Advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing

Shengwu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1531-1542

  Li, Cong ^a   Cao, Wenguang ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

CRISPR Cas9 system; Gene editing; Off target effect; Single guide RNA

Indexed keywords

DNA; RNA;

BACTERIUM; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOMICS;

BACTERIA; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DNA; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOMICS; RNA;

EID: 84949501101     PISSN: 10003061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.13345/j.cjb.140589     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Thompsson KR, Capecchi MR. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell, 1987, 51(3): 503-512.
2. Thomas G, Charles A, Carlos F. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 2013, 31(7): 397-405.
3. Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(3): 233-239.
4. James E, Julie EN, Prashant M. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013, 41(7): 4336-4343.
5. Friedland AE, Tzur YB, Esvelt KM, et al. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Methods, 2013, 10(8): 741-743.
6. Andrew RB, Charlotte T, Chris PP. Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Rep, 2013, 4(1): 220-228.
7. Chang N, Sun C, Gao L. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos. Cell Res, 2013, 23(4): 465-472.
8. Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110(34): 13904-13909.
9. Shen B, Zhang J, Wu H. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting. Cell Res, 2013, 23(5): 720-723.
10. Wei L, Fei T, Tianda L, et al. Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(8): 684-686.
11. Feng ZY, Zhang BT, Ding WN. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res, 2013, 23(10): 1229-1232.
12. Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen KL, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. J Genet Genomics, 2014, 41(2): 63-68.
13. Shan QW, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(8): 686-688.
14. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 823-826.
15. Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol, 1987, 169(12): 5429-5433.
16. Lillestøl R, Redder P, Garrett RA. A putative viral defence mechanism in archaeal cells. Archaea, 2006, 2(1): 59-72.
17. Coffey A, Ross RP. Bacteriophage-resistance systems in dairy starter strains, molecular analysis to application. Anton Leeuw, 2002, 82(1): 303-321.
18. Jansen R, Embden JD, Gaastra W. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol, 2002, 43(6): 1565-1575.
19. Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. The CRISPRdb database and tools to display CRISPRs and to generate dictionaries of spacers and repeats. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007, 8(1): 172-181.
20. Klug A. The discovery of zinc fingers and their applications in gene regulation and genome manipulation. Q Rev Biophys, 2010, 79: 213-231.
21. Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science, 2009, 326(5959): 1509-1512.
22. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extra-chromosomal origin. Microbiology, 2005, 151(8): 2551-2561.
23. Mojica FJ, Diez VC, Garcia MJ. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol, 2005, 60(2): 174-182.
24. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science, 2007, 315(5819): 1709-1712.
25. Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in Staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science, 2008, 322(5909): 1843-1845.
26. Jansen R, Embden JD, Gaastra W. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol, 2002, 43(6): 1565-1575.
27. Kunin V, Sorek R, Hugenholtz P. Evolutionary conservation of sequence and secondary structures in CRISPR repeats. Genome Biol, 2007, 8(4): R61.
28. Pouecel C, Salvignol G, Vergnaud G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology, 2005, 151(3): 653-663.
29. Mojica FJ, Ferrer C, Juez G. Long stretches of short tandem repeats are present in the largest replicons of the Archaea Halofera mediterranei and Halofera volcanii and could be involved in replicon partitioning. Mol Microbiol, 1995, 17(1): 85-93.
30. Heidelberg JF, Nelson WC, Schoenfeld T. Germ warfare in a microbial matcommunity: CRISPR provide insights into the co-evolution of host and viral genomes. PLoS ONE, 2009, 4(1): e4169.
31. Brouns SJ, Jore MM, Lundgren M. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science, 2008, 321(5891): 960-964.
32. Garneau JE, Dupuis M, Villion M. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature, 2010, 468(7320): 67-71.
33. Haft DH, Selengut J, Mongodin EF, et al. A guild of 45 CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein families and multiple CRISPR/Cas subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes. PLoS Comput Biol, 2005, 1(6): 474-483.
34. Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2011, 9(6): 467-477.
35. Makarova KS, Aravind L, Wolf YI, et al. Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct, 2011, 6(38): 1-27.
36. Gesner EM, Schellenberg MJ, Garside EL. Recognition and maturation of effector RNAs in a CRISPR interference pathway. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2011, 18(6): 688-692.
37. Sashital DG, Jinek M, Doudns JA. An RNA-induced conformational change required for CRISPR RNA cleavage by the endoribonuclease Cse3. Nat Struct Molr Biol, 2011, 18(6): 680-687.
38. Lintner NG, Frankel KA, Tsutakawa SE. The structure of the CRISPR-associated protein Cas3 provides insight into the regulation of the CRISPR/Cas system. J Mol Biol, 2011, 405(4): 939-955.
39. Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature, 2011, 471(7340): 602-607.
40. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, et al. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature, 2014, 507(7490): 62-67.
41. Beloglazova N, Brown G, Zimmerman MD. A novel family of sequence-specific endoribonucleases associated with the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. J Biochem, 2008, 283(29): 20361-20371.
42. Semenova E, Nagornykh M, Pyatnitskiy M. Analysis of CRISPR system function in plant pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2009, 296(1): 110-116.
43. Villion M, Moineau S. The double-edged sword of CRISPR-Cas systems. Cell Res, 2013, 23(1): 15-17.
44. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 816-821.
45. Kevin ME, Prashant M, Jonathan LB. Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat Methods, 2013, 10(11): 1116-1121.
46. Hou Z, Zhang Y, Propson NE. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110(39): 15644-15649.
47. Carlson DF, Walton MW, Fahrenkrug SC. Precision editing of large animal genomes. Adv Genet, 2012, 80: 37-97.
48. Patrick DH, David A, Joshua AW, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 827-832.
49. Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(3): 227-229.
50. Shalem O, Sanjana NE, Hartenian E. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science, 2014, 343(6166): 84-87.
51. Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Science, 2014, 343(6166): 80-84.
52. Shen B, Brown KM, Lee TD. Efficient gene disruption in diverse strains of Toxoplasma gondii using CRISPR/Cas9. MBio, 2014, 5(3): e01114.
53. Guo X, Zhang T, Hu Z. Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Development, 2014, 141(3): 707-714.
54. Niu Y, Shen B, Cui YQ. Generation of gene modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos. Cell, 2014, 156(4): 836-843.
55. Hai T, Teng F, Guo RF, et al. One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res, 2014, 24(3): 372-375.
56. Heo YT, Quan X, Xu YN, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-mediated gene knock-in in bovine-induced pluripotent cells. Stem Cells Dev, 2015, 24(3): 393-402.
57. Han HB, Ma YH, Wang T, et al. One-step generation of myostatin gene knockout sheep via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Agr Sci Eng, 2014, 1(1): 2-5.
58. Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(8): 688-691.
59. Clop A, Marcq F, Takeda H. A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheep. Nat Genet, 2006, 38(7): 813-818.
60. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell, 2013, 153(4): 910-918.
61. Wu Y, Liang D, Wang YH. Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell, 2013, 13(6): 659-662.
62. Schwank G, Koo BK, Sasselli V, et al. Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell, 2013, 13(6): 653-658.
63. Sampson TR, Saroj SD, Llewellyn AC. A CRISPR-CAS system mediates bacterial innate immune evasion and virulence. Nature, 2013, 497(7448): 254-257.
64. Helen S. CRISPR technology leaps from lab to industry. J Nematol, 2014, 46(2): 130-260.
65. Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 822-826.
66. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819-823.
67. Cem K, Sevki A, Ritambhara S, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol, 2014, 32(7): 677-683.
68. Vikram P, Steven L, John PG, et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 839-843.
69. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin CY, et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell, 2013, 154(6): 1380-1389.
70. Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 2013, 152(5): 1173-1183.
71. Martin J, Fuguo J, David WT, et al. Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science, 2014, 43(6176): 1247997.
72. O'Connell MR, Oakes BL, Sternberg SH, et al. Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature, 2014, 516(7530): 263-266.