Adaptive Protein Evolution in Animals and the Effective Population Size Hypothesis

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Galtier, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANNELID; ARTICLE; BIRD; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; ECHINODERM; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INSECT; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLLUSC; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE; REPTILE; SIMULATION; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; MUTATION; POPULATION DENSITY; PRIMATE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; HUMANS; MUTATION; POPULATION DENSITY; PRIMATES; PROTEINS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84958729901     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005774     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Zhang J, Parallel adaptive origins of digestive RNases in Asian and African leaf monkeys. Nat Genet. 2006 Jul;38(7):819–23. 16767103
2. Labbé P, Berticat C, Berthomieu A, Unal S, Bernard C, Weill M, et al. Forty years of erratic insecticide resistance evolution in the mosquito Culex pipiens. PLoS Genet. 2007 Nov;3(11):e205. 18020711
3. Liu Y, Cotton JA, Shen B, Han X, Rossiter SJ, Zhang S, Convergent sequence evolution between echolocating bats and dolphins. Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):R53–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.058 20129036
4. Huerta-Sánchez E, Jin X, Asan Bianba Z, Peter BM, Vinckenbosch N, et al. Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature. 2014 Aug 14;512(7513):194–7. doi: 10.1038/nature13408 25043035
5. Kimura M, The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press; 1983.
6. Gillespie J.H, The causes of molecular evolution. Oxford University Press; 1991.
7. Maynard Smith J, What determines the rate of evolution. Am Nat. 1976; 110:331–8.
8. McDonald JH, Kreitman M, Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–4. 1904993
9. Rand DM, Kann LM, Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jul;13(6):735–48. 8754210
10. Fay JC, Wyckoff GJ, Wu CI, Positive and negative selection on the human genome. Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1227–34. 11454770
11. Smith NGC, Eyre-Walker A, Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1022–4. 11875568
12. Bierne N, Eyre-Walker A, The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jul;21(7):1350–60. 15044594
13. Welch JJ, Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):821–37. 16582427
14. Boyko AR, Williamson SH, Indap AR, Degenhardt JD, Hernandez RD, Lohmueller KE, et al. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2008 May 30;4(5):e1000083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000083 18516229
15. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD, Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Sep;26(9):2097–108. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp119 19535738
16. Charlesworth J, Eyre-Walker A, The McDonald-Kreitman test and slightly deleterious mutations. Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Jun;25(6):1007–15. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn005 18195052
17. Eyre-Walker A, Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test. Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):2017–24. 12524367
18. Loewe L, Charlesworth B, Bartolomé C, Nöel V, Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations. Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):1079–92. 16299397
19. Eyre-Walker A, Woolfit M, Phelps T, The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans. Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):891–900. 16547091
20. Hvilsom C, Qian Y, Bataillon T, Li Y, Mailund T, Sallé B, et al. Extensive X-linked adaptive evolution in central chimpanzees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 7;109(6):2054–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106877109 22308321
21. Loire E, Chiari Y, Bernard A, Cahais V, Romiguier J, Nabholz B, et al. Population genomics of the endangered giant Galápagos tortoise. Genome Biol. 2013 Dec 16;14(12):R136. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r136 24342523
22. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, James SA, et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature. 2009 Mar 19;458(7236):337–41. doi: 10.1038/nature07743 19212322
23. Gossmann TI, Song B-H, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Dixon CJ, Kapralov MV, et al. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1822–32. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq079 20299543
24. Halligan DL, Oliver F, Eyre-Walker A, Harr B, Keightley PD, Evidence for pervasive adaptive protein evolution in wild mice. PLoS Genet. 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000825 20107605
25. Carneiro M, Albert FW, Melo-Ferreira J, Galtier N, Gayral P, Blanco-Aguiar JA, et al. Evidence for widespread positive and purifying selection across the european rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome. Mol Biol Evol 29:1837–1849. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss025 22319161
26. Tsagkogeorga G, Cahais V, Galtier N, The population genomics of a fast evolver: high levels of diversity, functional constraint and molecular adaptation in the tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(8):740–9. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs054 22745226
27. Charlesworth J, Eyre-Walker A, The rate of adaptive evolution in enteric bacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jul;23(7):1348–56. 16621913
28. Eyre-Walker A, The genomic rate of adaptive evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):569–75. 16820244
29. Strasburg JL, Kane NC, Raduski AR, Bonin A, Michelmore R, Rieseberg LH, Effective population size is positively correlated with levels of adaptive divergence among annual sunflowers. Mol Biol Evol. 2011 May;28(5):1569–80. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq270 20952500
30. Phifer-Rixey M, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Churchill GA, Piálek J, Tucker PK, et al. Adaptive evolution and effective population size in wild house mice. Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Oct;29(10):2949–55. 22490822
31. Gossmann TI, Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A, The effect of variation in the effective population size on the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(5):658–67. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs027 22436998
32. Jensen JD, Bachtrog D, Characterizing the influence of effective population size on the rate of adaptation: Gillespie’s Darwin domain. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:687–701. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr063 21705473
33. Razeto-Barry P, Díaz J, Vásquez RA, The nearly neutral and selection theories of molecular evolution under the fisher geometrical framework: substitution rate, population size, and complexity. Genetics. 2012 Jun;191(2):523–34. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.138628 22426879
34. Lourenço JM, Glémin S, Galtier N, The rate of molecular adaptation in a changing environment. Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jun;30(6):1292–301. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst026 23412912
