Measurement and modeling of coronary blood flow

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 335-356

  Sinclair, Matthew D ^a   Lee, Jack ^a   Cookson, Andrew N ^a   Rivolo, Simone ^a   Hyde, Eoin R ^a   Smith, Nicolas P ^a,b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RADIOACTIVE MICROSPHERE; ULTRASMALL SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CATHETERIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY ANEURYSM; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; CORONARY SINUS; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART CYCLE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART INDEX; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART VENTRICLE FILLING; HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MICROANGIOPATHY; MODEL; MORPHOMETRICS; MUCOCUTANEOUS LYMPH NODE SYNDROME; NONHUMAN; PATIENT HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SIMULATION; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; HEMODYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY VESSELS; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 84943585371     PISSN: 19395094     EISSN: 1939005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1309     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Dodge JT, Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. Circulation 1992, 86:232-246.
2. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:830-840.
3. Weaver ME, Pantely GA, Bristow JD, Ladley HD. A quantitative study of the anatomy and distribution of coronary arteries in swine in comparison with other animals and man. Cardiovasc Res 1986, 20:907-917.
4. Kassab GS, Rider CA, Tang NJ, Fung YC. Morphometry of pig coronary arterial trees. Am J Physiol 1993, 265:H350-H365.
5. Van Bavel E, Spaan JAE. Branching patterns in the porcine coronary arterial tree. Estimation of flow heterogeneity. Circ Res 1992, 71:1200-1212.
6. Kassab GS, Lin DH, Fung YC. Morphometry of pig coronary venous system. Am J Physiol 1994, 267:H2100-H2113.
7. Kassab GS, Fung YC. Topology and dimensions of pig coronary capillary network. Am J Physiol 1994, 267:H319-H325.
8. Kaneko N, Matsuda R. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the human capillary network and the intramyocardial micronecrosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011, 300:754-761.
9. Huo Y, Kassab GS. Intraspecific scaling laws of vascular trees. J R Soc Interface 2012, 9:190-200.
10. Huo Y, Kassab GS. The scaling of blood flow resistance: from a single vessel to the entire distal tree. Biophys J 2009, 96:339-346.
11. Choy JS, Kassab GS. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries. J Appl Physiol 2008, 104:1281-1286.
12. Kassab GS. Scaling laws of vascular trees: of form and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006, 290:H894-H903.
13. Spaan JAE, ter Wee R, van Teeffelen JWGE, Streekstra G, Siebes M, Kolyva C, Vink H, Fokkema DS, VanBavel E. Visualisation of intramural coronary vasculature by an imaging cryomicrotome suggests compartmentalisation of myocardial perfusion areas. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005, 43:431-435.
14. Van Horssen P, van den Wijngaard JPHM, Brandt MJ, Hoefer IE, Spaan JAE, Siebes M. Perfusion territories subtended by penetrating coronary arteries increase in size and decrease in number toward the subendocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014, 306:H496-H504.
15. Westerhof N, Boer C. Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature. Physiol Rev 2006, 86:1263-1308.
16. Duncker D, Bache R. Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise. Physiol Rev 2008, 88:1009-1086.
17. Van den Wijngaard JPHM, Kolyva C, Siebes M, Dankelman J, van Gemert MJC, Piek JJ, Spaan JAE. Model prediction of subendocardial perfusion of the coronary circulation in the presence of an epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008, 46:421-432.
18. Mosher P, Ross J, Mcfate PA, Shaw RF. Control of coronary blood flow by an autoregulatory mechanism. Circ Res 1964, 14:250-259.
19. Secomb TW. Theoretical models for regulation of blood flow. Microcirculation 2008, 15:765-775.
20. Proudfit WL, Shirey EK, Sones FM. Selective cine coronary arteriography: correlation with clinical findings in 1, 000 patients. Circulation 1966, 33:901-910.
21. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS. The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:957-965.
22. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CAG, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:636-643.
23. Van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, Davies JE, Siebes M, Spaan JAE, Piek JJ. Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013, 10:439-452.
24. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993, 87:1354-1367.
25. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Möbius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012, 367:991-1001.
26. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:213-224.
27. Winjns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization The task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2010, 31:2501-2555.
28. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 59:1392-1402.
29. Hughes A, Parker K, Davies J. Waves in arteries: a review of wave intensity analysis in the systemic and coronary circulations. Artery Res 2008, 2:51-59.
30. Parker KH. An introduction to wave intensity analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:175-188.
31. Sen S, Asrress KN, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Malik IS, Foale RA, Mikhail GW, Foin N, Broyd C, Hadjiloizou N, et al. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61:1409-1420.
32. Berry C, van't Veer M, Witt N, Kala P, Bocek O, Pyxaras SA, McClure JD, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, et al. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61:1421-1427.
33. Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary pathophysiology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 5:193-202.
34. Spaan JAE, Piek JJ, Hoffman JIE, Siebes M. Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices. Circulation 2006, 113:446-455.
35. Baumgart D, Haude M, Goerge G, Ge J. Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve. Circulation 1998, 98:40-46.
36. De Bruyne B, Hersbach F, Pijls N. Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but 'normal' coronary angiography. Circulation 2001, 104:2401-2406.
37. Meuwissen M. Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity. Circulation 2002, 106:441-446.
38. Kyriacou A, Whinnett ZI, Sen S, Pabari PA, Wright I, Cornelussen R, Lefroy D, Davies DW, Peters NS, Kanagaratnam P, et al. Improvement in coronary blood flow velocity with acute biventricular pacing is predominantly due to an increase in a diastolic backward-travelling decompression (suction) wave. Circulation 2012, 126:1334-1344.
39. De Silva K, Foster P, Guilcher A, Bandara A, Jogiya R, Lockie T, Chowiencyzk P, Nagel E, Marber M, Redwood S, et al. Coronary wave energy: a novel predictor of functional recovery after myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013, 6:166-175.
40. Rivolo S, Asrress KN, Chiribiri A, Sammut E, Wesolowski R, Bloch LØ, Grøndal AK, Hønge JL, Kim WY, Marber M, et al. Enhancing coronary wave intensity analysis robustness by high order central finite differences. Artery Res 2014, 8:98-109.
41. Rumberger J, Nerem R, Muir W. Coronary artery pressure development and wave transmission characteristics in the horse. Cardiovasc Res 1979, 13:413-419.
42. Wilson R, Laughlin D, Ackell P. Transluminal, subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity and vasodilator reserve in man. Circulation 1985, 72:82-92.
43. Chilian W, Marcus M. Phasic coronary blood flow velocity in intramural and epicardial coronary arteries. Circ Res 1982, 50:775-781.
44. Davies JE, Whinnett ZI, Francis DP, Manisty CH, Aguado-Sierra J, Willson K, Foale R, Malik IS, Hughes AD, Parker KH, et al. Evidence of a dominant backward-propagating 'suction' wave responsible for diastolic coronary filling in humans, attenuated in left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 2006, 113:1768-1778.
45. Siebes M, Kolyva C, Verhoeff B-J, Piek JJ, Spaan JAE. Potential and limitations of wave intensity analysis in coronary arteries. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:233-239.
46. Lee J, Cookson A, Chabiniok R, Rivolo S, Hyde E, Sinclair M, Michler C, Sochi T, Smith N. Multiscale modelling of cardiac perfusion. In: Quarteroni A, ed. Modeling the Heart and the Circulatory System. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer; 2015, 51-96.
47. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, Lin FY, Mendoza DD, Shin DH, Ariaratnam NS, Koduru S, Granada JF, Gerber TC, et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:1149-1157.
48. Wong DTL, Ko BS, Cameron JD, Nerlekar N, Leung MCH, Malaiapan Y, Crossett M, Leong DP, Worthley SG, Troupis J, et al. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61:1271-1279.
49. Stuijfzand WJ, Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Marcu CB, Heymans MW, Van Kuijk CC, Van Rossum AC, Nieman K, Min JK, Leipsic J, et al. Additional value of transluminal attenuation gradient in CT angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014, 7:374-386.
50. Yoon YE, Choi JH, Kim JH, Park KW, Doh JH, Kim YJ, Koo BK, Min JK, Erglis A, Gwon HC, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 5:1088-1096.
