Target Selection during Protein Quality Control

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 124-137

  Shao, Sichen ^a   Hegde, Ramanujan S ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chaperone; Degradation; Protein misfolding; Triage; Ubiquitination

Indexed keywords

GLYCOPROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEASOME; PROTEOME; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; PROTEIN;

CELL FUNCTION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM ASSOCIATED DEGRADATION; ENZYME KINETICS; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN QUALITY CONTROL; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; RIBOSOME ASSOCIATED QUALITY CONTROL; UBIQUITINATION; METABOLISM; QUALITY CONTROL;

PROTEINS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84959156601     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: 13624326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.10.007     Document Type: Review

References (116)

1. Wolff S., et al. Differential scales of protein quality control. Cell 2014, 157:52-64.
2. Chiti F., Dobson C.M. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:333-366.
3. Powers E.T., et al. Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78:959-991.
4. Amm I., et al. Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843:182-196.
5. Mizushima N., et al. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27:107-132.
6. MacGurn J.A., et al. Ubiquitin and membrane protein turnover: from cradle to grave. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81:231-259.
7. Rodrigo-Brenni M.C., Hegde R.S. Design principles of protein biosynthesis-coupled quality control. Dev. Cell 2012, 23:896-907.
8. Bengtson M.H., Joazeiro C.A.P. Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality control. Nature 2010, 467:470-473.
9. Brandman O., et al. A ribosome-bound quality control complex triggers degradation of nascent peptides and signals translation stress. Cell 2012, 151:1042-1054.
10. Defenouillère Q., et al. Cdc48-associated complex bound to 60S particles is required for the clearance of aberrant translation products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5046-5051.
11. Shao S., et al. Listerin-dependent nascent protein ubiquitination relies on ribosome subunit dissociation. Mol. Cell 2013, 50:637-648.
12. Verma R., et al. Cdc48/p97 promotes degradation of aberrant nascent polypeptides bound to the ribosome. Elife 2013, 2:e00308.
13. Shao S., et al. Structure and assembly pathway of the ribosome quality control complex. Mol. Cell 2015, 57:433-444.
14. Doma M.K., Parker R. Endonucleolytic cleavage of eukaryotic mRNAs with stalls in translation elongation. Nature 2006, 440:561-564.
15. Inada T. Quality control systems for aberrant mRNAs induced by aberrant translation elongation and termination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1829:634-642.
16. Shoemaker C.J., Green R. Translation drives mRNA quality control. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:594-601.
17. Roy B., Jacobson A. The intimate relationships of mRNA decay and translation. Trends Genet. 2013, 29:691-699.
18. Frischmeyer P.A., et al. An mRNA surveillance mechanism that eliminates transcripts lacking termination codons. Science 2002, 295:2258-2261.
19. Dimitrova L.N., et al. Nascent peptide-dependent translation arrest leads to Not4p-mediated protein degradation by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:10343-10352.
20. Cole S.E., et al. A convergence of rRNA and mRNA quality control pathways revealed by mechanistic analysis of nonfunctional rRNA decay. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:440-450.
21. Shoemaker C.J., et al. Dom34:Hbs1 promotes subunit dissociation and peptidyl-tRNA drop-off to initiate no-go decay. Science 2010, 330:369-372.
22. Pisareva V.P., et al. Dissociation by Pelota, Hbs1 and ABCE1 of mammalian vacant 80S ribosomes and stalled elongation complexes. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1804-1817.
23. Dever T.E., Green R. The elongation, termination, and recycling phases of translation in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4:a013706.
24. Shoemaker C.J., Green R. Kinetic analysis reveals the ordered coupling of translation termination and ribosome recycling in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:E1392-E1398.
25. Becker T., et al. Structure of the no-go mRNA decay complex Dom34-Hbs1 bound to a stalled 80S ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:715-720.
26. Pisarev A.V., et al. The role of ABCE1 in eukaryotic posttermination ribosomal recycling. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:196-210.
27. Preis A., et al. Cryoelectron microscopic structures of eukaryotic translation termination complexes containing eRF1-eRF3 or eRF1-ABCE1. Cell Rep. 2014, 8:59-65.
