Predicting neointimal hyperplasia in stented arteries using time-dependant computational fluid dynamics: A review

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 408-418

  Murphy, Jonathan ^a   Boyle, Fergal ^a  

^a DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Coronary stent; Restenosis; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS; CORONARY STENTS; FLOW MODEL; IN-VIVO; NEOINTIMAL HYPERPLASIA; RESTENOSIS; WALL SHEAR STRESS;

FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUIDS; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ENDOTHELIN 1;

ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY STENT; GEOMETRY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; OSCILLATION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOGENESIS;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; STENTS; TUNICA INTIMA;

EID: 77950862191     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. S. Allender, P. Scarborough, V. Peto, M. Raymer, J. Leal, R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. Gray, European cardiovascular disease statistics: European Heart Network, 2008.
2. Grüntzig A. Transluminal dialation of coronary-artery stenosis. The Lancet 1978, 311:263.
3. Detre K., Holubkov R., Kelsey S., et al. Percutaneous tranluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981. The national heart lung and blood registry. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 318:265-270.
4. Gruentzig A.R., King S.B., Schlumpf W. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The early Zurich experience. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987, 316:1127-1132.
5. Kahn J.K., Hartzler G.O. Frequency and causes of failure with contempory balloon angioplasty and implications for new technologies. Am. J. Cardiol. 1990, 66:858-860.
6. Holmes D.R.J., Vlietstra R.E., Smith H.C., Vetrovec G.W., et al. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a report from the PTCA Registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Am. J. Cardiol. 1984, 53:77C-81C.
7. Carrozza J.P., Kuntz R.E., Levine M.J., Pomerantz R.M., Fishman R.F., Mansour M., Gibson C.M., Senerchia C.C., Diver D.J., Safian R.D. Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1992, 20:328-337.
8. Van Belle E., Bauters C., Hubert E., Bodart J.-C., Abolmaali K., Meurice T., McFadden E.P., Lablanche J.-M., Bertrand M.E. Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels. Circulation 1997, 96:1454-1460.
9. Lally C., Dolan F., Prendergast P.J. Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:1574-1581.
10. Malek A.M., Alper S.L., Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999, 282:2035-2042.
11. LaDisa J.F.J., Olson L.E., Molthen R.C., Hettrick D.A., Pratt P.F., Hardel M.D., Kersten J.R., Warltier D.C., Pagel P.S. Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 288:H2465-H2475.
12. Kute S.M., Vorp D.A. The effect of proximal artery flow on the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of a vascular bypass graft: computational study. J. Biomech. Eng. 2001, 123:277-283.
13. Ojha M. Spatial and temporal variations of wall shear stress within an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. J. Biomech. 1993, 26:1377-1388.
14. DePaola N., Gimbrone M.A.J., Davies P.F., Dewey C.F. Vascular endothelium responds to fluid shear stress gradients. Arterioscler. Thromb. 1992, 12:1254-1257.
15. Ku D.N., Giddens D.P., Zarins C.K., Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1985, 5:293-302.
16. Zarins C.K., Giddens D.P., Bharadvaj B.K., Sottiurai V.S., Mabon R.F., Glagov S. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ. Res. 1983, 53:502-514.
17. Himburg H.A., Grzybowski D.M., Hazel A.L., LaMack J.A., Li X.-M., Friedman M.H. Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeability. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, 286:H1916-H1922.
18. Malek A., Izumo S. Physiological fluid shear stress causes downregulation of endothelin-1 mRNA in bovine aortic endothelium. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 1992, 263:C389-C396.
19. Nichols W.W., O'Rourke M.F. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries 2005, 326-327. Hodder Arnold, London.
20. Rajamohan D., Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., Ibrahim A.A., Jog M.A. Developing pulsatile flow in a deployed coronary stent. J. Biomech. Eng. 2006, 128:347-359.
21. Berry J., Santamarina A., Moore J., Roychowdhury S., Routh W. Experimental and computational flow evaluation of coronary stents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 28:386-398.
22. He Y., Duraiswamy N., Frank A.O., Moore J.E. Blood flow in stented arteries: a parametric comparison of strut design patterns in three dimensions. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:637-647.
23. Kastrati A., Mehilli J., Dirschinger J., Pache J., Ulm K., Schuhlen H., Seyfarth M., Schmitt C., Blasini R., Neumann F.J., Schomig A. Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. Am. J. Cardiol. 2001, 87:34-39.
24. Garasic J.M., Edelman E.R., Squire J.C., Seifert P., Williams M.S., Rogers C. Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. Circulation 2000, 101:812-818.
