Comparing Four Instructional Techniques for Promoting Robust Knowledge

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 181-218

  Richey, J Elizabeth ^a   Nokes Malach, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Analogical comparison; Expertise; Practice; Self explanation; Worked examples

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939888354     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-014-9268-0     Document Type: Review

References (169)

1. Adelson, B. (1981). Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages. Memory & Cognition, 9(4), 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03197568.
2. Ainsworth, S., & Burcham, S. (2007). The impact of text coherence on learning by self-explanation. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 286–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.004.
3. Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., Koedinger, K. R., & Popescu, O. (2003). A tutorial dialog system to support self-explanation: Evaluation and open questions. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 39–46).
4. Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Learning through case comparisons: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 87–113. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775712.
5. Allard, F., & Starkes, J. L. (1991). Motor-skill experts in sports, dance, and other domains. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 126–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: compilation of weak-method problem situations. Psychological Review, 94(2), 192–210. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.192.
7. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48, 35–44. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.35.
8. Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 932–945. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.932.
9. Anzai, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86(2), 124–140. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.2.124.
10. Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214. doi:10.3102/00346543070002181.
11. Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774–783. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.774.
12. Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: a taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.612.
13. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 271–311. doi:10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056.
14. Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0013247.
15. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. N. (2000). How analogies are generated: the roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 108–124. doi:10.3758/BF03211580.
16. Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). Key misconceptions in algebraic problem solving. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 571–576). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
17. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61–100). Washington, D.C: American Educational Research Association.
18. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R., Vye, N. J., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: research foundations. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1078–1089. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1078.
19. Brown, D. E., & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18(4), 237–261. doi:10.1007/BF00118013.
20. Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook on research in conceptual change (pp. 127–154).
21. Brown, A. L., & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 493–523. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90014-X.
22. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:10.2307/1176008.
23. Burns, B. D., & Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(1), 241–261. doi:10.1080/02724980143000262.
24. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61–79. doi:10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_3.
25. Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 1020–1031. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.1020.
26. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 355–376. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.355.
27. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1147–1156. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1147.
28. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1990). Learning subgoals and methods for solving probability problems. Memory & Cognition, 18(6), 593–603. doi:10.3758/BF03197102.
29. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804.
30. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.
31. Chen, Z. (1999). Schema induction in children’s analogical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 703–715. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.703.
32. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, Vol. 5 (pp. 161–238). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook on research in conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
35. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 29–39. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.19.1.29.
36. Chi, M. T. H., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Complex declarative learning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 371–399). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0101_4.
37. Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 69–105. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0101_4.
38. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2.
39. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1.
41. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3.
42. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. doi:10.3102/00346543063001001.
43. Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15(1), 89–132. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(91)80014-V.
44. Compton, B. J., & Logan, G. D. (1991). The transition from algorithm to retrieval in memory-based theories of automaticity. Memory & Cognition, 19(2), 151–158. doi:10.3758/BF03197111.
45. Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. A. (2000). Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: a computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 389–415.
46. Cooper, G. A., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 347–362. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.79.4.347.
47. Crowley, K., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Explanation and generalization in young children’s strategy learning. Child Development, 70(2), 304–316. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00023.
48. Cummins, D. D. (1992). Role of analogical reasoning in the induction of problem categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1103–1124. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1103.
49. Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012). The import of knowledge export: connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 153–176. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.696438.
50. Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., & Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of improvement: the power law applies by strategy within task. Psychological Science, 9(1), 1–7. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00001.
51. Dellarosa, D. (1985). Abstraction of problem-type schemata through problem comparison (Tech. Rep. No. 146). Boulder.
52. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Hardiman, P. T., & Mestre, J. P. (1992). Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: effects on schema acquisition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 307–331. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0203_3.
53. Dunbar, K. N., Fugelsang, J. A., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naive theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In P. Shah & M. Lovett (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 193–206). New York: Erlbaum.
54. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.803.
55. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1997). Cognitive and developmental factors in expert performance. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in contex: Human and machine (pp. 3–41). Cambridge: MIT Press.
56. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211.
57. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (p. 344). New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208(4448), 1181–1182. doi:10.1126/science.7375930.
59. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.363.
60. Fitts, P. M. (1964). Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243–285). New York: Academic Press.
61. Fong, G. T., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(1), 34–45. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.1.34.
62. Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. H. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002.
63. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3.
64. Gentner, D. (2002). Analogical reasoning, psychology of. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Nature Publishing Group.
65. Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65(2–3), 263–297. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1003_2.
66. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: a general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393–405. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393.
67. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 33(8), 1343–1382. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01070.x.
68. Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1), 99–120. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2101&2_6.
69. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6.
70. Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 539–550. doi:10.1037/h0084333.
71. Guo, J.-P., Pang, M. F., Yang, L.-Y., & Ding, Y. (2012). Learning from comparing multiple examples: on the dilemma of “similar” or “different”. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 251–269. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9192-0.
72. Hardiman, P. T., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (1989). The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 17(5), 627–638. doi:10.3758/BF03197085.
73. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: Freeman. doi:10.1002/ccd.10470.
74. Hausmann, R. G. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2002). Can a computer interface support self-explaining? Cognitive Technology, 7(1), 4–14.
75. Hausmann, R. G. M., & VanLehn, K. A. (2007). Explaining self-explaining: A contrast between content and generation. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger, & J. Greer (Eds.), 13th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 417–424). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
76. Hickey, D. T., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2005). Theory, level, and function: Three dimensions for understanding transfer and student assessment. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 251–294). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
77. Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding, and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14(3), 251–283. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1403_1.
79. Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332–340. doi:10.3758/BF03197035.
80. Judd, C. H. (1908). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28–42.
81. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 579–588. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579.
82. Kellman, P. J., & Garrigan, P. (2009). Perceptual learning and human expertise. Physics of Life Reviews, 6(2), 53–84. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2008.12.001.
83. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
84. Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. A. W. M. M. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 239–264. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0.
85. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 511–550. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1404_2.
86. Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012). The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757–798. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x.
87. Koedinger, K. R., Booth, J. L., & Klahr, D. (2013). Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science, 342(22), 935–937. doi:10.1126/science.1238056.
88. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: a view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52(1), 57–66. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.57.
89. Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C.-H., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), 417–446. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1004new_2.
90. Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335–1342. doi:10.1126/science.208.4450.1335.
91. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 6(4), 586–597. doi:10.3758/BF03212967.
92. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492.
93. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: the effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), 1–95. doi:10.1037/h0093502.
94. Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Medin, D. L. (2000). Tall is typical: central tendency, ideal dimensions, and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 41–50. doi:10.3758/BF03211575.
95. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 431–467. doi:10.1006/cogp.1993.1011.
96. McKeithen, K. B., Reitman, J. S., Rueter, H. H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 307–325. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(81)90012-8.
97. McLaren, B. M., Lim, S.-J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). When and how often should worked examples be given to students? New results and a summary of the current state of research. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2176–2181). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
98. Neves, D. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). Knowledge compilation: Mechanisms for the automatization of cognitive skills. In Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 57–84). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
99. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
100. Nokes, T. J., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Comparing multiple paths to mastery: what is learned? Cognitive Science, 29(5), 769–796. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_32.
101. Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Mestre, J. (2013). Toward a model of transfer as sense-making. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 184–207. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.807556.
102. Nokes, T. J., Schunn, C. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2010). Problem solving and human expertise. In E. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education, Volume 5 (Vol. 5, pp. 265–272). Oxford: Elsevier.
103. Nokes, T. J., Hausmann, R. G. M., VanLehn, K. A., & Gershman, S. (2011). Testing the instructional fit hypothesis: the case of self-explanation prompts. Instructional Science, 39(5), 645–666. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9151-4.
104. Nokes-Malach, T. J., VanLehn, K. A., Belenky, D. M., Lichtenstein, M., & Cox, G. (2013). Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1237–1263. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0164-z.
105. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 510–520. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.510.
106. Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(3), 398–415. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.398.
107. Ohlsson, S. (1993). Abstract schemas. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 51–66. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2801.
108. Ohlsson, S., & Rees, E. (1991). The function of conceptual understanding in the learning of arithmetic procedures. Cognition and Instruction, 8(2), 103–179. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0802_1.
109. Owen, E., & Sweller, J. (1985). What do students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 272–284. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.272.
110. Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429.
111. Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122.
112. Phye, G. D. (1990). Inductive problem solving: schema inducement and memory-based transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 826–831. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.826.
113. Phye, G. D. (2001). Problem-solving instruction and problem-solving transfer: the correspondence issue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 571–578. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.571.
