Posterior tibial slope accuracy with patient-specific cutting guides during total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary study of 50 cases

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2015, Pages S233-S240

  Schlatterer, B ^a   Linares, J M ^b   Cazal, J ^a   Merloz, P ^c   Plaweski, S ^d  

^a Institut Monégasque de Médecine Chirurgie Sportive   (Monaco)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c HÔPITAL MICHALLON   (France)

^d GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

Author keywords

Implant alignment; Patient specific cutting guides; Posterior tibial slope; Specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; HIP KNEE ANKLE ANGLE; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PATIENT SPECIFIC CUTTING GUIDE; POSTERIOR TIBIAL SLOPE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; KNEE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIBIA; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIBIA;

EID: 84955384345     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ast M.P., Nam D., Haas S.B. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a review. Orthop Clin North Am 2012, 43:e17-e22.
2. Barrett W., Hoeffel D., Dalury D., Mason J.B., Murphy J., Himden S. In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:343-347.
3. Chareancholvanich K., Narkbunnam R., Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B:354-359.
4. DeHaan A.M., Adams J.R., DeHart M.L., Huff T.W. Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:2065-2069.
5. Helmy N., Dao Trong M.L., Kuhnel S.P. Accuracy of patient specific cutting blocks in total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int 2014, 2014:562919.
6. Heyse T.J., Tibesku C.O. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee 2014, 21:268-271.
7. Nam D., McArthur B.A., Cross M.B., Pearle A.D., Mayman D.J., Haas S.B. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 2012, 25:213-219.
8. Myers K., Merwin S.L., Cabrera B., Lementowski P. An evaluation of the need for blood transfusion when using patient specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. Int J 2014, 1:55.
9. Lionberger D.R., Crocker C.L., Chen V. Patient specific instrumentation. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1699-1704.
10. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Ruh E.L., Williams B.M., Foreman K., Ford A.D., et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:889-894.
11. Issa K., Rifai A., McGrath M.S., Callaghan J.J., Wright C., Malkani A.L., et al. Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2013, 26:429-433.
12. Kassab S., Pietrzak W.S. Patient-specific positioning guides versus manual instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative comparison. J Surg Orthop Adv 2014, 23:140-146.
13. Argenson J., Blanc G., Girerd D., Viehweger E., Pomero V., Jouve J., et al. La place des guides de coupe sur mesure dans les prothèses totales de genou 2014, 29-36. [e-mémoires de l'Académie nationale de chirurgie, vol. 13].
14. Anderl W., Pauzenberger L., Kolblinger R., Kiesselbach G., Brandl G., Laky B., et al. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 10.1007/s00167-014-3345-2.
15. Ivie C.B., Probst P.J., Bal A.K., Stannard J.T., Crist B.D., Sonny Bal B. Improved radiographic outcomes with patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:2100-2103.
16. Pfitzner T., Abdel M.P., von Roth P., Perka C., Hommel H. Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472:2913-2922.
17. Ng V.Y., DeClaire J.H., Berend K.R., Gulick B.C., Lombardi A.V. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:99-107.
18. MacDessi S.J., Jang B., Harris I.A., Wheatley E., Bryant C., Chen D.B. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014, 21:406-409.
19. Sassoon A., Nam D., Nunley R., Barrack R. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015, 473:151-158.
20. Thienpont E., Schwab P.E., Fennema P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2014, 96-B:1052-1061.
21. Voleti P.B., Hamula M.J., Baldwin K.D., Lee G.C. Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1709-1712.
22. Mannan A., Smith T.O., Sagar C., London N.J., Molitor P.J. No demonstrable benefit for coronal alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015, 101:461-468.
23. Stronach B.M., Pelt C.E., Erickson J.A., Peters C.L. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1705-1708.
24. Woolson S.T., Harris A.H., Wagner D.W., Giori N.J. Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014, 96:366-372.
25. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1968, 277:7-72.
26. Kotela A., Kotela I. Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int Orthop 2014, 38:2099-2107.
27. Boonen B., Schotanus M.G., Kerens B., van der Weegen W., van Drumpt R.A., Kort N.P. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2206-2212.
28. Koch P.P., Muller D., Pisan M., Fucentese S.F. Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2200-2205.
29. Abane L., Anract P., Boisgard S., Descamps S., Courpied J., Hamadouche M. A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2015, 97:56-63.
30. Lustig S., Scholes C.J., Oussedik S.I., Kinzel V., Coolican M.R., Parker D.A. Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28:469-473.
31. Conteduca F., Iorio R., Mazza D., Caperna L., Bolle G., Argento G., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2194-2199.
32. Hamilton W.G., Parks N.L. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1508-1509.
33. Franceschi J.P., Sbihi A. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery F. 3D templating and patient-specific cutting guides (Knee-Plan) in total knee arthroplasty: postoperative CT-based assessment of implant positioning. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014, 100:S281-S286.
34. Porter A., Snyder B., Franklin P., Ayers D. A prospective randomised comparison of patient specific instruments with standard TKA instrumentation. Bone Joint J Orthopaedic Proceedings 2014, 96-B:5.
35. Ng V.Y., Arnott L., Li J., Hopkins R., Lewis J., Sutphen S., et al. Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 22:1833-1842.
36. Chen J.Y., Yeo S.J., Yew A.K., Tay D.K., Chia S.L., Lo N.N., et al. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 22:630-635.
37. Yan C.H., Chiu K.Y., Ng F.Y., Chan P.K., Fang C.X. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2.
38. Victor J., Dujardin J., Vandenneucker H., Arnout N., Bellemans J. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472:263-271.
39. Sarmah S.S., Patel S., Hossain F.S., Haddad F.S. The radiological assessment of total and unicompartmental knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:1321-1329.
40. Denis K., Van Ham G., Bellemans J., Labey L., Sloten J.V., Van Audekercke R., et al. How correctly does an intramedullary rod represent the longitudinal tibial axes?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 424-433.
41. Oswald M.H., Jakob R.P., Schneider E., Hoogewoud H.M. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993, 8:419-426.
42. Schlatterer B., Suedhoff I., Bonnet X., Catonne Y., Maestro M., Skalli W. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009, 95:2-11.
43. Yoo J.H., Chang C.B., Shin K.S., Seong S.C., Kim T.K. Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:586-592.
44. Faschingbauer M., Sgroi M., Juchems M., Reichel H., Kappe T. Can the tibial slope be measured on lateral knee radiographs?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 10.1007/s00167-014-2864-1.
45. Frye B.M., Najim A.A., Adams J.B., Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V. MRI is more accurate than CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2015.
46. Bonnin M.P., Saffarini M., Mercier P.E., Laurent J.R., Carrillon Y. Is the anterior tibial tuberosity a reliable rotational landmark for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:260-267. [e1-2].
47. Drnek D., Haffner N., Sadjed A., Ritschl P. Patient-specific instruments as a standard procedure in total knee arthroplasty: logistics and postoperative radiological results in 70 patients. Case Rep Clin Med 2014, 3:57-63.