Necessary conditions of learning

Necessary Conditions of Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-308

  Marton, Ference ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954460697     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315816876     Document Type: Book

References (334)

1. Ahlberg, A. (1992). Att möta matematiska problem. En belysning av barnens lärande [Encountering mathematical problems]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
2. Airey, J. & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (1), 27-49.
3. Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as an academic: Implications for academic development, academia and academic work (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sydney, Australia).
4. Al Murani, T. (2007). The deliberate use of teaching algebra: A realistic variation study (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Oxford, England).
5. Al Murani, T. & Watson, A. (2009, August). Exchange systematicity: Interactional dynamics of variation in mathematics lessons. Paper presented at the bi-annual conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
6. Anderberg, E., Svensson, L. & Alvegård, C. (2008). The epistemological role of language use in learning: A phenomenographic intentional-expressive approach. Educational Research Review, 3 (1), 14-29.
7. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W. & Cruikshank, K. A. (2000). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
8. Ashton-Warner, S. (1963). Teacher. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
9. Athey, C. (1990). Extending thought in young children: A parent-teacher partnership. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
10. Barnett, S. A. (1973). Homo docens. Journal of Biosocial Science, 5, 393-403.
11. Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Bantam Books.
12. Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge-Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws & T. A. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching: Research agenda for mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 27-46). Reston, VA: NCTM and Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T. & Lesh, R. (1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysisemphasis on the operator construct. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 13-48) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Bereiter, C. (2002). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, 9 (3), 321-327.
15. Bergqvist, K. (1990). Doing schoolwork: Task premises and joint activity in the comprehensive classroom. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science.
16. Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45-68). Hong Kong, China: CERC.
17. Biggs, J. B. & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
18. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
19. Björklund, C. (2007). Hållpunkter för lärande: Småbarns möten med matematik [Critical conditions of learning: Toddlers encountering mathematics]. Jakobsdal, Sweden: Åbo Akademi University.
20. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 9-21.
21. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives-Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
22. Boden, M. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
23. Bogdan, B. (1999). Patterns of human growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Booth, S. (1992). Learning to program: A phenomenographic perspective. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
25. Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Marton, F., Lewis, D. C. & Wilss, L. A. (2004). A longitudinal study of learning for a group of indigenous Australian university students: Dissonant conceptions and strategies. Higher Education, 47, 91-112.
26. Bowden, J., Dall'Alba, G., Martin, E., Masters, G., Laurillard, D., Marton, F., Ramsden, P. & Stephanou, A. (1992). Displacement, velocity, and frames of reference: Phenomenographic studies of students' understanding and some implications for teaching and assessment. American Journal of Physics, 60, 262-268.
27. Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (2004). The university of learning. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
28. Bowden, J. & Walsh, E. (Eds.). (2000). Phenomenography. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.
29. Bradley, F. H. (2008). Appearance and reality. New York, NY: Macmillan.
30. Bransford, J. D. & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, 24, 61-100.
31. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
32. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
33. Brumby, M. N. (1979). Students' perceptions and learning styles associated with the concept of evolution by natural selection (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Surrey, England).
34. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M. & Grunow, A. (2010). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. [Essay]. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Stanford, CA. Retrieved from http://www.carniegiefoundation.org/spotlight/webinar-bryk-gomez-building-networked-improvement-communities-ineducation
35. Buck-Morss, S. (1975). Socio-economic bias in Piaget's theory and its implications for crossculture studies. In K. F. Riegel (Ed.), The development of dialectical operations (pp. 35-49). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
36. Burger, W. F. & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 17 (1), 31-48.
37. Calvin, W. H. (1996). How brains think. New York, NY: Basic Books.
38. Calvin, W. H. (2004). A brief history of mind. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Carlgren, I. & Marton, F. (2000). Lärare av imorgon [Teachers of tomorrow]. Stockholm, Sweden: Lärarförbundet.
40. Cassirer, E. (1923). Substance and function: Einstein's theory of relativity. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
41. Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
42. Cheung, W. M. (2005). Describing and enhancing creativity in Chinese writing (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong).
43. Cheung, W. M., Marton, F. & Tse, S. K. (2010). Soaring across the sky like a heavenly horse: Enhancing creativity in Chinese writing. In F. Marton, S. K. Tse & W. M. Cheung (Eds.), On the learning of Chinese (pp. 147-162). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
44. Cheung, W. M., Tse, S. K., Lam, J. W. I. & Loh, E. K. Y. (2009). Progress in international reading literacy study 2006 (PIRLS): Pedagogical correlates of fourth-grade students in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 32 (3), 293-308.
