Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 25, Issue , 2014, Pages 135-144

  Chodera, John D ^a   Noé, Frank ^b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MARKOV STATE MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; METABOLISM; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES;

PROTEIN;

BIOCHEMISTRY; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84900548447     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Lane T.J., Shukla D., Beauchamp K.A., Pande V.S. To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013, 23:58-65.
2. Shaw D.E., Dror R.O., Salmon J.K., Grossman J., Mackenzie K.M., Bank J.A., Young C., Deneroff M.M., Batson B., Bowers K.J., Chow E., Eastwood M.P., Ierardi D.J., Klepeis J.L., Kuskin J.S., Larson R.H., Lindorff-Larsen K., Maragakis P., Moraes M.A., Piana S., Shan Y., Towles B. Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC09) 2009.
3. Noé F., Wu H., Prinz J.-H., Plattner N. Projected and hidden Markov models for calculating kinetics and metastable states of complex molecules. J Chem Phys 2013, 139:184114.
4. An introduction to Markov state models and their application to long timescale molecular simulation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2014, vol 797. Springer. G.R. Bowman, V.S. Pande, F. Noé (Eds.).
5. Schütte C., Sarich M. Metastability and Markov state models in molecular dynamics: modeling. Analysis, Algorithmic Approaches, Vol. 24 of Courant Lecture Notes, American Mathematical Society 2013.
6. Pande V.S., Beauchamp K., Bowman G.R. Everything you wanted to know about Markov state models but were afraid to ask. Methods 2010, 52:99-105.
7. Prinz J.-H., Wu H., Sarich M., Keller B., Senne M., Held M., Chodera J., Schütte C., Noé F. Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. J Chem Phys 2011, 134:174105.
8. Sarich M., Noé F., Schütte C. On the approximation error of Markov state models. SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 2010, 8:1154-1177.
9. Sarich M., Schütte C. Approximating selected non-dominant timescales by Markov state models. Comm Math Sci 2012, 10:1001.
10. Rohrdanz M.A., Zheng W., Maggioni M., Clementi C. Determination of reaction coordinates via locally scaled diffusion map. J Chem Phys 2011, 134:124116.
11. Zheng W., Rohrdanz M.A., Clementi C. Rapid exploration of configuration space with diffusion-map-directed molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:12769-12776.
12. Djurdjevac N., Sarich M., Schütte C. Estimating the eigenvalue error of Markov state models. Multiscale Model Simul 2012, 10:61-81.
13. Prinz J.-H., Chodera J.D., Noé F. Spectral rate theory for two-state kinetics. Phys Rev X 2014, 4:011020.
14. Noé F., Nüske F. A variational approach to modeling slow processes in stochastic dynamical systems. SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 2013, 11:635-655.
15. Nueske F., Keller B.G., Mey A.S.J.S., Perez-Hernandez G., Noé F. Variational approach to molecular kinetics. J Chem Theory Comput 2014, 10:1739-1752.
16. Gu C., Chang H.-W., Maibaum L., Pande V.S., Carlsson G.E., Guibas L.J. Building Markov state models with solvent dynamics. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14(Suppl. 2):S8.
17. McGibbon R.T., Pande V.S. Learning kinetic distance metrics for Markov state models of protein conformational dynamics. J Chem Theor Comput 2013, 9:2900-2906.
18. Teo I., Schulten K. A computational kinetic model of diffusion for molecular systems. J Chem Phys 2013, 139:121929.
19. Molgedey L., Schuster H.G. Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations. Phys Rev Lett 1994, 72:3634-3637.
20. Schwantes C.R., Pande V.S. Improvements in Markov state model construction reveal many non-native interactions in the folding of NTL9. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:2000-2009.
21. Perez-Hernandez G., Paul F., Giorgino T., de Fabritiis G., Noé F. Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction. J Chem Phys 2013, 139:015102.
22. Buchete N.V., Hummer G. Coarse master equations for peptide folding dynamics. J Phys Chem B 2008, 112:6057-6069.
23. Schütte C., Noé F., Lu J., Sarich M., Vanden-Eijnden E. Markov state models based on milestoning. J Chem Phys 2011, 134:204105.
24. Prinz J.-H., Chodera J.D., Pande V.S., Swope W.C., Smith J.C., Noé F. Optimal use of data in parallel tempering simulations for the construction of discrete-state Markov models of biomolecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 2011, 134:244108.
25. Beauchamp K.A., Bowman G.R., Lane T.J., Maibaum L., Haque I., Pande V.S. MSMBuilder2: modeling conformational dynamics at the picosecond to millisecond scale. J Chem Theory Comput 2011, 7:3412-3419. 10.1021/ct200463m.
26. Bowman G.R., Beauchamp K.A., Boxer G., Pande V.S. Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems. J Chem Phys 2009, 131:124101. 10.1063/1.3216567.
