A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A multicentre randomised controlled trial

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 97-B, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 56-63

  Abane, L ^a   Anract, P ^a   Boisgard, S ^b   Descamps, S ^b   Courpied, J P ^a   Hamadouche, M ^a,b  

^a Université Paris 5 ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ENDOPROSTHESIS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT SPECIFIC CUTTING GUIDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; BLEEDING; BONE PLUG; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; HIP KNEE ANKLE ANGLE; HOSPITALIZATION; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOURNIQUET;

ENOXAPARIN;

EID: 84925363865     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34391     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:963-974.
2. No authors listed. Swedish knee arthroplasty register. Annual report 2012. http:// www.myknee.se/pdf/117-SKAR-2012-Engl-1.0.pdf (date last accessed 14 November 2014).
3. No authors listed. The Norwegian arthroplasty register annual report 2010. http:// nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/Report-2010.pdf (date last accessed 27 October 2014).
4. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:2143-2149.
5. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:45-53.
6. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:26-34.
7. Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, et al. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:1588-1596.
8. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:682-687.
9. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:236-243.
10. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:261-269.
11. Beldame J, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. Pin track induced fractures around computer-assisted TKA. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:249-255.
12. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:2389-2397.
13. Ng VY, De CLaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:99-107.
14. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, et al. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94(11 Suppl A):95-99.
15. Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, et al. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2206-2212.
16. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:354-359.
17. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:895-902.
18. Cooke TD, Sled EA, Scudamore RA. Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol 2007;34:1796-1801.
19. Mercuriali F, Inghilleri G. Proposal of an algorithm to help the choice of the best transfusion strategy. Curr Med Res Opin 1996;13:465-478.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-14.
21. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-69.
22. Huang NF, Dowsey MM, Ee E, et al. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1737-1741.
23. Abdel MP, Parratte S, Blanc G, et al. No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2468-2476.
24. Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP. Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012;83:387-393.
25. Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(Suppl.1):96-100.
26. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:26-29.
27. Nam D, Maher PA, Rebolledo BJ, et al. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2013;20:263-267.
28. Noble JW, Moore CA, Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:153-155.
29. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks costeffective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:889-894.
30. Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, et al. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2213-2219.
31. Pfitzner T, Abdel MP, von Roth P, Perka C, Hommel H. Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instrumentsin TKA: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2913-2922.
32. Pietsch M, Djahani O, Zweiger C, et al. Custom-fit minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: effect on blood loss and early clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2234-2240.
33. Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to Conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3988-3995.
34. Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H, Arnout N, Bellemans J. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:263-271.
35. Vundelinckx BJ, Bruckers L, De Mulder K, De Schepper J, Van Esbroeck G. Functional and radiographic short-term outcome evaluation of the visionaire system, a patient-matched instrumentation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:964-970.
36. Woolson ST, Harris AH, Wagner DW, Giori NJ. Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2014;96-A:366-372.
37. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, et al. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee 2013;20:242-249.
38. Krishnan SP, Dawood A, Richards R, Henckel J, Hart AJ. A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012;94-B:1457-1461.
39. Yau WP, Chiu KY. Cutting errors in total knee replacement: assessment by computer assisted surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008;16:670-673.
40. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2194-2199.
41. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Oussedik SI, et al. Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:469-473.
42. Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hochegger M, Plattner F, Hofmann S. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: the importance of planning by the surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2220-2226.
43. Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL. Patient-specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Required Frequent Surgeon-directed Changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:169-174.