45. Chi, M., Feltovich, P. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
46. Chik, P. P. M. (2006). Differences in learning as a function of differences between hierarchical and sequential organization of the content taught (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong).
47. Chik, P. P. M., Leung, A. & Marton, F. (2010). Learning words. In F. Marton, S. K. Tse & W. M. Cheung (Eds.), On the learning of Chinese (pp. 103-122). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
48. Chik P. P. M. & Marton, F. (2010). Chinese pedagogy and a pedagogy for Chinese. In F. Marton, S. K. Tse & W. M. Cheung (Eds.), On the learning of Chinese (pp. 9-30). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
49. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner's "Verbal Behavior." Language, 35, 26-58.
50. Claparede, E. (1919). La conscience de la resemblance et de la difference chez l'enfant [The child's awareness of similarity and difference]. Archives de Psychologie, 17, 67-80.
51. Comenius, J. A. (2002). Didactica Magna-Stora undervisningsläran [The great science of teaching]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur. (Original work published 1657)
52. Crombie, A. C. (1953). Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science, 1100-1700. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53. Cronbach, L. J. (1980). Toward a reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
54. Cronbach, L. J. & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
55. Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2006). Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy. In Y. Munakata & M. H. Johnson (Eds.), Processes of change in brain and cognitive development, attention and performance, XXI (pp. 249-274). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Dahlgren, L. O. (1978). Effects of university education on the conceptions of reality. Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Göteborg.
57. Dahlgren, L. O. (1979). Children's conception of price as a function of the questions asked. Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Göteborg.
58. Dahlgren, L. O. (1985). Quality and quantity in teaching and learning: Economics at university level as a case. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Linköping, Sweden.
59. Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
60. Day, J. M. (1994). Introduction. In J. M. Day (Ed.), Plato's "Meno" in focus (pp. 1-34). London, UK: Routledge.
61. de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
62. Deleuze, G. (2004). Difference and repetition. London, UK: Continuum.
63. Derrida, J. (2001). Writing and difference. London, UK: Routledge.
64. de Saussure, F. (1916/1983). Course in general linguistics. Guildford, UK: Duckworth.
65. Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life. Hong Kong, China: Government Printer.
66. Einhorn, S. (1998). En dold Gud [A hidden God]. Stockholm, Sweden: Månpocket.
67. Ekeblad, E. (1993). Barn som pedagoger. Rapport nr 15 Institutionen för pedagogik [Children as pedagogues]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet.
68. Ekeblad, E. (1996). Children, learning, numbers. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
69. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
70. Elliott, J. (2004). The independent evaluation of the progressive and innovative primary schools (PIPS) project. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
71. Emanuelsson, J. (2001). En fråga om frågor [A question about questions]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
72. Emanuelsson, J. & Häggström, J. (2008, March 24-28). Algebra teaching and classroom evaluation in the west and the east: A comparative study of classroom interaction in relation to algebraic tasks. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
73. Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243-259.
74. Engeström, Y (2011) Personal communication.
75. Entwistle, N. & Marton, F. (1994). Knowledge objects: Understandings constituted through intensive academic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 161-178.
76. Fan, L. & Zhu, Y. (2004). How have Chinese students performed in mathematics? A perspective from large-scale international comparisons. In L. Fan, N-Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 3-26). Singapore: World Scientific.
77. Feffer, M. (1988). Radical constructionism: Rethinking the dynamics of development. New York, NY: New York University Press.
78. Feldman, D. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
79. Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, A. (1979). Los systemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño [Writing systems in child development]. Siglo, México: Siglo XXI. (Quoted by Tolchinsky, 2003).
80. Fodor, J. (1980). On the impossibility of acquiring "more powerful" structures. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 142-162). London, UK: Routledge.
81. Fröhagen, J. & Ottander-Bjerkesjö, H. (2009). Att kunna såga rakt: Rapport från en learning study i slöjd [Sawing straight] (Unpublished thesis, Stockholms Universitet, Sweden).
82. Fyrenius, A., Wirell, S. & Silén, C. (2007). Students approaches to achieving understanding-Approaches to learning revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (2), 149-165.
83. Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students' content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets-schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68 (7), 3-15.
84. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
85. Gergely, G., Bekkering, H. & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.
86. Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. (2006a). Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy. In Y. Munakata & M. H. Johnson (Eds.), Processes of change in brain and cognitive development, attention and performance, XXI (pp. 249-274). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
87. Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. (2006b). Sylvia's recipe: The role of imitation and pedagogy in the transmission of cultural knowledge. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levenson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and human interaction (pp. 229-255). Oxford, UK: Berg.
88. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Novotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, UK: Sage.
89. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
90. Gibson, J. J. & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment. Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.
91. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
92. Goldenberg, P. & Mason, J. (2008). Shedding light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 183-194.
93. Gould, S. J. (1997). Life's grandeur. London, UK: Vintage.
94. Gruber, H. E. (1974). Darwin on Man. London, UK: Wildwood House.
95. Gu, L. (1991). Xuehui jiaoxue [Learning to teach]. Beijing, China: People's Education Press.
96. Gu, L. Y., Huang, R. J. & Marton, F. (2004). Teaching with variation: A Chinese way of promoting effective mathematics learning. In L. H. Fan, Y. Wong, J. F. Cai & S. Q. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 309-347). Singapore: World Scientific.
97. Guo, J. P. & Pang, M. F. (2011). Learning a mathematical concept from comparing examples. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 495-525.
98. Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
99. Gustafsson, B., Stigebrandt, E. & Ljungvall, R. (1981). Den dolda läroplanen [The hidden curriculum]. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
100. Gustafsson, J-E. (1976). Verbal and figural aptitudes in relation to instructional methods: Studies in aptitude-treatment interactions. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
101. Gustafsson, J-E. (2003). What do we know about effects of school resources on educational results? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 77-110.
102. Gustavsson, L. (2008). Att bli bättre lärare: Hur undervisningsinnehållets behandling blir till samtalsämne lärare emellan [Becoming a better teacher: How the content of teaching is turned into topic of conversation between teachers]. Kristianstad, Sweden: Högskolan i Kristianstad.
103. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
104. Häggström, J. (2008). Teaching systems of linear equations in Sweden and China: What is made possible to learn? Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
105. Hannula, M. M. & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and mathematical skills in young children. Learning and Instruction, 15, 237-256.
106. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107. Hansson, Å. (2010). Instructional responsibility in mathematics education: Modeling classroom teaching using Swedish data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75 (2), 171-189.
108. Hansson, Å. (2011). Ansvar för matematiklärande [Responsibility for mathematics learning]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
109. Harman, R. (2011). Meno's paradox and Socrates' "theory of recollection." Retrieved from www. eden.rutgers.edu/˜journal/papers/harman.pdf
110. Harris, L. R. (2011). Phenomenographic perspectives on the structure of conceptions: The origins, purposes, strengths, and limitations of the what/how and referential/structural frameworks. Educational Research Review, 6, 109-124.
111. Hart, K. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. London, UK: Murray.
112. Hatala, R. M., Brooks, L. R. & Norman, G. R. (2003). Practice makes perfect: The critical role of mixed practice in the acquisition of ECG interpretation skills. Advances in Health Education, 8, 17-26.
113. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London, UK: Routledge.
114. Hella, E. & Wright, A. (2009). Learning "about" and "from" religion: Phenomenography, the variation theory of learning and religious education in Finland and the UK. British Journal of Religious Education, 31 (1), 53-64.
115. Helmstad, G. (1999). Understandings of understanding. An inquiry concerning experiential conditions for developmental learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
116. Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L. & Wernberg, A. (2007). Generative learning: Learning beyond the learning situation. Educational Action Research, 15 (2), 181-208.
117. Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L. & Wernberg, A. (2008). Variation theory-An organizing principle to guide design research in education. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 111-130). New York, NY: Routledge.
118. Holmqvist, M. & Mattison, J. (2009). Contrasting cases and their impact on learning: A replication of a learning study confirming the impact of contrasts. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 10, 38-46.
119. Holmqvist, M. & Molnár, M. (2006). Att kunna tillämpa have och has i engelska språket. [Being able to use have and has in English.] In I. M Holmqvist (Ed.), Lärande i skolan. Learning study som skolutvecklingsmodell (pp. 151-176). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
120. Hong Kong Examination Authority. (1992). Annual report. Hong Kong, China: Author. (In Marton & Pang, 2006)
121. Hong Kong Examination Authority. (1995). Annual report. Hong Kong, China: Author. (In Marton & Pang, 2006)
122. Horner, V. & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8 (3), 164-181.
123. Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. London, UK: Marion Boyars.
124. Ilyenkov, E. V. (2008). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's "Capital." Delhi, India: Aakar Books.
125. Ingerman, Å., Linder, C. & Marshall, D. (2009). The learners' experience of variation: Following students' threads of learning physics in computer simulation sessions. Instructional Science, 37, 273-292.
