A New Look at Multiple Goal Pursuit: the Promise of a Person-Centered Approach

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 407-445

  Wormington, Stephanie Virgine ^a   Linnenbrink Garcia, Lisa ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic motivation; Achievement; Achievement goals; Engagement; Motivation profiles; Person centered; Well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958780245     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-016-9358-2     Document Type: Review

References (138)

1. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261.
3. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.
4. Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: influences on student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 369–389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706.
6. Bembenutty, H. (1999). Sustaining motivation and academic goals: the role of academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 233–257. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80002-8.
7. Berger, J. L. (2012). Uncovering vocational students' multiple goal profiles in the learning of professional mathematics: differences in learning strategies, motivational beliefs and cognitive abilities. Educational Psychology, 32, 405–425. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.674663.
8. Bergman, L. R. (2001). A person approach in research on adolescence: some methodological challenges. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 28–53.
9. Bergman, L. R., & El-Khouri, B. M. (1999). Studying individual patterns of development using i-states as objects analysis (ISOA). Biometric Journal, 41, 753–770. doi:10.1177/0743558401161004.
10. Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El Khouri, B. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: a person-oriented approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Bergman, L. R., & Trost, K. (2006). The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 601–632. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0023.
12. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis. [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: BioStat.
13. Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., & Bordeleau, L. (1998). A developmental study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students’ self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 309–319. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01293.x.
14. Brdar, I., Rijavec, M., & Loncaric, D. (2006). Goal orientations, coping with school failure and school achievement. European Journal of Psychology and Education, 21, 53–70. doi:10.1007/BF03173569.
15. Breckenridge, J. N. (2000). Validating cluster analysis: consistent replication and symmetry. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 261–285. doi:10.1007/BF03173569.
16. Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40, 167–176. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3.
17. Cairns, R. B., Bergman, L. R., & Kagan, J. (1998). Methods and models for studying the individual. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Cano, F., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2009). University students’ achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 131–153. doi:10.1348/000709908X314928.
19. Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 32–47. doi:10.1037/a0026042.
20. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Cuevas, R., García-Calvo, T., & Contreras, O. (2013). Perfiles motivacionales en educación física: Una aproximación desde la teoría de las Metas de Logro 2x2. Anales de Psicología, 29, 685–692.
23. Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., Stupniski, R. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Individual differences in achievement goals: a longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 584–608. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.002.
24. Day, E. A., Yeo, S., & Radosevich, D. J. (2003). Comparing two-and three-factor models of goal orientation: A meta-analysis. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
25. Dina, F., & Efklides, A. (2009). Student profiles of achievement goals, goal instructions and external feedback: their effect on mathematical task performance and affect. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 2, 235–262.
26. DiStefano, C. (2012). Cluster analysis and latent class clustering techniques. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 645–666). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Dull, R. B., Schleifer, L. L., & McMillan, J. J. (2015). Achievement goal theory: the relationship of accounting students’ goal orientations with self-efficacy, anxiety, and achievement. Accounting Education, 24, 152–174. doi:10.1080/09639284.2015.1036892.
28. Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2003). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: coherence, concordance, and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 378–385. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00013-1.
29. Dweck, C. S., & Bempechat, J. (1983). Children’s theories of intelligence: consequences for learning. In S. Paris, G. Olsen, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 239–256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
31. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.
32. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.
33. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: a meditational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.
34. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.
35. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628.
36. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549–563. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549.
37. Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. doi:10.1037/a0023952.
38. Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161–176. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.161.
39. Fortunato, V. J., & Goldblatt, A. M. (2006). An examination of goal orientation profiles using cluster analysis and their relationships with dispositional characteristics and motivational response patterns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2150–2183. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00099.x.
40. Gómez-López, M., Granero-Gallegos, A., Baena-Extremera, A., & Abraldes, J. A. (2014). Goal orientation effects on elite handball players motivation and motivational climate. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 434–440.
41. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541.
42. Hair, J. R., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Macmillan.
43. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Determinants and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284.
44. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: when are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1–21. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1.
45. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638.
46. Hayamizu, T., & Weiner, B. (1991). A test of Dweck’s model of achievement goals as related to perceptions of ability. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 226–234. doi:10.1080/00220973.1991.10806562.
47. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed and random effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486–504. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486.
48. Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 359–388. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9155-x.
49. Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48–73. doi:10.1037/a0026223.
50. Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodman, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/a0018947.
51. Hulleman, C. S., & Senko, C. (2010). Up around the bend: forecasts for achievement goal theory and research in 2020 (pp. 71–104). In S. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 16). New York: Emerald.
52. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275–292. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00156.
53. Inglés, C. J., Martínez Monteagudo, M. C., García Fernández, J. M., Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., Delgado Domenech, B., & Torregrosa, M. S. (2015). Motivational profiles Spanish students of compulsory secondary education: differential analysis of academic self-attributions. Anales de Psicología, 31, 579–588. doi:10.6018/analesps.31.2.173281.
