Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography

JAMA

Volumn 308, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1237-1245

  Min, James K ^a   Leipsic, Jonathon ^c   Pencina, Michael J ^e   Berman, Daniel S ^a   Koo, Bon Kwon ^h   Van Mieghem, Carlos ^j   Erglis, Andrejs ^k   Lin, Fay Y ^l   Dunning, Allison M ^l   Apruzzese, Patricia ^e   Budoff, Matthew J ^b   Cole, Jason H ^o   Jaffer, Farouc A ^f   Leon, Martin B ^m,n   Malpeso, Jennifer ^b   Mancini, G B John ^d   Park, Seung Jung ⁱ   Schwartz, Robert S ^p   Shaw, Leslee J ^q   Mauri, Laura ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e HARVARD CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

ⁱ University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^j ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^k PAULS STRADINS CLINICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Latvia)

^l WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^m NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

ⁿ NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^o Cardiology Associates   (United States)

^p MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^q EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84866553064     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS. The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(10):957-965.
2. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography vs conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(8):636-643.
3. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ. CT angiography: an alternative to nuclear perfusion imaging? Heart. 2008;94(3):255-257.
4. Lauer MS. CT angiography: first things first. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(1):1-3.
5. Hachamovitch R, Di Carli MF. Methods and limitations of assessing new noninvasive tests, I: anatomy-based validation of noninvasive testing. Circulation. 2008;117(20):2684-2690.
6. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-1516.
7. Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, et al; BARI 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(24):2503-2515.
8. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve. Heart. 1998; 80(6):539-542.
9. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve vs angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213-224.
10. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve vs angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(3):177-184.
11. Fearon WF, Bornschein B, Tonino PA, et al; Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) Study Investigators. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2010;122(24):2545-2550.
12. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(19):1989-1997.
13. Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(10):3195-3209.
14. Min JK, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5(5):301-309.
15. Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(3):190-204.
16. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5(4):198-224.
17. Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6(3):191-199.
18. Naidu SS, Rao SV, Blankenship J, et al. Clinical expert consensus statement on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions [published online March 20, 2012]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. doi:10.1002/ccd.24311.
19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under 2 or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837-845.
20. Fearon WF, Takagi A, Jeremias A, et al. Use of fractional myocardial flow reserve to assess the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(9):1013-1014.
21. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al; COURAGE Investigators. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117(10):1283-1291.
22. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging - executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation. 2003;108(11):1404-1418.
23. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(7):1475-1497.
24. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900-2907.
25. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; American College of Radiology; American Heart Association; American Society of Echocardiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Society of Nuclear Medicine. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(23):2201-2229.
26. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(4):521-528.
27. Gaemperli O, Bengel FM, Kaufmann PA. Cardiac hybrid imaging. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(17):2100-2108.
28. Mowatt G, Vale L, Brazzelli M, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(30):1-207.