Quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance derived myocardial perfusion measurements using advanced techniques: Microsphere validation in an explanted pig heart system

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Schuster, Andreas ^a,b   Zarinabad, Niloufar ^a   Ishida, Masaki ^a   Sinclair, Matthew ^a   Van Den Wijngaard, Jeroen P H M ^c   Morton, Geraint ^a   Hautvast, Gilion L T F ^d   Bigalke, Boris ^a,e   Van Horssen, Pepijn ^c   Smith, Nicolas ^a   Spaan, Jos A E ^c   Siebes, Maria ^c   Chiribiri, Amedeo ^a   Nagel, Eike ^a  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Deconvolution; Isolated heart perfusion; Microspheres; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Quantification

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; MICROSPHERE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; FLUORESCENT DYE; GADOBUTROL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; EXPLANT; FLUORESCENCE; HEART; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HYPEREMIA; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SWINE; VALIDATION STUDY; ANIMAL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CORONARY OCCLUSION; DISEASE MODEL; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROBUBBLE; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERFUSION; PIG; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY OCCLUSION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FLUORESCENT DYES; HYPEREMIA; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROBUBBLES; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PERFUSION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84907942048     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0082-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. CJ Murray, AD Lopez, Lancet 1997 349 9064 1498 1504 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2 9167458
2. Predicting therapeutic benefit from myocardial revascularization procedures: are measurements of both resting left ventricular ejection fraction and stress-induced myocardial ischemia necessary? R Hachamovitch, A Rozanski, SW Hayes, LE Thomson, G Germano, JD Friedman, I Cohen, DS Berman, J Nucl Cardiol 2006 13 6 768 778 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.017 17174808
3. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. PAL Tonino, B De Bruyne, NHJ Pijls, U Siebert, F Ikeno, M van' t Veer, V Klauss, G Manoharan, T Engstrøm, KG Oldroyd, PN Ver Lee, PA MacCarthy, WF Fearon, N Engl J Med 2009 360 3 213 224 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611 19144937
4. Letter by Schuster et Al. regarding article, "selecting a noninvasive imaging study after an inconclusive exercise test" A Schuster, G Morton, E Nagel, Circulation 2011 123 23 632 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004879 21670238
5. Magnetic resonance versus radionuclide pharmacological stress perfusion imaging for flow-limiting stenoses of varying severity. DC Lee, OP Simonetti, KR Harris, TA Holly, RM Judd, E Wu, FJ Klocke, Circulation 2004 110 1 58 65 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133389.48487.B6 15210596
6. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. J Schwitter, CM Wacker, AC van Rossum, M Lombardi, N Al-Saadi, H Ahlstrom, T Dill, HBW Larsson, SD Flamm, M Marquardt, L Johansson, Eur Heart J 2008 29 4 480 489 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617 18208849
7. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. J Schwitter, D Nanz, S Kneifel, K Bertschinger, M Büchi, PR Knüsel, B Marincek, TF Lüscher, GK von Schulthess, Circulation 2001 103 18 2230 2235 10.1161/01.CIR.103.18.2230 11342469
8. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. JP Greenwood, N Maredia, JF Younger, JM Brown, J Nixon, CC Everett, P Bijsterveld, JP Ridgway, A Radjenovic, CJ Dickinson, SG Ball, S Plein, Lancet 2012 379 9814 453 460 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4 22196944
9. Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance. N Bettencourt, A Chiribiri, A Schuster, E Nagel, Curr Heart Fail Rep 2009 6 3 142 153 10.1007/s11897-009-0021-9 19723455
10. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. WG Hundley, DA Bluemke, JP Finn, SD Flamm, MA Fogel, MG Friedrich, VB Ho, M Jerosch-Herold, CM Kramer, WJ Manning, M Patel, GM Pohost, AE Stillman, RD White, PK Woodard, J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 55 23 2614 2662 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011 20513610
11. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to guide complex revascularization in stable coronary artery disease. G Morton, A Schuster, D Perera, E Nagel, Eur Heart J 2010 31 18 2209 2215 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq256 20705696
