Structures of the scanning and engaged states of the mammalian srp-ribosome complex

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue JULY 2015, 2015, Pages 1-21

  Voorhees, Rebecca M ^a   Hegde, Ramanujan S ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE; MACROMOLECULE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMMUNOBLOTTING; PLASMID; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RIBOSOME; RNA TRANSLATION; TRANSLATION REGULATION; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MACROMOLECULE; MAMMAL; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MAMMALS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RIBOSOMES; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE;

EID: 84937403604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07975     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Amunts A, Brown A, Bai XC, Llacer JL, Hussain T, Emsley P, Long F, Murshudov G, Scheres SH, Ramakrishnan V 2014. Structure of the yeast mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit. Science 343:1485–1489. doi:10.1126/science.1249410
2. Bai XC, Fernandez IS, McMullan G, Scheres SH. 2013. Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo-EM particles. eLife 2:e00461. doi:10.7554/eLife.00461
3. Batey RT, Rambo RP, Lucast L, Rha B, Doudna JA. 2000. Crystal structure of the ribonucleoprotein core of the signal recognition particle. Science 287:1232–1239. doi:10.1126/science.287.5456.1232
4. Becker T, Armache JP, Jarasch A, Anger AM, Villa E, Sieber H, Motaal BA, Mielke T, Berninghausen O, Beckmann R 2011. Structure of the no-go mRNA decay complex Dom34-Hbs1 bound to a stalled 80S ribosome. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18:715–720. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2057
5. Berndt U, Oellerer S, Zhang Y, Johnson AE, Rospert S. 2009. A signal-anchor sequence stimulates signal recognition particle binding to ribosomes from inside the exit tunnel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 106:1398–1403. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808584106
6. Bhushan S, Hoffmann T, Seidelt B, Frauenfeld J, Mielke T, Berninghausen O, Wilson DN, Beckmann R. 2011. SecMstalled ribosomes adopt an altered geometry at the peptidyl transferase center. PLOS Biology 9:e1000581 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000581
7. Bornemann T, Jockel J, Rodnina MV, Wintermeyer W. 2008. Signal sequence-independent membrane targeting of ribosomes containing short nascent peptides within the exit tunnel. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 15:494–499. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1402
8. Brown A, Long F, Nicholls RA, Toots J, Emsley P, Murshudov G. 2015. Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography 71:136–153. doi:10.1107/S1399004714021683
9. Clemons WMJ, Gowda K, Black SD, Zwieb C, Ramakrishnan V. 1999. Crystal structure of the conserved subdomain of human protein SRP54M at 2.1 A resolution:evidence for the mechanism of signal peptide binding. Journal of Molecular Biology 292:697–705. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3090
10. Conti BJ, Elferich J, Yang Z, Shinde U, Skach WR. 2014. Cotranslational folding inhibits translocation from within the ribosome-Sec61 translocon complex. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 21:228–235. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2779
11. del Alamo M, Hogan DJ, Pechmann S, Albanese V, Brown PO, Frydman J. 2011. Defining the specificity of cotranslationally acting chaperones by systematic analysis of mRNAs associated with ribosome-nascent chain complexes. PLOS Biology 9:e1001100. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001100
12. DeLano W L. 2006. The PyMOL molecular graphics system.http://www.pymol.org
13. Egea PF, Napetschnig J, Walter P, Stroud RM. 2008. Structures of SRP54 and SRP19, the two proteins that organize the ribonucleic core of the signal recognition particle from Pyrococcus furiosus. PLOS ONE 3:e3528 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003528.
