Peptide identification quality control

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2105-2114

  Vaudel, Marc ^a   Burkhart, Julia M ^a   Sickmann, Albert ^a,b   Martens, Lennart ^c,d   Zahedi, René P ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR ANALYTISCHE WISSENSCHAFTEN ISAS E V   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Identification; MS

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEARCH ENGINE; STANDARD;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79955761196     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000704     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sadygov, R. G., Cociorva, D., Yates, J. R., 3rd., Large-scale database searching using tandem mass spectra: looking up the answer in the back of the book. Nat. Methods 2004, 1, 195-202.
2. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
3. Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Gygi, S. P., A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1285-1292.
4. Helsens, K., Timmerman, E., Vandekerckhove, J., Gevaert, K., Martens, L., Peptizer, a tool for assessing false positive peptide identifications and manually validating selected results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 2364-2372.
5. Pfeifer, N., Leinenbach, A., Huber, C. G., Kohlbacher, O., Improving peptide identification in proteome analysis by a two-dimensional retention time filtering approach. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4109-4115.
6. Wang, G., Wu, W. W., Zhang, Z., Masilamani, S., Shen, R., Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 146-159.
7. Cerqueira, F. R., Graber, A., Schwikowski, B., Baumgartner, C., MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 2265-2277.
8. Kall, L., Storey, J. D., Noble, W. S., QVALITY: non-parametric estimation of q-values and posterior error probabilities. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 964-966.
9. Storey, J. D., Tibshirani, R., Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9440-9445.
10. Sickmann, A., Reinders, J., Wagner, Y., Joppich, C. et al., The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13207-13212.
11. Olsen, J. V., de Godoy, L. M. F., Li, G., Macek, B. et al., Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 2010-2021.
12. Martens, L., Chambers, M., Sturm, M., Kessner, D. et al., mzML - a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 10, R110.000133.
13. Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D., Mallick, P., ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2534-2536.
14. Kohlbacher, O., Reinert, K., Gropl, C., Lange, E. et al., TOPP - the OpenMS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, e191-e197.
15. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
16. Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 768-774.
17. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
18. Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J., Gevaert, K., DBToolkit: processing protein databases for peptide-centric proteomics. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3584-3585.
19. Martens, L., Hermjakob, H., Jones, P., Adamski, M. et al., PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3537-3545.
20. Kall, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., MacCoss, M. J., Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 923-925.
21. Jones, A. R., Siepen, J. A., Hubbard, S. J., Paton, N. W., Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1220-1229.
22. Yu, W., Taylor, J. A., Davis, M. T., Bonilla, L. E. et al., Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1172-1189.
23. Burkhart, J. M., Premsler, T., Sickmann, A., Quality control of nano-LC-MS systems using stable isotope-coded peptides. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1049-1057.
24. Flikka, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J., Gevaert, K., Eidhammer, I., Improving the reliability and throughput of mass spectrometry-based proteomics by spectrum quality filtering. Proteomics 2006, 6, 2086-2094.
25. Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Error tolerant searching of uninterpreted tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1426-1434.