126. Inoue-Nakamura, N. & Matsuzawa, T. (1997). Development of stone tool-use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111 (2), 159-173.
127. Ireson, J., Mortimore, P. & Hallam, S. (1999). The common strands of pedagogy and their implications. In P. Mortimer (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 212-241). London, UK: Paul Chapman.
128. Itard, J. M. G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. Newark, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1801)
129. Jensen, M. (2007). Lärande och låtsaslek [Learning and pretending]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborg Universitet, Kollegium SSKKII.
130. Johansson, B. (1975). Aritmetikundervisning [Data collection]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen.
131. Johansson, B., Marton, F. & Svensson, L. (1985). An approach to describing learning as a change between qualitatively different conceptions. In A. L. Pines & T. H. West (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 233-257). New York, NY: Academic Press.
132. Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
133. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26 (3), 379-424.
134. Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38 (6), 523-550.
135. Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40 (4), 651-672.
136. Karlsson, H. & Malm, E. (2010). Bråk i årskurs 1: Kritiska aspekter elever måste urskilja för att förstå det matematiska innehållet bråk [Fractions in year 1: Critical aspects that the pupils have to discern in order to grasp the mathematical content "fraction."]. Jönköping, Sweden: Högskolan i Jönköping, Högskolan för Lärande och Kommunikation.
137. Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing. New York, NY: Hafner.
138. Kerlinger, F. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
139. Kerr, R. & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice. Perceptual and motor skills, 46, 343-347.
140. Ki, W. W. (2007). The enigma of Cantonese tones: How intonation language speakers can be assisted to discern them (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong).
141. Ki, W. W., Ahlberg, K. & Marton, F. (2006, August). Computer-assisted perceptual learning of Cantonese tones. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Computers in Education, Beijing, China.
142. Ki, W. W. & Marton, F. (2003, August). Learning Cantonese tones. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.
143. Kilborn, V. (1979). PUMP-projektet-bakgrund och erfarenheter [The PUMP project: Background and experiences]. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
144. Ko, P. Y. (2002). The notion of teaching excellence in the People's Republic of China: The case of Chinese language teachers (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong).
145. Ko, P. Y. & Marton, F. (2004). Variation and the secret of the virtuoso. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 43-62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Kroksmark, T. (1987). Fenomenografisk didaktik [Phenomenographic didactics]: Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
147. Kroksmark, T. (Ed.). (2011). Den tidlösa pedagogiken [Timeless pedagogy] (2nd ed.). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
148. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
149. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
150. Kullberg, A. (2010). What is taught and what is learned: Professional insights gained and shared by teachers of mathematics. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
151. Kwan, T., Ng, F. P. & Chik, P. (2002). Repetition and variation. In F. Marton & P. Morris (Eds.), What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning (pp. 39-58). Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
152. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
153. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
154. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
155. Lénárt, I. (1993). Alternative models on the drawing ball. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 277-312.
156. Libet, B. (2004). Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
157. Limberg, L. (1998). Att söka information för att lära. En studie av samspel mellan informationssökning och lärande [Searching information for learning]. Sweden: Högskolan i Borås.
158. Lindahl, M. (1996). Inlärning och erfarande. Ettåringars möte med skolans värld [Learning and experiencing. One-year-olds' encounter with the world of pre-school]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
159. Lindahl, M. & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2002). Imitation and variation: Reflections on toddlers' strategies for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46 (1), 25-45.
160. Lindström, B., Marton, F., Emanuelsson, J., Lindahl, M. & Packendorf, M. (2011). Pre-school children's learning of number concepts in a game-based environment. In J. Emanuelsson, L. Fainsilber, J. Häggström, A. Kullberg, B. Lindström & M. Löwing (Eds.), Voices on learning and instruction in mathematics (pp. 119-141). Gothenburg, Sweden: National Center for Mathematics Education, University of Gothenburg.
161. Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
162. Lo, M. L., Chik, P. & Pang, M. F. (2006). Patterns of variation in teaching the color of light to primary 3 students. Instructional Science, 34, 1-19.
163. Lo, M. L., Hung, H. H. Y. & Chik, P. P. M. (2007). Improving teaching and learning through a learning study-Using variation to teach electro-chemical series in Hong Kong. Curriculum Perspectives, 27 (3), 49-62.