14. Egea PF, Shan SO, Napetschnig J, Savage DF, Walter P, Stroud RM. 2004. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 427:215–221. doi:10.1038/nature02250
15. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. 2010. Features and development of coot. Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography 66:486–501. doi:10.1107/S0907444910007493
16. Flanagan JJ, Chen JC, Miao Y, Shao Y, Lin J, Bock PE, Johnson AE. 2003. Signal recognition particle binds to ribosome-bound signal sequences with fluorescence-detected subnanomolar affinity that does not diminish as the nascent chain lengthens. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:18628–18637. doi:10.1074/jbcM300173200
17. Focia PJ, Shepotinovskaya IV, Seidler JA, Freymann DM. 2004. Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science 303:373–377. doi:10.1126/science.1090827
18. Goddard TD, Huang CC, Ferrin TE. 2007. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. Journal of Structural Biology 157:281–287. doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.010
19. Grotwinkel JT, Wild K, Segnitz B, Sinning I. 2014. SRP RNA remodeling by SRP68 explains its role in protein translocation. Science 344:101–104. doi:10.1126/science.1249094
20. Hainzl T, Huang S, Merilainen G, Brannstrom K, Sauer-Eriksson AE. 2011. Structural basis of signal-sequence recognition by the signal recognition particle. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18:389–391. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1994
21. Halic M, Becker T, Pool MR, Spahn CM, Grassucci RA, Frank J, Beckmann R. 2004. Structure of the signal recognition particle interacting with the elongation-arrested ribosome. Nature 427:808–814. doi:10.1038/nature02342
22. Halic M, Beckmann R. 2005. The signal recognition particle and its interactions during protein targeting. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 15:116–125. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2005.01.013
23. Halic M, Blau M, Becker T, Mielke T, Pool MR, Wild K, Sinning I, Beckmann R. 2006. Following the signal sequence from ribosomal tunnel exit to signal recognition particle. Nature 444:507–511. doi:10.1038/nature05326
24. Hessa T, Sharma A, Mariappan M, Eshleman HD, Gutierrez E, Hegde RS. 2011. Protein targeting and degradation are coupled for elimination of mislocalized proteins. Nature 475:394–397. doi:10.1038/nature10181
25. Holtkamp W, Lee S, Bornemann T, Senyushkina T, Rodnina MV, Wintermeyer W. 2012. Dynamic switch of the signal recognition particle from scanning to targeting. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 19:1332–1337 doi:10.1038/nsmb.2421
26. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324:218–223. doi:10.1126/science.1168978
27. Jan CH, Williams CC, Weissman JS. 2014. Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximityspecific ribosome profiling. Science 346:1257521. doi:10.1126/science.1257521
28. Janda CY, Li J, Oubridge C, Hernandez H, Robinson CV, Nagai K. 2010. Recognition of a signal peptide by the signal recognition particle. Nature 465:507–510. doi:10.1038/nature08870
29. Keenan RJ, Freymann DM, Stroud RM, Walter P. 2001. The signal recognition particle. Annual Review of Biochemistry 70:755–775. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.755
30. Keenan RJ, Freymann DM, Walter P, Stroud RM. 1998. Crystal structure of the signal sequence binding subunit of the signal recognition particle. Cell 94:181–191. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81418-X
31. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model:application to complete genomes. Journal of Molecular Biology 305:567–580 doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315
32. Kucukelbir A, Sigworth FJ, Tagare HD. 2014. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nature Methods 11:63–65. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2727
33. Lakkaraju AK, Mary C, Scherrer A, Johnson AE, Strub K. 2008. SRP keeps polypeptides translocation-competent by slowing translation to match limiting ER-targeting sites. Cell 133:440–451. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.049
34. Lareau LF, Hite DH, Hogan GJ, Brown PO. 2014. Distinct stages of the translation elongation cycle revealed by sequencing ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. eLife 3:e01257. doi:10.7554/eLife.01257
35. Lutcke H, High S, Romisch K, Ashford AJ, Dobberstein B. 1992. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is sufficient for the interaction with signal sequences. The EMBO Journal 11:1543–1551
36. Mariappan M, Li X, Stefanovic S, Sharma A, Mateja A, Keenan RJ, Hegde RS. 2010. A ribosome-associating factor chaperones tail-anchored membrane proteins. Nature 466:1120–1124. doi:10.1038/nature09296
37. Mason N, Ciufo LF, Brown JD. 2000. Elongation arrest is a physiologically important function of signal recognition particle. The EMBO Journal 19:4164–4174. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.15.4164
38. Mateja A, Paduch M, Chang HY, Szydlowska A, Kossiakoff AA, Hegde RS, Keenan RJ. 2015. Protein targeting Structure of the Get3 targeting factor in complex with its membrane protein cargo. Science 347:1152–1155 doi:10.1126/science.1261671
39. Mateja A, Szlachcic A, Downing ME, Dobosz M, Mariappan M, Hegde RS, Keenan RJ. 2009. The structural basis of tail-anchored membrane protein recognition by Get3. Nature 461:361–366. doi:10.1038/nature08319
40. Miller JD, Wilhelm H, Gierasch L, Gilmore R, Walter P. 1993. GTP binding and hydrolysis by the signal recognition particle during initiation of protein translocation. Nature 366:351–354. doi:10.1038/366351a0
41. Mindell JA, Grigorieff N. 2003. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy Journal of Structural Biology 142:334–347. doi:10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00069-8
42. Murshudov GN, Skubak P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, Winn MD, Long F, Vagin AA. 2011 REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography 67:355–367. doi:10.1107/S0907444911001314
43. Nicholls RA, Long F, Murshudov GN. 2012. Low-resolution refinement tools in REFMAC5. Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography 68:404–417. doi:10.1107/S090744491105606X.
