Efficacy of an ICALL tutoring system and process-oriented corrective feedback

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 334-364

  Choi, Inn Chull ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

corrective feedback; intelligent computer assisted language learning (ICALL); process oriented; tutoring program; Web based

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955171339     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2014.960941     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. N.J.Adler, (1991). International dimensions of organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.
2. L.Amaral,, D.Meurers,, & R.Ziaib, (2011). Analyzing learner language: Towards a flexible natural language processing architecture for intelligent language tutors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 1–16.
3. Y.M.Bae, (2007). Item analysis of Korean SAT English grammar test [Suneung yeongeo munbeob munhang bunseok] (Unpublished MA thesis). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
4. A.Bailin,, & L.Levin, (1989). Introduction: Intelligent computer assisted language instruction. Computers and the Humanities, 23, 3–11.
5. S.Bax, (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.
6. S.Bax, (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.
7. E.Bick, (2003). A CG & PSG hybrid approach to automatic corpus annotation. Technical Papers - University Center for Computer Corpus Research on Language, 17, 1–11. SProLaC2003 at Corpus Linguistics.
8. J.Bitchener,, S.Young,, & D.Cameron, (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205.
9. S.Bolhuis, (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13(3), 327–347.
10. E.Brill, (1995). Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4), 543–565.
11. D.H.Brown, (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
12. D.H.Brown, (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
13. M.E.Butler-Pascoe, (2011). The history of CALL: The intertwining paths of technology and second/foreign language teaching. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 16–32. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://www.igi-global.com/ijcallt
14. M.E.Butler-Pascoe,, & K.M.Wiburg, (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
15. C.Chapelle, (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22–34.
16. C.Chapelle, (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Y.-S.Cho, (2012). Hanguk junghagsaeng yeongeo hagseubjaeui munbeob oryu bunseog [An analysis of grammatical errors among Korean middle school EFL learners]. (Unpublished MA thesis). Chonnam University, Kwangju, Korea.
18. M.Chodorow,, J.R.Tetreault,, & N.-R.Han, (2007). Detection of grammatical errors involving prepositions. Paper presented at the 4th ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions, The Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague.
19. I.-C.Choi, (1991). CALLeui wisang gwa jeonmang [Current status and prospects of CALL]. English Teaching, 42, 69–87.
20. I.-C.Choi, (2007). Impact of ASR and bilingualism-based testing on acquisition of oral proficiency. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 10(3), 229–245.
21. I.-C.Choi, (2010). Silyong Yeongmunbeob Baeggwasajeon [Practical English grammar encyclopedia] (2nd ed.). Seoul: Saram In Publishing Co.
22. R.B.Clariana, (1990). A comparison of answer-until-correct feedback and knowledge-of-correct-response feedback under two conditions of contextualization. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17(4), 125–129.
23. S.P.Corder, (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press
24. G.Dudeney, (2007). The Internet and the language classroom (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. R.Ellis, (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. R.Ellis, (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 87–105.
27. R.Ellis,, S.Loewen,, & R.Erlam, (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.
28. D.R.Felice,, & S.Pulman, (2009). Automatic detection of preposition errors in learner writing. CALICO Journal, 26(3), 512–528.
29. S.Fotos,, & S.M.Brownne, (2004). The development of CALL and current options. In S.Fotos & S.M.Brownne(Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. J.Gamper,, & J.Knapp, (2002). A review of intelligent CALL systems. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 329–342.
31. S.Gass,, & L.Selinker, (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York, NY: Routledge.
32. C.Gattegno, (1972). Teaching foreign languages in schools: The silent way (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Educational Solutions.
33. F.S.Gharehchopogh,, & Z.A.Khalifelu, (2011). Using intelligent tutoring systems in instruction and education. 2nd International Conference on Education and Management Technology. IPEDR Vol. 13. Singapore: IACSIT Press.
34. L.Gómeza,, D.Freemana,, & Y.Freemana, (2005). Dual language education: A promising 50–50 model. The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 29(1), 145–164.
35. A.C.Graesser, (2005). AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 612–618.
36. S.Granger, (Ed.). (1998). Learner English on computer. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
37. S.Granger, (2003). Error-tagged learner corpora and CALL: A promising synergy. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 465–480.
38. S.Granger,, J.Hung,, & S.Petch-Tyson, (Eds.). (2002). Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. E.Hamayan,, F.Genesee,, & N.Cloud, (2013). Dual language instruction from A to Z: Practical guidance for teachers and administrators. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
40. N.-R.Han,, J.R.Tetreault,, S.-H.Lee,, & J.-Y.Ha, (2010). Using an error-annotated learner corpus to develop an ESL/EFL error correction system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association.
41. T.Heift, (2003). Multiple learner errors and feedback: A challenge for ICALL systems. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 533–548.
42. T.Heift, (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416–431.
43. T.Heift,, & M.Schulze, (2003). Error diagnosis and error correction in CALL. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 433–436.
44. T.Heift,, & M.Schulze, (2007). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
45. Y.-R.Hong, (2012). A study on English-learning motivation among high school students in Seoul (Seoul jiyeog godeung haksaengdeului yeongeo hagseub donggi yeongu) (Unpublished MA thesis). Chungang University, Seoul, Korea.
46. N.H.Hornberger, (1990). Creating successful learning contexts for bilingual literacy. Teachers College Record, 92(2), 212–229.
47. D.Horowitz, (1986). Process, not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 141–144.
