Molecular dynamics simulations: Advances and applications

Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 37-47

  Hospital, Adam ^a   Goñi, Josep Ramon ^a   Orozco, Modesto ^a   Gelpí, Josep L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Allostery; Conformational ensembles; Docking; Molecular dynamics; Refinement; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954211632     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11786949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/AABC.S70333     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, et al. The protein data bank. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Cryst. 2002;58:899-907.
2. Flores S, Echols N, Milburn D, et al. The database of macromolecular motions: new features added at the decade mark. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D296-D301.
3. Bhabha G, Biel JT, Fraser JS. Keep on moving: discovering and perturbing the conformational dynamics of enzymes. Acc Chem Res. 2015; 48(2):423-430.
4. Cockrell GM, Kantrowitz ER. ViewMotions rainbow: a new method to illustrate molecular motions in proteins. J Mol Graph Model. 2013;40: 48-53.
5. Gerstein M, Krebs W. A database of macromolecular motions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(18):4280-4290.
6. Goh CS, Milburn D, Gerstein M. Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004; 14(1):104-109.
7. Kokkinidis M, Glykos NM, Fadouloglou VE. Protein flexibility and enzymatic catalysis. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2012;87:181-218.
8. Stevens RC, Lipscomb WN. Allosteric control of quaternary states in E. coli aspartate transcarbamylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;171(3):1312-1318.
9. Shinoda T, Arai K, Shigematsu-Iida M, et al. Distinct conformation-mediated functions of an active site loop in the catalytic reactions of NAD-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(17):17068-17075.
10. Karplus M. Role of conformation transitions in adenylate kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(17):E71; author reply E72.
11. Kalko SG, Gelpi JL, Fita I, Orozco M. Theoretical study of the mechanisms of substrate recognition by catalase. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123(39):9665-9672.
12. Jakopitsch C, Droghetti E, Schmuckenschlager F, Furtmuller PG, Smulevich G, Obinger C. Role of the main access channel of catalase-peroxidase in catalysis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(51):42411-42422.
13. Bidon-Chanal A, Marti MA, Crespo A, et al. Ligand-induced dynamical regulation of NO conversion in Mycobacterium tuberculosis truncated hemoglobin-N. Proteins. 2006;64(2):457-464.
14. Hara I, Ichise N, Kojima K, et al. Relationship between the size of the bottleneck 15 A from iron in the main channel and the reactivity of catalase corresponding to the molecular size of substrates. Biochemistry. 2007;46(1):11-22.
15. Bidon-Chanal A, Marti MA, Estrin DA, Luque FJ. Dynamical regulation of ligand migration by a gate-opening molecular switch in truncated hemoglobin-N from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(21):6782-6788.
16. Guallar V, Lu C, Borrelli K, Egawa T, Yeh SR. Ligand migration in the truncated hemoglobin-II from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: the role of G8 tryptophan. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(5):3106-3116.
17. Daigle R, Guertin M, Lague P. Structural characterization of the tunnels of Mycobacterium tuberculosis truncated hemoglobin N from molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 2009;75(3):735-747.
18. Ahalawat N, Murarka RK. Conformational changes and allosteric communications in human serum albumin due to ligand binding. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2015:1-13.
19. Barbany M, Meyer T, Hospital A, et al. Molecular dynamics study of naturally existing cavity couplings in proteins. PLoS One. 2015;10(3): e0119978.
20. Bowman GR, Bolin ER, Hart KM, Maguire BC, Marqusee S. Discovery of multiple hidden allosteric sites by combining Markov state models and experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(9): 2734-2739.
21. Bouvier B, Zakrzewska K, Lavery R. Protein-DNA recognition triggered by a DNA conformational switch. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50(29):6516-6518.
22. Zakrzewska K, Lavery R. Towards a molecular view of transcriptional control. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012;22(2):160-167.
23. Perez A, Noy A, Lankas F, Luque FJ, Orozco M. The relative flexibility of B-DNA and A-RNA duplexes: database analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(20):6144-6151.
24. Leo-Macias A, Lopez-Romero P, Lupyan D, Zerbino D, Ortiz AR. An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies. Biophys J. 2005;88(2):1291-1299.
25. Velazquez-Muriel JA, Rueda M, Cuesta I, Pascual-Montano A, Orozco M, Carazo JM. Comparison of molecular dynamics and superfamily spaces of protein domain deformation. BMC Struct Biol. 2009;9:6.