54. Jang, L. Y., & Liu, W. C. (2012). 2 × 2 achievement goals and achievement emotions: a cluster analysis of students’ motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 59–76. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0066-5.
55. Järvelä, S., & Niemivirta, M. (2001). Motivation in context: Challenges and possibilities in studying the role of motivation in new pedagogical cultures (pp. 105–127). In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implication. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press Ltd.
56. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014.
57. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5.
58. Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2002). Should childhood be a journey or a race? Response to Harackiewicz et al. (2002). Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 646–648. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.646.
59. Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569–581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569.
60. Kolíc-Vehovec, S., Rončević, B., & Bajšanski, I. (2008). Motivational components of self-regulated learning and reading strategy use in university students: the role of goal orientation patterns. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 108–113. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.07.005.
61. Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2014). Differences in students’ school motivation: a latent class modelling approach. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 137–163. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9274-6.
62. Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 377–389. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0029.
63. Law, W., Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2012). Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 806–819. doi:10.1037/a0027179.
64. Levy, I., Kaplan, A., & Patrick, H. (2004). Early adolescents' achievement goals, social status, and attitudes towards cooperation with peers. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 127–159. doi:10.1023/B:SPOE.0000018547.08294.b6.
65. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: the use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197.
66. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Multiple goals, multiple contexts: The dynamic interplay between personal goals and contextual goal stresses. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications. Advances in learning and instruction series (pp. 251–269). Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.
67. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Middleton, M. J., Ciani, K. D., Easter, M. A., O’Keefe, P. A., & Zusho, A. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47, 281–301. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722515.
68. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., & Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 19–70.
69. Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Ee, J., & Koh, C. (2009). Understanding students’ motivation in project work: a 2 × 2 achievement goal approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 87–106.
70. Luo, W., Paris, S. G., Hogan, D., & Luo, Z. (2011). Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003.
71. Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: a second look. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (vol. 2, pp. 221–267). New York: Academic Press.
72. Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: the past, present, and future. In K. Wentzel (Ed.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77–104). New York: Routledge.
73. Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. Cairns, L. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Martínez, L. N., Llorca, J. A. S., & Tello, F. P. H. (2012). Perfiles motivacionales en educación física. De Psicología, 29, 33–39.
75. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181–190. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.181.
76. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514.
77. Meece, J. L., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582–590. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.582.
78. Méndez-GiMénez, A., Cecchini-Estrada, J. A., & Fernández-Río, J. (2014). El modelo de perfeccionismo disposicional 2x2 en la adolescencia: una comprobación en el contexto de la Educación Física. Universitas Psychologica, 13, 1333–1343. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-4.mpda.
79. Méndez-Giménez, A., González González de Mesa, C., Cecchini Estrada, J. A., & Fernández-Río, J. (2013). Perfiles motivacionales y sus consecuencias en educación física. Un estudio complementario de metas de logro 2x2 y autodeterminación. In Revista de psicología del deporte (Vol. 22, pp. 0029–38).
80. Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: an underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710.
81. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77.
82. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H., Anderman, E., & Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0965.
83. Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hicks, L., Roeser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., Kaplan, A., Arunkumar, R., & Middleton, M. (1997). Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey (PALS). Unpublished manuscript. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
84. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
85. Moreira, P. A., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Predictors of academic performance and school engagement—Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspectives using person-centered and variable-centered approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016.
86. Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432–447. doi:10.1037/a0014221.
87. Nelson, K. G., Shell, D. F., Husman, J., Fishman, E. J., & Soh, L. K. (2015). Motivational and self‐regulated learning profiles of students taking a foundational engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 74–100. doi:10.1002/jee.20066.
88. Ng, C. (2006). The role of achievement goals in completing a course assignment: examining the effects of performance-approach and multiple goals. Open Learning, 21, 33–48. doi:10.1080/02680510500472189.
89. Ng, C. C. (2009). Profiling learners’ achievement goals when completing academic essays. Educational Psychology, 29, 279–295. doi:10.1080/01443410902797988.
90. Nicholls, J. G. (1979). Quality and equality in intellectual development. American Psychologist, 34, 1071–1084. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.11.1071.
91. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328.
92. Nicholls, J. G., Cheung, P. C., Lauer, J., & Patashnick, M. (1989). Individual differences in academic motivation: perceived ability, goals, beliefs, and values. Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 63–84. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(89)90010-1.
93. Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents’ theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 683–692. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.683.
94. Niemivirta, M. (1996a). Intentional and adaptive learning modes – The self at stake. Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference on Educational Research, Sevilla, Spain.
95. Niemivirta, M. (1996b). Motivational-cognitive components in self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Motivation, Landau, Germany.