48. Y.-M.Kim, (2008). An analysis of the grammatical errors made by Korean English learners (Hangukin yeongeo hagseubjaeui munbeobjeog oryu yuhyeong bunseog) (Unpublished MA thesis). Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
49. O.Kraif,, G.Antoniadis,, S.Echinard,, M.Loiseau,, T.Lebarbe,, & C.Ponton, (2004). NLP tools for CALL: The simpler, the better. Paper presented at InSTIL/ICALL2004 – NLP and Speech Technologies in Advanced Language Learning Systems, Venice, Italy.
50. M.-N.Lamy,, & R.Hampel, (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
51. C.Leacock,, M.Chodorow,, M.Gamon,, & J.Tetreault, (2014). Automated grammatical error detection for language learners (2nd ed.). San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
52. J.Lee, (2009). Automatic correction of grammatical errors in non-native English text (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge, MA.
53. K.Leelawong,, J.Davis,, N.Vye,, G.Biswas,, D.Schwartz,, K.Belynne,, T.Katzlberger,, & J.Bransford, (2002). The effects of feedback in supporting learning by teaching in a teachable agent environment. Paper presented at The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2002 (pp. 245–252), Seattle, WA.
54. A.Lesgold, (1994). Assessment of intelligent training technology. In E.Baker & H.O’Neil (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. M.Levy, (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
56. S.L’Haire,, & A.V.Faltin, (2003). Error diagnosis in the free text project. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 481–495.
57. P.Lightbown,, & N.Spada, (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 429–448.
58. K.Lochtma, (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 271–283.
59. S.Loewen, (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54(1), 153–188.
60. M.Long,, & P.Robinson, (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C.Doughty & J.Williams(Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. R.Lyster,, & L.Ranta, (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.
62. R.Lyster,, K.Saito,, & M.Sato, (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000365
63. C.Matthews, (1993). Grammar frameworks in intelligent CALL. CALICO Journal, 11(1), 5–27.
64. C.Matthews, (1994). Intelligent computer assisted language learning as cognitive science: The choice of syntactic frameworks for language tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(4), 533–556.
65. W.Menzel,, & I.Schröder, (1998). Model-based diagnosis under structural uncertainty. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 284–288). Brighton, UK.
66. J.Merrill, (1987). Levels of questioning and forms of feedback: Instructional factors in courseware design. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(1), 18–22.
67. G.R.Morrison,, S.M.Ross,, M.Gopalakrishnan,, & J.Casey, (1995). The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 32–50.
68. E.H.Mory, (1994). Adaptive feedback in computer-based instruction: Effects of response certitude on performance, feedback-study time, and efficiency. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(3), 263–290.
69. R.Nagata,, A.Kawai,, K.Morihiro,, & N.Isu, (2006). A feedback-augmented method for detecting errors in the writing of learners of English. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the ACL (pp. 241–248). Sydney, Australia: The Association for Computational Linguistics.
70. Y.-E.Noh, (2013). An error analysis of Korean high school students’ sentence-level English composition (Yeongeo sseuigi jidoreul wihan sujunbeol munjangdanwi oryu bunseog) (Unpublished MA thesis). Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.
71. I.Panova,, & R.Lyster, (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 573–595.
72. J.Payette,, & G.Hirst, (1992). An intelligent computer-assistant for stylistic instruction. Computers and the Humanities, 26, 87–102.
73. J.Piaget, (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
74. J.Piaget, (1990). The child's conception of the world. New York, NY: Littlefield Adams.
75. K.R.Potter, (2002). Taming overgeneration in a constraint-relaxed parser. Paper presented at the 13th Meeting of Computational Linguistics. The Association for Computational Linguistics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
76. D.R.Pridemore,, & J.D.Klein, (1991). Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), 27–32.
77. D.R.Pridemore,, & J.D.Klein, (1995). Control of practice and level of feedback in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 444–450.
78. J.C.Richards, (1974). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. English Language Teaching Journal, 25, 204–229.
79. J.C.Richards,, & T.S.Rodgers, (1987). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. A.Rozovskaya,, M.Sammons,, J.Gioja,, & D.Roth, (2011). University of Illinois system in HOO text correction shared task. Paper presented at the European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG). The Association for Computational Linguistics, Nancy, France.
81. V.J.Russel,, & N.Spada, (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J.M.Norris& L.Ortega(Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
82. S.Sauro, (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96–120.
83. D.Schneider,, & K.F.McCoy, (1998). Recognizing syntactic errors in the writing of second language learners. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1198–1204). The Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Canada.
84. M.Schulze, (2008). Interfaces in intelligent CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 301–303.
85. K.Shaalan, (2005). An intelligent computer assisted language learning system for Arabic learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1&2), 81–108.
86. G.Stockwell, (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2), 105–120.
87. W.P.Thomas,, & V.P.Collier, (2003). The multiple benefits of dual language. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 61–64.
88. W.P.Thomas,, & V.P.Collier, (2012). Dual language education for a transformed world. Albuquerque, NM: Fuente Press.
89. N.Tokuda, (2002). New developments in intelligent CALL systems in a rapidly internationalized information age. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 319–327.
90. J.Toole, & T.Heift, (2002). The tutor assistant: An authoring tool for an intelligent language tutoring system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 373–386.
91. J.Vermunt,, & L.Verschaffel, (2000). Process-oriented teaching. In R.-J.Simons, J.V.D.LindenJ. v. d., & T.Duffy. (Eds.), New learning (pp. 209–225). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
92. M.M.Whyte,, D.M.Karolick,, M.C.Neilsen,, G.D.Elder,, & W.T.Hawley, (1995). Cognitive styles and feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 195–203.
93. H.-L.Yang,, & C.-L.Liu, (2006). Process-oriented e-learning architecture in supporting mastery learning. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 3(6), 635–657.