26. Micheletti C. Comparing proteins by their internal dynamics: exploring structure-function relationships beyond static structural alignments. Phys Life Rev. 2013;10(1):1-26.
27. Baxa MC, Haddadian EJ, Jumper JM, Freed KF, Sosnick TR. Loss of conformational entropy in protein folding calculated using realistic ensembles and its implications for NMR-based calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(43):15396-15401.
28. Noe F, Schuette C, Vanden-Eijnden E, Reich L, Weikl TR. Constructing the equilibrium ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(45):19011-19016.
29. Naganathan AN, Orozco M. The native ensemble and folding of a protein molten-globule: functional consequence of downhill folding. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(31):12154-12161.
30. Candotti M, Esteban-Martin S, Orozco M. Atomistic insights on protein-urea structural organization from MD simulations of a chemically denatured protein ensemble determined by NMR. FEBS J. 2012;279:531-531.
31. Bryn Fenwick R, Esteban-Martin S, Salvatella X. Understanding biomolecular motion, recognition, and allostery by use of conformational ensembles. Eur Biophys J. 2011;40(12):1339-1355.
32. McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature. 1977;267(5612):585-590.
33. Warshel A, Levitt M. Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions-dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of carbonium-ion in reaction of lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1976;103(2):227-249.
34. Roccatano D, Barthel A, Zacharias M. Structural flexibility of the nucleosome core particle at atomic resolution studied by molecular dynamics simulation. Biopolymers. 2007;85(5-6):407-421.
35. Sharma S, Ding F, Dokholyan NV. Multiscale modeling of nucleosome dynamics. Biophys J. 2007;92(5):1457-1470.
36. Tinoco I Jr, Wen JD. Simulation and analysis of single-ribosome translation. Phys Biol. 2009;6(2):025006.
37. Brandman R, Brandman Y, Pande VS. A-site residues move independently from P-site residues in all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of the 70S bacterial ribosome. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29377.
38. Orozco M, Orellana L, Hospital A, et al. Coarse-grained representation of protein flexibility. Foundations, successes, and shortcomings. In: Christov C, editor. Advances in Proteins Chemistry and Structural Biology, Vol 85: Computational Chemistry Methods in Structural Biology. Waltham, MA: Academic Press; 2011:183-215.
39. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins. 1999;35(2):133-152.
40. Roux B, Simonson T. Implicit solvent models. Biophys Chem. 1999;78(1-2):1-20.
41. Orozco M, Luque FJ. Theoretical methods for the description of the solvent effect in biomolecular systems. Chem Rev. 2000; 100(11):4187-4226.
42. Bashford D, Case DA. Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects. Ann Rev Phys Chem. 2000;51:129-152.
43. Haberthuer U, Caflisch A. FACTS: fast analytical continuum treatment of solvation. J Comput Chem. 2008;29(5):701-715.
44. Luchko T, Gusarov S, Roe DR, et al. Three-dimensional molecular theory of solvation coupled with molecular dynamics in Amber. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6(3):607-624.
45. Vorobjev YN. Advances in implicit models of water solvent to compute conformational free energy and molecular dynamics of proteins at constant pH. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2011;85:281-322.
46. Kleinjung J, Fraternali F. Design and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecular simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;25: 126-134.
47. Anandakrishnan R, Drozdetski A, Walker RC, Onufriev AV. Speed of conformational change: comparing explicit and implicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 2015;108(5):1153-1164.
48. Hermans J, Berendsen HJC, Vangunsteren WF, Postma JPM. A consistent empirical potential for water-protein interactions. Biopolymers. 1984;23(8):1513-1518.
49. Mackerell AD, Wiorkiewiczkuczera J, Karplus M. An all-atom empirical energy function for the simulation of nucleic-acids. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117(48):11946-11975.
50. Ott KH, Meyer B. Parametrization of GROMOS force field for oligosaccharides and assessment of efficiency of molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 1996;17(8):1068-1084.
51. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102(18):3586-3616.
52. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, et al. A 2nd generation force-field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic-acids, and organic-molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117(19):5179-5197.
53. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105(28):6474-6487.
54. Rueda M, Ferrer-Costa C, Meyer T, et al. A consensus view of protein dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(3):796-801.
55. Perez A, Lankas F, Luque FJ, Orozco M. Towards a molecular dynamics consensus view of B-DNA flexibility. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(7):2379-2394.
56. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE I, et al. AMBER 12. San Francisco, CA: University of California; 2012.
57. Brooks BR, Brooks CL 3rd, Mackerell AD Jr, et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(10): 1545-1614.
58. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2008;4(3):435-447.
59. Nelson MT, Humphrey W, Gursoy A, et al. NAMD: a parallel, object oriented molecular dynamics program. Int J Supercomput Appl High Perform Comput. 1996;10(4):251-268.
60. Larsson P, Hess B, Lindahl E. Algorithm improvements for molecular dynamics simulations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2011; 1(1):93-108.
61. Harvey MJ, Giupponi G, De Fabritiis G. ACEMD: accelerating biomolecular dynamics in the microsecond time scale. J Chem Theory Comput. 2009;5(6):1632-1639.
62. Pan AC, Roux B. Building Markov state models along pathways to determine free energies and rates of transitions. J Chem Phys. 2008; 129(6):064107.
63. Bowman GR, Huang X, Pande VS. Using generalized ensemble simulations and Markov state models to identify conformational states. Methods. 2009;49(2):197-201.
64. Chodera JD, Noe F. Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;25:135-144.
65. Da LT, Sheong FK, Silva DA, Huang X. Application of Markov state models to simulate long timescale dynamics of biological macromolecules. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;805:29-66.
66. Voelz VA, Bowman GR, Beauchamp K, Pande VS. Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39). J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(5):1526-1528.
67. Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G. Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(25):10184-10189.
68. Micheletti C, Laio A, Parrinello M. Reconstructing the density of states by history-dependent metadynamics. Phys Rev Lett. 2004; 92(17):170601.
69. Laio A, Rodriguez-Fortea A, Gervasio FL, Ceccarelli M, Parrinello M. Assessing the accuracy of metadynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2005; 109(14):6714-6721.
70. Raiteri P, Laio A, Gervasio FL, Micheletti C, Parrinello M. Efficient reconstruction of complex free energy landscapes by multiple walkers metadynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110(8):3533-3539.
71. Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M. Metadynamics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2011;1(5):826-843.
72. Dickson A, Brooks CL. WExplore: hierarchical exploration of high-dimensional spaces using the weighted ensemble algorithm. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118(13):3532-3542.
73. Abdul-Wahid B, Feng H, Rajan D, et al. AWE-WQ: fast-forwarding molecular dynamics using the accelerated weighted ensemble. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54(10):3033-3043.
74. Doshi U, Hamelberg D. Towards fast, rigorous and efficient conformational sampling of biomolecules: advances in accelerated molecular dynamics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1850(5):878-888.
75. Miao Y, Feixas F, Eun C, McCammon JA. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding. J Comput Chem. 2015; 36(20):1536-1549.
76. Nymeyer H, Gnanakaran S, Garcia AE. Atomic simulations of protein folding, using the replica exchange algorithm. Methods Enzymol. 2004;383:119-149.
77. Kubitzki MB, de Groot BL. Molecular dynamics simulations using temperature-enhanced essential dynamics replica exchange. Biophys J. 2007;92(12):4262-4270.
78. Meng Y, Dashti DS, Roitberg AE. Computing alchemical free energy differences with Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics (H-REMD) simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2011; 7(9):2721-2727.
79. Burgi R, Kollman PA, Van Gunsteren WF. Simulating proteins at constant pH: an approach combining molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulation. Proteins. 2002;47(4):469-480.
80. Stern HA. Molecular simulation with variable protonation states at constant pH. J Chem Phys. 2007;126(16):164112.
81. Baptista AM, Martel PJ, Petersen SB. Simulation of protein conformational freedom as a function of pH: constant-pH molecular dynamics using implicit titration. Proteins. 1997;27(4):523-544.
82. Goh GB, Hulbert BS, Zhou H, Brooks CL. Constant pH molecular dynamics of proteins in explicit solvent with proton tautomerism. Proteins. 2014;82(7):1319-1331.
83. Itoh SG, Damjanovic A, Brooks BR. pH replica-exchange method based on discrete protonation states. Proteins. 2011;79(12):3420-3436.
84. Meyer T, D'Abramo M, Hospital A, et al. MoDEL (molecular dynamics extended library): a database of atomistic molecular dynamics trajectories. Structure. 2010;18(11):1399-1409.