12. Imaging in the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: special focus on magnetic resonance. A Schuster, G Morton, A Chiribiri, D Perera, J-L Vanoverschelde, E Nagel, J Am Coll Cardiol 2012 59 4 359 370 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.076 22261158
13. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire. T Kurita, H Sakuma, K Onishi, M Ishida, K Kitagawa, T Yamanaka, T Tanigawa, T Kitamura, K Takeda, M Ito, Eur Heart J 2009 30 4 444 452 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn521 19098020
14. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. MA Costa, S Shoemaker, H Futamatsu, C Klassen, DJ Angiolillo, M Nguyen, A Siuciak, P Gilmore, MM Zenni, L Guzman, TA Bass, N Wilke, J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50 6 514 522 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.053 17678734
15. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. N Wilke, M Jerosch-Herold, Y Wang, Y Huang, BV Christensen, AE Stillman, K Ugurbil, K McDonald, RF Wilson, Radiology 1997 204 2 373 384 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240523 9240523
16. Contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging in the detection of reduced coronary flow velocity reserve. AA Barmeyer, A Stork, K Muellerleile, C Tiburtius, AK Schofer, TA Heitzer, T Hofmann, G Adam, T Meinertz, GK Lund, Radiology 2007 243 2 377 385 10.1148/radiol.2432060331 17456867
17. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. HP Kühl, M Katoh, C Buhr, GA Krombach, R Hoffmann, T Rassaf, M Neizel, A Buecker, M Kelm, Am J Cardiol 2007 99 8 1090 1095 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.061 17437733
18. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. T Lockie, M Ishida, D Perera, A Chiribiri, K De Silva, S Kozerke, M Marber, E Nagel, R Razavi, S Redwood, S Plein, J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 57 1 70 75 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.019
19. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. S Watkins, R McGeoch, J Lyne, T Steedman, R Good, M-J McLaughlin, T Cunningham, V Bezlyak, I Ford, HJ Dargie, KG Oldroyd, Circulation 2009 120 22 2207 2213 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.872358 19917885
20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t sense. S Plein, S Ryf, J Schwitter, A Radjenovic, P Boesiger, S Kozerke, Magn Reson Med 2007 58 4 777 785 10.1002/mrm.21381 17899611
21. Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion MRI. M Ishida, G Morton, A Schuster, E Nagel, A Chiribiri, Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2010 3 2 65 73 10.1007/s12410-010-9013-0
22. Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing. AK Attili, A Schuster, E Nagel, JHC Reiber, RJ van der Geest, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 26 Suppl 1 27 40 10.1007/s10554-009-9571-x 20058082
23. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: inter-study reproducibility. G Morton, R Jogiya, S Plein, A Schuster, A Chiribiri, E Nagel, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012 13 11 954 960 10.1093/ehjci/jes103 22634739
24. Quantification of Absolute Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery DiseaseComparison Between Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography. G Morton, A Chiribiri, M Ishida, ST Hussain, A Schuster, A Indermuehle, D Perera, J Knuuti, S Baker, E Hedström, P Schleyer, M O'Doherty, S Barrington, E Nagel, J Am Coll Cardiol 2012 60 16 1546 1555 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.052 22999722
25. An isolated perfused pig heart model for the development, validation and translation of novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques. A Schuster, I Grünwald, A Chiribiri, R Southworth, M Ishida, G Hay, N Neumann, G Morton, D Perera, T Schaeffter, E Nagel, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010 12 53 10.1186/1532-429X-12-53 20849589
26. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of isolated perfused pig hearts in a 3T clinical MR scanner. A Schuster, A Chiribiri, M Ishida, G Morton, M Paul, S Hussain, B Bigalke, D Perera, T Schaeffter, E Nagel, Interv Med Appl Sci 2012 4 4 186 192 10.1556/IMAS.4.2012.4.3 24265875
27. Visualisation of intramural coronary vasculature by an imaging cryomicrotome suggests compartmentalisation of myocardial perfusion areas. JAE Spaan, R Ter Wee, JWGE van Teeffelen, G Streekstra, M Siebes, C Kolyva, H Vink, DS Fokkema, E VanBavel, Med Biol Eng Comput 2005 43 4 431 435 10.1007/BF02344722 16255423
28. Blood flow distributions by microsphere deposition methods. FW Prinzen, JB Bassingthwaighte, Cardiovasc Res 2000 45 1 13 21 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00252-7 10728307
