Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 58, Issue 19, 2011, Pages 1989-1997

  Koo, Bon Kwon ^a   Erglis, Andrejs ^b   Doh, Joon Hyung ^c   Daniels, David V ^d   Jegere, Sanda ^b   Kim, Hyo Soo ^a   Dunning, Allison ^e   Defrance, Tony ^f   Lansky, Alexandra ^g   Leipsic, Jonathan ^h   Min, James K ⁱ  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b PAULS STRADINS CLINICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Latvia)

^c Inje University   (South Korea)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^f CVCTA   (United States)

^g YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

computational fluid dynamics; coronary CT angiography; fractional flow reserve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80055019355     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. B. DeBruyne, T. Baudhuin, and J.A. Melin Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans Validation with positron emission tomography Circulation 89 1994 1013 1022 (Pubitemid 24076525)
2. A. Berger, K.J. Botman, and P.A. MacCarthy Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2005 438 442 (Pubitemid 41040283)
3. P.A. Tonino, B. DeBruyne, and N.H. Pijls Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 2009 213 224
4. N.H. Pijls, J.A. van Son, R.L. Kirkeeide, B. DeBruyne, and K.L. Gould Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Circulation 87 1993 1354 1367 (Pubitemid 23110406)
5. W.F. Fearon, B. Bornschein, and P.A. Tonino Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease Circulation 122 2010 2545 2550
6. N.H. Pijls, W.F. Fearon, and P.A. Tonino Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 177 184
7. J.K. Min, L.J. Shaw, and D.S. Berman The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 957 965
8. M.J. Budoff, D. Dowe, and J.G. Jollis Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 1724 1732
9. J.M. Miller, C.E. Rochitte, and M. Dewey Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT N Engl J Med 359 2008 2324 2336
10. W.B. Meijboom, M.F. Meijs, and J.D. Schuijf Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 2135 2144
11. W.B. Meijboom, C.A. Van Mieghem, and N. van Pelt Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 636 643
12. M.S. Lauer CT angiography: first things first Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2 2009 1 3
13. R.F. Redberg, and J. Walsh Pay now, benefits may followthe case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography N Engl J Med 359 2008 2309 2311
14. H.J. Kim, I.E. Vignon-Clementel, J.S. Coogan, C.A. Figueroa, K.E. Jansen, and C.A. Taylor Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries Ann Biomed Eng 38 2010 3195 3209
15. H.J. Kim, K.E. Jansen, and C.A. Taylor Incorporating autoregulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system in three-dimensional finite element models of arterial blood flow Ann Biomed Eng 38 2010 2314 2330
16. H.J. Kim, I.E. Vignon-Clementel, and C.A. Figueroa On coupling a lumped parameter heart model and a three-dimensional finite element aorta model Ann Biomed Eng 37 2009 2153 2169
17. S. Abbara, A. Arbab-Zadeh, and T.Q. Callister SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 2009 190 204
18. G.L. Raff, A. Abidov, and S. Achenbach SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 2009 122 136
19. P.J. Scanlon, D.P. Faxon, and A.M. Audet ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) J Am Coll Cardiol 33 1999 1756 1824
20. B. DeBruyne, N.H. Pijls, and E. Barbato Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans Circulation 107 2003 1877 1883 (Pubitemid 36444128)
21. I.E. Vignon-Clementel, C.A. Figueroa, K.E. Jansen, and C.A. Taylor Outflow boundary conditions for 3D simulations of non-periodic blood flow and pressure fields in deformable arteries Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 13 2010 625 640
22. C.D. Murray The physiological principle of minimum work: I The vascular system and the cost of blood volume Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 12 1926 207 214
23. G.M. Hutchins, M.M. Miner, and J.K. Boitnott Vessel caliber and branch-angle of human coronary artery branch-points Circ Res 38 1976 572 576
24. Y. Zhou, G.S. Kassab, and S. Molloi In vivo validation of the design rules of the coronary arteries and their application in the assessment of diffuse disease Phys Med Biol 47 2002 977 993 (Pubitemid 34269541)
25. A. Kamiya, and T. Togawa Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery Am J Physiol 239 1980 H14 H21
26. C.K. Zarins, M.A. Zatina, D.P. Giddens, D.N. Ku, and S. Glagov Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis J Vasc Surg 5 1987 413 420 (Pubitemid 17040159)
27. R.F. Wilson, K. Wyche, B.V. Christensen, S. Zimmer, and D.D. Laxson Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation Circulation 82 1990 1595 1606 (Pubitemid 20367962)
28. B.J. Chow, A. Abraham, and G.A. Wells Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronary angiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2 2009 16 23
29. M.R. Patel, E.D. Peterson, and D. Dai Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography N Engl J Med 362 2010 886 895
30. P. MacCarthy, A. Berger, and G. Manoharan Pressure-derived measurement of coronary flow reserve J Am Coll Cardiol 45 2005 216 220 (Pubitemid 40094728)
31. P.A. Tonino, W.F. Fearon, and B. DeBruyne Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2816 2821
32. R. Bugiardini, and C.N. Bairey Merz Angina with "normal" coronary arteries: a changing philosophy JAMA 293 2005 477 484
33. A.J. Taylor, M. Cerqueira, and J.M. Hodgson ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 1864 1894
34. A.J. Einstein Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? Heart 94 2008 1519 1521
35. J.K. Min, D.S. Berman, and M.J. Budoff Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography) study J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5 2011 301 309