96. Niemivirta, M. (1998). Individual differences in motivational and cognitive factors affecting self-regulated learning: a pattern-oriented approach. In P. Nenniger, R. S. Jäger, A. Frey, & M. Wosnitza (Eds.), Advances in motivation (pp. 23–42). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
97. Niemivirta, M. (2002). Motivation and performance in context: the influence of goal orientations and instructional setting on situational appraisals and task performance. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 45, 250–270. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2002.250.
98. Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8–47. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.003.
99. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
100. Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2013). Avoidance-oriented students’ development in motivation for maths, selfregulated learning behaviour and achievement: a person-centred study in the lowest level of secondary education. Educational Psychology, 33, 828–848. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.802885.
101. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544.
102. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
103. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
104. Poulin, R., Duchesne, S., & Ratelle, C. (2010). Profils de buts d’apprentissage et caractéristiques personnelles des élèves au début du secondaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 42, 44–54. doi:10.1037/a0016544.
105. Pulkka, A. T., & Niemivirta, M. (2013a). Adult students' achievement goal orientations and evaluations of the learning environment: a person-centred longitudinal analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 297–322. doi:10.1080/13803611.2013.767741.
106. Pulkka, A. T., & Niemivirta, M. (2013b). In the eye of the beholder: Do adult students' achievement goal orientation profiles predict their perceptions of instruction and studying? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.002.
107. Rijavec, M., & Brdar, I. (2002). Coping with school failure and self-regulated learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 177–194. doi:10.1007/BF03173257.
108. Riveiro, J. M. S., Cabanach, R. G., & Arias, A. V. (2001). Multiple-goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, and motivational strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 561–572. doi:10.1348/000709901158677.
109. Rosa, E. D. D., & Bernardo, A. B. (2013). Are two achievement goals better than one? Filipino students' achievement goals, deep learning strategies and affect. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 97–101. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.005.
110. Schwinger, M., & Wild, E. (2012). Prevalence, stability, and functionality of achievement goal profiles in mathematics from third to seventh grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.08.001.
111. Seifert, T. L., & O’Keefe, B. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality, and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 81–92. doi:10.1348/000709901158406.
112. Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: the role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 320–336. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.320.
113. Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2012). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646.
114. Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2013). Profiles of motivated self-regulation in college computer science courses: differences in major versus required non-major courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 899–913. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9437-9.
115. Shim, S. S., & Finch, W. H. (2014). Academic and social achievement goals and early adolescents' adjustment: a latent class approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 98–105. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.015.
116. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71–81. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.71.
117. Skaalvik, S., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2005). Self-concept, motivational orientation, and help-seeking behavior in mathematics: a study of adults returning to high school. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 285–302. doi:10.1007/s11218-005-3276-3.
118. Steinley, D., & Brusco, M. J. (2011). Evaluating mixture modeling for clustering: recommendations and cautions. Psychological Methods, 16, 63–79. doi:10.1037/a0022673.
119. Stoeger, H., Steinbach, J., Obergriesser, S., & Matthes, B. (2014). What is more important for fourth-grade primary school students for transforming their potential into achievement: the individual or the environmental box in multidimensional conceptions of giftedness? High Ability Studies, 25, 5–21. doi:10.1080/13598139.2014.914381.
120. Tapola, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 291–312. doi:10.1348/000709907X205272.
121. Tapola, A., Jaakkola, T., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). The influence of achievement goal orientations and task concreteness on situational interest. Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 455–479. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.813370.
122. Tas, Y., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Personal and contextual factors associated with students’ cheating in science. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 440–463. doi:10.1080/00220970903548046.
123. Tello, F. P. H., Martínez, L. N., & Mira, I. J. (2012). Academic goal profiles: a comparison of blind and sighted students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 1043–1054. doi:10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39395.
124. Thorkildsen, T. A. (1988). Theories of education in academically able adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 323–330. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(88)90031-8.
125. Thorkildsen, T. A., & Nicholls, J. G. (1998). Fifth graders’ achievement orientations and beliefs: individual and classroom differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 179–201. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.179.
126. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: a person-centered analysis. Learning and Instruction, 18, 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.003.
127. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2011). Stability and change in achievement goal orientations: a person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 82–100. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.002.
128. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Achievement goal orientations and academic well-being across the transition to upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 290–305. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.002.
129. Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170–182. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4.
130. Valle, A., Cabanach, R. G., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Rodríguez, S., & Piñeiro, I. (2003). Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 71–87. doi:10.1348/000709903762869923.
131. Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of self-reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education). PloS One, 9, e93594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093594.
132. Vandewalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015. doi:10.1177/0013164497057006009.
133. Veermans, M., & Tapola, A. (2004). Primary school students’ motivational profiles in longitudinal settings. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 373–395. doi:10.1080/0031383042000245780.
134. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Wang, C. J., Biddle, S. J., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). The 2× 2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 147–168. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.08.012.
136. Wang, C. K., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Spray, C. M., & Biddle, S. J. (2002). Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: differences in self‐determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 433–445. doi:10.1348/000709902320634401.
137. Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236.
138. Wolters, C., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211–238. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1.