Navigating through metaproteomics data: A logbook of database searching

Proteomics

Volumn 15, Issue 20, 2015, Pages 3439-3453

  Muth, Thilo ^a   Kolmeder, Carolin A ^b   Salojärvi, Jarkko ^b   Keskitalo, Salla ^c   Varjosalo, Markku ^c   Verdam, Froukje J ^d   Rensen, Sander S ^d   Reichl, Udo ^a,e   de Vos, Willem M ^b,f   Rapp, Erdmann ^a   Martens, Lennart ^g,h  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^h DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; De novo sequencing; False discovery rate; Metaproteomics; Search parameters

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS; RELIABILITY; SEQUENCE DATABASE; WORKFLOW; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETICS; HUMAN; METAGENOME; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; HUMANS; METAGENOME; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84944167587     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400560     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Vaudel, M., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., Current methods for global proteome identification. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2012, 9, 519-532.
2. Allmer, J., Algorithms for the de novo sequencing of peptides from tandem mass spectra. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2011, 8, 645-657.
3. Nesvizhskii, A. I., A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2092-2123.
4. Tharakan, R., Edwards, N., Graham, D. R., Data maximization by multipass analysis of protein mass spectra. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1160-1171.
5. Colaert, N., Degroeve, S., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms. J. Proteome Res 2011, 10, 5555-5561.
6. Yadav, A. K., Kumar, D., Dash, D., Learning from decoys to improve the sensitivity and specificity of proteomics database search results. PLoS One 2012, 7, e50651.
7. Vaudel, M., Burkhart, J. M., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., Zahedi, R. P., Peptide identification quality control. Proteomics 2011, 11, 2105-2114.
8. Muth, T., Benndorf, D., Reichl, U., Rapp, E., Martens, L., Searching for a needle in a stack of needles: challenges in metaproteomics data analysis. Mol. Biosyst. 2013, 9, 578-585.
9. Cantarel, B. L., Erickson, A. R., VerBerkmoes, N. C., Erickson, B. K. et al., Strategies for metagenomic-guided whole-community proteomics of complex microbial environments. PLoS One 2011, 6, e27173.
10. Kolmeder, C. A., de Vos, W. M., Metaproteomics of our microbiome - developing insight in function and activity in man and model systems. J. Proteomics 2014, 97, 3-16.
11. Tanca, A., Palomba, A., Deligios, M., Cubeddu, T. et al., Evaluating the impact of different sequence databases on metaproteome analysis: insights from a lab-assembled microbial mixture. PLoS One 2013, 8, e82981.
12. Jagtap, P., Goslinga, J., Kooren, J. A., McGowan, T. et al., A two-step database search method improves sensitivity in peptide sequence matches for metaproteomics and proteogenomics studies. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1352-1357.
13. Hansen, S. H., Stensballe, A., Nielsen, P. H., Herbst, F. A., Metaproteomics: evaluation of protein extraction from activated sludge. Proteomics 2014, 14, 2535-2539.
14. Chapman, B., Bellgard, M., High-throughput parallel proteogenomics: a bacterial case study. Proteomics 2014, 14, 2780-2789.
15. Jagtap, P. D., Johnson, J. E., Onsongo, G., Sadler, F. W. et al., Flexible and accessible workflows for improved proteogenomic analysis using the Galaxy Framework. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 5898-5908.
16. Rooijers, K., Kolmeder, C., Juste, C., Doré, J. et al., An iterative workflow for mining the human intestinal metaproteome. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 6.
17. Cain, J. A., Solis, N., Cordwell, S. J., Beyond gene expression: the impact of protein post-translational modifications in bacteria. J. Proteomics 2014, 97, 265-286.
18. Searle, B. C., Turner, M., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 245-253.
19. Jones, A. R., Siepen, J. A., Hubbard, S. J., Paton, N. W., Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1220-1229.
20. Shteynberg, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Moritz, R. L., Deutsch, E. W., Combining results of multiple search engines in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12, 2383-2393.
21. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
22. Granholm, V., Käll, L., Quality assessments of peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1086-1093.
23. Blakeley, P., Overton, I. M., Hubbard, S. J., Addressing statistical biases in nucleotide-derived protein databases for proteogenomic search strategies. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 5221-5234.
24. Perez-Cobas, A. E., Gosalbes, M. J., Friedrichs, A., Knecht, H. et al., Gut microbiota disturbance during antibiotic therapy: a multi-omic approach. Gut 2013, 62, 1591-1601.
25. Del Chierico, F., Petrucca, A., Mortera, S. L., Vernocchi, P. et al., A metaproteomic pipeline to identify newborn mouse gut phylotypes. J. Proteomics 2014, 97, 17-26.
26. Ng, C., DeMaere, M. Z., Williams, T. J., Lauro, F. M. et al., Metaproteogenomic analysis of a dominant green sulfur bacterium from Ace Lake, Antarctica. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1002-1019.