51. Morton G, Chiribiri A, Ishida M, Hussain ST, Schuster A, Indermuehle A, Perera D, Knuuti J, Baker S, Hedström E, et al. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 60:1546-1555.
52. Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:412-424.
53. Hautvast GLTF, Chiribiri A, Lockie T, Breeuwer M, Nagel E, Plein S. Quantitative analysis of transmural gradients in myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2011, 66:1477-1487.
54. Chiribiri A, Hautvast GLTF, Lockie T, Schuster A, Bigalke B, Olivotti L, Redwood SR, Breeuwer M, Plein S, Nagel E. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location: quantitative analysis of transmural perfusion gradients by high-resolution MRI versus FFR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013, 6:600-609.
55. Christian TF, Aletras AH, Arai AE. Estimation of absolute myocardial blood flow during first-pass MR perfusion imaging using a dual-bolus injection technique: comparison to single-bolus injection method. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27:1271-1277.
56. Hsu L-Y, Groves DW, Aletras AH, Kellman P, Arai AE. A quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow by contrast-enhanced first-pass CMR perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in dogs and feasibility study in humans. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 5:154-166.
57. Schuster A, Zarinabad N, Ishida M, Sinclair M, van den Wijngaard JP, Morton G, Hautvast GL, Bigalke B, van Horssen P, Smith N, et al. Quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance derived myocardial perfusion measurements using advanced techniques: microsphere validation in an explanted pig heart system. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014, 16:82.
58. Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang SC, Buxton D, Gambhir SS, Hansen H, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. Circulation 1992, 86:1004-1017.
59. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE, Wilson RF. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998, 25:73.
60. Zarinabad N, Chiribiri A, Hautvast G, Schuster A, Sinclair M, van den Wijngaard J, Smith N, Spaan J, Siebes M, Breeuwer M, et al. Modelling parameter role on accuracy of cardiac perfusion quantification. In: Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer; 2013, 370-382.
61. Epstein FH, Meyer CH. Myocardial perfusion using arterial spin labeling CMR: promise and challenges. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:1262-1264.
62. Zun Z, Wong EC, Nayak KS. Assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in humans using arterial spin labeling (ASL): feasibility and noise analysis. Magn Reson Med 2009, 62:975-983.
63. Zun Z, Varadarajan P, Pai RG, Wong EC, Nayak KS. Arterial spin labeled CMR detects clinically relevant increase in myocardial blood flow with vasodilation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:1253-1261.
64. Do HP, Jao TR, Nayak KS. Myocardial arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging with improved sensitivity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014, 16:15.
65. Heymann MA, Payne BD, Hoffman JI, Rudolph AM. Blood flow measurements with radionuclide-labeled particles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1977, 20:55-79.
66. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, Liao SL, Taylor JL, Balaban RS, Arai AE. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004, 232:677-684.
67. Nekolla SG, Reder S, Saraste A, Higuchi T, Dzewas G, Preissel A, Huisman M, Poethko T, Schuster T, Yu M, et al. Evaluation of the novel myocardial perfusion positron-emission tomography tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: comparison to 13N-ammonia and validation with microspheres in a pig model. Circulation 2009, 119:2333-2342.
68. Chilian WM, Layne SM, Klausner EC, Eastham CL, Marcus ML. Redistribution of coronary microvascular resistance produced by dipyridamole. Am J Physiol 1989, 256:H383-H390.
69. Hale S, Vivaldi M, Kloner R. Fluorescent microspheres: a new tool for visualization of ischemic myocardium in rats. Am J Physiol 1986, 251:H863-H868.
70. Kowallik P, Schulz R, Guth BD, Schade A, Paffhausen W, Gross R, Heusch G. Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow with multiple colored microspheres. Circulation 1991, 83:974-982.
71. Krueger MA, Huke SS, Glenny RW. Visualizing regional myocardial blood flow in the mouse. Circ Res 2013, 112:e88-e97.
72. Kelly JJ, Ewen JR, Bernard SL, Glenny RW, Barlow CH. Regional blood flow measurements from fluorescent microsphere images using an imaging cryomicrotome. Rev Sci Instrum 2000, 71:228.
73. Van Horssen P, Siebes M, Hoefer I, Spaan JAE, van den Wijngaard JPHM. Improved detection of fluorescently labeled microspheres and vessel architecture with an imaging cryomicrotome. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010, 48:735-744.