85. Jo S, Kim T, Iyer VG, Im W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J Comput Chem. 2008;29(11):1859-1865.
86. Miller BT, Singh RP, Klauda JB, Hodoscek M, Brooks BR, Woodcock HL 3rd. CHARMMing: a new, flexible web portal for CHARMM. J Chem Inf Model. 2008;48(9):1920-1929.
87. Kota P. GUIMACS-a Java based front end for GROMACS. In Silico Biol. 2007;7(1):95-99.
88. Sellis D, Vlachakis D, Vlassi M. Gromita: a fully integrated graphical user interface to gromacs 4. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2009;3:99-102.
89. Roopra S, Knapp B, Omasits U, Schreiner W. jSimMacs for GROMACS: a Java application for advanced molecular dynamics simulations with remote access capability. J Chem Inf Model. 2009; 49(10):2412-2417.
90. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph Model. 1996;14(1):33-38.
91. Hospital A, Andrio P, Fenollosa C, Cicin-Sain D, Orozco M, Gelpi JL. MDWeb and MDMoby: an integrated web-based platform for molecular dynamics simulations. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(9):1278-1279.
92. Monod J, Changeux JP, Jacob F. Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. J Mol Biol. 1963;6(4):306-329.
93. Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux JP. On nature of allosteric transitions-a plausible model. J Mol Biol. 1965;12(1):88-118.
94. Koshland DE, Nemethy G, Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry. 1966;5(1):365-385.
95. Henzler-Wildman KA, Thai V, Lei M, et al. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature. 2007;450(7171):838-844.
96. Sfriso P, Emperador A, Orellana L, Hospital A, Lluis Gelpi J, Orozco M. Finding conformational transition pathways from discrete molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012; 8(11):4707-4718.
97. Sfriso P, Hospital A, Emperador A, Orozco M. Exploration of conformational transition pathways from coarse-grained simulations. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(16):1980-1986.
98. Kim MK, Jernigan RL, Chirikjian GS. Efficient generation of feasible pathways for protein conformational transitions. Biophys J. 2002;83(3):1620-1630.
99. Bahar I, Rader AJ. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;15(5):586-592.
100. Orellana L, Rueda M, Ferrer-Costa C, Lopez-Blanco JR, Chacon P, Orozco M. Approaching elastic network models to molecular dynamics flexibility. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6(9):2910-2923.
101. Orellana L, Orozco M. Understanding protein dynamics with coarse-grained models: from structures to disease. FEBS J. 2012;279: 528-528.
102. Schlitter J, Engels M, Kruger P, Jacoby E, Wollmer A. Targeted molecular-dynamics simulation of conformational change-application to the T-R transition in insulin. Mol Simul. 1993;10(2-6):291-308.
103. Kruger P, Verheyden S, Declerck PJ, Engelborghs Y. Extending the capabilities of targeted molecular dynamics: simulation of a large conformational transition in plasminogen activator inhibitor 1. Protein Sci. 2001;10(4):798-808.
104. Perdih A, Kotnik M, Hodoscek M, Solmajer T. Targeted molecular dynamics simulation studies of binding and conformational changes in E. coli MurD. Proteins. 2007;68(1):243-254.
105. Deganutti G, Cuzzolin A, Ciancetta A, Moro S. Understanding allosteric interactions in G protein-coupled receptors using supervised molecular dynamics: a prototype study analysing the human A3 adenosine receptor positive allosteric modulator LUF6000. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23(14):4065-4071.
106. Arkhipov A, Shan Y, Das R, et al. Architecture and membrane interactions of the EGF receptor. Cell. 2013;152(3):557-569.
107. Klepeis JL, Lindorff-Larsen K, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009;19(2):120-127.
108. Anderson JS, Mustafi SM, Hernández G, LeMaster DM. Statistical allosteric coupling to the active site indole ring flip equilibria in the FK506-binding domain. Biophys Chem. 2014;192:41-48.
109. Boczek EE, Reefschläger LG, Dehling M, et al. Conformational processing of oncogenic v-Src kinase by the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(25):E3189-E3198.
110. Wigley DB, Muirhead H, Gamblin SJ, Holbrook JJ. Crystallization of a ternary complex of lactate-dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. J Mol Biol. 1988;204(4):1041-1043.
111. Wigley DB, Gamblin SJ, Turkenburg JP, et al. Structure of a ternary complex of an allosteric lactate-dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1992;223(1):317-335.