27. Kolmeder, C. A., de Been, M., Nikkilä, J., Ritamo, I. et al., Comparative metaproteomics and diversity analysis of human intestinal microbiota testifies for its temporal stability and expression of core functions. Plos One 2012, 7, e29913.
28. Vaudel, M., Burkhart, J. M., Breiter, D., Zahedi, R. P. et al., A complex standard for protein identification, designed by evolution. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 5065-5071.
29. Käll, L., Storey, J. D., Noble, W. S., Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, i42-i48.
30. Verdam, F. J., Fuentes, S., de Jonge, C., Zoetendal, E. G. et al., Human intestinal microbiota composition is associated with local and systemic inflammation in obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013, 21, E607-E615.
31. Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havlis, J., Olsen, J. V., Mann, M., In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2856-2860.
32. Verhees, C. H., Kengen, S. W., Tuininga, J. E., Schut, G. J. et al., The unique features of glycolytic pathways in Archaea. Biochem. J. 2003, 375, 231-246.
33. Ettema, T. J., de Vos, W. M., van der Oost, J., Discovering novel biology by in silico archaeology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 859-869.
34. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467.
35. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
36. Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M. et al., A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59-65.
37. Fermin, D., Allen, B. B., Blackwell, T. W., Menon, R. et al., Novel gene and gene model detection using a whole genome open reading frame analysis in proteomics. Genome Biol. 2006, 7, R35.
38. Sennels, L., Bukowski-Wills, J. C., Rappsilber, J., Improved results in proteomics by use of local and peptide-class specific false discovery rates. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10, 179.
39. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Aebersold, R., Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data - The protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1419-1440.
40. Martens, L., Hermjakob, H., Proteomics data validation: why all must provide data. Mol. Biosyst. 2007, 3, 518-522.
41. Muth, T., Weilnböck, L., Rapp, E., Huber, C. G. et al., DeNovoGUI: an open source graphical user interface for de novo sequencing of tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 1143-1146.
42. Frank, A., Pevzner, P., PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 964-973.
43. Liu, M., Fan, L., Zhong, L., Kjelleberg, S., Thomas, T., Metaproteogenomic analysis of a community of sponge symbionts. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1515-1525.
44. Daniel, H., Moghaddas Gholami, A., Berry, D., Desmarchelier, C. et al., High-fat diet alters gut microbiota physiology in mice. ISME J. 2014, 8, 295-308.
45. Ossipova, E., Fenyo, D., Eriksson, J., Optimizing search conditions for the mass fingerprint-based identification of proteins. Proteomics 2006, 6, 2079-2085.
46. Stead, D. A., Preece, A., Brown, A. J., Universal metrics for quality assessment of protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5, 1205-1211.
47. Sowell, S. M., Abraham, P. E., Shah, M., Verberkmoes, N. C. et al., Environmental proteomics of microbial plankton in a highly productive coastal upwelling system. ISME J. 2011, 5, 856-865.
48. Lichtman, J. S., Marcobal, A., Sonnenburg, J. L., Elias, J. E., Host-centric proteomics of stool: a novel strategy focused on intestinal responses to the gut microbiota. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2013, 12, 3310-3318.
49. Cooper, B., The problem with peptide presumption and the downfall of target-decoy false discovery rates. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 9663-9667.
50. Wang, G., Wu, W. W., Zhang, Z., Masilamani, S., Shen, R. F., Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 146-159.
51. Gupta, N., Bandeira, N., Keich, U., Pevzner, P. A., Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 22, 1111-1120.
52. Chalkley, R. J., When target-decoy false discovery rate estimations are inaccurate and how to spot instances. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 1062-1064.
53. Shevchenko, A., Sunyaev, S., Loboda, A., Bork, P. et al., Charting the proteomes of organisms with unsequenced genomes by MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and BLAST homology searching. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1917-1926.
54. Leprevost, F. V., Valente, R. H., Lima, D. B., Perales, J. et al., PepExplorer: a similarity-driven tool for analyzing de novo sequencing results. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2014, 13, 2480-2489.
55. Lam, H., Deutsch, E. W., Eddes, J. S., Eng, J. K. et al., Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics 2007, 7, 655-667.
56. Lam, H., Deutsch, E. W., Eddes, J. S., Eng, J. K. et al., Building consensus spectral libraries for peptide identification in proteomics. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 873-875.
57. Bastida, F., Hernandez, T., Garcia, C., Metaproteomics of soils from semiarid environment: functional and phylogenetic information obtained with different protein extraction methods. J. Proteomics 2014, 101, 31-42.
58. Adamski, M., Blackwell, T., Menon, R., Martens, L. et al., Data management and preliminary data analysis in the pilot phase of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3246-3261.