74. Marxen M, Sled JG, Yu LX, Paget C, Henkelman RM. Comparing microsphere deposition and flow modeling in 3D vascular trees. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006, 291:H2136-H2141.
75. Decking UKM, Pai VM, Bennett E, Taylor JL, Fingas CD, Zanger K, Wen H, Balaban RS. High-resolution imaging reveals a limit in spatial resolution of blood flow measurements by microspheres. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004, 287:H1132-H1140.
76. Van den Wijngaard JP, Schwarz JC, van Horssen P, van Lier MG, Dobbe JG, Spaan JA, Siebes M. 3D Imaging of vascular networks for biophysical modeling of perfusion distribution within the heart. J Biomech 2013, 46:229-239.
77. Beighley PE, Thomas PJ, Jorgensen SM, Ritman EL. 3D architecture of myocardial microcirculation in intact rat heart: a study with micro-CT. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997, 430:165-175.
78. Lee J, Beighley P, Ritman E, Smith N. Automatic segmentation of 3D micro-CT coronary vascular images. Med Image Anal 2007, 11:630-647.
79. Rodriguez-Porcel M, Lerman A, Ritman EL, Wilson SH, Best PJM, Lerman LO. Altered myocardial microvascular 3D architecture in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 2000, 102:2028-2030.
80. Rodriguez-Porcel M, Zhu X-Y, Chade AR, Amores-Arriaga B, Caplice NM, Ritman EL, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Functional and structural remodeling of the myocardial microvasculature in early experimental hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006, 290:H978-H984.
81. Urbieta-Caceres V, Zhu X. Reversal of experimental renovascular hypertension restores coronary microvascular function and architecture. Am J Hypertens 2011, 24:1999-2006.
82. Van Horssen P, Siebes M, Spaan JAE, Hoefer IE, van den Wijngaard JPHM. Innate collateral segments are predominantly present in the subendocardium without preferential connectivity within the left ventricular wall. J Physiol 2014, 592:1047-1060.
83. Hakimzadeh N, van Horssen P, van Lier MGJTB, van den Wijngaard JPHM, Belterman C, Coronel R, Piek JJ, Verberne HJ, Spaan JAE, Siebes M. Detection and quantification methods of monocyte homing in coronary vasculature with an imaging cryomicrotome. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2014, 76C:196-204.
84. Sled JG, Marxen M, Henkelman RM. Analysis of micro-vasculature in whole kidney specimens using micro-CT. Proc SPIE 2004, 5535:53-64.
85. Goyal A, Lee J, Lamata P, van den Wijngaard J, van Horssen P, Spaan J, Siebes M, Grau V, Smith NP. Model-based vasculature extraction from optical fluorescence cryomicrotome images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32:56-72.
86. Sinclair M, Lee J, Schuster A, Chiribiri A, van den Wijngaard JP, van Horssen P, Siebes M, Spaan JAE, Nagel E, Smith N. Microsphere skimming in the porcine coronary arteries: implications for flow quantification. Microvas Res 2015, 100:59-79.
87. Zarins CK, Taylor CA, Min JK. Computed fractional flow reserve (FFTCT) derived from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2013, 6:708-714.
88. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013, 61:2233-2241.
89. Smith NP. A computational study of the interaction between coronary blood flow and myocardial mechanics. Physiol Meas 2004, 25:863-877.
90. Bovendeerd PHM, Borsje P, Arts T, van De Vosse FN. Dependence of intramyocardial pressure and coronary flow on ventricular loading and contractility: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 2006, 34:1833-1845.
91. Mynard J, Nithiarasu P. A 1D arterial blood flow model incorporating ventricular pressure, aortic valve and regional coronary flow using the locally conservative Galerkin (LCG) method. Commun Numer Methods Eng 2008, 24:367-417.
92. Reymond P, Merenda F, Perren F, Rüfenacht D, Stergiopulos N. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009, 297:H208-H222.
93. Smith N, Kassab G. Analysis of coronary blood flow interaction with myocardial mechanics based on anatomical models. Philos Trans R Soc A 2001, 359:1251-1262.