27. Noé F. Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models. J Chem Phys 2008, 128:244103.
28. Trendelkamp-Schroer B., Noé F. Efficient Bayesian estimation of Markov model transition matrices with given stationary distribution. J Phys Chem 2013, 138:164113.
29. Buchete N.V., Hummer G. Peptide folding kinetics from replica exchange molecular dynamics. Phys Rev E 2008, 77:030902.
30. Chodera J.D., Swope W.C., Noé F., Prinz J.-H., Pande V.S. Dynamical reweighting: improved estimates of dynamical properties from simulations at multiple temperatures. J Phys Chem 2011, 134:244107.
31. Schütte C., Fischer A., Huisinga W., Deuflhard P. A direct approach to conformational dynamics based on hybrid Monte Carlo. J Comput Phys 1999, 151:146-168.
32. Deuflhard P., Weber M. Robust perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics. Linear Algebra Appl. 2005, vol 398C:161-184. Elsevier, New York. M. Dellnitz, S. Kirkland, M. Neumann, C. Schütte (Eds.).
33. Bowman G.R. Improved coarse-graining of Markov state models via explicit consideration of statistical uncertainty. J Chem Phys 2012, 137:134111.
34. Yao Y., Cui R.Z., Bowman G.R., Silva D.-A., Sun J., Huang X. Hierarchical Nyström methods for constructing Markov state models for conformational dynamics. J Chem Phys 2013, 138:174106.
35. Beauchamp K.A., McGibbon R., Lin Y.-S., Pande V.S. Simple few-state models reveal hidden complexity in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:17807-17813.
36. Bowman G.R., Meng L., Huang X. Quantitative comparison of alternative methods for coarse-graining biological networks. J Chem Phys 2013, 139:121905.
37. Jain A., Stock G. Identifying metastable states of folding proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 2012, 8:3810.
38. Senne M., Trendelkamp-Schroer B., Mey A.S.J.S., Schütte C., Noé F. EMMA - a software package for Markov model building and analysis. J Chem Theory Comput 2012, 8:2223-2238.
39. Cronkite-Ratcliff B., Pande V. MSMExplorer: visualizing Markov state models for biomolecule folding simulations. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:950-952.
40. Harvey M.J., Giupponi G., De Fabritiis G. ACEMD: accelerated molecular dynamics simulations in the microseconds timescale. J Chem Theory Comput 2009, 5:1632.
41. Eastman P., Friedrichs M.S., Chodera J.D., Radmer R.J., Bruns C.M., Ku J.P., Beauchamp K.A., Lane T.J., Wang L.-P., Shukla D., Tye T., Houston M., Stich T., Klein C., Shirts M.R., Pande V.S. OpenMM 4: a reusable, extensible, hardware independent library for high performance molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:461.
42. Salomon-Ferrer R., Götz A.W., Le Grand S., Walker R.C. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:3878.
43. Lindorff-Larsen K., Piana S., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 2011, 334:517.
44. De Sancho D., Mittal J., Best R.B. Folding kinetics and unfolded state dynamics of the GB1 hairpin from molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2013, 9:1743.
45. Noé F., Schütte C., Vanden-Eijnden E., Reich L., Weikl T. Constructing the full ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:19011-19016.
46. Voelz V.A., Jäger M., Zhu L., Yao S., Bakajin O., Weiss S., Lapidus L.J., Pande V.S. Markov state models of millisecond folder ACBP reveals new views of the folding reaction. Biophys J 2011, 100:515a. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3015.
47. Voelz V.A., Jäger M., Yao S., Chen Y., Zhu L., Waldauer S.A., Bowman G.R., Friedrichs M., Bakajin O., Lapidus L.J., Weiss S., Pande V.S. Slow unfolded-state structuring of acyl-CoA binding protein revealed by simulation and experiment. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:12565-12577.
48. jie Deng N., Dai W., Levy R.M. How kinetics within the unfolded state affects protein folding: an analysis based on Markov state models and an ultra-long MD trajectory. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:12787-12799.
49. Piana S., Lindorff-Larsen K., Shaw D.E. Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:5915-5920.
50. Weber J.K., Pande V.S. Protein folding is mechanically robust. Biophys J 2012, 102:859-867.
51. Jain A., Stock G. Hierarchical folding free energy landscape of HP35 revealed by most probably path clustering. J Phys Chem B 2014, (in press). 10.1021/jp410398a.
52. Weber J.K., Jack R.L., Pande V.S. Emergence of glass-like behavior in Markov state models of protein folding dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:5501-5504.
53. Bowman G.R., Geissler P.L. Extensive conformational heterogeneity within protein cores. J Phys Chem B 2014, (in press). 10.1021/jp4105823.
