3D templating and patient-specific cutting guides (Knee-Plan®) in total knee arthroplasty: Postoperative CT-based assessment of implant positioning

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2014, Pages S281-S286

  Franceschi, J P ^a   Sbihi, A ^a  

^a Clinique Juge   (France)

^b SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

Author keywords

CTscan; Custom cutting guides; Patient specific 3D preoperative templating; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTHROLYSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LIGAMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ORTHOPEDIC SOFTWARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RIGIDITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; ARTHROPLASTY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMUR; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84937539279     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of totalknee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;229:153-6.
2. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replace-ment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:77-9.
3. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replace-ment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;73:709-14.
4. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grika J. Alignment intotal knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with theconventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:682-7.
5. Rand JA, Coventry JB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;232:168-73.
6. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall AwardPaper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:7-13.
7. Bargen JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty.Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;173:178-83.
8. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, et al. Effect ofrotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin OrthopRelat Res 1999;366:155-63.
9. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, et al. Knee replace-ment. Lancet 2012;379:1331-40.
10. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assistedand conventional total knee replacement: a comparative prospective, ran-domised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1039-44.
11. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Miseen place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur: comparai-son avec la technique conventionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87:18-28.
12. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignmentoutcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1097-106.
13. Galaud B, Beaufils P, Michaut M, Abadie P, Fallet L, Boisrenoult P. [Distal femoraltorsion: comparison of CT scan and intra operative navigation measurementsduring total knee arthroplasty. A report of 70 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Repara-trice Appar Mot 2006;94:573-9.
14. Michaut M, Beaufils P, Galaud B, Abadie P, Boisrenoult P, Fallet L. [Rota-tional alignment of femoral component with computer-assisted surgery (CAS)during total knee arthroplasty]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008;94:580-4.
15. Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. OrthopTraumatol Surg Res 2009;95(5):365-72.
16. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Zuo JL, Tang WM, Ng TP. Computer navigation did notimprove alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice. Clin Orthop RelatRes 2008;466(4):935-45.
17. Blakeney WG, Khan RJ, Wall SJ. Computer-assisted techniques versus con-ventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: arandomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(15):1377-84.
18. Stulberg BN, Zadzilka JD. Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: inopposition. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl. 1):29-32.
19. Novak EJ, Silverstein MD, Bozic KJ. The cost-effectiveness of computer-assistednavigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;98:2389-97.
20. Siston RA, GioriNJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL. Surgical navigation for total kneearthroplasty: a perspective. J Biomech 2007;40:728-35.
21. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G, et al. Evaluationof the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee SurgSports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2194-9.
22. Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA usingpatient-specific instrumentation. Knee 2012;21(1):268-71.
23. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Oussedik SI, Kinzel V, Coolican MR, Parker DA. Unsa-tisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIREpatient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:469-73.
24. Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S, SeongSC, Lee MC, Is TKA. Using patient-specific instru-ments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of onesystem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(12):3988-95.
25. Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H, Arnout N, Bellemans J. Patient-specificguides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective ran-domized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:263-71.
26. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospec-tive randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides comparedwith conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:354-9.
27. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catoné Y. Accuracy of reconstructionof the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning anda cementless modular neck stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:333-40.
28. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinicalrating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-4.
29. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validationstudy of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically impor-tant patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients withosteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
30. Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, Coldham G, Krause B. Three-dimensionalpolyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing gen-eration of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(3):256-66.
31. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthro-plasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospectivetrial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:372-7.
32. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomizedstudy of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint SurgAm 2007;89:236-43.
33. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components intotal knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective,randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:471-6.