164. Lo, M. L. & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies, 1 (1), 7-22.
165. Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y. & Chik, P. (Eds), (2005). For each and everyone. Catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
166. Luhmann, N. (2002). Theories of distinction. Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
167. Lundgren, U. (1977). Model analysis of pedagogical processes. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
168. Luria, A. R. (1978). The development of writing in the child. In M. Cole (Ed.), The selected writings of A. R. Luria (pp. 146-194). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe. (Original work published 1929, quoted by Tolchinsky, 2003)
169. Ma Li. (1999). A traditional Chinese way of teaching mathematics. Periodical from American Mathematical Society (Mathematics subject classification 01A25, 97D50).
170. Ma, Liping. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
171. Magnér, B. & Magnér, H. (1976). Medveten människa [Being aware]. Stockholm, Sweden: Wahlström & Widstrand.
172. Markova, I. (1982). Paradigms, thought, and language. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
173. Mårtensson, P. (2013). Lärares gemensamma kunskapsproduktion [Teachers' collective production of knowledge]. Unpublished manuscript, Jönköpings Högskola, Sweden.
174. Marton, F. (1967). Reliabilitet och skolbetyg. [Reliability and school-marks]. Licentiatavhandlingar från Pedagogiska Institutionen, Göteborgs Universitet.
175. Marton, F. (1974). Inlärning och studiefärdighet [Study skills and learning]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet, Rapporter från Pedagogiska Institutionen.
176. Marton, F. (1975). On non-verbatim learning. I. Level of processing and level of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16, 273-279.
177. Marton, F. (1978). Describing conceptions of the world around us. Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.
178. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
179. Marton, F. (2001, November 26-27). The learning study. Keynote address delivered at the Hong Kong Subsidized Secondary School Council 30th Anniversary Education Conference, Hong Kong.
180. Marton, F. (2003). Learning study-pedagogisk utveckling direkt i klassrummet [Learning study-Pedagogical development right in the classroom]. In I. Carlgren, I. Josefsson & C. Liberg (Eds.), Forskning av denna världen-praxisnära forskning inom utbildningsvetenskap (pp. 43-50). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Research Council.
181. Marton, F. (2005). Om praxisnära grundforskning [On praxis-related basic research]. In I. Carlgren, I. Josefsson & C. Liberg (Eds.), Forskning av denna världen II-om teorins roll i praxisnära forskning (pp. 105-122). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Research Council.
182. Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 501-539.
183. Marton, F., Asplund-Carlsson, M. & Halász, L. (1992). Differences in understanding and the use of reflective variation in reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 1-16.
184. Marton, F., Beaty, E. & Dall'Alba, G. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-300
185. Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. & Tse, L. K. (1992). The paradox of the Asian learner. Paper presented at the Fourth Asian Regional Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
186. Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. & Tse, L. K. (1996). Memorizing and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69-84). Hong Kong, China: CERC.
187. Marton, F. & EDB Chinese Language Research Team. (2009). The Chinese learner of tomorrow. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner (pp. 133-168). Hong Kong, China: University of Hong Kong, CERC.
188. Marton, F., Hounsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (Eds.). (1997). The experience of learning (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
189. Marton, F. & Månsson, M. (1984). Vad gör livet värt att leva? [What makes life worth living?]. In F. Marton & C-G. Wenestam (Eds.), Att uppfatta sin omvärld. Varför vi förstår verkligheten på olika sätt (pp. 143-160). Stockholm, Sweden: AWE/Gebers.
190. Marton, F. & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 193-220.
191. Marton, F. & Pang, M. F. (2007). The paradox of pedagogy: The relative contribution of teachers and learners to learning. Iskolakultura, 1(1), 1-29.
192. Marton, F. & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of conceptual change (pp. 533-539). New York, NY: Routledge.
193. Marton, F. & Pang, M. F. (2013). Meanings are acquired from experiencing differences against a background of sameness, rather than from experiencing sameness against a background of difference: Putting a conjecture to the test by embedding it in a pedagogical tool. Frontline Learning Research, 1, 24-41.
194. Marton, F. & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education: Research and Development, 24, 335-348
195. Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127.
196. Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 39-58). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
197. Marton, F. & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum [Variation is the mother of learning ]. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (3), 381-395.
198. Marton, F. & Tsui, A. B. M (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
199. Marton, F. & Wenestam, C-G. (1988). Qualitative differences in retention when a text is read several times. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 2, pp. 370-376) Chichester, UK: Wiley.
200. Marton, F., Tse, S. K. & Cheung, W. M. (Eds.). (2010). On the learning of Chinese. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
201. Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997, January 3-7). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
202. Marton, F. & Neuman, D. (1989). The perceptibility of numbers and the origin of arithmetic skills. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.
203. Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning II-Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127.
