. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
190. Sipe, L. (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children’s Literature in Education,29 (2), 97-108.
191. Sipe, L. (2000a). The construction of literary understanding by first and second graders in oral response to picture storybook read-alouds. Reading Research Quarterly,35 (2), 252-75.
192. Sipe, L. (2000b). ‘Those two gingerbread boys could be brothers’: How children use intertextual connections during storybook readalouds. Children’s Literature in Education, 31 (2), 73-90.
193. Sipe, L. (2001). A palimpsest of stories: Young children’s construction of intertextual links among fairytale variants. Reading Research and Instruction, 40 (4), 333-51.
194. Sipe, L., & Bauer, J. (2001). Urban kindergartners’ literary understanding of picture storybooks. The New Advocate, 14 (4), 329-42.
195. Smith, F. (1988). Joining the literacy club: Further essays into education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
196. Spiro, R., Coulson, R., Feltovich, P., & Anderson, D. (2004). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 640-53). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
197. Squire, J.R. (1990). Research on reader response and the national literature initiative. In M. Hayhoe & S. Parker (Eds.), Reading and response (pp. 13-24). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
198. Stephens, J. (1992). Language and ideology in children’s literature. New York: Longman.
199. Stephens, J., & Watson, K. (Eds). (1994). From picture book to literary theory. Sydney, AU: St Clair Press.
200. Stevenson, D. (1995). Zoom. [Review of the book Zoom]. The Bulletin of the Center for Children’s Books, 48 (6), 189-90.
201. Still, J., & Worton, M. (1990). Introduction. In M. Worton & J. Still (Eds.), Intertextuality: Theories and practices (pp. 1-44). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
202. Styles, M., & Arizpe, E. (2001). A gorilla with ‘grandpa’s eyes’: How children interpret visual texts - a case study of Anthony Browne’s Zoo. Children’s Literature in Education,32 (4), 261-81.
203. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy Web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55 (7), 662-9.
204. Taylor, B., Peterson, D., Pearson, P.D., & Rodriguez, M. (2002). Looking inside classrooms: Reflecting on the ‘how’ as well as the ‘what’ in effective reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 56 (3), 270-9.
205. Teale, W. (2003). Reading aloud to children as a classroom instructional activity: Insights from research and practice. In A. van Kleeck, S. Stahl, & E. Bauer (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 114-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
206. Thomson, J. (1984). Wolfgang Iser’s ‘The act of reading’ and the teaching of literature. English in Australia, 70, 18-30.
207. Tompkins, J.P. (Ed.). (1980). Reader response criticism: From formalism to poststructuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
208. Torr, J. (2004). Talking about picture books: The influence of maternal education on four-year-old children’s talk with mothers and pre-school teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4 (2), 181-210.
209. Trites, R. S. (1994). Manifold narratives: Metafiction and ideology in picture books. Children’s Literature in Education, 25(4), 225-42.
210. Villaume, S., & Worden, T. (1993). Developing literate voices: The challenge of whole language. Language Arts, 70 (6), 462-8.
211. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
212. Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed. & Trans.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-88). Armonk, NY: Sharpe. (Original work published 1960).
213. Walsh, M. (2000). Text-related variables in narrative picture books: Children’s response to visual and verbal texts. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,23 (2), 139-56.
214. Walsh, M. (2003). ‘Reading’ pictures: What do they reveal? Young children’s reading of visual texts. Reading: Literacy and Language, 37 (3), 123-30.
215. Wasik, B., & Bond, M. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (2), 243-50.
216. Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. New York: Methuen.
217. Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
218. Wiesner, D. (1992). Caldecott acceptance speech. The Horn Book, 68 (4), 416-22.
219. Wiesner, D. (2002). The 2002 Caldecott medal acceptance speech. Journal of Youth Services in Libraires,15 (4), 14-16.
220. Yaden, D., Rowe, D., & MacGillivray, L. (2000). Emergent literacy: A matter (polyphony) of perspectives. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol.3, pp. 425-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
221. Yearwood, S. (2002). Popular postmodernism for young adult readers: Walk two moons, Holes and Monster. The ALAN Review,29 (3), 50-3.
222. Yenawine, P. (2005). Thoughts on visual literacy. In J. Flood, S. Brice Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.). Research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 845-6). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
223. Banyai, I. (1995). Re-zoom. New York: Puffin Books.
224. Banyai, I. (1995). Zoom. New York: Puffin Books.
225. Bateman, R. (1998). Safari. Toronto: Penguin Studio.
226. Browne, A. (1977). A walk in the park. London: Julia MacRae Books.
227. Browne, A. (1984). Willy the wimp. London: Julia MacRae Books.
228. Browne, A. (1997). Willy the dreamer. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick Press.
229. Browne, A. (1998). Voices in the park. London: Picture Corgi Books.
230. Child, L. (2000). Beware of the storybook wolves. New York: Scholastic.
231. Child, L. (2002). Who’s afraid of the big bad book? New York: Hyperion.
232. Creech, S. (1994). Walk two moons. New York: HarperCollins.
233. Demi. (1990). The empty pot. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
234. Di Camillo, K. (2003). The tale of Despereaux. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick Press.
235. Fleischman, S. (1997). Seedfolks. New York: HarperTrophy.
236. Gilman, P. (1992). Something from nothing. Richmond Hill, ON: Scholastic Canada.
237. Konigsburg, E. L. (1996). The view from Saturday. New York: Atheneum.
238. Korman, G. (2003). The danger. New York: Scholastic.
239. Korman, G. (2003). The deep. New York: Scholastic.
240. Korman, G. (2003). The discovery. New York: Scholastic.
241. Lyon, G. (1996). A day at damp camp. New York: Orchard Books.
242. Macaulay, D. (1987). Why the chicken crossed the road. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
243. Macaulay, D. (1990). Black and white. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
244. Macaulay, D. (1995). Shortcut. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
245. Martin, J. B. (1998). Snowflake Bentley. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
246. Rylant, C. (1985). Every living thing. New York: Macmillan.
247. Sachar, L. (1998). Holes. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
248. Scieszka, J. (1989). The true story of the three little pigs. New York. Scholastic.
249. Scieszka, J. (1992). The Stinky Cheese Man and other fairly stupid tales. New York: Viking.
250. Seuss, Dr. (1970). Bartholomew and the oobleck. New York: Random House.
251. Sis, P. (1996). Starry messenger: Galileo Galilei. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
252. Van Draanen, P. (2001). Flipped. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
253. Wiesner, D. (1991). Tuesday. New York: Clarion Books.
254. Wiesner, D. (2001). The three pigs. New York: Clarion Books.
255. Willems, M. (2003). Don’t let the pigeon drive the bus! New York: Hyperion.