28. Brown A., et al. Structural basis for stop codon recognition in eukaryotes. Nature 2015, 524:493-496.
29. Becker T., et al. Structural basis of highly conserved ribosome recycling in eukaryotes and archaea. Nature 2012, 482:501-506.
30. Marton M.J., et al. Evidence that GCN1 and GCN20, translational regulators of GCN4, function on elongating ribosomes in activation of eIF2alpha kinase GCN2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17:4474-4489.
31. Ishimura R., et al. Ribosome stalling induced by mutation of a CNS-specific tRNA causes neurodegeneration. Science 2014, 345:455-459.
32. Shen P.S., et al. Rqc2p and 60S ribosomal subunits mediate mRNA-independent elongation of nascent chains. Science 2015, 347:75-78.
33. Lyumkis D., et al. Structural basis for translational surveillance by the large ribosomal subunit-associated protein quality control complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:15981-15986.
34. Hessa T., et al. Protein targeting and degradation are coupled for elimination of mislocalized proteins. Nature 2011, 475:394-397.
35. Shao S., Hegde R.S. Membrane protein Insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27:25-56.
36. Shan S-O., Walter P. Co-translational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:921-926.
37. Hegde R.S., Keenan R.J. Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:787-798.
38. Halic M., Beckmann R. The signal recognition particle and its interactions during protein targeting. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2005, 15:116-125.
39. Stefanovic S., Hegde R.S. Identification of a targeting factor for posttranslational membrane protein insertion into the ER. Cell 2007, 128:1147-1159.
40. Rodrigo-Brenni M.C., et al. Cytosolic quality control of mislocalized proteins requires RNF126 recruitment to Bag6. Mol. Cell 2014, 55:227-237.
41. Mariappan M., et al. A ribosome-associating factor chaperones tail-anchored membrane proteins. Nature 2010, 466:1120-1124.
42. Voorhees R.M., Hegde R.S. Structures of the scanning and engaged states of the mammalian SRP-ribosome complex. Elife 2015, 4:e07975.
43. Minami R., et al. BAG-6 is essential for selective elimination of defective proteasomal substrates. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:637-650.
44. Wang F., et al. A chaperone cascade sorts proteins for posttranslational membrane insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:159-171.
45. Frydman J., et al. Folding of nascent polypeptide chains in a high molecular mass assembly with molecular chaperones. Nature 1994, 370:111-117.
46. Gristick H.B., et al. Crystal structure of ATP-bound Get3-Get4-Get5 complex reveals regulation of Get3 by Get4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:437-442.
47. Mateja A., et al. Structure of the Get3 targeting factor in complex with its membrane protein cargo. Science 2015, 347:1152-1155.
48. Mock J-Y., et al. Bag6 complex contains a minimal tail-anchor-targeting module and a mock BAG domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112:106-111.
49. Xu Y., et al. SGTA recognizes a noncanonical ubiquitin-like domain in the Bag6-Ubl4A-Trc35 complex to promote endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Cell Rep. 2012, 2:1633-1644.
50. Leznicki P., et al. The association of BAG6 with SGTA and tail-anchored proteins. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e59590.
51. Leznicki P., et al. A biochemical analysis of the constraints of tail-anchored protein biogenesis. Biochem. J. 2011, 436:719-727.
52. Rome M.E., et al. Precise timing of ATPase activation drives targeting of tail-anchored proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:7666-7671.
53. Rome M.E., et al. Differential gradients of interaction affinities drive efficient targeting and recycling in the GET pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:E4929-E4935.
54. Wang Q., et al. A ubiquitin ligase-associated chaperone holdase maintains polypeptides in soluble states for proteasome degradation. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:758-770.
55. Claessen J.H.L., et al. The chaperone BAG6 captures dislocated glycoproteins in the cytosol. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e90204.
56. Payapilly A., High S. BAG6 regulates the quality control of a polytopic ERAD substrate. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127:2898-2909.
57. Claessen J.H.L., Ploegh H.L. BAT3 guides misfolded glycoproteins out of the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e28542.
58. Ciechanover A., Stanhill A. The complexity of recognition of ubiquitinated substrates by the 26S proteasome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843:86-96.
59. Caramelo J.J., Parodi A.J. A sweet code for glycoprotein folding. FEBS Lett. 2015, Published online July 28, 2015. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.07.021.