204. Marton, F., Watkins, D. & Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hong Kong. Learning and Instruction, 7, 21-48.
205. Marton, F., Wen, Q. F. & Wong, K. C. (2005). "Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear…": Changes in Chinese university students' views of the temporal structure of learning. Higher Education, 49, 291-318.
206. Mason, J. (2011). Explicit and implicit pedagogy: Variation theory as a case study. In C. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31 (3), 107-112.
207. Mason, J. & Watson, A. (2005, August, 23-27). Mathematical exercises: What is exercised, what is attended to, and how does the structure of the exercises influence this? Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
208. Mathews, M. H. (1992). Making sense of place: Children's understanding of large-scale environments. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester.
209. Maunula, T. (2011). Dynamiska aspekter av innehållslig interaktion. [Dynamical aspects of content-related interaction]. Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Education, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
210. Mayr, F. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
211. McKenzie, J. (2003). Variation and change in university teachers' ways of experiencing teaching (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia).
212. McKinsey and Co. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. New York, NY: Author.
213. Meltzoff, A. N. (1988). Infant imitation after a one week delay: Long term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 24, 470-476.
214. Montessori, M. (1987). Barnasinnet [The absorbent mind]. Stockholm, Sweden: MacBook. (Original work published 1949)
215. Morris, A. & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40 (1), 5-14.
216. Moxley, S. E. (1979). Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 2 (1), 65-70.
217. Mulhall, S. (1993). On being in the world: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on seeing aspects. London, UK: Routledge.
218. Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
219. National Association for the Study of Educational Methods. (2011). Lesson study in Japan. Hiroshima, Japan: Keisuisha.
220. Nemirovsky, R. (2011). Episodic feelings and transfer of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20 (2), 308-337.
221. Nemirovsky, R., Tierny, C. & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (2), 119-172.
222. Neuman, D. (1987). The origin of arithmetic skills: A phenomenographic approach. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
223. Neuman, D. (2013). Att ändra arbetssätt och kultur inom den inledande aritmetikundervisningen [Changing ways of working and culture in the initial teaching of arithmetic]. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 18 (2), 3-46.
224. Newman, D., Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for change in school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
225. Ng, F. P., Kwan, T. & Chik, P. M. (2000). Analysis of a primary Chinese language lesson. Curriculum Forum, 8, 79-89.
226. Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (2), 119-154.
227. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction. "Mode 2" revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179-194.
228. Nutbrown, C. (1994). Threads of thinking: Young children learning and the role of early education. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
229. Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74 (3), 273-306.
230. Nye, B., Konstantopoulus, S. & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26 (3), 237-257.
231. OECD. (2012). Education at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/eag 2012.htm
232. OECD. (2013) PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do-Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. 1). PISA, OECD Publishing.
233. Olteanu, C. (2007). " Vad skulle x kunna vara? " Andragradsekvation och andragradsfunktion som objekt för lärande ["What could x be?" Second-degree equation and second-degree function as objects of learning]. Kristianstad, Sweden: Högskolan i Kristianstad.
234. Örnkloo, H. (2007). Fitting objects into holes: On the development of spatial cognition skills. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
235. Paine, L. (1990). The teacher as a virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92 (1), 49-81.
236. Paine, L. & Ma, L. P. (1993). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives on Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 675-697.
237. Pang, M. F. (2002). Making learning possible: The use of variation in the teaching of school economics (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong).
238. Pang, M. F. (2010). Boosting financial literacy: Benefits from learning study. Instructional Science, 38, 659-677.
239. Pang, M. F. & Chik, P. P. M. (2005). Primary 4 general studies: Price. In M. L. Lo & W. Y. Pong (Eds.), For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies (pp. 96-115). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
240. Pang, M. F., Linder, C. & Fraser, D. (2006). Beyond lesson study and design experiments: Using theoretical tools in practice and finding out how they work. International Review of Economics Education, 5, 28-46.
241. Pang, M. F. & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond "lesson study": Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31, 175-194.
242. Pang, M. F. & Marton, F. (2007). On the paradox of pedagogy: The relative contribution of teachers and learners to learning. Iskolakultura Online, 1, 1-29.
243. Pang, M. F. & Marton, F. (2013, January 23). Interaction between the learners' initial grasp of the object of learning and the learning resource afforded. Instructional Science, 41 (6), 1065-1082.
244. Park, K. (2012). Two faces of mathematics lessons in Korea: Conventional lessons and innovative lessons. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 121-135.
245. Patrick, K. (1998). Teaching and learning: The construction of an object of study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia).