29. Improved detection of fluorescently labeled microspheres and vessel architecture with an imaging cryomicrotome. P van Horssen, M Siebes, I Hoefer, JAE Spaan, JPHM van den Wijngaard, Med Biol Eng Comput 2010 48 8 735 744 10.1007/s11517-010-0652-8 20574721
30. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. MD Cerqueira, NJ Weissman, V Dilsizian, AK Jacobs, S Kaul, WK Laskey, DJ Pennell, JA Rumberger, T Ryan, MS Verani, Circulation 2002 105 4 539 542 10.1161/hc0402.102975 11815441
31. Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. M Ishida, A Schuster, G Morton, A Chiribiri, S Hussain, M Paul, N Merkle, H Steen, D Lossnitzer, B Schnackenburg, K Alfakih, S Plein, E Nagel, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011 13 1 28 10.1186/1532-429X-13-28 21609423
32. Myocardial blood flow quantification from MRI by deconvolution using an exponential approximation basis. G Hautvast, A Chiribiri, N Zarinabad, A Schuster, M Breeuwer, E Nagel, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 59 7 2060 2067 10.1109/TBME.2012.2197620 22575632
33. Tracer-dilution techniques in the study of microvascular behavior. KL Zierler, Fed Proc 1965 24 5 1085 1091 5320104
34. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance. Feasibility and methods comparison. N Zarinabad, A Chiribiri, GLTF Hautvast, M Ishida, A Schuster, Z Cvetkovic, PG Batchelor, E Nagel, Magn Reson Med 2012 68 6 1994 04 10.1002/mrm.24195 22354744
35. Zarinabad N, Hautvast G, Sammut E, Arujuna A, Breeuwer M, Nagel E, Chiribiri A. Effects of tracer arrival time on the accuracy of high-resolution (voxel-wise) myocardial perfusion maps from contrast-enhanced first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014.;: doi:10.1109/TBME.2014.2322937.
36. Modelling Parameter Role on Accuracy of Cardiac Perfusion Quantification. N Zarinabad, A Chiribiri, G Hautvast, A Schuster, M Sinclair, JPHM van den Wijngaard, N Smith, JA Spaan, M Siebes, M Breeuwer, E Nagel, Lect Notes Comput Sci 2013 7945 13
37. Deconvolution for DCE-MRI using an exponential approximation basis. SL Keeling, T Kogler, R Stollberger, Med Image Anal 2009 13 1 80 90 10.1016/j.media.2008.06.011 18656417
38. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. JM Bland, DG Altman, Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 2868172
39. Accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance of absolute myocardial blood flow with a high-field system: comparison with conventional field strength. TF Christian, SP Bell, L Whitesell, M Jerosch-Herold, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 9 1103 1110 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.06.009 19761990
40. A Quantitative Pixel-Wise Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow by Contrast-Enhanced First-Pass CMR Perfusion Imaging: Microsphere Validation in Dogs and Feasibility Study in Humans. L-Y Hsu, DW Groves, AH Aletras, P Kellman, AE Arai, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012 5 2 154 166 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.07.013 22340821
41. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. TF Christian, DW Rettmann, AH Aletras, SL Liao, JL Taylor, RS Balaban, AE Arai, Radiology 2004 232 3 677 684 10.1148/radiol.2323030573 15284436
42. Perfusion phantom: An efficient and reproducible method to simulate myocardial first-pass perfusion measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. A Chiribiri, A Schuster, M Ishida, G Hautvast, N Zarinabad, G Morton, J Otton, S Plein, M Breeuwer, P Batchelor, T Schaeffter, E Nagel, Magn Reson Med 2012 69 3 698 07 10.1002/mrm.24299 22532435
43. High-Resolution Versus Standard-Resolution Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease. M Motwani, N Maredia, TA Fairbairn, S Kozerke, A Radjenovic, JP Greenwood, S Plein, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012 5 3 306 13 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971796 22499848
44. Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease. ST Hussain, M Paul, S Plein, AM Shah, G McCann, MS Marber, P Maccarthy, S Redwood, A Chiribiri, G Morton, A Schuster, M Ishida, MA Westwood, D Perera, E Nagel, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012 14 1 65 10.1186/1532-429X-14-65 22992411
45. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location: quantitative analysis of transmural perfusion gradients by high-resolution MRI versus FFR. A Chiribiri, GLTF Hautvast, T Lockie, A Schuster, B Bigalke, L Olivotti, SR Redwood, M Breeuwer, S Plein, E Nagel, J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2013 6 5 600 609 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.019