94. Pries A, Secomb T. Microvascular blood viscosity in vivo and the endothelial surface layer. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005, 289:H2657-H2664.
95. Pries AR, Neuhaus D, Gaehtgens P. Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit. Am J Physiol 1992, 263:H1770-H1778.
96. VanBavel E, Tuna BG. Integrative modeling of small artery structure and function uncovers critical parameters for diameter regulation. PLoS One 2014, 9:e86901.
97. Segal SS. Regulation of blood flow in the microcirculation. Microcirculation 2005, 12:33-45.
98. Kassab GS, Berkley J, Fung YC. Analysis of pig's coronary arterial blood flow with detailed anatomical data. Ann Biomed Eng 1997, 25:204-217.
99. Hyde ER, Cookson AN, Lee J, Michler C, Goyal A, Sochi T, Chabiniok R, Sinclair M, Nordsletten D, Spaan JAE, et al. Multi-scale parameterisation of a myocardial perfusion model using whole-organ arterial networks. Ann Biomed Eng 2014, 42:797-811.
100. Cookson A, Lee J, Michler C, Chabiniok R, Hyde E, Nordsletten D, Sinclair M, Siebes M, Smith N. A novel porous mechanical framework for modelling the interaction between coronary perfusion and myocardial mechanics. J Biomech 2012, 45:850-855.
101. Fåhræus R, Lindqvist T. The viscosity of the blood in narrow capillary tubes. Am J Physiol 1931, 96:562-568.
102. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P. The endothelial surface layer. Pflugers Arch 2000, 440:653-666.
103. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P. Biophysical aspects of blood flow in the microvasculature. Cardiovasc Res 1996, 32:654-667.
104. Downey JM, Kirk ES. Inhibition of coronary blood flow by a vascular waterfall mechanism. Circ Res 1975, 36:753-760.
105. Spaan JA, Breuls NP, Laird JD. Diastolic-systolic coronary flow differences are caused by intramyocardial pump action in the anesthetized dog. Circ Res 1981, 49:584-593.
106. Krams R, Sipkema P, Westerhof N. Varying elastance concept may explain coronary systolic flow impediment. Am J Physiol 1989, 257:H1471-H1479.
107. Westerhof N, Lankhaar J-W, Westerhof BE. The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:131-141.
108. Zinemanas D, Beyar R, Sideman S. An integrated model of LV muscle mechanics, coronary flow, and fluid and mass transport. Am J Physiol 1995, 268:H633-H645.
109. Mynard JP, Penny DJ, Smolich JJ. Scalability and in vivo validation of a multiscale numerical model of the left coronary circulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014, 306:H517-H528.
110. Van der Horst A, Boogaard FL, van't Veer M, Rutten MCM, Pijls NHJ, van de Vosse FN. Towards patient-specific modeling of coronary hemodynamics in healthy and diseased state. Comput Math Methods Med 2013, 2013:393792.
111. Smith NP, Pullan AJ, Hunter PJ. An anatomically based model of transient coronary blood flow in the heart. SIAM J Appl Math 2002, 62:990.
112. Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38:3195-3209.
113. Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Developing computational methods for three-dimensional finite element simulations of coronary blood flow. Finite Elem Anal Des 2010, 46:514-525.
114. Sengupta D, Kahn AM, Burns JC, Sankaran S, Shadden SC, Marsden AL. Image-based modeling of hemodynamics in coronary artery aneurysms caused by Kawasaki disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2012, 11:915-932.
115. Kung E, Kahn AM, Burns JC, Marsden A. In vitro validation of patient-specific hemodynamic simulations in coronary aneurysms caused by Kawasaki disease. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2014, 5:189-201.
116. Xiao N, Alastruey J, Figueroa CA. A systematic comparison between 1-D and 3-D hemodynamics in compliant arterial models. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2014, 30:204-231.
117. Sherwin SJ, Franke V, Peiró J, Parker K. One-dimensional modelling of a vascular network in space-time. J Eng Math 2003, 47:217-250.
118. Formaggia L, Lamponi D, Quarteroni A. One-dimensional models for blood flow in arteries. J Eng Math 2002, 47:251-276.
119. Sherwin SJ, Formaggia L, Peirã J. Computational modelling of 1D blood flow with variable mechanical properties and its application to the simulation of wave propagation in the human arterial system. Int J Numer Method Fluid 2003, 700:673-700.