246. Patrick, K. (2002). Doing history. In F. Marton & P. Morris (Eds.), What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning (pp. 93-112). Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
247. Pellegrini, A. D. & Gustafson, K. (2005). Boys' and girls' uses of objects for exploration, play, and tools in early childhood. In A. D. Pellegrini & P. K. Smith (Eds.), The nature of play: Great apes and humans (pp. 113-128). New York, NY: Guildford Press. (Quoted by Jensen, 2007)
248. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: Norton.
249. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child's conception of the space. New York, NY: Norton.
250. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
251. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child's construction of quantities. London, UK: Routledge.
252. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
253. Pong, W. Y. (2000). Widening the space of variation-inter-contextual and intra-contextual shifts in pupils' understanding of two economic concepts (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong, China).
254. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
255. Pramling, I. (1983). The child's conception of learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
256. Pramling, N. & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2001). "It is floating 'cause there is a hole": A young child's experience of natural science. Early Years, 21 (2), 139-149.
257. Pramling, N. & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2011). Introduction and the frame of the book. In N. Pramling & I. Pramling Samuelsson (Eds.), Educational encounters: Nordic studies in early childhood didactics (pp. 1-14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
258. Premack, D. (1984). Pedagogy and aesthetics as sources of culture. In M. S. Gazzinga (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuroscience (pp. 13-35). New York, NY: Plenum.
259. Premack, D. & Premack, A. J. (2003). Original intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
260. Prosser, M. (1994). A phenomenographic study of students' intuitive and conceptual understanding of certain electrical phenomena. Instructional Science, 22, 189-205.
261. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
262. Reis, M. (2011). Att ordna, från ordning till ordning. Yngre förskolebarns matematiserande [To order. From order to order. Toddlers' mathematizing]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
263. Resnick, L. (1989). Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline. In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem-solving (pp. 32-60). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Quoted by Schoenfeld (1992).
264. Roche, J. (1988). Newton's Principia. In J. Fauvel, R. Flood, M. Shortland & R. Wilson (Eds.), Let Newton be! A new perspective on his life and works (pp. 43-61). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
265. Rovio-Johansson, A. & Lumsden, M. (2012). Collaborative production of pedagogical knowledge: Enhancing students' learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4, 72-83.
266. Runesson, U. (1999) Variationens pedagogik [The pedagogy of variation]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitais Gothoburgensis.
267. Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect of learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35 (1), 69-87.
268. Runesson, U. & Mok, I. A. C. (2004). Discernment and the question, "What can be learned?" In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 63-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
269. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson.
270. Sachs, L. (1983). Evil eye or bacteria. Stockholm, Sweden: University of Stockholm, Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology.
271. Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner's perspective I. Some common-sense conceptions. Reports from the Department of Education, Göteborg University, no. 76.
272. Säljö, R. (1982). Learning and understanding: A study of differences in constructing meaning from a text. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
273. Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken [Learning in practice]. Stockholm, Sweden: Prisma.
274. Säljö, R. (2001). The individual in social practices. Comments to Ference Marton's "The practice of learning." Nordic Educational Research, 2, 108-116.
275. Sandberg, J. (1994). Human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Gothenburg, Sweden: BAS.
276. Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19 (1), 19-43.
277. Schmittau, J. & Vagliardo, J. (2006). Using concept mapping in the development of the concept of positional system. In A. Canas & J. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (pp. xxx-xxx). San Jose, Costa Rica.
278. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
279. Schwartz, D. L. & Bransford, D. J. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522.
280. Schwartz, D. L. & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22 (2), 129-184.
281. Séguin, E. (1977). Idiocy and its treatment by the physiological method. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1866)
282. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 5, 4-14.
283. Signert, K. (2012). Variation and invarians i Maria Montessoris sinnestränande material. [ Variation and invariance in Maria Montessori's materials for sense-development]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
284. Signert, K. & Marton, F. (2008). Sinnenas skolning-variation och invarians i Maria Montessoris pedagogik [Nurturing the senses-variation and invariance in the pedagogy of Maria Montessori]. In H. Rystedt & R. Säljö (Eds.), Kunskap och människans redskap: Teknik och lärande (pp. 179-194). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
285. Silén, C. (2000). Mellan kaos och kosmos-Om eget ansvar och självständighet i lärande [Between chaos and cosmos-On the learners' own responsibility and independence]. Linköping, Sweden: Linköpings Universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
286. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
287. Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (In Schmittau & Vagliardo, 2006)
288. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
289. Skolverket. (2004). Nationella utvärderingen av grundskolan 2003. Sammanfattande huvudrapport [The national evaluation of the Swedish comprehensive school]. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritzes.
