|
|
Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 140-146
|
|
Patient-specific positioning guides versus manual instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative comparison.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CASE CONTROL STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HISTOLOGY;
HUMAN;
KNEE;
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;
KNEE PROSTHESIS;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
OPERATION DURATION;
PATIENT POSITIONING;
PEROPERATIVE CARE;
PROSTHESIS;
RADIOGRAPHY;
STATISTICS;
SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;
THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;
VERY ELDERLY;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;
INTRAOPERATIVE CARE;
KNEE JOINT;
KNEE PROSTHESIS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OPERATIVE TIME;
PATIENT POSITIONING;
PROSTHESIS FITTING;
SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
|
EID: 84908021143
PISSN: 1548825X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3113/JSOA.2014.0140 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (9)
|
|
References (0)
|