35. Romiguier J, Gayral P, Ballenghien M, Bernard A, Cahais V, Chenuil A, et al. Comparative population genomics in animals uncovers the determinants of genetic diversity. Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):261–3. doi: 10.1038/nature13685 25141177
36. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A, Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies. Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2251–61. 18073430
37. Messer PW, Petrov DA, Frequent adaptation and the McDonald-Kreitman test. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8615–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220835110 23650353
38. Perry GH, Melsted P, Marioni JC, Wang Y, Bainer R, Pickrell JK, et al. Comparative RNA sequencing reveals substantial genetic variation in endangered primates. Genome Res. 2012 Apr;22(4):602–10. doi: 10.1101/gr.130468.111 22207615
39. Martin G, Lenormand T, A general multivariate extension of Fisher’s geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution. 2006 May;60(5):893–907. 16817531
40. Lourenço J, Galtier N, Glémin S, Complexity, pleiotropy, and the fitness effect of mutations. Evolution. 2011 Jun;65(6):1559–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01237.x 21644948
41. Duret L, Galtier N, Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10:285–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001 19630562
42. Pessia E, Popa A, Mousset S, Rezvoy C, Duret L, Marais GA, Evidence for widespread GC-biased gene conversion in eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(7):675–82. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs052 22628461
43. Ratnakumar A, Mousset S, Glémin S, Berglund J, Galtier N, Duret L, et al. Detecting positive selection within genomes: the problem of biased gene conversion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 27;365(1552):2571–80. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0007 20643747
44. Drummond DA, Wilke CO, Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell. 2008 Jul 25;134(2):341–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042 18662548
45. Welch JJ, Eyre-Walker A, Waxman D, Divergence and polymorphism under the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol. 2008 Oct;67(4):418–26. doi: 10.1007/s00239-008-9146-9 18818860
46. Betancourt AJ, Blanco-Martin B, Charlesworth B, The relation between the neutrality index for mitochondrial genes and the distribution of mutational effects on fitness. Evolution. 2012 Aug;66(8):2427–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01628.x 22834742
47. Corbett-Detig RB, Hartl DL, Sackton TB, Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species. PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 10;13(4):e1002112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002112 25859758
48. Schneider A, Charlesworth B, Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD, A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations. Genetics. 2011 Dec;189(4):1427–37. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.131730 21954160
49. Enard D, Messer PW, Petrov DA, Genome-wide signals of positive selection in human evolution. Genome Res. 2014 Jun;24(6):885–95. doi: 10.1101/gr.164822.113 24619126
50. Daub JT, Hofer T, Cutivet E, Dupanloup I, Quintana-Murci L, Robinson-Rechavi M, et al. Evidence for polygenic adaptation to pathogens in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jul;30(7):1544–58. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst080 23625889
51. Bank C, Ewing GB, Ferrer-Admettla A, Foll M, Jensen JD, Thinking too positive? Revisiting current methods of population genetic selection inference. Trends Genet. 2014 Dec;30(12):540–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.010 25438719
52. Ohta T, Very slightly deleterious mutations and the molecular clock. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1–2):1–6.
53. Akashi H, Osada N, Ohta T, Weak selection and protein evolution. Genetics. 2012 Sep;192(1):15–31. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140178 22964835
54. Lesecque Y, Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A, A resolution of the mutation load paradox in humans. Genetics. 2012 Aug;191(4):1321–30. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140343 22661324
55. Cherry JL, Should we expect substitution rate to depend on population size? Genetics. 1998 Oct;150(2):911–9. 9755219
56. Gillespie JH, The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Apr;55(2):145–56. 10329514
57. Orr HA, Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):13–20. 10937178
58. Charlesworth B, Jain K, Purifying selection, drift, and reversible mutation with arbitrarily high mutation rates. Genetics. 2014 Dec;198(4):1587–602. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167973 25230951
59. Obbard DJ, Welch JJ, Kim KW, Jiggins FM, Quantifying adaptive evolution in the Drosophila immune system. PLoS Genet. 2009 Oct;5(10):e1000698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000698 19851448
60. Fay JC, Weighing the evidence for adaptation at the molecular level. Trends Genet. 2011 Sep;27(9):343–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.06.003 21775012
61. Lanfear R, Kokko H, Eyre-Walker A, Population size and the rate of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Jan;29(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.009 24148292
62. Gayral P, Melo-Ferreira J, Glémin S, Bierne N, Carneiro M, Nabholz B, et al. Reference-free population genomics from next-generation transcriptome data and the vertebrate-invertebrate gap. PLoS Genet. 2013 Apr;9(4):e1003457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003457 23593039
63. Figuet E, Ballenghien M, Romiguier J, Galtier N, Biased gene conversion and GC-content evolution in the coding sequences of reptiles and vertebrates. Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Dec 19;7(1)240–250. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu277 25527834
64. Gayral P, Weinert L, Chiari Y, Tsagkogeorga G, Ballenghien M, et al. Next-generation sequencing of transcriptomes: a guide to RNA isolation in nonmodel animals. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jul;11(4):650–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03010.x 21481219
65. Cahais V, Gayral P, Tsagkogeorga G, Melo-Ferreira J, Ballenghien M, Weinert L, et al. Reference-free transcriptome assembly in non-model animals from next-generation sequencing data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 Sep;12(5):834–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03148.x 22540679
66. Ranwez V, Harispe S, Delsuc F, Douzery EJ, MACSE: Multiple Alignment of Coding SEquences accounting for frameshifts and stop codons. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e22594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022594 21949676
67. Hernandez RD, Williamson SH, Zhu L, Bustamante CD, Context-dependent mutation rates may cause spurious signatures of a fixation bias favoring higher GC-content in humans. Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Oct;24(10):2196–202. 17656634
68. Guéguen L, Gaillard S, Boussau B, Gouy M, Groussin M, Rochette NC, et al. Bio++: efficient extensible libraries and tools for computational molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Aug;30(8):1745–50. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst097 23699471