290. Skolverket. (2009). Vad påverkar resultaten I svensk grundskola? [What affects the results in the Swedish comprehensive school?]. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritzes.
291. Skolverket. (2012). Tid för matematik: erfarenheter från matematiksatsningen 2009-2011 [Time for mathematics. Conclusions from the mathematics initiative]. Stockholm, Sweden: National Board of Education.
292. Smedslund, J. (1961). The acquisition of conservation of substance and weight in children. In I. E. Sigel & F. H. Hooper (Eds.), Logical thinking in children (pp. 281-286). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Quoted by M. Feffer, 1988)
293. Smedslund, J. (1970). Circular relation between understanding and logic. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 217-219.
294. Snyder, B. (1973). The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
295. SOU:31. (2005). Stödet till utbildningsvetenskaplig forskning [Support for educational research]. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritzes.
296. Spencer Brown, G. (1972). Laws of form. New York, NY: Julian Press.
297. Spielberg, H. (1982). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (3rd ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
298. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, UK: Heinemann.
299. Stevenson, H. W. & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. New York, NY: Summit.
300. Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
301. Stilling, N. A., Weisler, S. E., Chase, C. H., Feinstein, M. H., Garfield, J. L. & Rissland, E. L. (1995). Cognitive science: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
302. Stoke, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
303. Sun, X. H. (2011). "Variation problems" and their roles in the topic of fraction division in Chinese mathematics textbook examples. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 65-85.
304. Sutton-Smith, B. (1979). Epilogue: Play as performance. In B. Sutton-Smith (Ed.), Play and learning. New York, NY: Gardner Press.
305. Svensson, L. (1976). Study skill and learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
306. Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning, III: Study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233-243.
307. Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 16 (2), 159-171.
308. Svensson, L. (2009). Introduktion till pedagogik [Introduction to pedagogy]. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedt.
309. Székely, L. (1950). Productive processes in learning and thinking. Acta Psychologica, 7, 388-407.
310. Szklarski, A. (1996). Barn och konflikter [Children and conflicts, in Swedish]. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University, Department of Education and Psychology.
311. Theman, J. (1983). Uppfattningar av politisk makt [Conceptions of political power]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
312. Thornton, R. K. & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66 (4), 338-352.
313. Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
314. Top test scores from Shanghai stun educators. (2012, December 7). New York Times, p. 1.
315. Trankell, A. (1973). Kvarteret Flisan: om en kris och dess övervinnande i ett svenskt förortssamhälle [The neighbourhood Flisan: On a crisis and overcoming it in a Swedish suburb]. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts.
316. Tse, S. K., Marton, F., Loh, E. K. Y. & Chik, P. P. M. (2010). Learning characters. In F. Marton, S. K. Tse & W. M. Cheung (Eds.), On the learning of Chinese (pp. 75-102). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
317. van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight, a theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
318. Van Rossum, E. J. & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-83.
319. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
320. Watson, A. & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as constructive activity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
321. Watson, A. & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8 (2), 91-111.
322. Wenestam, C-G. (1978). Horisontalisering: Ett sätt att missuppfatta det man laser [Horizontalization: A way of misunderstanding what you read]. Reports from the Department of Education, Göteborg University.
323. Wenestam, C-G. (1980). Qualitative differences in retention. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
324. Wenestam, C-G. & Wass, H. (1987). Swedish and US children's thinking about death: A qualitative study and cross-cultural comparison. Death Studies, 11 (2), 99-121.
325. Wernberg, A. (2009). Lärandets objekt [The object of learning]. Kristianstad, Sweden: Högskolan i Kristianstad.
326. Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
327. Wertheimer, M. (1961). Productive thinking. London, UK: Tavistock.
328. Whalen, D. H., Lewitt, A. G. & Wang, Q. (1991). Intonational differences in the reduplicated babbling of French-and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 18, 501-516.
329. White, S. H. (1989). Foreword. In D. Newman, P. Griffin & M. Cole (Eds.), The construction zone: Working for change in school (pp. ix-xiv). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
330. Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York, NY: New American Library. (Quoted by Bereiter, 2002)
331. Wilcken, P. (2010). Claude Lévi-Strauss: The poet in the laboratory. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
332. Williams, F. (1993). Creativity assessment packet. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
333. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
334. Zhang, D., Li, S. & Tang, R. (2004). The "Two basics": Mathematics teaching and learning in mainland China. In L. Fan, N-Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 189-207). Singapore: World Scientific.