Improved radiographic outcomes with patient-specific total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2100-2103

  Ivie, Conrad B ^a   Probst, Patrick J ^a   Bal, Amrit K ^b   Stannard, James T ^c   Crist, Brett D ^a   Sonny Bal, B ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b Asheville High School   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Frontal plane limb alignment; Limb mechanical axis; Patient specific cutting guides; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULL HYPOTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; BONE MALALIGNMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE; KNEE JOINT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84908305146     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lotke P.A., Ecker M.L. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59(1):77.
2. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73(5):709.
3. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:153.
4. Werner F.W., Ayers D.C., Maletsky L.P., et al. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005, 38(2):349.
5. Almouahed S., Gouriou M., Hamitouche C., et al. Design and evaluation of instrumented smart knee implant. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011, 58(4):971.
6. Dorr L.D., Boiardo R.A. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986, 205:5.
7. Insall J.N., Binazzi R., Soudry M., et al. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985, 192:13.
8. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Ng V.Y. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 2011, 34(9):e504.
9. Daniilidis K., Tibesku C.O. Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments. Int Orthop 2013, 37(1):45.
10. Boonen B., Schotanus M.G., Kort N.P. Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012, 83(4):387.
11. Chareancholvanich K., Narkbunnam R., Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B(3):354.
12. Barrack R.L., Ruh E.L., Williams B.M., et al. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012, 94(11 Suppl. A):95.
13. Tigani D., Busacca M., Moio A., et al. Preliminary experience with electromagnetic navigation system in TKA. Knee 2009, 16(1):33.
14. Sikorski J.M. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008, 90(9):1121.
15. Teter K.E., Bregman D., Colwell C.W. The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 321:117.
16. Elloy M.A., Manning M.P., Johnson R. Accuracy of intramedullary alignment in total knee replacement. J Biomed Eng 1992, 14(5):363.
17. Krishnan S.P., Dawood A., Richards R., et al. A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012, 94(11):1457.
18. Mont M.A., Johnson A.J., Issa K., et al. Single-use instrumentation, cutting blocks, and trials decrease contamination during total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of navigated and nonnavigated cases. J Knee Surg 2013, 26(4):285.
19. Watters T.S., Mather R.C., Browne J.A., et al. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2011, 20(2):112.
20. Tibesku C.O., Hofer P., Portegies W., et al. Benefits of using customized instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: results from an activity-based costing model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013, 133(3):405.
21. Dossett H.G., Swartz G.J., Estrada N.A., et al. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012, 35(2):e160.
22. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Ruh E.L., et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(3):889.
23. Stronach B.M., Pelt C.E., Erickson J., et al. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(1):169.
24. Blakeney W.G., Khan R.J., Wall S.J. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(15):1377.
25. Burnett R.S., Barrack R.L. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(1):264.