120. Lee J, Smith N. Development and application of a one-dimensional blood flow model for microvascular networks. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008, 222:487-512.
121. Matthys KS, Alastruey J, Peiró J, Khir AW, Segers P, Verdonck PR, Parker KH, Sherwin SJ. Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: assessment of 1-D numerical simulations against in vitro measurements. J Biomech 2007, 40:3476-3486.
122. Willemet M, Alastruey J. Arterial pressure and flow wave analysis using time-domain 1-D hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2015, 43:190-206.
123. Perdikaris P, Grinberg L, Karniadakis GE. An effective fractal-tree closure model for simulating blood flow in large arterial networks. Ann Biomed Eng 2015, 43:1432-1442.
124. Young DF, Tsai FY. Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenosis-I. Steady flow. J Biomech 1973, 6:395-410.
125. Stergiopulos N, Young DF, Rogge TR. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J Biomech 1992, 25:1477-1488.
126. Ford MD, Nikolov HN, Milner JS, Lownie SP, Demont EM, Kalata W, Loth F, Holdsworth DW, Steinman DA. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng 2008, 130:021015.
127. Stuhne GR, Steinman DA. Finite-element modeling of the hemodynamics of stented aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 2004, 126:382.
128. Hoi Y, Woodward SH, Kim M, Taulbee DB, Meng H. Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations. J Biomech Eng 2006, 128:844-851.
129. Radaelli A, Augsburger L, Cebral J, Ohta M, Rüfenacht D, Balossino R, Benndorf G, Hose D, Marzo A, Metcalfe R, et al. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model-a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. J Biomech 2008, 41:2069-2081.
130. Anor T, Grinberg L, Baek H, Madsen JR, Jayaraman MV, Karniadakis GE. Modeling of blood flow in arterial trees. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2010, 2:612-623.
131. Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, LaDisa JF, Jansen KE, Feinstein JA, Taylor CA. On coupling a lumped parameter heart model and a three-dimensional finite element aorta model. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 37:2153-2169.
132. Xiao N, Humphrey JD, Figueroa CA. Multi-scale computational model of three-dimensional hemodynamics within a deformable full-body arterial network. J Comput Phys 2013, 244:22-40.
133. Figueroa CA, Vignon-Clementel IE, Jansen KE, Hughes TJR, Taylor CA. A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2006, 195:5685-5706.
134. Santamarina A, Weydahl E. Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature. Ann Biomed Eng 1998, 26:944-954.
135. Sankaran S, Esmaily Moghadam M, Kahn AM, Tseng EE, Guccione JM, Marsden AL. Patient-specific multiscale modeling of blood flow for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 2012, 40:2228-2242.
136. De Santis G, Mortier P, De Beule M, Segers P, Verdonck P, Verhegghe B. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics: structured mesh generation from coronary angiography. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010, 48:371-380.
137. Waters SL, Pedley TJ. Oscillatory flow in a tube of time-dependent curvature. Part 1. Perturbation to flow in a stationary curved tube. J Fluid Mech 1999, 383:327-352.
138. Wellnhofer E, Osman J, Kertzscher U, Affeld K, Fleck E, Goubergrits L. Non-dimensional modeling in flow simulation studies of coronary arteries including side-branches: a novel diagnostic tool in coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2011, 216:277-282.
139. Wentzel JJ, Chatzizisis YS, Gijsen FJH, Giannoglou GD, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Endothelial shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res 2012, 96:234-243.
140. Vankan W, Huyghe J, Janssen J, Huson A. Poroelasticity of saturated solids with an application to blood perfusion. Int J Eng Sci 1996, 34:1019-1031.
141. Huyghe JM, Arts T, van Campen DH, Reneman RS. Porous medium finite element model of the beating left ventricle. Am J Physiol 1992, 262:H1256-H1267.
142. Chapelle D, Gerbeau J-F, Sainte-Marie J, Vignon-Clementel IE. A poroelastic model valid in large strains with applications to perfusion in cardiac modeling. Comput Mech 2009, 46:91-101.
