Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Ast, Michael P ^a   Nam, Denis ^a   Haas, Steven B ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Improved accuracy; Joint arthroplasty; Patient specific instrumentation; Surgical efficiency; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84868028813     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: 15581373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Lotke P.A., Ecker M.L. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59(1):77-79.
2. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, (299):153-156.
3. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H. Why are total knees failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 404:7-13.
4. Bellemans J., Colyn W., Vandenneucker H., et al. Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients?: The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(1):45-53.
5. Bellemans J. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for a successful TKA: opposes. Orthopedics 2011, 34(9):507-509.
6. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(12):2143-2149.
7. Noble J.W., Moore C.A., Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(1):153-155.
8. Spencer B.A., Mont M.A., McGrath M.S., et al. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 2009, 33(6):1571-1575.
9. Bugbee H, Patil S, D'Lima D. Accuracy of implant placement using customized patient instrumentation. AAOS Meeting. San Diego, February 19, 2011.
10. Yaffe MA, McCoy BW, Patel A, et al. Customized instrumentation and computer-assisted surgery technology in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomed Eng. Presented AAOS Annual meeting. San Francisco, CA, February 2012.
11. Ng V.Y., Declaire J.H., Berend K.R., et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared to manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(1):99-107.
12. Anouchi Y.S., Whiteside L.A., Kaiser A.D., et al. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 287:170-177.
13. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., et al. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 356:144-153.
14. Heyse T.J., Chong L.R., Davis J., et al. MRI analysis for rotation of total knee components. Knee 2012, 19(5):571-575.
15. Haas SB. Debate: conventional instruments vs. patient specific instruments. Knee Society Specialty Day- AAOS Annual Meeting. San Francisco, February 11, 2012.
16. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Ruh E.L., et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(3):889-894.
17. Duffy G.P. Maximizing surgeon and hospital total knee arthroplasty volume using customized patient instrumentation and swing operating rooms. Am J Orthop 2011, 40(11 Suppl):5-8.
18. Lionberger DR, Crocker CL, Chen V. Customized cutting jigs improve OR efficiency, but not accuracy. Proceedings of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Annual Meeting. Dallas, November 2011.
19. Slover J.D., Rubash H.E., Malchau H., et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of custom total knee cutting blocks. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(2):180-185.
20. Watters T.S., Mather R.C., Browne J.A., et al. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2011, 20(2):112-116.
21. Johnson D.R. The benefits of customized patient instrumentation to lower-volume joint replacement surgeons: results from practice. Am J Orthop 2011, 40(11 Suppl):13-16.