SEABED: Small molEcule activity scanner weB servicE baseD

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 773-775

  Fenollosa, Carlos ^a,b   Otón, Marcel ^a,b   Andrio, Pau ^a,b,c   Cortés, Jorge ^a,b   Orozco, Modesto ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Goñi, J Ramon ^a,b  

^a BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

^b CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^c National Institute of Bioinformatics   (Spain)

^d INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^f National Institute of Bioinformatics   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR LIBRARY; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; MUTATION; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PHARMACOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; WORKFLOW;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MUTATION; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES; SOFTWARE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84929018196     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu709     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alvarez, J.C. (2004) High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8, 365-370.
2. Bajorath, J. (2002) Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 1, 882-894.
3. Borrelli, K.W. et al. (2005) PELE: protein energy landscape exploration. A novel Monte Carlo based technique. J.Chem. Theory Comput., 1, 1304-1311.
4. Camps, J. et al. (2009) FlexServ: an integrated tool for the analysis of protein flexibility. Bioinformatics, 25, 1709-1710.
5. Carlson, H.A. (2002). Protein flexibility is an important component of structure-based drug discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des., 8, 1571-1578.
6. Carrillo, O. et al. (2012). Fast atomistic molecular dynamics simulations from essential dynamics samplings. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 792-799.
7. Chaudhuri, R. et al. (2012) Application of drug-perturbed essential dynamics/molecular dynamics (ED/MD) to virtual screening and rational drug design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 2204-2214.
8. Cherkasov, A. et al. (2006) Progressive docking: a hybrid QSAR/docking approach for accelerating in silico high throughput screening. J. Med. Chem. 49, 7466-7478.
9. Coleman, R.G. et al. (2013) Ligand pose and orientational sampling in molecular docking. PLoS One, 8, e75992.
10. Ferrer-Costa, C. et al. (2005). PMUT: a web-based tool for the annotation of pathological mutations on proteins. Bioinformatics, 21, 3176-3178.
11. Fukunishi, H. et al. (2008) Hidden active information in a random compound library: extraction using a pseudo-structure-activity relationship model. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 575-582.
12. Gelpí, J.L. et al. (2001) Classical molecular interaction potentials: improved setup procedure in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Proteins, 45, 428-437.
13. Grosdidier, A. et al. (2011) SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W270-W277.
14. Hospital, A. et al. (2012) MDWeb and MDMoby: an integrated web-based platform for molecular dynamics simulations. Bioinformatics, 28, 1278-1279.
15. Le Guilloux, V. et al. (2009) Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC Bioinform., 10, 168.
16. Li, H. et al. (2005). Very fast empirical prediction and interpretation of protein pKa values. Proteins, 61, 704-721.
17. Madadkar-Sobhani, A. and Guallar, V. (2013) PELE web server: atomistic study of biomolecular systems at your fingertips. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, W322-W328.
18. McVean, G.A. et al. (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1, 092 human genomes. Nature, 491, 56-65.
19. Meyer, T. et al. (2010) MoDEL (molecular dynamics extended library): a database of atomistic molecular dynamics trajectories. Structure, 18, 1399-1409.
20. Mysinger, M.M. et al. (2012) Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking. J. Med. Chem., 55, 6582-6594.
21. O'Boyle, N.M. et al. (2011) Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 3, 33.
22. Orozco, M. and Luque, F.J. (2000) Theoretical methods for the description of the solvent effect in biomolecular systems. Chem. Rev., 100, 4187-4226.
23. Rueda, M. et al. (2009) Consistent improvement of cross-docking results using binding site ensembles generated with elastic network normal modes. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 49, 716-725.
24. Tetko, I.V. et al. (2005) Virtual computational chemistry laboratory-design and description. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 19, 453-463.
25. Trott, O. and Olson, A.J. (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455-461.
26. Yoon, S. et al. (2005) Surrogate docking: structure-based virtual screening at high throughput speed. J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des., 19, 483-497.