143. Michler C, Cookson A, Chabiniok R, Hyde E, Lee J, Sinclair M, Sochi T, Goyal A, Vigueras G, Nordsletten D, et al. A computationally efficient framework for the simulation of cardiac perfusion using a multi-compartment Darcy porous-media flow model. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2012, 29:217-232.
144. Cookson A, Lee J, Michler C, Chabiniok R, Hyde E, Nordsletten D, Smith NP. A spatially-distributed computational model to quantify behaviour of contrast agents in MR perfusion imaging. Med Image Anal 2014, 18:1200-1216.
145. Mittal N, Zhou Y, Ung S, Linares C, Molloi S, Kassab GS. A computer reconstruction of the entire coronary arterial tree based on detailed morphometric data. Ann Biomed Eng 2005, 33:1015-1026.
146. Kaimovitz B, Lanir Y, Kassab GS. A full 3-D reconstruction of the entire porcine coronary vasculature. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2010, 299:H1064-H1076.
147. Kassab GS. The coronary vasculature and its reconstruction. Ann Biomed Eng 2000, 28:903-915.
148. Beard DA, Bassingthwaighte JB. The fractal nature of myocardial blood flow emerges from a whole-organ model of arterial network. J Vasc Res 2000, 37:282-296.
149. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 1997, 276:122-126.
150. Wischgoll T, Choy JS, Ritman EL, Kassab GS. Validation of image-based method for extraction of coronary morphometry. Ann Biomed Eng 2008, 36:356-368.
151. Rohan E. Modeling large-deformation-induced microflow in soft biological tissues. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 2006, 20:251-276.
152. Chapman SJ, Shipley RJ, Jawad R. Multiscale modeling of fluid transport in tumors. Bull Math Biol 2008, 70:2334-2357.
153. Smith AF, Shipley RJ, Lee J, Sands GB, LeGrice IJ, Smith NP. Transmural variation and anisotropy of microvascular flow conductivity in the rat myocardium. Ann Biomed Eng 2014, 42:1966-1977.
154. Hyde ER, Michler C, Lee J, Cookson AN, Chabiniok R, Nordsletten DA, Smith NP. Parameterisation of multi-scale continuum perfusion models from discrete vascular networks. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013, 51:557-570.
155. Huo Y, Linares CO, Kassab GS. Capillary perfusion and wall shear stress are restored in the coronary circulation of hypertrophic right ventricle. Circ Res 2007, 100:273-283.
156. Mittal N, Zhou Y, Linares C, Ung S, Kaimovitz B, Molloi S, Kassab GS. Analysis of blood flow in the entire coronary arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005, 289:H439-H446.
157. Chilian WM. Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium. Circ Res 1991, 69:561-570.
158. Marxen M, Sled JG, Henkelman RM. Volume ordering for analysis and modeling of vascular systems. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 37:542-551.
159. Sengupta D, Kahn AM, Kung E, Esmaily Moghadam M, Shirinsky O, Lyskina GA, Burns JC, Marsden AL. Thrombotic risk stratification using computational modeling in patients with coronary artery aneurysms following Kawasaki disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2014, 13:1261-1276.
160. Willemet M, Lacroix V, Marchandise E. Inlet boundary conditions for blood flow simulations in truncated arterial networks. J Biomech 2011, 44:897-903.
161. Mynard JP, Penny DJ, Smolich JJ. Validation of a multi-scale model of the coronary circulation in adult sheep and newborn lambs. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013, 2013:3857-3860.
162. Baretta A, Corsini C, Yang W, Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL, Feinstein JA, Hsia T-Y, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, Pennati G. Virtual surgeries in patients with congenital heart disease: a multi-scale modelling test case. Philos Trans R Soc A 2011, 369:4316-4330.
163. Kim HJ, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Incorporating autoregulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system in three-dimensional finite element models of arterial blood flow. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38:2314-2330.
164. Esmaily Moghadam M, Vignon-Clementel IE, Figliola R, Marsden AL. A modular numerical method for implicit 0D/3D coupling in cardiovascular finite element simulations. J Comput Phys 2013, 244:63-79.
165. Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for 3D simulations of non-periodic blood flow and pressure fields in deformable arteries. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2010, 13:625-640.
166. Olufsen M. Structured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteries. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:H257-H268.
