Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: A national multicenter trial

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 983-991

  Kato, Shingo ^a   Kitagawa, Kakuya ^a   Ishida, Nanaka ^a   Ishida, Masaki ^a   Nagata, Motonori ^a   Ichikawa, Yasutaka ^b   Katahira, Kazuhiro ^c   Matsumoto, Yuji ^d   Seo, Koji ^e   Ochiai, Reiji ^f   Kobayashi, Yasuyuki ^g   Sakuma, Hajime ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Matsusaka Central Hospital   (Japan)

^c Kumamoto Central Hospital   (Japan)

^d Department of Cardiology   (Japan)

^e Utsunomiya Central Clinic PET Center   (Japan)

^f Koga Hospital   (Japan)

^g ST MARIANNA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

coronary artery; coronary artery disease; magnetic resonance angiography; national multicenter trial

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE; JAPAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 77956525573     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.071     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. T. Thom, N. Haase, and W. Rosamond Heart disease and stroke statistics2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation 113 2006 e85 e151
2. J.D. Schuijf, J.J. Bax, and L.J. Shaw Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography Am Heart J 151 2006 404 411
3. W.Y. Kim, P.G. Danias, and M. Stuber Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses N Engl J Med 345 2001 1863 1869 (Pubitemid 33716560)
4. O.M. Weber, A.J. Martin, and C.B. Higgins Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography Magn Reson Med 50 2003 1223 1228
5. S. Plein, T.R. Jones, J.P. Ridgway, and M.U. Sivananthan Three-dimensional coronary MR angiography performed with subject-specific cardiac acquisition windows and motion-adapted respiratory gating AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 2003 505 512
6. E. Spuentrup, M. Katoh, and A. Buecker Free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession coronary MR angiography with radial k-space sampling: comparison with cartesian k-space sampling and cartesian gradient-echo coronary MR angiographypilot study Radiology 231 2004 581 586
7. H. Sakuma, Y. Ichikawa, and N. Suzawa Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography Radiology 237 2005 316 321
8. J.P. Finn, K. Nael, V. Deshpande, O. Ratib, and G. Laub Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology Radiology 241 2006 338 354
9. H. Sakuma, Y. Ichikawa, S. Chino, T. Hirano, K. Makino, and K. Takeda Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 1946 1950
10. C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, and K. Nehrke Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance Eur Heart J 26 2005 2313 2319
11. A.C. Pouleur, J.B. le Poulain de Waroux, J. Kefer, A. Pasquet, J.L. Vanoverschelde, and B.L. Gerber Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 1 2008 114 121
12. P.M. Bossuyt, J.B. Reitsma, and D.E. Bruns Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative Ann Intern Med 138 2003 40 44
13. P.M. Bossuyt, J.B. Reitsma, and D.E. Bruns The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 138 2003 W1 W12
14. J.A. Knottnerus, and J.W. Muris Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study J Clin Epidemiol 56 2003 1118 1128
15. X. Liu, X. Zhao, and J. Huang Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 2007 1326 1332
16. J.M. Miller, C.E. Rochitte, and M. Dewey Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT N Engl J Med 359 2008 2324 2336
17. M.J. Budoff, D. Dowe, and J.G. Jollis Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 1724 1732
18. X. Bi, J.C. Carr, and D. Li Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla in 5 minutes with slow infusion of Gd-BOPTA, a high-relaxivity clinical contrast agent Magn Reson Med 58 2007 1 7
19. X. Liu, X. Bi, J. Huang, R. Jerecic, J. Carr, and D. Li Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T Invest Radiol 43 2008 663 668
20. Q. Yang, K. Li, and X. Liu Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center J Am Coll Cardiol 54 2009 69 76
21. C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, and B. Schnackenburg Comparison of radial and Cartesian imaging techniques for MR coronary angiography J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6 2004 865 875