Multiple learner errors and meaningful feedback: A challenge for ICALL systems

CALICO Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 533-548

  Heift, Trude ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Error analysis; Feedback; German as a second language; Grammar instruction; Natural language processing (NLP) CALL

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849085671     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v20i3.533-548     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bangs, J. (2002, August). Why is feedback dying of starvation? – Let’s try to revive it. Paper presented at EUROCALL 2002, Jyväskylä, Finland.
2. Brandl, K. K. (1995). Strong and weak students preference for error feedback options and responses. Modern Language Journal, 79, 194-211.
3. Felix, U. (2002, August). Teaching language online: Deconstructing myths. Plenary Ad-dress at EUROCALL 2002, Jyväskylä, Finland.
4. Heift, T. (1998). Designed intelligence: A language teacher model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Canada.
5. Heift, T. (2001). Error-specific and individualized feedback in a web-based language tutoring system: Do they read it? ReCALL, 13 (2), 129-42.
6. Heift, T., & Nicholson, D. (2000). Enhanced server logs for intelligent, adaptive web-based systems. In Proceedings of the workshop on adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems, ITS’ 2000 (pp. 23-28). Montreal, Canada,.
7. Heift, T., & Nicholson, D. (2001). Web delivery of adaptive and interactive language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12 (4), 310-325.
8. Holland, M. V. (1994). Lessons learned in designing intelligent CALL: Managing communication across disciplines. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 7 (3), 227-256.
9. Pusack, J. P. (1983). Answer-processing and error correction in foreign language CAI. System, 11 (1), 53-64.
10. Kenning, M.-M., & Kenning, M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning. Ellis Horwood Limited, England.
11. Menzel, W., & Schröder, I. (1998). Constraint-based diagnosis for intelligent language tutoring systems (Fachbereich Informatik Report Nr. FBI-HH-B-208-98). Ham-burg, Germany: Universität Hamburg.
12. Nagata, N. (1991). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77, 330-8.
13. Nagata, N. (1995). An effective application of natural language processing in second language instruction. CALICO Journal, 13 (1), 47-67.
14. Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14 (1), 53-75.
15. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics: Fundamentals (CSLI Lecture Notes). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information.
16. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Schneider, D., & McCoy, K. (1998). Recognizing syntactic errors in the writing of second language learners. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on computational linguistics (COLING) (pp. 1198-1204). Montreal, Canada.
18. Schwind, C. B. (1990a). An intelligent language tutoring system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 557-579.
19. Schwind, C. B. (1990b). Feature grammars for semantic analysis. Computational Intelli-gence, 6, 172-178.
20. Schwind, C. B. (1995). Error analysis and explanation in knowledge based language tu-toring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8 (4), 295-325.
21. Van der Linden, E. (1993). Does feedback enhance computer-assisted language learning. Computers & Education, 21 (1-2), 61-65.
22. Van Noord, G. (1997). An efficient implementation of the head-corner parser. Computational Linguistics, 23 (3), 425-456.