Current methods for global proteome identification

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 519-532

  Vaudel, Marc ^a   Sickmann, Albert ^a,b   Martens, Lennart ^c,d  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR ANALYTISCHE WISSENSCHAFTEN ISAS E V   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

bioinformatics; identification; proteomics

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AUTOANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA PROCESSING; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SEARCH ENGINE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; WORKFLOW;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84870596405     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/epr.12.51     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422(6928), 198-207 (2003).
2. Gevaert K, Van Damme P, Ghesquière B et al. A la carte proteomics with an emphasis on gel-free techniques. Proteomics 7(16), 2698-2718 (2007).
3. Lange E, Gröpl C, Reinert K, Kohlbacher O, Hildebrandt A. High-accuracy peak picking of proteomics data using wavelet techniques. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 243-254 (2006).
4. Bertsch A, Gröpl C, Reinert K, Kohlbacher O. OpenMS and TOPP: open source software for LC-MS data analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 696, 353-367 (2011).
5. Martens L, Chambers M, Sturm M et al. mzML-a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10(1), R110.000133 (2011).
6. Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D, Mallick P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24 (21), 2534-2536 (2008).
7. Halligan BD, Geiger JF, Vallejos AK, Greene AS, Twigger SN. Low cost, scalable proteomics data analysis using Amazon's cloud computing services and open source search algorithms. J. Proteome Res. 8(6), 3148-3153 (2009).
8. Slotta DJ, McFarland MA, Markey SP. MassSieve: panning MS/MS peptide data for proteins. Proteomics 10(16), 3035-3039 (2010).
9. Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR 3rd. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifcations from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1(1), 21-26 (2002).
10. Nesvizhskii AI. A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identifcation in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 73(11), 2092-2123 (2010).
11. Deutsch EW, Mendoza L, Shteynberg D et al. A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. Proteomics 10 (6), 1150-1159 (2010).
12. Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identifcation rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantifcation. Nat. Biotechnol. 26(12), 1367-1372 (2008).
13. Bartels C. Fast algorithm for peptide sequencing by mass spectroscopy. Biological Mass Spectrometry 19(6), 363-368 (1990).
14. Seidler J, Zinn N, Boehm ME, Lehmann WD. De novo sequencing of peptides by MS/MS. Proteomics 10(4), 634-649 (2010).
15. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identifcation by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20 (18), 3551-3567 (1999).
16. Yates JR 3rd, Eng JK, McCormack AL, Schieltz D. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modifed peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal. Chem. 67(8), 1426-1436 (1995).
17. Geer LY, Markey SP, Kowalak JA et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3(5), 958-964 (2004).
18. Craig R, Beavis RC. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20(9), 1466-1467 (2004).
19. Tanner S, Shu H, Frank A et al. InsPecT: identifcation of posttranslationally modifed peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 77(14), 4626-4639 (2005).
20. Yadav AK, Kumar D, Dash D. MassWiz: a novel scoring algorithm with target-decoy based analysis pipeline for tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 10 (5), 2154-2160 (2011).
21. Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10 (4), 1794-1805 (2011).
22. Tabb DL, Fernando CG, Chambers MC. MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identifcation by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. J. Proteome Res. 6(2), 654-661 (2007).
23. Yates JR 3rd, Morgan SF, Gatlin CL, Griffn PR, Eng JK. Method to compare collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides: potential for library searching and subtractive analysis. Anal. Chem. 70 (17), 3557-3565 (1998).
24. Lam H. Building and searching tandem mass spectral libraries for peptide identifcation. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10(12), R111.008565 (2011).
25. Frank A, Pevzner P. PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 77(4), 964-973 (2005).
26. Ma B, Zhang K, Hendrie C et al. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17(20), 2337-2342 (2003).
27. Tabb DL, Saraf A, Yates JR 3rd. GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model. Anal. Chem. 75(23), 6415-6421 (2003).
28. Tabb DL, Ma ZQ, Martin DB, Ham AJ, Chambers MC. DirecTag: accurate sequence tags from peptide MS/MS through statistical scoring. J. Proteome Res. 7(9), 3838-3846 (2008).
29. Junker J, Bielow C, Bertsch A, Sturm M, Reinert K, Kohlbacher O. TOPPAS: a graphical workfow editor for the analysis of high-throughput proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 11(7), 3914-3920 (2012).
30. Vaudel M, Barsnes H, Berven FS, Sickmann A, Martens L. SearchGUI: an open-source graphical user interface for simultaneous OMSSA and X!Tandem searches. Proteomics 11(5), 996-999 (2011).
