Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it

Science

Volumn 342, Issue 6161, 2013, Pages 935-937

  Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a   Booth, Julie L ^b   Klahr, David ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCHOOL; SCIENCE; TEACHING; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH;

DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; LEARNING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

EID: 84888030114     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1238056     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. M. Dynarski et al., Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort [Report provided to Congress by the National Center for Education Evaluation, Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Washington, DC, 2007].
2. Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, Randomized Controlled Trials Commissioned by the IES since 2002: How Many Found Positive Versus Weak or No Effects; http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/IES- Commissioned-RCTs-positive-vs-weak-or-null-findings-7-2013.pdf.
3. J. Roschelle et al., Am. Educ. Res. J. 47, 833-878 (2010).
4. J. F. Pane, B. A. Griffin, D. F. McCaffrey, R. Karam, Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale (Working paper, Rand Corp., Alexandria, VA, 2013); www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working-papers/WR900/WR984/RAND-WR984. pdf.
5. D. Klahr, J. Li, J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 14, 217-238 (2005).
6. D. Klahr, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (suppl. 3), 14075-14080 (2013).
7. A. T. Corbett, J. R. Anderson, Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 (ACM Press, New York, 2001), pp. 245-252.
8. R. A. Schmidt, R. A. Bjork, Psychol. Sci. 3, 207-217 (1992).
9. A. Paivio, J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 4, 32-38 (1965).
10. J. A. Kaminski, V. M. Sloutsky, A. F. Heckler, Science 320, 454-455 (2008).
11. G. Wulf, C. H. Shea, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 185-211 (2002).
12. H. Pashler et al., Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning (National Center for Education Research 2007-2004, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2007).
13. R. Wylie, K. R. Koedinger, T. Mitamura, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CSS, Wheat Ridge, CO, 2009), pp. 1300-1305.
14. R. E. Goska, P. L. Ackerman, J. Educ. Psychol. 88, 249-259 (1996).
15. S. Kalyuga, Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 387-399 (2007).
16. K. A. Dunlosky, E. J. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, D. T. Willingham, Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 14, 4-58 (2013).
17. S. Kalyuga, P. Ayres, P. Chandler, J. Sweller, Educ. Psychol. 38, 23-31 (2003).
18. R. L. Goldstone, J. Y. Son, J. Learn. Sci. 14, 69-110 (2005).
19. P. A. Woźniak, E. J. Gorzelańczyk, Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Warsz.) 54, 59-62 (1994).
20. P. I. Pavlik, J. R. Anderson, J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 14, 101-117 (2008).
21. K. R. Koedinger, A. T. Corbett, C. Perfetti, Cogn. Sci. 36, 757-798 (2012).
22. L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, S. Clarke, Eds., Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue (American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 2013).
23. G. Bradshaw, in Cognitive Models of Science, R. Giere and H. Feigl, Eds. (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1992), pp. 239-250.
24. H. A. Simon, Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1969).
25. N. Li, W. Cohen, K. Koedinger, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 7315, 185-194 (2012).
26. K. VanLehn, Artif. Intell. 31, 1 (1987).
27. D. Lomas, K. Patel, J. Forlizzi, K. R. Koedinger, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York, 2013), pp. 89-98.
28. E. Andersen, Y. Liu, R. Snider, R. Szeto, Z. Popović, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York, 2011), pp. 1275-1278.
29. R. A. Bjork, J. Dunlosky, N. Kornell, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 417-444 (2013).
30. LearnLab, Pittsburgh Science of learning Center; www.learnlab.org/ technologies/datashop/index.php.
31. InBloom, www.inbloom.org.
32. Strategic Education Research Partnership, www.serpinstitute.org/about/ overview.php.
33. IES, U.S. Department of Education, Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 84.305H; http://ies.ed.gov/funding/ncer-rfas/partnerships.asp.
34. S. A. Barab, in Handbook of the Learning Sciences, K. Sawyer, Ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006), pp. 153-170.
35. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, www.sree.org/.
36. International Educational Data Mining Society, www.educationaldatamining. org/.