44. Noriega TR, Chen J, Walter P, Puglisi JD. 2014a. Real-time observation of signal recognition particle binding to actively translating ribosomes. eLife 3:e04418. doi:10.7554/eLife.04418
45. Noriega TR, Tsai A, Elvekrog MM, Petrov A, Neher SB, Chen J, Bradshaw N, Puglisi JD, Walter P. 2014b. Signal recognition particle-ribosome binding is sensitive to nascent chain length. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:19294–19305. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.563239
46. Ogg SC, Walter P. 1995. SRP samples nascent chains for the presence of signal sequences by interacting with ribosomes at a discrete step during translation elongation. Cell 81:1075–1084. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80012-1
47. Pechmann S, Chartron JW, Frydman J. 2014. Local slowdown of translation by nonoptimal codons promotes nascent-chain recognition by SRP in vivo. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 21:1100–1105. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2919
48. Pellecchia M, Montgomery DL, Stevens SY, Vander Kooi CW, Feng HP, Gierasch LM, Zuiderweg ER. 2000 Structural insights into substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Nature Structural Biology 7:298–303 doi:10.1038/74062
49. Pisareva VP, Skabkin MA, Hellen CU, Pestova TV, Pisarev AV. 2011. Dissociation by Pelota, Hbs1 and ABCE1 of mammalian vacant 80S ribosomes and stalled elongation complexes. The EMBO Journal 30:1804–1817 doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.93
50. Rabu C, Wipf P, Brodsky JL, High S. 2008. A precursor-specific role for Hsp40/Hsc70 during tail-anchored protein integration at the endoplasmic reticulum. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:27504–27513. doi:10.1074/jbc.M804591200
51. Rosendal KR, Wild K, Montoya G, Sinning I. 2003. Crystal structure of the complete core of archaeal signal recognition particle and implications for interdomain communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 100:14701–14706. doi:10.1073/pnas.2436132100
52. Saraogi I, Akopian D, Shan SO. 2014. Regulation of cargo recognition, commitment, and unloading drives cotranslational protein targeting. The Journal of Cell Biology 205:693–706. doi:10.1083/jcb.201311028
53. Schaffitzel C, Oswald M, Berger I, Ishikawa T, Abrahams JP, Koerten HK, Koning RI, Ban N. 2006. Structure of the E. coli signal recognition particle bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 444:503–506. doi:10.1038/nature05182
54. Scheres SH. 2012. RELION:implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. Journal of Structural Biology 180:519–530. doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006
55. Scheres SH. 2014. Beam-induced motion correction for sub-megadalton cryo-EM particles. eLife 3:e03665 doi:10.7554/eLife.03665
56. Scheres SH, Chen S. 2012. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nature Methods 9:853–854. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2115
57. Seidelt B, Innis CA, Wilson DN, Gartmann M, Armache JP, Villa E, Trabuco LG, Becker T, Mielke T, Schulten K, Steitz TA, Beckmann R. 2009. Structural insight into nascent polypeptide chain-mediated translational stalling Science 326:1412–1415. doi:10.1126/science.1177662
58. Shan SO, Walter P. 2005. Co-translational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle. FEBS Letters 579:921–926. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.049
59. Shao S, Hegde RS. 2011a. A calmodulin-dependent translocation pathway for small secretory proteins. Cell 147:1576–1588. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.048
60. Shao S, Hegde RS. 2011b. Membrane protein insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 27:25–56. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154125
61. Shao S, Hegde RS. 2014. Reconstitution of a minimal ribosome-associated ubiquitination pathway with purified factors. Molecular Cell 55:880–890. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.07.006