54. Shan Y., Kim E.T., Eastwood M.P., Dror R.O., Seeliger M.A., Shaw D.E. How does a drug molecule find its binding site?. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133:9181.
55. Buch I., Giorgino T., de Fabritiis G. Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:10184-10189. 10.1073/pnas.1103547108.
56. Huang D., Caflisch A. The free energy landscape of small molecule unbinding. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002002. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002002.
57. Held M., Metzner P., Prinz J.-H., Noé F. Mechanisms of protein-ligand association and its modulation by protein mutations. Biophys J 2010, 100:701.
58. Weber M., Bujotzek A., Haag R. Quantifying the rebinding effect in multivalent chemical ligand-receptor systems. J Chem Phys 2012, 137:054111.
59. Qiao Q., Bowman G.R., Huang X. Dynamics of an intrinsically disordered protein reveal metastable conformations that potentially seed aggregation. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:16092.
60. Lin Y.-S., Bowman G.R., Beauchamp B. Investigating how peptide length and a pathogenic mutation modify the structural ensemble of amyloid beta monomer. Biophy J 2012, 102:315-324.
61. Bowman G., Geissler P. Equilibrium fluctuations of a single folded protein reveal a multitude of potential cryptic allosteric sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:11681-11686.
62. Shukla D., Meng Y., Roux B., Pande V.S. Activation pathway of Src kinase reveals intermediate states as targets for drug design. Nat Commun 2014, 5:3397.
63. Kohlhoff K.J., Shukla D., Lawrenz M., Bowman G.R., Konerding D.E., Belov D., Altman R.B., Pande V.S. Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand modulation of GPCR activation pathways. Nat Chem 2014, 5:3397.
64. Sadiq S., Noé F., de Fabritiis G. Kinetic characterization of the critical step in HIV-1 protease maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:20449-20454.
65. Da L.-T., Avila F.P., Wang D., Huang X. A two-state model for the dynamics of pyrophosphate ion release in bacterial RNA polymerase. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1003020.
66. Faelber K., Posor Y., Gao S., Held M., Roske Y., Schulze D., Haucke V., Noé F., Daumke O. Crystal structure of nucleotide-free dynamin. Nature 2011, 477:556-560.
67. Noé F., Doose S., Daidone I., Löllmann M., Chodera J.D., Sauer M., Smith H.C. Dynamical fingerprints for probing individual relaxation processes in biomolecular dynamics with simulations and kinetic experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:4822-4827.
68. Keller B.G., Prinz J.-H., Noé F. Markov models and dynamical fingerprints: unraveling the complexity of molecular kinetics. Chem Phys 2012, 396:92.
69. Xia J., Deng N., Levy R.M. NMR relaxation in proteins with fast internal motions and slow conformational exchange: model-free framework and Markov state simulations. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:6625-6634.
70. Lindner B., Yi Z., Prinz J.-H., Smith J., Noé F. Dynamic neutron scattering from conformational dynamics. I: Theory and Markov models. J Chem Phys 2013, 139:175101.
71. Zheng Y., Lindner B., Prinz J.-H., Noé F., Smith J. Dynamic neutron scattering from conformational dynamics. II: Application using molecular dynamics simulation and Markov modeling. J Chem Phys 2013, 139:175102.
72. Zhuang W., Cui R.Z., Silva D.-A., Huang X. Simulating the T-jump-triggered unfolding dynamics of trpzip2 peptide and its time-resolved IR and two-dimensional IR signals using the Markov state model approach. J Phys Chem B 2011, 115:5415-5424.
73. Baiz C.R., Lin Y., Peng C.S., Beauchamp K.A., Voelz V.A., Pande V.S., Tokmakoff A. A molecular interpretation of 2D IR protein folding experiments with Markov state models. Biophys. J. 2014, 106:1359-1370.
74. Song J., Gao F., Cui R.Z., Shuang F., Liang W., Huang X., Zhuang W. Investigating the structural origin of trpzip2 temperature dependent unfolding fluorescence lineshape based on a Markov state model simulation. J Phys Chem B 2012, 116:12669-12676.
75. Pirchi M., Ziv G., Riven I., Cohen S.S., Zohar N., Barak Y., Haran G. Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy maps the folding landscape of a large protein. Nat Commun 2011, 2:493.
76. Stigler J., Ziegler F., Gieseke A., Gebhardt J.C.M., Rief M. The complex folding network of single calmodulin molecules. Science 2011, 334:512-516.
77. Keller B.G., Kobitski A., Jäschke A., Nienhaus G.U., Noé F. Complex RNA folding kinetics revealed by single molecule FRET and hidden Markov models. J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136:4534-4543.
78. Jämbeck J.P.M., Lyubartsev A.P. Update to the General Amber Force Field for small solutes with an emphasis on free energies of hydration. J Phys Chem B 2014, 118:3793-3804.