114. Pirolli, P. L., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 240–272. doi:10.1037/h0080061.
115. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207.
116. Proffitt, J. B., Coley, J. D., & Medin, D. L. (2000). Expertise and category-based induction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 811–828. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.811.
117. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Teaching students to recognize structural similarities between statistics word problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 325–342. doi:10.1002/acp.796.
118. Reed, S. K. (1989). Constraints on the abstraction of solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 532–540. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.532.
119. Reed, S. K., Ackinclose, C. C., & Voss, A. A. (1990). Selecting analogous problems: similarity versus inclusiveness. Memory & Cognition, 18(1), 83–98. doi:10.3758/BF03202649.
120. Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 381–400. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.381.
121. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21(1), 1–29. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2101_1.
122. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5.
123. Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out-example principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229–246). New York: Cambridge University Press.
124. Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 1–37. doi:10.1111/cogs.12086.
125. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: a cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_3.
126. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: smooth transitions help learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(4), 293–315. doi:10.1080/00220970209599510.
127. Richey, J. E., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2013). How much is too much? Learning and motivation effects of adding instructional explanations to worked examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 104–124. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.006.
128. Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316, 1128–1129. doi:10.1126/science.1142103.
129. Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667065.
130. Ringenberg, M., & VanLehn, K. A. (2006). Scaffolding problem solving with annotated, worked-out examples to promote deep learning. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (Vol. 4053, pp. 624–634). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/11774303.
131. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x.
132. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561–574. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.561.
133. Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: an iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346.
134. Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 836–852. doi:10.1037/a0016026.
135. Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Schema training in analogical reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 529–538. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.529.
136. Ross, B. H., & Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 427–440. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.2.427.
137. Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.
138. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1.
139. Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2006). When less is sometimes more: Optimal learning conditions are required for schema acquisition from multiple examples. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1943–1948). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
140. Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 205–221. doi:10.1007/BF01323044.
141. Schoenfeld, A. H., & Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 8(5), 484–494. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.484.
142. Schunn, C. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1999). The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23(3), 337–370. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2303_3.
143. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1–51). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
144. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: when instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education, 46(4), 426–445. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.011.
145. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 285–296. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.285.
146. Sherman, J., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 88–100. doi:10.1037/a0013156.
147. Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. Siegler (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 325–348). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
148. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). The transfer of text-editing skill. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(4), 403–423. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80047-X.
149. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of a cognitive skill. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
150. Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). It pays to compare: an experimental study on computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(4), 408–426. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.11.004.
151. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: what makes an expert student ? Instructional Science, 26, 127–140. doi:10.1023/A:1003096215103.
152. Sweller, J. (1983). Control mechanisms in problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 32–40. doi:10.3758/BF03197659.
153. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
154. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3.
155. Sweller, J., & Levine, M. (1982). Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 463–474. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.463.
156. Sweller, J., Mawer, R. F., & Howe, W. (1982). Consequences of history-cued and means-end strategies in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 95(3), 455. doi:10.2307/1422136.
157. Sweller, J., Mawer, R. F., & Ward, M. R. (1983). Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(4), 639–661. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.112.4.639.
158. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205.
159. Taatgen, N. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2002). Why do children learn to say “broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback. Cognition, 86(2), 123–155.
160. Taatgen, N. A., & Lee, F. J. (2003). Production compilation: a simple mechanism to model complex skill acquisition. Human Factors, 45(1), 61–76. doi:10.1518/hfes.45.1.61.27224.
161. Thorndyke, P. W. (1984). Applications to schema theory in cognitive research. In J. A. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory (pp. 167–191). San Francisco: Freeman.
162. VanLehn, K. A. (1996). Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 513–539. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.513.
163. VanLehn, K. A. (1999). Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: an evaluation of Cascade. Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0801_3.
164. VanLehn, K. A., & Jones, R. M. (1993). What mediates the self-explanation effect? Knowledge gaps, schemas or analogies? In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1034–1039). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
165. VanLehn, K. A., & van de Sande, B. (2009). Acquiring conceptual expertise from modeling: The case of elementary physics. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), Development of professional performance: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 356–378). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
166. Voss, J. F., Tyler, S. W., & Yengo, L. A. (1983). Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In R. F. Dilion & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition, Vol. 1. New York: Academic P.
167. Ward, M. R., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7(1), 1–39. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0701_1.
168. Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 393–409. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9136-5.
169. Zeitz, C. M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277–312. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1204_1.