25. Gaston R.D., Gary S.M., Augusto D.P., Kenneth M.K., Lowell F.S., Jeffrey J.P., Wong S.C., Martin B.L. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995, 26:720-724.
26. Mehran R., Dangas G., Abizaid A.S., Mintz G.S., Lansky A.J., Satler L.F., Pichard A.D., Kent K.M., Stone G.W., Leon M.B. Angiographic Patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999, 100:1872-1878.
27. Wentzel J.J., Krams R., Schuurbiers J.C.H., Oomen J.A., Kloet J., van der Giessen W.J., Serruys P.W., Slager C.J. Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2001, 103:1740-1745.
28. LaDisa J., Olson L., Hettrick D., Warltier D., Kersten J., Pagel P. Axial stent strut angle influences wall shear stress after stent implantation: analysis using 3D computational fluid dynamics models of stent foreshortening. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 2005, 4:59.
29. Banerjee R.K., Devarakonda S.B., Rajamohan D., Back L.H. Developed pulsatile flow in a deployed coronary stent. Biorheology 2007, 44:91-102.
30. Faik I., et al. Time-dependent 3D simulations of the hemodynamics in a stented coronary artery. Biomed. Mater. 2007, 2:S28.
31. LaDisa J.F., Guler I., Olson L.E., Hettrick D.A., Kersten J.R., Warltier D.C., Pagel P.S. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 31:972-980.
32. LaDisa J.F., Olson L.E., Guler I., Hettrick D.A., Kersten J.R., Warltier D.C., Pagel P.S. Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated with time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98:947-957.
33. Smedby O., Johansson J., Molgaard J., Olsson A.G., Walldius G., Erikson U. Predilection of atherosclerosis for the inner curvature in the femoral artery: a digitized angiography study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1995, 15:912-917.
34. Prosi M., Perktold K., Ding Z., Friedman M.H. Influence of curvature dynamics on pulsatile coronary artery flow in a realistic bifurcation model. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1767-1775.
35. Seo T., Schachter L.G., Barakat A.I. Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33:444-456.
36. Wentzel J.J., Whelan D.M., van der Giessen W.J., van Beusekom H.M., Andhyiswara I., Serruys P.W., Slager C.J., Krams R. Coronary stent implantation changes 3-D vessel geometry and 3-D shear stress distribution. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:1287-1295.
37. LaDisa J., Olson L., Douglas H., Warltier D., Kersten J., Pagel P. Alterations in regional vascular geometry produced by theoretical stent implantation influence distributions of wall shear stress: analysis of a curved coronary artery using 3D computational fluid dynamics modeling. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 2006, 5:40.
38. Chen H.Y., Hermiller J., Sinha A.K., Sturek M., Zhu L., Kassab G.S. Effects of stent sizing on endothelial and vessel wall stress: potential mechanisms for in-stent restenosis. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106:1686-1691.
39. Lansky A.J., Roubin G.S., O'Shaughnessy C.D., Moore P.B., Dean L.S., Raizner A.E., Safian R.D., Zidar J.P., Kerr J.L., Popma J.J., Mehran R., Kuntz R.E., Leon M.B. Randomized comparison of GR-II stent and palmaz-schatz stent for elective treatment of coronary stenoses. Circulation 2000, 102:1364-1368.
40. Frank A.O., Walsh P.W., Moore J.E.J. Computational fluid dynamics and stent design. Artif. Organs 2002, 26:614-621.
41. Duraiswamy N., Schoephoerster R.T., James E.Moore J. Comparison of near-wall hemodynamic parameters in stented artery models. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131:061006. (Unbound).
42. Nageh T., de Belder A.J., Thomas M.R., Williams I.L., Wainwright R.J. A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and Wallstent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL studt. Am. Heart J. 2001, 141:971-976.
43. Duraiswamy N., Cesar J.M., Schoephoerster R.T., Moore J.E. Effects of stent geometry on local flow dynamics and resulting platelet deposition in an in vitro model. Biorheology 2008, 45:547-561.
44. Balossino R., Gervaso F., Migliavacca F., Dubini G. Effects of different stent designs on local hemodynamics in stented arteries. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:1053-1061.
45. J. Murphy, F. Boyle, Assessment of the effects of increasing levels of physiological realism in the computational fluid dynamics analyses of implanted coronary stents, in: Proceedings of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (2008).
46. LaDisa J.F.J., Olson L.E., Guler I., Hettrick D.A., Audi S.H., Kersten J.R., Warltier D.C., Pagel P.S. Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 97:424-430.
47. Friedman M.H., Hutchins G.M., Bargeron C.B., Deters O.J., Mark F.F. Correlation between intimal thickness and fluid shear in human arteries. Atherosclerosis 1981, 39:425-436.
48. Lei M., Kleinstreuer C., Truskey G.A. A focal stress gradient-dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis in branching arteries. Med. Eng. Phys. 1996, 18:326-332.
49. Longest P.W., Kleinstreuer C. Computational haemodynamics analysis and comparison study of arterio-venous grafts. J. Med. Eng. Technol 2000, 24:102-110.