31. Stein SE, Scott DR. Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identifcation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5(9), 859-866 (1994).
32. Craig R, Cortens JC, Fenyo D, Beavis RC. Using annotated peptide mass spectrum libraries for protein identifcation. J. Proteome Res. 5(8), 1843-1849 (2006).
33. Craig R, Cortens JP, Beavis RC. Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identifcation data. J. Proteome Res. 3(6), 1234-1242 (2004).
34. Lam H, Deutsch EW, Eddes JS et al. Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identifcation from MS/MS. Proteomics 7(5), 655-667 (2007).
35. Helsens K, Martens L, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K. MascotDatfle: an open-source library to fully parse and analyse MASCOT MS/MS search results. Proteomics 7(3), 364-366 (2007).
36. Barsnes H, Huber S, Sickmann A, Eidhammer I, Martens L. OMSSA Parser: an open-source library to parse and extract data from OMSSA MS/MS search results. Proteomics 9(14), 3772-3774 (2009).
37. Muth T, Vaudel M, Barsnes H, Martens L, Sickmann A. XTandem Parser: an open-source library to parse and analyse X!Tandem MS/MS search results. Proteomics 10(7), 1522-1524 (2010).
38. Barsnes H, Vaudel M, Colaert N et al. compomics-utilities: an open-source Java library for computational proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 70 (2011).
39. Käll L, Canterbury JD, Weston J, Noble WS, MacCoss MJ. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identifcation from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4(11), 923-925 (2007).
40. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifcations made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74(20), 5383-5392 (2002).
41. Nesvizhskii AI, Vitek O, Aebersold R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4(10), 787-797 (2007).
42. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical signifcance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100(16), 9440-9445 (2003).
43. Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confdence in large-scale protein identifcations by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4(3), 207-214 (2007).
44. Wang G, Wu WW, Zhang Z, Masilamani S, Shen RF. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 81(1), 146-159 (2009).
45. Martens L, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K. DBToolkit: processing protein databases for peptide-centric proteomics. Bioinformatics 21(17), 3584-3585 (2005).
46. Lam H, Deutsch EW, Aebersold R. Artifcial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9(1), 605-610 (2010).
47. Vaudel M, Burkhart JM, Sickmann A, Martens L, Zahedi RP. Peptide identifcation quality control. Proteomics 11(10), 2105-2114 (2011).
48. Klimek J, Eddes JS, Hohmann L et al. The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved Peptide and protein identifcation software tools. J. Proteome Res. 7(1), 96-103 (2008).
49. Granholm V, Noble WS, Käll L. On using samples of known protein content to assess the statistical calibration of scores assigned to peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 10 (5), 2671-2678 (2011).
50. Vaudel M, Burkhart JM, Breiter D, Zahedi R P, Sickmann A, Martens L. A complex standard for protein identifcation, designed by evolution. J. Proteome. Res. 11(10), 5065-5071 (2012).
51. Searle BC, Turner M, Nesvizhskii AI. Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies. J. Proteome Res. 7(1), 245-253 (2008).
52. Jones AR, Siepen JA, Hubbard SJ, Paton NW. Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines. Proteomics 9(5), 1220-1229 (2009).
53. Yu W, Taylor JA, Davis MT et al. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identifcation in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines. Proteomics 10 (6), 1172-1189 (2010).
54. Nahnsen S, Bertsch A, Rahnenführer J, Nordheim A, Kohlbacher O. Probabilistic consensus scoring improves tandem mass spectrometry peptide identifcation. J. Proteome Res. 10(8), 3332-3343 (2011).
55. Edwards N, Wu X, Tseng C-W. An unsupervised, model-free, machine-learning combiner for peptide identifcations from tandem mass spectra. Clinical Proteomics 5(1), 23-36 (2009).
56. Barboza R, Cociorva D, Xu T et al. Can the false-discovery rate be misleading? Proteomics 11(20), 4105-4108 (2011).
57. Pawson T, Scott JD. Protein phosphorylation in signaling-50 years and counting. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30(6), 286-290 (2005).
58. Pompach P, Chandler KB, Lan R, Edwards N, Goldman R. Semi-automated identifcation of N-Glycopeptides by hydrophilic interaction chromatography, nano-reverse-phase LC-MS/MS, and glycan database search. J. Proteome Res. 11(3), 1728-1740 (2012).
59. Wuhrer M, Catalina MI, Deelder AM, Hokke CH. Glycoproteomics based on tandem mass spectrometry of glycopeptides. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 849(1-2), 115-128 (2007).
60. von der Lieth CW, Lütteke T, Frank M. The role of informatics in glycobiology research with special emphasis on automatic interpretation of MS spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1760(4), 568-577 (2006).