62. Shao S, von der Malsburg K, Hegde RS. 2013. Listerin-dependent nascent protein ubiquitination relies on ribosome subunit dissociation. Molecular Cell 50:637–648. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.015
63. Sharma A, Mariappan M, Appathurai S, Hegde RS. 2010. In vitro dissection of protein translocation into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Methods in Molecular Biology 619:339–363. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-412-8_20
64. Shoemaker CJ, Eyler DE, Green R. 2010. Dom34:Hbs1 promotes subunit dissociation and peptidyl-tRNA drop-off to initiate no-go decay. Science 330:369–372. doi:10.1126/science.1192430
65. Siegel V, Walter P. 1986. Removal of the Alu structural domain from signal recognition particle leaves its protein translocation activity intact. Nature 320:81–84. doi:10.1038/320081a0
66. Siegel V, Walter P. 1988. The affinity of signal recognition particle for presecretory proteins is dependent on nascent chain length. The EMBO Journal 7:1769–1775
67. Stefanovic S, Hegde RS. 2007. Identification of a targeting factor for posttranslational membrane protein insertion into the ER. Cell 128:1147–1159. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.036
68. von Heijne G. 1990. Protein targeting signals. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2:604–608. doi:10.1016/0955-0674(90)90100-S
69. Voorhees RM, Weixlbaumer A, Loakes D, Kelley AC, Ramakrishnan V. 2009. Insights into substrate stabilization from snapshots of the peptidyl transferase center of the intact 70S ribosome. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 16:528–533. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1577
70. Voorhees RM, Fernandez IS, Scheres SH, Hegde RS. 2014. Structure of the mammalian ribosome-Sec61 complex to 3.4 A resolution. Cell 157:1632–1643. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.024
71. Walter P, Blobel G. 1981. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Signal recognition protein (SRP) mediates the selective binding to microsomal membranes of in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. The Journal of Cell Biology 91:551–556. doi:10.1083/jcb.91.2.551.
72. Walter P, Ibrahimi I, Blobel G. 1981. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. The Journal of Cell Biology 91:545–550. doi:10.1083/jcb.91.2.545
73. Wang F, Brown EC, Mak G, Zhuang J, Denic V. 2010. A chaperone cascade sorts proteins for posttranslational membrane insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Molecular Cell 40:159–171. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.038
74. Weichenrieder O, Wild K, Strub K, Cusack S. 2000. Structure and assembly of the Alu domain of the mammalian signal recognition particle. Nature 408:167–173. doi:10.1038/35041507
75. Wilson DN, Beckmann R. 2011. The ribosomal tunnel as a functional environment for nascent polypeptide folding and translational stalling. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 21:274–282. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2011.01.007
76. Wolin SL, Walter P. 1989. Signal recognition particle mediates a transient elongation arrest of preprolactin in reticulocyte lysate. The Journal of Cell Biology 109:2617–2622. doi:10.1083/jcb.109.6.2617
77. Zhang Y, Berndt U, Gölz H, Tais A, Oellerer S, Wölfle T, Fitzke E, Rospert S. 2012. NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. Molecular Biology of the Cell 23:3027–3040. doi:10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0112
78. Zhang D, Shan SO. 2012. Translation elongation regulates substrate selection by the signal recognition particle The Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:7652–7660. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.325001
79. Zhang X, Rashid R, Wang K, Shan SO. 2010. Sequential checkpoints govern substrate selection during cotranslational protein targeting. Science 328:757–760. doi:10.1126/science.1186743
80. Zopf D, Bernstein HD, Johnson AE, Walter P. 1990. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kd protein subunit of the signal recognition particle contains an RNA binding site and can be crosslinked to a signal sequence. The EMBO Journal 9:4511–4517