An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 1291-1299

  Leo Macias, Alejandra ^a   Lopez Romero, Pedro ^a   Lupyan, Dmitry ^b   Zerbino, Daniel ^a   Ortiz, Angel R ^a  

^a CENTRO DE BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR SEVERO OCHOA   (Spain)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 14844314722     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.052449     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amadei, A., M. A. Ceruso, and A. Di Nola. 1999. On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 36:419-424.
2. Atilgan, A. R., S. R. Durell, R. L. Jernigan, M. C. Demirel, O. Keskin, and I. Bahar. 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80:505-515.
3. Bahar, I., A. R. Atilgan, and B. Erman. 1997. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold. Des. 2:173-181.
4. Baker, D., and A. Sali. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 294:93-96.
5. Berendsen, H. J., and S. Hayward. 2000. Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:165-169.
6. Brenner, S. E., P. Koehl, and M. Levitt. 2000. The ASTRAL compendium for protein structure and sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:254-256.
7. de Groot, B. L., S. Hayward, D, M. van Aalten, A. Amadei, and H. J. Berendsen. 1998. Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: a comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data. Proteins. 31:116-127.
8. Delarue, M., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2002. Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model. J. Mol. Biol. 320:1011-1024.
9. Ferrara, P., H. Gohlke, D. J. Price, G. Klebe, and C. L. Brooks 3rd. 2004. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 47:3032-3047.
10. Fiser, A., M. Feig, C. L. Brooks 3rd, and A. Sali. 2002. Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling. Acc. Chem. Res. 35:413-421.
11. Hinsen, K. 1998. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins. 33:417-429.
12. Johnson, R., and D. Wichern. 1998. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle City, NJ.
13. Karplus, M., and J. A. McCammon. 2002. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:646-652.
14. Kelley, L. A., R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. Sternberg. 2000. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol. 299:499-520.
15. Keskin, O., S. R. Durell, I. Bahar, R. L. Jernigan, and D. G. Covell. 2002. Relating molecular flexibility to function: a case study of tubulin, Biophys. J. 83:663-680.
16. Keskin, O., R. L. Jernigan, and I. Bahar. 2000. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. Biophys. J. 78:2093-2106.
17. Kitao, A., and N. Go. 1999. Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:164-169.
18. Koh I. Y., V. A. Eyrich, M. A. Marti-Renom, D. Przybylski, M. S. Madhusudhan, N. Eswar, O. Grana, F. Pazos, A. Valencia, A. Sali, and B. Rost. 2003. EVA: evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3311-3315.
19. Krebs, W. G., V. Alexandrov, C. A. Wilson, N. Echols, H. Yu, and M. Gerstein. 2002. Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic. Proteins. 48:682-695.
20. Langley, R. 1970. Practical Statistics. Simply Explained. Dover, New York.
21. Levitt, M., M. Gerstein, E. Huang, S. Subbiah, and J. Tsai. 1997. Protein folding: the endgame. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66:549-579.
22. Ma, J. 2004. New advances in normal mode analysis of supermolecular complexes and applications to structural refinement. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 5:119-123.
23. Marti-Renom, M. A., M. S. Madhusudhan, and A. Sali. 2004. Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci. 13:1071-1087.
24. Marti-Renom, M. A., A. C. Stuart, A. Fiser, R. Sanchez, F. Melo, and A. Sali. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29:291-325.
25. Murzin, A. G., S. E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia. 1995. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247:536-540.
26. Ortiz, A. R., C. E. Strauss, and O. Olmea. 2002. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci. 11:2606-2621.
27. O'Toole, N., M. Grabowski, Z. Otwinowski, W. Minor, and M. Cygler. 2004. The structural genomics experimental pipeline: insights from global target lists. Proteins. 56:201-210.
28. Qian, B., A. R. Ortiz, and D. Baker. 2004. Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:15346-15351.
29. Sanchez, R., and A. Sali. 1997. Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:206-214.
30. Shi, J., T. L. Blundell, and K. Mizuguchi. 2001. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol. 310:243-257.
31. Steinmetz, A. C., J. P. Renaud, and D. Moras. 2001. Binding of ligands and activation of transcription by nuclear receptors. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:329-359.
32. Stewart, G. W. 1980. The efficient generation of random orthogonal matrices with an application to condition estimation. SIAM J. Humer. Anal. 17:403-409.
33. Suhre, K., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2004. On the potential of normal-mode analysis for solving difficult molecular-replacement problems. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60:796-799.
34. Temiz, N. A., E. Meirovitch, and I. Bahar. 2004. Escherichia coli adenylate kinase dynamics: comparison of elastic network model modes with mode-coupling (15)N-NMR relaxation data. Proteins. 57:468-480.
35. Tirion, M. M. 1996. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77:1905-1908.
36. Tramontane, A., and V. Morea. 2003. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins. 53(Suppl. 6):352-368.
37. Valadie, H., J. J. Lacapcre, Y. H. Sanejouand, and C. Etchebest. 2003. Dynamical properties of the MscL of Escherichia coli: a normal mode analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 332:657-674.
38. van Aalten, D. M., D. A. Conn, B. L. de Groot, H. J. Berendsen, J. B. Findlay, and A. Amadei. 1997. Protein dynamics derived from clusters of crystal structures. Biophys. J. 73:2891-2896.
39. Xu, C., D. Tobi, and I. Bahar. 2003. Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T ↔ R2 transition. J. Mol. Biol. 333:153-168.