Sameness and difference in transfer

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 499-535

  Marton, Ference ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751506977     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 28, 101-139.
2. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (2004). The university of learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
3. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with interesting applications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
4. Carraher, D. W., Nemirovsky, R., & Schliemann, A. D. (1995, July). Situated generalization. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Vol. 1 (p. 234), Recife, Brazil.
5. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
6. Chik, P. P. M., & Lo, M. L. (2004). Simultaneity and the enacted object of learning, In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 89-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
8. de Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.
9. Detterman, D. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). ( 1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Dienes, Z. (1963). An experimental study of mathematics-learning. London: Hutchinson.
11. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5, whole No. 270).
12. Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students' content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facet-schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S3-S15.
13. Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teaming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15. Gibson, E. J., & Dick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.
17. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306-355.
18. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 1-38.
19. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
20. Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 99-167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Gu, L. (1991). Xuehui jiao xue [Learning to teach]. Beijing: Peoples Education Press.
22. Gu, L., Huang, R., & Marton, F. (2005). Teaching with variation: A Chinese way of promoting effective mathematics learning. In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 309-347). Singapore: World Scientific.
23. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 2, pp. 21-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L., & Wernberg, A. (2005, August). Learning patterns. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
25. Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L., & Wernberg, A. (in press). Variation theory: An organizing principle to guide design research in education. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Handbook of design research in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Hounsell, D. (2005). Contrasting conceptions of essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (3rd ed., pp. 106-125). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment. Retrieved November 30, 2005, from http://www.tla.Ed.ac.uk/resources/ EoL.html
27. Itard, J. M. G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1801)
28. Judd, C. H. (1908). The relation of special training and general intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28-42.
29. Kangshen, S., Crossley, J. N., & Lun, A. W.-C. (1999). The nine chapters on the mathematical art. Beijing: Science Press.
30. Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 395-401.
31. Ki, W. W., & Marton, F. (2003, August). Learning Cantonese tones. Paper presented at the 11 th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.
32. Ki, W. W., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning Cantonese tones II. Unpublished manuscript.
33. Lane, H. (1977). The wild boy of Aveyron. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Chik, P. P. M. (Eds.). (2005). For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
36. Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Research. 32(1), 17-20.
37. Lobato, J. (2004). An international working conference: Addressing the transfer dilemma. Proposal funded by the National Science Foundation.
38. Lobato, J. (in press). Research methods for alternative approaches to transfer: Implications for design experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.). Design research in education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39. Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Thinking, 21(1), 87-116.
40. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 193-220.
42. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.), (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (2005). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (3rd ed, pp. 89-105). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment. November 30, 2005, from http://www.tla.Ed.ac.uk/resources/EoL.html
44. Marton, F., & Signert, K. (2005, August). Affordances for learning. Studying teaching in terms of the learning that the inherent pattern of variation and invariance makes possible: Maria Montessori's pedagogy as an example. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Teaching and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
45. Mason, J. (2001). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
46. Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. London: Routledge Falmer.
47. Mason, J., & Watson, A. (2005, August). Mathematical exercises: What is exercised, what is attended to and how does the structure of exercises influence these? Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
48. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Antropoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
49. Mestre, J. (2002). Transfer of learning: Issues and research agenda: Report of a workshop held at the National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
50. Mestre, J. (Ed.), (2005). Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
51. Montessori, M. (1965). Spontaneous activity in education: The advanced Montessori method. New York: Schocken. (Original work published 1917)
52. Moxley, S. E. (1979). Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 65-70.
53. Neuman, D. (1987). The origin of arithmetic skills: A phenomenographic approach. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
54. Packer, M. (2001). The problem of transfer, and the sociocultural critique of schooling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 493-514.
55. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.
56. Reed, S., Ernst, G., & Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6(3), 436-450.
57. Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 381-400.
58. Sandberg, I. (1994). Human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Göteborg, Sweden: BAS.
59. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
60. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522.
61. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184.
62. Seguin, E. (1907). Idiocy: And its treatment by the physiological method. New York: Teachers College.
63. Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination (pp. 113-150). Chichester, England: Wiley.
64. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, C. (2005). Schema: A critical appraisal and reevaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(2), 85-101.
65. Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Schema theory: Critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(4), 376-382.
66. SimCalc Mathworlds. (1996). SimCalc Mathworlds (Version 1.164) [Computer software] (1996). Dartmouth: University of Massachusetts.
67. Smedslund, J. (1953). The problem of "what is learned?" Psychological Review, 60, 157-158.
68. Stagray, J. R., & Downs, D. (1993). Differential sensitivity for frequency among speakers of atone and a non-tone language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 21(1), 5-16.
69. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology: Vol. 2. The psychology of learning. New York: Columbia University Press.
70. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.
71. Tseitlin, M., & Galili, I. (2004). Physics teaching in the search for its self: From physics as a discipline to physics as a discipline-culture. Science & Education, 13, 1-27.
72. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Conceptualizing transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing(pp. 19-38). Amsterdam, TheNetherlands: Pergamon.
73. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.