167. Olufsen MS, Peskin CS, Kim WY, Pedersen EM, Nadim A, Larsen J. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2000, 28:1281-1299.
168. Vignon I, Tayler C. Outflow boundary conditions for one-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure waves in arteries. Wave Motion 2004, 39:361-374.
169. Taylor C, Draney M, Ku J, Parker D, Steele B, Wang K, Zarins C. Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Comput Aided Surg 1999, 4:231-247.
170. Migliavacca F, Dubini G, Bove EL, de Leval MR. Computational fluid dynamics simulations in realistic 3-D geometries of the total cavopulmonary anastomosis: the influence of the inferior caval anastomosis. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125:805-813.
171. Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F, Quarteroni A. On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2001, 191:561-582.
172. Blanco PJ, Feijóo RA, Urquiza SA. A unified variational approach for coupling 3D-1D models and its blood flow applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2007, 196:4391-4410.
173. Urquiza SA, Blanco PJ, Vénere MJ, Feijóo RA. Multidimensional modelling for the carotid artery blood flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2006, 195:4002-4017.
174. Taylor CA, Steinman DA. Image-based modeling of blood flow and vessel wall dynamics: applications, methods and future directions: sixth international bio-fluid mechanics symposium and workshop, March 28-30, 2008, Pasadena, California. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38:1188-1203.
175. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo B-K, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012, 308:1237-1245.
176. Sherwin SJ, Blackburn HM. Three-dimensional instabilities and transition of steady and pulsatile axisymmetric stenotic flows. J Fluid Mech 2005, 533:297-327.
177. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, Jensen JM, Mauri L, De Bruyne B, Bezerra H, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014, 63:1145-1155.
178. Koo B-K, Erglis A, Doh J-H, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim H-S, Dunning A, DeFrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noni. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:1989-1997.
179. Martin D, Boyle FJ. Computational structural modelling of coronary stent deployment: a review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2011, 14:331-348.
180. Murphy J, Boyle F. Predicting neointimal hyperplasia in stented arteries using time-dependant computational fluid dynamics: a review. Comput Biol Med 2010, 40:408-418.
181. Ladisa JF, Guler I, Olson LE, Hettrick DA, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, Pagel PS. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann Biomed Eng 2003, 31:972-980.
182. LaDisa JF, Olson LE, Guler I, Hettrick DA, Audi SH, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, Pagel PS. Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery. J Appl Physiol 2004, 97:424-430.
183. LaDisa JF, Olson LE, Guler I, Hettrick DA, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, Pagel PS. Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated with time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models. J Appl Physiol 2005, 98:947-957.
184. Morlacchi S, Chiastra C, Gastaldi D, Pennati G, Dubini G, Migliavacca F. Sequential structural and fluid dynamic numerical simulations of a stented bifurcated coronary artery. J Biomech Eng 2011, 133:121010.
185. Chiastra C, Morlacchi S, Pereira S, Dubini G, Migliavacca F. Computational fluid dynamics of stented coronary bifurcations studied with a hybrid discretization method. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 2012, 35:76-84.
186. Martin D, Boyle F. Finite element analysis of balloon-expandable coronary stent deployment: influence of angioplasty balloon configuration. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2013, 29:1161-1175.
187. Schuster A, Chiribiri A, Ishida M, Morton G, Paul M, Hussain S, Bigalke B, Perera D, Schaeffter T, Nagel E. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of isolated perfused pig hearts in a 3T clinical MR scanner. Interv Med Appl Sci 2012, 4:186-192.
188. Patel AR, Antkowiak PF, Nandalur KR, West AM, Salerno M, Arora V, Christopher J, Epstein FH, Kramer CM. Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 56:561-569.
189. Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N, Ishida M, Nagata M, Ichikawa Y, Katahira K, Matsumoto Y, Seo K, Ochiai R, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 56:983-991.
190. Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore SC. Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2007, 48:783-793.
191. Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Asrress KN, Echavarria-Pinto M, Lockie T, Khawaja MZ, Cuevas C, Foin N, et al. Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention 2013, 9:91-101.
192. Kassab GS, Algranati D, Lanir Y. Myocardial-vessel interaction: role of LV pressure and myocardial contractility. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013, 51:729-739.