112. Cameron AD, Roper DI, Moreton KM, Muirhead H, Holbrook JJ, Wigley DB. Allosteric activation in Bacillus stearothermophilus lactate-dehydrogenase investigated by an x-ray crystallographic analysis of a mutant designed to prevent tetramerization of the enzyme. J Mol Biol. 1994;238(4):615-625.
113. Jackson RM, Gelpi JL, Cortes A, et al. Construction of a stable dimer of Bacillus stearothermophilus lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry. 1992;31(35):8307-8314.
114. Esteban-Martin S, Bryn Fenwick R, Salvatella X. Refinement of ensembles describing unstructured proteins using NMR residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(13):4626-4632.
115. Koshland DE. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958;44(2):98-104.
116. Hawkins PCD, Nicholls A. Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52(11):2919-2936.
117. Ishikawa Y. A script for automated 3-dimentional structure generation and conformer search from 2-dimentional chemical drawing. Bioinformation. 2013;9(19):988-992.
118. Klett J, Cortes-Cabrera A, Gil-Redondo R, Gago F, Morreale A. ALFA: Automatic ligand flexibility assignment. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54(1):314-323.
119. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem. 2004;47(7):1739-1749.
120. Nabuurs SB, Wagener M, De Vlieg J. A flexible approach to induced fit docking. J Med Chem. 2007;50(26):6507-6518.
121. Borrelli KW, Vitalis A, Alcantara R, Guallar V. PELE: protein energy landscape exploration. A novel Monte Carlo based technique. J Chem Theory Comput. 2005;1(6):1304-1311.
122. Emperador A, Solernou A, Sfriso P, et al. Efficient relaxation of protein-protein interfaces by discrete molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9(2):1222-1229.
123. Csermely P, Palotai R, Nussinov R. Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: an extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35(10):539-546.
124. Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(52):18908-18913.
125. Fukunishi Y. Structural ensemble in computational drug screening. Exp Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010;6(7):835-849.
126. Ivetac A, McCammon JA. A molecular dynamics ensemble-based approach for the mapping of druggable binding sites. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;819:3-12.
127. Okamoto Y, Kokubo H, Tanaka T. Ligand docking simulations by generalized-ensemble algorithms. In: KarabenchevaChristova T, editor. Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Vol 92. Waltham, MA: Academic Press; 2013:63-91.
128. Fenollosa C, Oton M, Andrio P, Cortes J, Orozco M, Goni JR. SEABED: Small molEcule activity scanner weB servicE baseD. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(5):773-775.
129. Maria Novoa E, Ribas de Pouplana L, Barril X, Orozco M. Ensemble docking from homology models. J Chem Theory Comput. 2010; 6(8):2547-2557.
130. Osguthorpe DJ, Sherman W, Hagler AT. Exploring protein flexibility: incorporating structural ensembles from crystal structures and simulation into virtual screening protocols. J Phys Chem B. 2012; 116(23):6952-6959.
131. Chaudhuri R, Carrillo O, Laughton CA, Orozco M. Application of drug-perturbed essential dynamics/molecular dynamics (ED/MD) to virtual screening and rational drug design. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012;8(7):2204-2214.
132. Dorn M, E Silva MB, Buriol LS, Lamb LC. Three-dimensional protein structure prediction: methods and computational strategies. Comput Biol Chem. 2014;53:251-276.
133. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science. 2011;334(6055):517-520.
134. Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE. Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(44):17845-17850.
135. Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE. Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(15):5915-5920.
136. Bonneau R, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2001;30: 173-189.
137. Lance BK, Deane CM, Wood GR. Exploring the potential of template-based modelling. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(15):1849-1856.
138. Joo K, Lee J, Lee S, Seo JH, Lee SJ, Lee J. High accuracy template based modeling by global optimization. Proteins. 2007;69:83-89.
139. Moult J. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;15(3): 285-289.
140. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc. 2010; 5(4):725-738.
141. Zhang Y. Protein structure prediction: when is it useful? Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009;19(2):145-155.
142. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(8):1015-1018.
143. Misura KMS, Baker D. Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins. 2005;59(1):15-29.
144. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234(3):779-815.
145. Raval A, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 2012;80(8):2071-2079.
146. Mirjalili V, Feig M. Protein structure refinement through structure selection and averaging from molecular dynamics ensembles. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9(2):1294-1303.
147. Chen J, Brooks CL III. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins. 2007;67(4):922-930.
148. Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(7):845-854.