61. Li Y, Al-Eryani R, Yarbrough ML, Orth K, Ball HL. Characterization of AMPylation on threonine, serine, and tyrosine using mass spectrometry J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22(4), 752-761 (2011).
62. Schwarzer J, Rapp E, Reichl U. N-glycan analysis by CGE-LIF: profling infuenza A virus hemagglutinin N-glycosylation during vaccine production. Electrophoresis 29(20), 4203-4214 (2008).
63. Beausoleil SA, Villén J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. A prob ability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24(10), 1285-1292 (2006).
64. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specifc phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127(3), 635-648 (2006).
65. Taus T, Köcher T, Pichler P et al. Universal and confdent phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J. Proteome Res. 10(12), 5354-5362 (2011).
66. Chalkley RJ, Clauser KR. Modifcation site localization scoring: strategies and performance. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11(5), 3-14 (2012).
67. Savitski MM, Lemeer S, Boesche M et al. Confdent phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10(2), M110.003830 (2011).
68. Beck F, Lewandrowski U, Wiltfang M et al. The good, the bad, the ugly: validating the mass spectrometric analysis of modifed peptides. Proteomics 11(6), 1099-1109 (2011).
69. Shteynberg D, Deutsch EW, Lam H et al iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identifcation rates and error estimates. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10(12), M111.007690 (2011).
70. Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4(10), 1419-1440 (2005).
71. von Haller PD, Yi E, Donohoe S et al. The application of new software tools to quantitative protein profling via isotope-coded affnity tag (ICAT) and tandem mass spectrometry: I. Statistically annotated datasets for peptide sequences and proteins identifed via the application of ICAT and tandem mass spectrometry to proteins copurifying with T cell lipid rafts. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2(7), 426-427 (2003).
72. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry Anal. Chem. 75(17), 4646-4658 (2003).
73. Martens L, Hermjakob H. Proteomics data validation: why all must provide data. Mol Biosyst. 3(8), 518-522 (2007).
74. Ma ZQ, Dasari S, Chambers MC et al. IDPicker 2.0: improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identifcation fltering. J. Proteome Res. 8(8), 3872-3881 (2009).
75. Vaudel M, Sickmann A, Martens L. Peptide and protein quantifcation: a map of the minefeld. Proteomics 10(4), 650-670 (2010).
76. Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 7(1), 51-61 (2008).
77. Gonnelli G, Hulstaert N, Degroeve S, Martens L. Towards a human proteomics atlas. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404(4), 1069-1077 (2012).
78. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T et al Exponentially modifed protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4(9), 1265-1272 (2005).
79. Paoletti AC, Parmely TJ, Tomomori-Sato C et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103(50), 18928-18933 (2006).
80. Colaert N, Gevaert K, Martens L. RIBAR and xRIBAR: methods for reproducible relative MS/MS-based label-free protein quantifcation. J. Proteome Res. 10(7), 3183-3189 (2011).
81. Colaert N, Helsens K, Impens F, Vandekerckhove J, Gevaert K. Rover: a tool to visualize and validate quantitative proteomics data from different sources. Proteomics 10(6), 1226-1229 (2010).
82. Vizcaíno JA, Mueller M, Hermjakob H, Martens L. Charting online OMICS resources: a navigational chart for clinical researchers. Proteomics. Clin. Appl. 3(1), 18-29 (2009).
83. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH et al UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Database issue), D115-D119 (2004).
84. Côté RG, Jones P, Martens L et al. The Protein Identifer Cross-Referencing (PICR) service: reconciling protein identifers across multiple source databases. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 401 (2007).
85. Dowell RD, Jokerst RM, Day A, Eddy SR, Stein L. The distributed annotation system. BMC Bioinformatics 2, 7 (2001).
86. Jones P, Vinod N, Down T et al. Dasty and UniProt DAS: a perfect pair for protein feature visualization. Bioinformatics 21(14), 3198-3199 (2005).
87. Curwen V, Eyras E, Andrews TD et al. The Ensembl automatic gene annotation system. Genome Res. 14(5), 942-950 (2004).
88. Zhang B, Schmoyer D, Kirov S, Snoddy J. GOTree Machine (GOTM): a web-based platform for interpreting sets of interesting genes using Gene Ontology hierarchies. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 16 (2004).
89. Bauer S, Grossmann S, Vingron M, Robinson PN. Ontologizer 2.0-a multifunctional tool for GO term enrichment analysis and data exploration. Bioinformatics 24(14), 1650-1651 (2008).
90. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4(1), 44-57 (2009).