60. Tannous A., et al. N-linked sugar-regulated protein folding and quality control in the ER. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 41:79-89.
61. Shrimal S., et al. Cotranslational and posttranslocational N-glycosylation of proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 41:71-78.
62. Hebert D.N., et al. Glucose trimming and reglucosylation determine glycoprotein association with calnexin in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 1995, 81:425-433.
63. Dancourt J., Barlowe C. Protein sorting receptors in the early secretory pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79:777-802.
64. Soldà T., et al. Substrate-specific requirements for UGT1-dependent release from calnexin. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:238-249.
65. Molinari M., et al. Persistent glycoprotein misfolding activates the glucosidase II/UGT1-driven calnexin cycle to delay aggregation and loss of folding competence. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:503-512.
66. Sousa M.C., et al. Recognition of the oligosaccharide and protein moieties of glycoproteins by the UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase. Biochemistry 1992, 31:97-105.
67. Sousa M., Parodi A.J. The molecular basis for the recognition of misfolded glycoproteins by the UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase. EMBO J. 1995, 14:4196-4203.
68. Caramelo J.J., et al. UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase recognizes structured and solvent accessible hydrophobic patches in molten globule-like folding intermediates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:86-91.
69. Caramelo J.J., et al. The endoplasmic reticulum glucosyltransferase recognizes nearly native glycoprotein folding intermediates. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:46280-46285.
70. Totani K., et al. Synthetic substrates for an endoplasmic reticulum protein-folding sensor, UDP-glucose: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005, 44:7950-7954.
71. Tannous A., et al. Reglucosylation by UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1 delays glycoprotein secretion but not degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015, 26:390-405.
72. Avezov E., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) mannosidase I is compartmentalized and required for N-glycan trimming to Man5-6GlcNAc2 in glycoprotein ER-associated degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:216-225.
73. Tamura T., et al. Characterization of early EDEM1 protein maturation events and their functional implications. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:24906-24915.
74. Hosokawa N., et al. EDEM1 accelerates the trimming of alpha1,2-linked mannose on the C branch of N-glycans. Glycobiology 2010, 20:567-575.
75. Aikawa J-I., et al. Trimming of glucosylated N-glycans by human ER α1,2-mannosidase I. J. Biochem. 2014, 155:375-384.
76. Benyair R., et al. Glycan regulation of ER-associated degradation through compartmentalization. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 41:99-109.
77. Ushioda R., et al. ERdj5 is required as a disulfide reductase for degradation of misfolded proteins in the ER. Science 2008, 321:569-572.
78. Gauss R., et al. A complex of Pdi1p and the mannosidase Htm1p initiates clearance of unfolded glycoproteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:782-793.
79. Frenkel Z., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of mammalian glycoproteins involves sugar chain trimming to Man6-5GlcNAc2. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:34119-34124.
80. Mikami K., et al. The sugar-binding ability of human OS-9 and its involvement in ER-associated degradation. Glycobiology 2010, 20:310-321.
81. Hosokawa N., et al. Human OS-9, a lectin required for glycoprotein endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation, recognizes mannose-trimmed N-glycans. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:17061-17068.
82. Groisman B., et al. Mannose trimming is required for delivery of a glycoprotein from EDEM1 to XTP3-B and to late endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation steps. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:1292-1300.
83. Szathmary R., et al. Yos9 protein is essential for degradation of misfolded glycoproteins and may function as lectin in ERAD. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:765-775.
84. Satoh T., et al. Structural basis for oligosaccharide recognition of misfolded glycoproteins by OS-9 in ER-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:905-916.
85. Kim W., et al. Yos9p detects and targets misfolded glycoproteins for ER-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:753-764.
86. Gauss R., et al. A complex of Yos9p and the HRD ligase integrates endoplasmic reticulum quality control into the degradation machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:849-854.
87. Denic V., et al. A luminal surveillance complex that selects misfolded glycoproteins for ER-associated degradation. Cell 2006, 126:349-359.
88. Stein A., et al. Key steps in ERAD of luminal ER proteins reconstituted with purified components. Cell 2014, 158:1375-1388.
89. Xu C., et al. Futile protein folding cycles in the ER are terminated by the unfolded protein O-mannosylation pathway. Science 2013, 340:978-981.
90. Nomaguchi M., et al. Role of HIV-1 Vpu protein for virus spread and pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2008, 10:960-967.
91. Margottin F., et al. A novel human WD protein, h-beta TrCp, that interacts with HIV-1 Vpu connects CD4 to the ER degradation pathway through an F-box motif. Mol. Cell 1998, 1:565-574.
92. Zhang Z-R., et al. Deubiquitinases sharpen substrate discrimination during membrane protein degradation from the ER. Cell 2013, 154:609-622.
93. Pierce N.W., et al. Detection of sequential polyubiquitylation on a millisecond timescale. Nature 2009, 462:615-619.
94. Christianson J.C., Ye Y. Cleaning up in the endoplasmic reticulum: ubiquitin in charge. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:325-335.
95. Rape M., et al. The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell 2006, 124:89-103.
96. Sato B.K., et al. Misfolded membrane proteins are specifically recognized by the transmembrane domain of the Hrd1p ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:212-222.
97. Ishikura S., et al. Serine residues in the cytosolic tail of the T-cell antigen receptor alpha-chain mediate ubiquitination and endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of the unassembled protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:23916-23924.
98. Blount J.R., et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 25 functions in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e36542.
99. Lee J-G., et al. Reversible inactivation of deubiquitinases by reactive oxygen species in vitro and in cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1568.
100. Kulathu Y., et al. Regulation of A20 and other OTU deubiquitinases by reversible oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1569.
101. Fan H-C., et al. Polyglutamine (PolyQ) diseases: genetics to treatments. Cell Transplant. 2014, 23:441-458.
102. Cheng S.H., et al. Defective intracellular transport and processing of CFTR is the molecular basis of most cystic fibrosis. Cell 1990, 63:827-834.
103. Fan J-Q. A counterintuitive approach to treat enzyme deficiencies: use of enzyme inhibitors for restoring mutant enzyme activity. Biol. Chem. 2008, 389:1-11.
104. Schmidt M., Finley D. Regulation of proteasome activity in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843:13-25.
105. Pratt W.B., et al. Targeting Hsp90/Hsp70-based protein quality control for treatment of adult onset neurodegenerative diseases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2015, 55:353-371.
106. Nillegoda N.B., et al. Ubr1 and Ubr2 function in a quality control pathway for degradation of unfolded cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:2102-2116.
107. Heck J.W., et al. Cytoplasmic protein quality control degradation mediated by parallel actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Ubr1 and San1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:1106-1111.
108. Eisele F., Wolf D.H. Degradation of misfolded protein in the cytoplasm is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:4143-4146.
109. Khosrow-Khavar F., et al. The yeast ubr1 ubiquitin ligase participates in a prominent pathway that targets cytosolic thermosensitive mutants for degradation. G3 2012, 2:619-628.
110. Rosenbaum J.C., et al. Disorder targets misorder in nuclear quality control degradation: a disordered ubiquitin ligase directly recognizes its misfolded substrates. Mol. Cell 2011, 41:93-106.
111. Bercovich B., et al. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of certain protein substrates in vitro requires the molecular chaperone Hsc70. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:9002-9010.
112. Ballinger C.A., et al. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19:4535-4545.
113. Kettern N., et al. Chaperone-assisted degradation: multiple paths to destruction. Biol. Chem. 2010, 391:481-489.
114. Lin H-C., et al. CRL2 aids elimination of truncated selenoproteins produced by failed UGA/Sec decoding. Science 2015, 349:91-95.
115. Babst M. Quality control: quality control at the plasma membrane: one mechanism does not fit all. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 205:11-20.
116. Fang N.N., et al. Rsp5/Nedd4 is the main ubiquitin ligase that targets cytosolic misfolded proteins following heat stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:1227-1237.