91. Sussman JL, Lin D, Jiang J et al. Protein Data Bank (PDB): database of three-dimensional structural information of biological macromolecules. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54(Pt 6 Pt 1), 1078-1084 (1998).
92. Hanson R. Jmol-a paradigm shift in crystallographic visualization. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43(5 Part 2), 1250-1260 (2010).
93. Haw R, Hermjakob H, D'Eustachio P, Stein L. Reactome pathway analysis to enrich biological discovery in proteomics data sets. Proteomics 11(18), 3598-3613 (2011).
94. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(Suppl. 1), D561-D568 (2011).
95. Martens L, Hermjakob H, Jones P et al. PRIDE: the proteomics identifcations database. Proteomics 5(13), 3537-3545 (2005).
96. Deutsch EW, Lam H, Aebersold R. PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workfows. EMBO Rep. 9(5), 429-434 (2008).
97. Cooper B. The problem with peptide presumption and low Mascot scoring. J. Proteome Res. 10(3), 1432-1435 (2011).
98. Hartler J, Thallinger GG, Stocker G et al. MASPECTRAS: a platform for management and analysis of proteomics LC-MS/MS data. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 197 (2007).
99. Häkkinen J, Vincic G, Månsson O, Wårell K, Levander F. The proteios software environment: an extensible multiuser platform for management and analysis of proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 8(6), 3037-3043 (2009).
100. Helsens K, Colaert N, Barsnes H et al. ms-lims, a simple yet powerful open source laboratory information management system for MS-driven proteomics. Proteomics 10(6), 1261-1264 (2010).
101. Wilkins MR, Arthur J W, Junius FK et al. Information management for proteomics: a perspective. Expert Rev. Proteomics 5(5), 663-678 (2008).
102. Stephan C, Kohl M, Turewicz M, Podwojski K, Meyer HE, Eisenacher M. Using Laboratory Information Management Systems as central part of a proteomics data workfow. Proteomics 10(6), 1230-1249 (2010).
103. Wang R, Fabregat A, Ríos D et al. PRIDE Inspector: a tool to visualize and validate MS proteomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 30(2), 135-137 (2012).
104. Everett LJ, Bierl C, Master SR. Unbiased statistical analysis for multi-stage proteomic search strategies. J. Proteome Res. 9(2), 700-707 (2010).
105. Colaert N, Degroeve S, Helsens K, Martens L. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identifcation algorithms. J. Proteome Res. 10 (12), 5555-5561 (2011).
106. Falkner JA, Falkner J W, Yocum AK, Andrews PC. A spectral clustering approach to MS/MS identifcation of post-translational modifcations. J. Proteome Res. 7(11), 4614-4622 (2008).
107. Ye D, Fu Y, Sun RX et al. Open MS/MS spectral library search to identify unanticipated post-translational modifcations and increase spectral identifcation rate. Bioinformatics 26(12), i399-1906 (2010).
108. Ahrné E, Müller M, Lisacek F. Unrestricted identifcation of modifed proteins using MS/MS. Proteomics 10(4), 671-686 (2010).
109. Jones AR, Eisenacher M, Mayer G et al. The mzIdentML Data Standard for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Results. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11 (7), 114-381 (2012).
110. Côté RG, Reisinger F, Martens L. jmzML, an open-source Java API for mzML, the PSI standard for MS data. Proteomics 10 (7), 1332-1335 (2010).
111. Foster JM, Degroeve S, Gatto L et al. A posteriori quality control for the curation and reuse of public proteomics data. Proteomics 11 (11), 2182-2194 (2011).
112. Purvine S, Eppel JT, Yi EC, Goodlett DR. Shotgun collision-induced dissociation of peptides using a time of fight mass analyzer. Proteomics 3(6), 847-850 (2003).
113. Venable JD, Dong MQ, Wohlschlegel J, Dillin A, Yates Jr. Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nat. Methods 1(1), 39-45 (2004).
114. Bern M, Finney G, Hoopmann MR, Merrihew G, Toth MJ, MacCoss MJ. Deconvolution of mixture spectra from ion-trap data-independent-acquisition tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82(3), 833-841 (2010).
115. Tran JC, Zamdborg L, Ahlf DR et al. Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics. Nature 480(7376), 254-258 (2011).
116. Liu X, Inbar Y, Dorrestein PC et al. Deconvolution and database search of complex tandem mass spectra of intact proteins: a combinatorial approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9(12), 2772-2782 (2010).
117. Paik YK, Jeong SK, Omenn GS et al. The Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project for cataloging proteins encoded in the genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 30(3), 221-223 (2012).